cover
Article Per Year (5 Year)
All
Home Page
OAI Link
Editorial Team
Contact
Reviewer
Google Scholar
Contact Name
Ahmad Syofyan
Contact Email
ahmad.syofyan@fh.unila.ac.id
Phone
-
Journal Mail Official
fiatjustisia@fh.unila.ac.id
Editorial Address
Ruang Jurnal, Gedung B, Fakultas Hukum, Universitas Lampung. Jl. Sumantri Brojonegoro No.1 Bandar Lampung. 35145. Indonesia
Location
Kota bandar lampung,
Lampung
INDONESIA
FIAT JUSTISIA: Jurnal Ilmu Hukum
Published by Universitas Lampung
ISSN : 19785186     EISSN : 24776238     DOI : http://doi.org/10.25041/fiatjustisia
Core Subject : Social,
Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice
Fiat Justisia: Jurnal Ilmu Hukum is an open access and peer-reviewed journal that aims to offer an international academic platform for cross-border legal research encompassing specifically concerning human rights, policy, values of Islam. These may include but are not limited to various fields such as: ● humanity ● heritage law ● family law ● civil and political rights ● economic, social, and cultural rights ● solidarity rights ● philosophy of law ● private law ● international law ● civil law ● criminal law ● administrative law ● constitutional law ● adat law ● Intellectual Property Rights ● commercial court ● district court ● high court ● supreme court ● constitutional court ● industrial relations court ● administrative court ● fishery court ● military court ● taxation court ● court of human rights ● court of religion
Arjuna Subject : Ilmu Sosial - Hukum
Articles 655 Documents
 62   63   64   65   66 
Childless Marriage in Indonesian Law: A Maqāṣid al-sharī‘ah Analysis of Ḥifẓ al-nasl Dahlan, Ahmad
Fiat Justisia: Jurnal Ilmu Hukum Vol. 19 No. 4 (2025)
Publisher : Universitas Lampung

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.25041/fiatjustisia.v19no4.4560

Abstract

Examines childless marriage in Indonesian law through a maqāṣid al-sharī‘ah [objectives of Islamic law] perspective, with particular attention to the interpretation of ḥifẓ al-nasl [protection of lineage]. It analyzes how Indonesian positive law and Islamic legal objectives conceptualize reproduction, lineage, and family obligations in the context of contemporary childlessness. Using a normative-juridical and conceptual approach, the study examines Indonesian marriage regulations, especially Law No. 1 of 1974 as amended by Law No. 16 of 2019, alongside classical and contemporary maqāṣid literature. The findings show that Indonesian positive law does not explicitly prohibit childless marriage, but implicitly regulates reproductive responsibility through norms concerning the purposes of marriage and family welfare. From a maqāṣid perspective, ḥifẓ al-nasl is not limited to an obligation to have children, but functions as a broader principle of preserving legitimate lineage and social continuity, allowing interpretive space for circumstances such as health, psychological, and socio-economic factors. This study argues that childless marriage constitutes a dynamic normative issue rather than a dichotomous conflict between Islamic law and state law, and contributes a nuanced maqāṣid-based framework for understanding childlessness within Indonesian family law and contemporary legal discourse.
Silencing Constitutional Rights and Repressive Actions by the Authorities: A Comparative Criminal Law Analysis of Indonesia and Nepal Murdiana, Elfa; Mayasari, Lutfiana Dwi; Sari, Ima Frafika; Nauval M.R, Alendra; Ibrahim, Muhammad Talib
Fiat Justisia: Jurnal Ilmu Hukum Vol. 19 No. 4 (2025)
Publisher : Universitas Lampung

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.25041/fiatjustisia.v19no4.4601

Abstract

The policing of protests in Indonesia and Nepal, revealing systemic patterns of excessive force, arbitrary detention, and the criminalization of political expression. In Indonesia, the August 25–29, 2025 protests involved structured abuse of authority, including physical persecution, deprivation of liberty without adherence to Criminal Procedure Code protocols, and obstruction of legal counsel. In Nepal, 2025 protests saw the use of live ammunition, torture, and other severe measures violating the right to freedom of assembly under the 2015 Constitution. Both cases highlight legal deficiencies: Indonesia relies on general penal provisions without specialized instruments for state violations, while Nepal, despite criminalizing torture under Section 167 of the National Penal Code 2017, struggles with politically influenced implementation. Acts of violence and procedural abuse meet the criteria of unlawful acts, abuse of authority, and human rights violations under national and international law, including ICCPR and anti-torture standards. The failure to prosecute security personnel entrenches impunity. Findings indicate that strengthening accountability mechanisms, prosecuting officers when offenses are established, reforming security governance, and instituting independent investigative bodies are essential to protect constitutional rights and prevent recurrent state violence during protests.
The Significance of Mediator Certificate for Village Heads in Dispute Resolution Ibad, Syahrul; Najib, Ainun; Ummassahda, Ummassahda; Rizzi, Marco
Fiat Justisia: Jurnal Ilmu Hukum Vol. 19 No. 4 (2025)
Publisher : Universitas Lampung

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.25041/fiatjustisia.v19no4.4610

Abstract

Humans are social beings whose interactions often generate conflicts arising from differing interests. Dispute resolution may be pursued through litigation or non-litigation mechanisms, including mediation. This study examines village-level mediation conducted by Kepala Desa (village head), which is rooted in local wisdom and community practices, and mandated by Law Number 6 of 2014 concerning Villages, Article 26 paragraph (4), requiring Kepala Desa to resolve community disputes. The findings indicate that mediator certification is urgently needed to enhance the effectiveness of Kepala Desa in dispute resolution and to improve efficiency in terms of cost, time, and access to justice. Although mediation outcomes are binding and have evidentiary value for the parties, they do not possess Permanent legal force equivalent to a final court decision unless elevated to a peace deed (akta perdamaian).
Legal Position of Joint Property in Marriage Without a Pre-Nuptial Agreement Sunardi, Heru; Jamaludin, Jamaludin; Muhammad, Adamu Abubakar
Fiat Justisia: Jurnal Ilmu Hukum Vol. 20 No. 1 (2026)
Publisher : Universitas Lampung

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.25041/fiatjustisia.v20no1.4691

Abstract

Marriage has legal consequences for the control and distribution of joint assets, particularly in the absence of a prenuptial agreement, which can create uncertainty and weaken the protection of personal property. This study examines the regulation of joint assets in prenuptial agreements under Law Number 16 of 2019 amending Law Number 1 of 1974 concerning Marriage and Presidential Instruction Number 1 of 1991 on the Compilation of Islamic Law (KHI), as well as the legal status of joint assets in marriages without such agreements. Using a normative legal research method with statutory and conceptual approaches, the study analyzes primary, secondary, and tertiary legal materials through literature review and qualitative description. Findings indicate that prenuptial agreements provide for the separation of assets and legal certainty, while marriages without agreements merge all assets into joint property, affirming equal rights between spouses but offering limited protection for personal property. The study highlights the strategic role of prenuptial agreements in safeguarding economic rights and ensuring legal certainty in marital property management.
Reconstructing Islamic Agricultural Financing Regulations: A Socio-Legal Study using Soft Systems Methodology Muqorobin, Ahmad; Etica, Use; Rodliyah, Nunung; Hidayah, Akmal; Ab Razak, Mohamed Rashid
Fiat Justisia: Jurnal Ilmu Hukum Vol. 20 No. 1 (2026)
Publisher : Universitas Lampung

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.25041/fiatjustisia.v20no1.4722

Abstract

Despite its constitutional role in supporting food sovereignty, Banyuwangi’s agricultural sector remains excluded from formal Islamic finance due to a regulatory gap between rigid banking standards and agricultural risk. This study identifies a Proximity Paradox, in which Islamic banks are structurally disincentivized from financing smallholders. Using Soft Systems Methodology (SSM) as a socio legal approach and drawing on empirical data from farmers, Islamic banks, and Bayt al-Māl wa al-Tamwīl (BMTs), the research formulates an Agricultural Financing Regulatory Model. The model recommends policy reform by the Financial Services Authority (Otoritas Jasa Keuangan, OJK) and the National Sharia Council (Dewan Syariah Nasional–Majelis Ulama Indonesia, DSN-MUI), including hybrid value chain contracts, mandatory agricultural takaful, and a formal Bank–BMT linkage scheme, to align banking compliance with agricultural realities and promote distributive justice (‘adl).

Page 66 of 66 | Total Record : 655

 62   63   64   65   66 

Filter by Year

2007 2026


Reset
Filter By Issues
All Issue Vol. 20 No. 1 (2026) Vol. 19 No. 4 (2025) Vol. 19 No. 3 (2025) Vol. 19 No. 2 (2025) Vol. 19 No. 1 (2025) Vol. 18 No. 4 (2024) Vol. 18 No. 3 (2024) Vol. 18 No. 2 (2024) Vol. 18 No. 1 (2024) Vol 17 No 3 (2023): Issue In progress (July 2023) Vol. 17 No. 4 (2023) Vol 17 No 3 (2023) Vol 17 No 2 (2023) Vol 17 No 1 (2023) Vol 16 No 4 (2022) Vol 16 No 3 (2022) Vol 16 No 2 (2022) Vol 16 No 1 (2022) Vol 15 No 4 (2021) Vol 15 No 3 (2021) Vol 15 No 2 (2021) Vol 15 No 1 (2021) Vol 14 No 4 (2020) Vol 14 No 3 (2020) Vol 14 No 2 (2020) Vol 14 No 1 (2020) Vol 13 No 4 (2019) Vol 13 No 3 (2019) Vol 13 No 2 (2019) Vol 13 No 1 (2019) Vol 12 No 4 (2018) Vol 12 No 3 (2018) Vol 12 No 2 (2018) Vol 12 No 1 (2018) Vol 11 No 4 (2017) Vol 11 No 3 (2017) Vol 11 No 2 (2017) Vol 11 No 1 (2017) Vol 10 No 4 (2016) Vol 10 No 3 (2016) Vol 10 No 2 (2016) Vol 10 No 1 (2016) Vol 9, No 4 (2015) Vol 9 No 4 (2015) Vol 9 No 3 (2015) Vol 9, No 3 (2015) Vol 9 No 2 (2015) Vol 9, No 2 (2015) Vol 9, No 1 (2015) Vol 9 No 1 (2015) Vol 8, No 4 (2014): FIAT JUSTISIA Vol 8 No 4 (2014) Vol 8, No 3 (2014): FIAT JUSTISIA Vol 8 No 3 (2014) Vol 8, No 2 (2014): FIAT JUSTISIA Vol 8 No 2 (2014) Vol 8 No 1 (2014) Vol 8, No 1 (2014): FIAT JUSTISIA Vol 7 No 3 (2013) Vol 7 No 2 (2013) Vol 7 No 1 (2013) Vol 6 No 3 (2012) Vol 6 No 2 (2012) Vol 6 No 1 (2012) Vol 5 No 3 (2011) Vol 5 No 2 (2011) Vol 5 No 1 (2011) Vol 4 No 3 (2010) Vol 2 No 3 (2008) Vol 2 No 2 (2008) Vol 1 No 2 (2007) Vol 1 No 1 (2007) Vol 7, No 3: FIAT JUSTISIA Vol 7, No 2: FIAT JUSTISIA Vol 7, No 1: FIAT JUSTISIA Vol 6, No 3: FIAT JUSTISIA Vol 6, No 2: FIAT JUSTISIA Vol 6, No 1 Vol 5, No 3: FIAT JUSTISIA Vol 5, No 2: FIAT JUSTISIA Vol 5, No 1 Vol 4, No 3 Vol 2, No 3 Vol 2, No 2 Vol 1, No 2 Vol 1, No 1 More Issue