cover
Article Per Year (5 Year)
All
Home Page
OAI Link
Editorial Team
Contact
Reviewer
Google Scholar
Contact Name
Kukuh Tejomurti
Contact Email
kukuhmurtifhuns@staff.uns.ac.id
Phone
+6281225027920
Journal Mail Official
yustisia@mail.uns.ac.id
Editorial Address
Fakultas Hukum Universitas Sebelas Maret Jalan Ir. Sutami No. 36A, Kentingan, Surakarta Kodepos: 57126
Location
Kota surakarta,
Jawa tengah
INDONESIA
Yustisia
Published by Universitas Sebelas Maret
ISSN : 08520941     EISSN : 25490907     DOI : https://doi.org/10.20961/yustisia.v9i3
Core Subject : Social,
Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice Social Sciences
The scope of the articles published in Yustisia Jurnal Hukum deal with a broad range of topics in the fields of Civil Law, Criminal Law, International Law, Administrative Law, Islamic Law, Constitutional Law, Environmental Law, Procedural Law, Antropological Law, Health Law, Law and Economic, Sociology of Law and another section related contemporary issues in Law (Social science and Political science). Yustisia Jurnal Hukum is an open access journal which means that all content is freely available without charge to the user or his/her institution. Users are allowed to read, download, copy, distribute, print, search, or link to the full texts of the articles, or use them for any other lawful purpose, without asking prior permission from the publisher or the author.
Arjuna Subject : Ilmu Sosial - Hukum
Articles 389 Documents
 16   17   18   19   20 
MODEL PEMIDANAAN YANG IDEAL BAGI KORBAN PENGGUNA NARKOBA DI INDONESIA Parasian Simanungkalit
Yustisia Vol 1, No 3: December 2012
Publisher : Faculty of Law, Universitas Sebelas Maret

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.20961/yustisia.v1i3.10090

Abstract

AbstractThe purpose of this research is to determine the ideal model of punishment for the victims of drug users in Indonesia as a guide law enforcement in dealing with drug abuse crimes. This research is doctrinal and non-doctrinal legal.  The research data used primary and secondary data. Secondary data consists of primary, secondary and tertiary legal materials.. Data collecting technique include observation, in-depth interviews, focus group discussions, distributing questionnaires, and literature. Technique of data analysis used the method of qualitative analysis and normative models of interactive analysis. The results of the research indicate that the implementation of imprisonment for the victims of drug users under the Act of Narcotics which are classified into criminal, contrary to the legal theory of victimology. Model of punishment that is expected for the victims of drug users is extrajudicial process, means all victims of drug users reported themselves to be rehabilitated. While those who do not report, the police and/ or BNN arrest, immediately deliver and turn over to rehabilitation. AbstrakPenelitian ini bertujuan untuk menentukan model pemidanaan yang ideal bagi korban pengguna narkoba di Indonesia  sebagai pedoman aparat penegak hukum dalam menangani kejahatan penyalahgunaan narkoba. Penelitian ini merupakan penelitian hukum  doktrinal dan nondoktrinal. Data yang digunakan berupa data primer dan data sekunder. Data sekunder terdiri atas  bahan hukum primer, sekunder dan tertier. Teknik pengumpulan data  meliputi observasi, wawancara mendalam, focus group discussion, penyebaran kuesioner, dan studi pustaka. Teknik analisis data menggunakan metode analisis normatif kualitatif dan model analisis interaktif. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa penerapan hukuman pidana penjara bagi korban pengguna narkoba menurut Undang-Undang Narkotika yang  diklasifikasi sebagai pelaku tindak pidana bertentangan dengan teori hukum tentang viktimologi. Model pemidanaan yang ideal bagi korban pengguna narkoba adalah proses di luar proses hukum yaitu semua korban pengguna narkoba melaporkan diri untuk direhabilitasi. Sementara bagi yang tidak melaporkan diri, polisi dan/atau Badan Narkotika Nasional (BNN) melakukan penangkapan, langsung diantar dan diserahkan ke tempat rehabilitasi
YURISDIKSI INTERNASIONAL PENANGGULANGAN PEROMPAKAN dI LAUT LEPAS Asri - dwi Utami; Siti Muslimah; Ayub Torry Satriyo Kusumo
Yustisia Vol 3, No 1: April 2014
Publisher : Faculty of Law, Universitas Sebelas Maret

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.20961/yustisia.v3i1.10130

Abstract

AbstractThis research aims to determine the jurisdiction concerning piracy on the high seas by international law. This research is a legal research with prescriptive characteristic use a statute approach and conceptual approach. The legal sources used are primary and secondary materials later are analyzed by a deductive method and legal interpretation. The results show that there has been international law rules which can be used as the basis for all states to apply their jurisdiction to the piracy. These rules are the convention on the high Seas 1958 (chS 1958), United Nations convention on the Law of the Sea 1982 (UNcLOS 1982), and the convention for the Suppression of Unlawful Acts Against the Safety of Maritime Navigation 1988 (SUA 1988). Instead of these international rules, some codes and guidances concerning combating piracy are also concluded by international organizations.Keywords : International Jurisdiction, Piracy, Law of The SeaAbstrakPenelitian ini bertujuan untuk mengetahui penerapan yurisdiksi terhadap perompakan di laut lepas menurut hukum internasional. Penelitian ini merupakan penelitian hukum yang bersifat preskriptif dengan pendekatan perundang-undangan dan pendekatan konseptual. Bahan hukum yang digunakan adalah bahan hukum primer dan bahan hukum sekunder yang selanjutnya dianalisis secara deduktif dan menggunakan interpretasi hukum. Hasil penelitian menjelaskan bahwa terdapat aturan-aturan hukum internasional yang dapat digunakan sebagai yurisdiksi untuk penegakan perompakan yaitu convention on the high seas 1958 (CHS 1958), United Nations convention on the Law of the Sea 1982 (UNCLOS 1982), convention for the Suppression of Unlawful Acts Against the Safety of Maritime Navigation 1988 (SUA 1988), dan beberapa pedoman dan aturan yang dikeluarkan oleh organisasi internasional untuk penegakan perompakan.Katakunci : yurisdiksi Internasional, Perompakan, Hukum Laut Internasional
FINDING BEST METHOD FOR CHILD PRISONER MEDIATION IN THE PROCESS OF TRANSITION BACK INTO COMMUNITY IN INDONESIA Pan Lindawaty Sewu; Yohanes Hermanto Sirait; Ai Permanasari
Yustisia Jurnal Hukum Vol 7, No 1: April 2018
Publisher : Faculty of Law, Universitas Sebelas Maret

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.20961/yustisia.v7i1.17168

Abstract

Children are the next generation of a state, no exception for child prisoner. There is limitless future for all children in the world, including Indonesia. The problem is, some of child prisoner transform into adult prisoner because their life background makes them hard to rejoin or accepted in any social community. This article aims to examine the best method for child prisoner mediation based on principle of for the best interest of the child. This article is a sociological juridical research, using secondary data and field data as addition. The data collected by using library research and analyzed qualitatively. This article finds that child prisoner mediation will help to provide opportunity for child prisoner and family members or other stakeholder to meet, with the help of a mediator, before release to have an open, honest, and sincere dialogue to prepare for the transition back into the community. The best interest of the child remains as core principle without decreasing other necessary principle in succussing mediation process. Child prisoner mediation is a process of mediation held especially for child prisoner and will restore the future of child prisoner in Indonesia.Keywords: child prisoner; community; mediation
KAJIAN FILOSOFIS TERHADAP STANDAR PERILAKU ETIS NOTARIS Supriyanta -
Yustisia Jurnal Hukum Vol 2, No 3: SEPTEMBER-DESEMBER
Publisher : Faculty of Law, Universitas Sebelas Maret

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.20961/yustisia.v2i3.10174

Abstract

AbstractA notary bound norms and values that constitute the parameters behave ethically. Philosophically, there is a size that is not universally applicable in the world of ethical behavior parameters notary. In a more concrete level, and factual measures for ethical behavior is a notary public Notary code of Ethics. In order to realize a notary ethical behavior, integrity and commitment required in the process of enforcement of the code Notary substance through a mechanism that has been agreed. This process must be done continuously so that woke standards of ethical behavior that can guide behavior that is not only derived from the text of the Notary Code, but also from a contextual understanding of the implementation of the Notary code of Ethics. Notary code of Ethics as the only parameter Notary ethical behavior in the sense that the most factual, should always be tailored to the developmental dynamics that occur in the community, so that the values contained in it maintained its existence.Keyword:  Philosopycal Analysis, Ethical Standards Of Conduct Notary
ANALISIS PERDA NO 13 TAHUN 2003 TENTANG APBD SEBAGAI FAKTOR KRIMINOGEN DALAM TINDAK PIDANA KORUPSI OLEH ANGGOTA DPRD SURAKARTA PERIODE 1999 - 2004 Ismunarno -
Yustisia Jurnal Hukum Vol 1, No 1: JANUARI-APRIL
Publisher : Faculty of Law, Universitas Sebelas Maret

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.20961/yustisia.v1i1.10596

Abstract

AbstractThis study aims to determine whether Perda could be kriminogen facts in a corruption and identify the location of the fault of the parties involved in relation to the regulation if it is based on Law no. 31 of 1999 Jo Law. 20 of 2001 on the eradication of corruption. This study is a descriptive normative nature. This research included literature research therefore examines only secondary data.  Based on the research result that Perda No. 13 of 2003 on budget is an amendment to the budget previously provided for in Regulation No. 1 of 2003. Changes made include sector budget: Education, Culture, Belief in God Almighty, Youth and Sports (budget increase), Population and Family Welfare (Budget derived), Health (Budget falls),  Housing and settlement lowered (Budget falls),  Recurrent Parliament (Budget rises),   Welfare (Budget falls),  Travel allowance legislators (budget increase),  Shopping goods (Articles ride). From the description above indicates that the changes are more likely to benefit / for the personal benefit of the members of Parliament, because of budget increases are related to the interests of members of parliament. Perda No 13 out 2003 on the budget that alter the law No. 1 Year 2003 there Kriminogen factor which is the act of corruption in particular violates Article 2 (1) and Article 3 of Law no. Jo 31 of 1999 Law No. 20 of 2001 on corruption because of errors in the process of changing the budget and the lack of legal basis as well as budget expenditures in the determination of certain sectors as described. From this research are expected to provide input on efforts that can be done to minimize corruption, especially by the executive and legislative branches in the region rose sharply as the enactment of local autonomy. Keywords : Perda, APBD, Kriminogen, Corruption
UNDANG-UNDANG KEPAILITAN DAN PENUNDAAN KEWAJIBAN PEMBAYARAN UTANG NO 37 TH 2004 MENGESAMPINGKAN BERLAKUNYA ASAS PACTA SUNT SERVANDA DALAM PENYELESAIAN SENGKETA KEPAILITAN Rahayu Hartini
Yustisia Vol 4, No 2: August 2015
Publisher : Faculty of Law, Universitas Sebelas Maret

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.20961/yustisia.v4i2.8648

Abstract

AbstractThis study was to formulate a concept of return policies / principles of the law of "pacta sunt servanda" in Law No. 37 Year 2004 regarding Bankruptcy in bankruptcy to resolve disputes arbitration clause. By promoting legal issue: Why the provisions of Article 303 of Law No. 37 Year 2004 on Bankruptcy and PKPU basic rule "pacta sunt servanda" in a bankruptcy dispute resolution by arbitration clause. Research is normative juridical approach the statutory (statute approach), histrorical approach, conceptual approach and case approach. Basingon: doctrine, theory and principles of law and reasoning/logic of the law as a legal argument. From the discussion of the research results obtained conclusions; that Article 303 of Law No. 37 In 2004 the basic rule pacta sunt servanda occurrence in bankruptcy solutions that are its arbitration clause. The principle is metanorma should be legal guidelines for each product that has never been out of the occurrence of any legal basis. (1).Pasal 303,UUK afflicted materil law, when it is left actually dangerous because it can cause legal uncertainty which may result in less used existing legal rules(Article 303 UUK, an article that "kebablasan wrong/confused".(2).Position agreement with the law is the same, meaning that the agreement in this case in particular the provisions of the Arbitration clause made by the party should be the same as in the case of the Law on Bankruptcy.Key Words: Bankruptcy, delay debt payment obligations(PKPU), Basis of pacta sunt servanda (PSS)AbstrakPenelitian ini untuk merumuskan kembali suatu konsep dasar/prinsip hukum “Pacta Sunt Servanda” dalam UU No. 37 Tahun 2004 tentang Kepailitan dalam menyelesaikan sengketa pailit dengan klausula arbitrase. Dengan mengedepankan legal issue;Mengapa ketentuan Pasal 303 UU No. 37 Tahun 2004 tentang Kepailitan dan PKPU mengesampingkan asas “Pacta Sunt Servanda” dalam penyelesaian sengketa pailit dengan klausul arbitrase. Merupakan penelitian yuridis normatif dengan pendekatan perundangan-undangan (statute approach), histrorical approach, conceptual approach dan case approach. Mendasarkan pada: doktrin, teori dan prinsip hukum dengan penalaran/logika hukum sebagai argumentasi hukum. Dari pembahasan hasil penelitian diperoleh kesimpulan;bahwa Pasal 303 UU No. 37 Tahun 2004 mengesampingkan berlakunya asas Pacta Sunt Servanda dalam penyelesaian masalah kepailitanyang ada klausul arbitrase-nya. Azas merupakan metanorma yang harus dijadikan pedoman bagi setiap produk hukum agar tidak pernah keluar dari berlakunya asas hukum. (1).Pasal 303 UUK mengalami cacat hokummateril, apabila hal ini dibiarkan justru berbahaya karena dapat menimbulkan ketidakpastian hukum yang dapat berdampak pada kurang bermanfaatnya aturan hukum yang ada (Pasal 303 UUK, merupakan Pasal yang “kebablasan/salah/keliru”.(2).Posisi perjanjian dengan undang-undang adalah sama/sederajad, artinya perjanjian dalam hal ini khususnya ketentuan mengenai Klausul Arbitrase yang dibuat oleh para pihak seharusnya sama berlakunyaseperti halnya UU Kepailitan.Kata kunci: Kepailitan, PKPU Asas Pacta Sunt Servanda (PSS)
THE CHALLENGES OF IMPLEMENTING PROHIBITION OF TORTURE IN TWO LEVELS: ASEAN AND INDONESIA Erna Dyah Kusumawati
Yustisia Jurnal Hukum Vol 1, No 2 (2012): MEI-AGUSTUS
Publisher : Faculty of Law, Universitas Sebelas Maret

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.20961/yustisia.v1i2.10634

Abstract

ABSTRAKArtikel ini menganalisis implementasi larangan penyiksaan level ASEAN dan Indonesia. Pembahasan diawali perkembangan pengaturan dan ratifikasi Konvensi PBB di tingkat ASEAN. Kemudian perkembangan dalam hukum nasional Indonesia. Selanjutnya analisis ditujukan kepada tantangan dan hambatan yang mungkin dihadapi dalam mengimplementasikan larangan penyiksaan di kedua level, regional dan nasional. Hasil analisis menyatakan bahwa larangan penyiksaan termasuk sebagai hak asasi yang bersifat fundamental dan tidak dapat dicabut (non-derogable). Norma larangan penyiksaan juga termasuk sebagai ius cogen atau peremptory norm atau norma yang memaksa dan sudah dianggap sebagai hukum kebiasaan internasional. Dengan demikian, meratifikasi atau tidak negara-negara anggota ASEAN dianggap terikat dan harus memenuhi kewajiban diatur dalam Konvensi Anti Penyiksaan. Terdapat kelemahan dalam tingkat ASEAN, yaitu dalam hal monitoring pemenuhan kewajiban-kewajiban Negara anggota. Badan HAM ASEAN tidak didesain sebagai pengawas yang independen, karena berada di bawah organisasi ASEAN. Pada level Indonesia, penyiksaan masih banyak ditemukan terutama untuk mendapatkan pengakuan tersangka dalam proses penyidikan dan penyiksaan dalam tahanan. Hukum di Indonesia belum berlaku maksimal. Konstitusi dan Hukum Hak Asasi Nasional sudah mengatur bahwa hak terbebas penyiksaan merupakan hak yang tidak dapat dicabut, namun demikian perlindungannya belum maksimal, mengingat KUHP tidak menjamin keseragaman pelaksanaan hukuman bagi pelaku penyiksaan. Demikian juga Pengadilan Hak Asasi Manusia tidak mempunyai kewenangan memeriksa perkara penyiksaan. Sehingga masih banyak diperlukan koreksi dalam hukum nasional, termasuk wewenang investigasi KOMNAS HAM dalam hal terjadi penyiksaan.Kata Kunci : Implementasi, Anti Penyiksaan, Hak Asasi ManusiaABSTRACTThis article will address the issue regarding prohibition of torture and its challenges at two levels: ASEAN and Indonesia. The prohibition of torture is considered to be a rule of “jus cogens” or peremptory norm as well as customary law. In addition the prohibition of torture is absolute and non-derogable. Therefore, it entails some obligations for states whether or not they ratify the CAT. States have the universal obligations to prevent torture and inhuman degrading treatment in their jurisdiction under international customary law. Since many of ASEAN countries do not ratified ICCPR, the AICHR have to implement the prohibition of torture based on the customary international law. In addition, AICHR needs to monitor the national law regarding the prohibition of torture. However, the AICHR lacks of protection mandate and might not functioning well especially when dealing with the allegation of the prohibition of torture or other human rights’ allegations within ASEAN jurisdiction. In Indonesia, the use of torture to get the confession is widely used by the police. Not all the perpetrators are brought to the Court of Law and are given an equitable sentences; although, Indonesia does have a regulation on prohibition of torture; the Criminal Code, the Law No 39/1999 concerning Human Rights, and the Law No. 26/2000 concerning Human Rights Courts. There is lack of competence of the Indonesian Human Rights Court to hear the violation cases. Also, there is lack of competence of the Indonesian Commission on Human Rights to investigate cases concerning torture.Keywords: Implementation, Prohibition of Torture, Human Rights
AKAR KONFLIK DALAM MASYARAKAT MULTIKULTURAL DI KARIMUNJAWA Anis Widyawati
Yustisia Vol 4, No 3: DECEMBER 2015
Publisher : Faculty of Law, Universitas Sebelas Maret

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.20961/yustisia.v4i3.8692

Abstract

AbstractKarimunjawa known as the "Mini Indonesia", this is because the population is composed of various ethnic groups as Javanese, Bugis-Makassar, Madura, Bajo, Mandar, and Buton. However, the multicultural conditions potentially trigger social conflict. The results showed that the forms of social conflict in Karimunjawa of which is the consumption of alcohol and unrest among the people at the time held dangdut music entertainment; fight youth; the tension between the National Park Authority with the public related to land ownership rights; fraud and theft committed by people outside Karimunjawa. While the causes of social conflict is generational differences; current development; economic issues; adolescent psychological development; intergroup differences of interest.Keywords: Multicultural Society, Social Conflict, Potential of Law Conflict AbstrakKarimunjawa dikenal sebagai “Indonesia Mini”, hal ini karena penduduknya terdiri dari berbagai etnis (suku) seperti Jawa, Bugis-Makasar, Madura, Bajo, Mandar, dan Buton. Namun, kondisi yang multikultural tersebut berpotensi memicu terjadinya konflik sosial. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa bentuk-bentuk konflik sosial di Karimunjawa di antaranya adalahkonsumsi miras dan kerusuhan antarwarga pada saat diadakan hiburan musik dangdut; perkelahian pemuda; ketegangan antara Balai Taman Nasional dengan masyarakat terkait dengan hak kepemilikan tanah; penipuan dan pencurian yang dilakukan oleh orang di luar Karimunjawa. Sedangkan faktorpenyebab terjadinya konflik sosial tersebut adalah perbedaan generasi; perkembangan zaman; masalah ekonomi; perkembangan psikologi remaja; perbedaan kepentingan antargolongan.Kata Kunci: Masyarakat Multikultural, Konflik Sosial, Potensi Konflik Hukum.
MODEL PERADILAN NON NEGARA (NON-STATE JUSTICE) SEBAGAI ALTERNATIF PENYELESAIAN SENGKETA TANAH DI KABUPATEN PAMEKASAN Rina Yulianti; Sri Maharani MTVM; Nurus Zaman
Yustisia Vol 2, No 1: April 2013
Publisher : Faculty of Law, Universitas Sebelas Maret

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.20961/yustisia.v2i1.11078

Abstract

ABSTRACTDispute resolution has been formally institutionalized through the courts, but not all the people in Pamekasan can access easily judiciary. In Rural Society priority harmony as the basis for solving their problems, because these mechanisms more cheap, simple, accordance with their customs and culture but this mechanism not legitimated. Socio-Legal Research methods used to explore and examine the potential mechanisms of informal dispute based on customs in Pamekasan, through in-depth interviews and sec- ondary data collection obtained typology of dispute / disputes land based sources of conflict and Mapping Reformers. Statute Approach and case approach was to construct a new building for the legitimacy of non- state mechanisms (Non-State Justice) which dominates land disputes models in Pamekasan. Results of this study, Pamekasan society resistant to the land disputes culture involving figures outside the formal mechanisms. There are three options land disputes models in Pamekasan by using actor resolver likes kalebun/Village Head, “Kyai” and Judge of Court. This proves the existence of pluralistic legal system in Indonesia. Regional Autonomy Act number 32 of 2004 and Act No. 30 of 1999 on Arbitration and Alterna- tive Dispute Resolution provides an opportunity to build a judicial function at the village and to be access for justice to society and legitimated based on local wisdom.Key Words : Alternative, Dispute Resolution, Land DisputeAbstrakPenelitian ini bertujuan untuk mengetahui  model  proses penyelesaian di luar pengadilan atau dalam bentuk peradilan non-negara (non-State Justice) sebagai Alternatif Penyelesaian Sengketa Tanah di Kabupaten Pamekasan. Peneltian ini menggunakan metode sosio legal research.  Pengumpulan data melalui wawancara mendalam dan pengumpulan data sekunder . Pendekatan perundang-undangan (stat- ute approach) dan pendekatan kasus (case approach) dilakukan untuk mengkonstruksi bangunan baru bagi legitimasi mekanisme non negara (Non-State Justice) yang mendominasi pola-pola penyelesaian sengketa tanah di Kabupaten Pamekasan. Analisis dilakukan dengan menafsirkan data yang diperoleh secara induksi dan membandingkan, menguji atau memverifikasi dengan teori yang sudah ada. Pembandingan atau pengujian ini dimaksudkan untuk mengkaitkan temuan dengan teori yang mengkaji hal-hal yang menjadi fokus penelitian.  Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa masyarakat di Kabupaten Pamekasan resisten dengan budaya penyelesaian sengketa tanah yang melibatkan tokoh-tokoh diluar mekanisme formal. Terdapat tiga pilihan pola penyelesaian di Kabupaten Pamekasan untuk menyelesaikan sengketa tanah yaitu dengan menggunakan aktor penyelesai Kalebun/Kepala Desa, Kyai dan Hakim di Pengadilan. Hal ini membuktikan adanya pluralistis sistem hukum yang berlaku di Indonesia. Undang-Undang Pemerintahan Daerah nomor 32 Tahun 2004 serta Undang-undang Nomor 30 Tahun 1999 tentang Arbitrase dan Alternatif Penyelesaian Sengketa memberikan peluang untuk membangun fungsi yudisial di tingkat desa sebagai upaya untuk mendekatkan akses keadilan terhadap masyarakat dan melegitimasi berbagai pola penyelesaian yang berbasis pada kearifan lokal.Keywords : Alternatif, Penyelesaian Sengketa, Sengketa
PENEGAKAN HUKUM MALPRAKTIK MELALUI PENDEKATAN MEDIASI PENAL Riska Andi Fitriono; Budi Setyanto; Rehnalemken Ginting
Yustisia Vol 5, No 1: April 2016
Publisher : Faculty of Law, Universitas Sebelas Maret

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.20961/yustisia.v5i1.8724

Abstract

AbstractThe purpose of this study is to formulate a law enforcement mallpractice through appropriate penal mediation approach and provide a win-win solution for the parties involved in the dispute medik.Target khususya that identify, inventory provisions regulating medical mallpraktek in Indonesia. The method used in this paper is a normative juridical method is done by researching library materials or so-called secondary data in the form of positive law. Results showed Forms discussion increasingly complex medical disputes require a model solution that is able to unravel the problems with wider, komprehenship and flexible with the disputing parties involved in the decision-making process; (b) Being able to reduce the number of medical disputes are resolved through litigation / court, so as to reduce the buildup of this case in the courts. Through the Institute of Medical Dispute Resolution will be able to generate trust and eventually will be the choice of the patient to resolve the dispute with the doctor / dentist / health care facilities; (c) Ability to address complaints of patients / families in obtaining protection, although the settlement of disputes are not necessarily able to satisfy it. However, the existence of these models are expected to provide a solution for both patients and health professionals in solving medical problems, without having to involve a lot of people who are not interestedAbstrakTujuan penelitian ini adalah merumuskan penegakan hukum malpraktik melalui pendekatan mediasi penal yang tepat dan memberikan win-win solution bagi para pihak yang terlibat dalam sengketa medik. Target khususya itu mengidentifikasi, menginventarisasi ketentuan pengaturan mallpraktek medis di Indonesia. Metode pendekatan yang digunakan dalam penulisan ini adalah metode yuridis normatif yang dilakukan dengan cara meneliti bahan pustaka atau yang disebut dengan data sekunder berupa hukum positif.Hasil pembahasan menunjukan Bentuk sengketa medik yang semakin kompleks membutuhkan suatu model penyelesaian yang mampu mengurai permasalahan dengan lebih luas, komprehenship dan luwes dengan melibatkan para pihak yang bersengketa dalam proses pengambilan keputusan ; (b) Mampu mengurangi jumlah sengketa medik yang diselesaikan melalui jalur litigasi / pengadilan , sehingga dapat mengurangi menumpuknya perkara dalam jalur pengadilan ini. Melalui Lembaga Penyelesaian Sengketa Medik  maka akan dapat menumbuhkan kepercayaan dan akhirnya akan menjadi pilihan pasien untuk menyelesaikan sengketanya dengan dokter/dokter gigi / sarana pelayanan kesehatan ; (c) Mampu mengatasi keluhan-keluhan pasien / keluarganya dalam memperoleh perlindungan, meskipun penyelesaian sengketa ini belum tentu dapat memuaskannya. Namun demikian adanya model tersebut diharapkan mampu memberikan solusi baik bagi pasien maupun tenaga kesehatan dalam menyelesaikan masalah medik , tanpa harus melibatkan banyak orang yang tidak berkepentingan.

Page 18 of 39 | Total Record : 389

 16   17   18   19   20 

Filter by Year

2012 2024


Reset
Filter By Issues
All Issue Vol 13, No 2: August 2024 Vol 13, No 1: April 2024 Vol 12, No 3: December 2023 Vol 12, No 2: August 2023 Vol 12, No 1: April 2023 Vol 11, No 3: December 2022 Vol 11, No 2: August 2022 Vol 11, No 1: April 2022 Vol 10, No 3: December 2021 Vol 10, No 2: August 2021 Vol 10, No 1: April 2021 Vol 9, No 3: December 2020 Vol 9, No 3: September - December 2020 Vol 9, No 2: August 2020 Vol 9, No 2: May - August 2020 Vol 9, No 1: April 2020 Vol 9, No 1: January - April 2020 Vol 8, No 3: December 2019 Vol 8, No 2: August 2019 Vol 8, No 1: April 2019 Vol 7, No 3: December 2018 Vol 7, No 2: August 2018 Vol 7, No 1: April 2018 Vol 6, No 3: December 2017 Vol 6, No 2: August 2017 Vol 6, No 1: April 2017 Vol 5, No 3: December 2016 Vol 5, No 2: August 2016 Vol 5, No 1: April 2016 Vol 4, No 3: December 2015 Vol 4, No 2: August 2015 Vol 4, No 1: April 2015 Vol 3, No 3: December 2014 Vol 3, No 2: August 2014 Vol 3, No 1: April 2014 Vol 2, No 3: December 2013 Vol 2, No 2: August 2013 Vol 2, No 1: April 2013 Vol 1, No 3: December 2012 Vol 1, No 2 (2012): MEI-AGUSTUS Vol 1, No 2: August 2012 Vol 1, No 1: April 2012 Vol 3, No 3: SEPTEMBER-DECEMBER Vol 3, No 2: MEI-AGUSTUS Vol 3, No 1: JANUARI-APRIL Vol 2, No 3: SEPTEMBER-DESEMBER Vol 2, No 2: MEI-AGUSTUS Vol 2, No 1: JANUARI-APRIL Vol 1, No 1: JANUARI-APRIL More Issue