cover
Article Per Year (5 Year)
All
Home Page
OAI Link
Editorial Team
Contact
Reviewer
Google Scholar
Contact Name
-
Contact Email
-
Phone
-
Journal Mail Official
-
Editorial Address
-
Location
Kota bandar lampung,
Lampung
INDONESIA
JEE (Jurnal Edukasi Ekobis)
Published by Universitas Lampung
ISSN : 23021373     EISSN : -     DOI : -
Core Subject : Education,
Education
JEE (Jurnal Edukasi Ekobis) adalah jurnal yang dikkhususkan untuk menampung tulisan hasil penelitian dosen dan mahasiswa program studi Pendidikan Ekonomi. Awal peneribtan JEE pada Juni 2012. JEE mengeluarkan 4 kali terbitan setiap tahunnya.
Arjuna Subject : -
Articles 620 Documents
 3   4   5   6   7 
PERBEDAAN MORALITAS SISWA DENGAN MODEL PORTOFOLIO DAN CTL Asnur Vevy; Eddy Purnomo; Yon Rizal
JEE (Jurnal Edukasi Ekobis) Vol 2, No 2 (2014): JEE (Jurnal Edukasi Ekobis)
Publisher : FKIP Unila

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar

Abstract

The method which used in this research is comparative study with experimental approaches. Hypotheses of test using anava and the t-test two independent samples.Based on the analysis of data it obtained the following research findings, 1) there is a difference of student morality in learning of IPS between students who are using portofolio and CTL. 2) there are difference of morality in the learning of IPS between students who have intrapersonal with interpersonal intelligence. 3) There is no interaction between learning model with intelligence 4) students morality in learning of IPS which is using portofolio is higher than CTL on students who have intrapersonal intelligence. 5) students morality in learning of IPS which is using portofolio is higher than CTL on students who have interpersonal intelligence 6)students morality in learning of IPS which have the intrapersonal intelligence is lower than the interpersonal intelligence in portofolio. 7) students morality in learning of IPS which have the intrapersonal is lower than the interpersonal by using CTL.Metode dalam penelitian ini studi banding dengan pendekatan eksperimen. Tes Hipotesis menggunakan anava dan t-test dua sampel independen. Berdasarkan analisis data diperoleh 1) Terdapat perbedaan moralitas siswa dalam pembelajaran IPS menggunakan portofolio dan CTL. 2) Terdapat perbedaan moralitas dalam pembelajaran IPS yang berkecerdasan intrapersonal dan interpersonal. 3) Tidak ada interaksi model pembelajaran dengan kecerdasan. 4) Moralitas siswa dalam pembelajaran IPS dengan portofolio lebih tinggi dibandingkan CTL pada siswa berkecerdasan intrapersonal. 5) Moralitas siswa dalam pembelajaran IPS menggunakan portofolio lebih tinggi dibandingkan CTL pada siswa berkecerdasan interpersonal. 6) Moralitas siswa dalam pembelajaran IPS yang berkecerdasan intrapersonal lebih rendah dibandingkan interpersonal menggunakan portofolio. 7) Moralitas siswa dalam pembelajaran IPS yang berkecerdasan intrapersonal lebih rendah dibandingkan interpersonal menggunakan CTL.Kata kunci: ctl, intrapersonal, interpersonal, moralitas, portofolio
PERBANDINGAN HASIL BELAJAR IPS TERPADU ANTARA MODEL MIND MAPPING DAN GROUP INVESTIGATION Risa Octa Ana; Eddy Purnomo; Nurdin Nurdin
JEE (Jurnal Edukasi Ekobis) Vol 1, No 6 (2013): JEE (jurnal Edukasi Ekobis)
Publisher : FKIP Unila

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar

Abstract

This study aims to determine effectiveness of learning model and difference in learning outcomes IPS Terpadu given mind mapping models of learning and group investigation (GI) taking into account students' attitudes towards IPS Terpadu. Method used was experimental. Sampling technique used was cluster random sampling. Data capture techniques of observation, documentation, test, questionnaire. Hypothesis testing using formula Anava and t-test. The results showed: (1) there are differences mean that learning outcomes of student learning using mind mapping learning compared to students using GI, (2) average value of learning outcomes of students who have positive attitude that learning to use mind mapping is higher than GI, (3 ) mean of student learning outcomes that have negative attitude towards IPS Terpadu subjects are learning to use mind mapping higher than GI, (4) there is no interaction between average achievement of students learning model with attitude.Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk mengetahui keefektifan model pembelajaran dan perbedaan hasil belajar IPS Terpadu yang diberi model pembelajaran mind mapping dan group investigation(GI) dengan memperhitungkan sikap siswa terhadap mata pelajaran IPS Terpadu. Metode yang digunakan adalah eksperimen. Teknik sampel yang digunakan adalah cluster random sampling.Teknik  pengambilan data yaitu observasi, dokumentasi, tes, angket.Pengujian hipotesis menggunakan rumus Anava dan t-test. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan: (1) ada perbedaan rerata hasil belajar siswa yang pembelajarannya menggunakan mind mapping dibandingkan siswa yang pembelajarannya menggunakan GI; (2) rerata nilai hasil belajar siswa yang memiliki sikap positif yang pembelajarannya menggunakan mind mapping lebih tinggi dibandingkan  dengan GI; (3) rerata hasil belajar siswa yang memiliki sikap negatif terhadap mata pelajaran IPS Terpadu yang pembelajarannya menggunakan mind mapping lebih tinggi dibandingkan GI; (4) tidak ada interaksi rerata hasil belajarantara model pembelajaran dengan  sikap siswa. Kata kunci: hasil belajar, mind mapping, GI, sikap siswa          
STUDI PERBANDINGAN PEMBELAJARAN NUMBERED HEADS TOGETHER DENGAN PEMBELAJARAN TWO STAY TWO STRAY Putri Yulianti; Raden Gunawan Sudarmanto; Yon Rizal
JEE (Jurnal Edukasi Ekobis) Vol 1, No 4 (2013): JEE (jurnal Edukasi Ekobis)
Publisher : FKIP Unila

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar

Abstract

The aimed of this research was to know wheather there is a difference on result of learning economy between those thaught using cooperative learnig model type NHT and type TSTS and to know which type is more effective between cooperative learning model type NHT and TSTS in economy subject. The experiment method of this research was Quasi Experiment. The design of this research was non-equivalent control group design. The population of this research was the first grade of SMA Negeri 3 Bandar Lampung year 2012/2013 which consisted of seven classes and 266 students. By using cluster random sampling, class x1 and x2 were chosen as the samples. Data collecting technique of this research were observation, documentation and tests. Hypothesis testing was analyzed by using Independent Samples Test. The result shows that (1) there are differences between those taught economy subject by using cooperativelearning type NHT and TSTS, (2) The using of cooperative learning type NHT is more effective than cooperative learning type TSTS in economy subject.Keywords: NHT, TSTS, RS.
HASIL BELAJAR IPS TERPADU DAN KEMAMPUAN BERPIKIR KRITIS ANTARA TSTS DENGAN GI Leni Widiawati; Pujiati Pujiati; Nurdin Nurdin
JEE (Jurnal Edukasi Ekobis) Vol 3, No 1 (2015): JEE (Jurnal Edukasi Ekobis)
Publisher : FKIP Unila

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar

Abstract

This study aimed to compare GI and TSTS model on learning achievement of Social Studies and critical thinking skills. The collection of data through observation, interviews, documentation and testing. Hypothesis testing using a t-test of two independent samples. The results showed an average of Integrated Social learning outcomes and critical thinking skills of students whose learning using learning TSTS model was higher than GI model. The average achievment of Social Studies with TSTS models was 80,322 and its increasing was 27,903 while 78,5 for GI models with an increasing 25,5. While the critical thinking skills of using TSTS model was 82,451 and 21,193 for its increasing and 77,5 for GI model with an increasing 20,3.Penelitian ini bertujuan membandingankan model pembelajaran TSTS dengan GI terhadap hasil belajar IPS Terpadu dan kemampuan berpikir kritis. Pengumpulan data melalui observasi, wawancara, dokumentasi dan tes. Pengujian hipotesis menggunakan t-test dua sampel independen. Hasil penelitian rata-rata hasil belajar IPS Terpadu dan kemampuan berpikir kritis siswa menggunakan model TSTS lebih tinggi dibandingkan model GI. Rata-rata hasil belajar IPS Terpadu model TSTS 80,322 dengan peningkatan 27,903 dan model GI 78,5 dengan peningkatan 25,5. Sedangkan kemampuan berpikir kritis model TSTS 82,451 dengan peningkatan 21,193 dan model GI 77,5 dengan peningkatan 20,3.Kata kunci: hasil belajar, berpikir kritis, GI, TSTS.
PERBANDINGAN PEMBELAJARAN KOOPERATIF TIPE SCAFFOLDING DENGAN TS-TS TERHADAP HASIL BELAJAR SISWA Sofia Luthfita; Tedi Rusman; Nurdin Nurdin
JEE (Jurnal Edukasi Ekobis) Vol 2, No 5 (2014): JEE (jurnal Edukasi Ekobis)
Publisher : FKIP Unila

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar

Abstract

This study have a purpose to know: 1) difference result of study IPS Terpadu cooperative learning Scaffolding with TS-TS (Two Stay Two Stray). 2) effectivity result of study IPS Terpadu which using cooperative learning Scaffolding more higher than TS-TS (Two Stay Two Stray). This study used an experimental method with a comparative approach. Data collecting instrument is in the form of a multiple choice test of 40 questions for 56 students. The results showed: a) there are differences in the results of Integrated IPS Terpadu through Scaffolding cooperative learning model with TS-TS (Two Stay Two Stray). This is indicated by the obtained Sig. of 17.484 2,017. b) there are difference of effectivity learning outcomes using cooperative learning type Scaffolding more higher than TS-TS (Two Stay Two Stray). It is showes premises 7,04 6,3.  Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk mengetahui: 1) perbedaan hasil belajar IPS Terpadu melalui model pembelajaran kooperatif tipe Jigsaw dengan STAD (Students Teams Achievement Of Division). 2) efektivitas hasil belajar IPS Terpadu yang menggunakan model pembelajaran kooperatif tipe Scaffolding lebih tinggi dibandingkan TS-TS (Two Stay Two Stray). Penelitian ini menggunakan metode eksperimen dengan pendekatan komparatif. Alat pengumpul data berupa tes pilihan ganda sebanyak 40 soal kepada 56 siswa. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan; a) ada perbedaan hasil belajar IPS Terpadu melalui model pembelajaran kooperatif tipe Scaffolding dengan TS-TS (Two Stay Two Stray). Hal ini ditunjukkan dengan diperoleh Sig. sebesar 17.484 2,017. b) efektivitas hasil belajar IPS Terpadu yang menggunakan model pembelajaran kooperatif tipe Scaffolding dengan TS-TS (Two Stay Two Stray). Hal ini ditunjukkan dengan 7,04 6,3.  Kata kunci: hasil belajar, scaffolding, TS-TS.
PENGARUH MOTIVASI BELAJAR DAN CARA BELAJAR TERHADAP HASIL BELAJAR IPS TERPADU Ardi Tri Saputra; Yon Rizal; Nurdin Nurdin
JEE (Jurnal Edukasi Ekobis) Vol 2, No 1 (2014): JEE (jurnal Edukasi Ekobis)
Publisher : FKIP Unila

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar

Abstract

The aim of this research is to find out the effect of learning motivation and learning way toward learning outcomes of Integrated Social Science. Method of research uses descriptive verification. Technique analysis data uses Simple Linear Regression and Multiple Linear Regression. The results of research showed: (1) there is positive and significant effect of learning motivation toward learning outcomes in Integrated Social Science with total 26,3%; (2) there is positive and significant effect of learning way toward learning outcomes in Integrated Social Science with total 24,3%; (3) there is positive and significant effect of learning motivation and a learning way toward learning outcomes in Integrated Social Science with total 46,9%. Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk mengetahui pengaruh motivasi belajar dan cara belajar terhadap hasil belajar IPS Terpadu. Metode penelitian menggunakan metode deskriptif verifikatif. Teknik analisis data menggunakan regresi linier sederhana dan regresi linier multipel. Hasil analisis menunjukkan bahwa: (1) ada pengaruh yang positif dan signifikan motivasi belajar terhadap hasil belajar IPS Terpadu pada siswa sebesar 26,3%; (2) ada pengaruh yang positif dan signifikan cara belajar terhadap hasil belajar IPS Terpadu siswa sebesar 24,3%; (3) ada pengaruh yang positif dan signifikan motivasi belajar dan cara belajar terhadap hasil belajar IPS Terpadu pada siswa sebesar 46,9%. Kata kunci:  cara belajar, hasil belajar, motivasi.
PENGARUH KEMANDIRIAN BELAJAR, AKTIVITAS BELAJAR DAN PERHATIAN ORANGTUA TERHADAP HASIL BELAJAR Meita Sari; R. Gunawan Sudarmanto; Nurdin Nurdin
JEE (Jurnal Edukasi Ekobis) Vol 1, No 5 (2013): JEE (jurnal Edukasi Ekobis)
Publisher : FKIP Unila

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar

Abstract

The method used in this study is the descriptive research method verification with ex post facto approach and surveys. Based on the analysis obtained the following results. 1.There is a positive and significant influence of Independence Learning to Student Learning Outcomes Economic Accounting Semester Class XI IPS School 10 Bandar Lampung High School Academic Year 2011/2012. 2.There positive and significant influence on Learning Outcomes Learning Activities Economic Accounting Students Semester Class XI IPS School 10 Bandar Lampung High School Academic Year 2011/2012. 3.Ada positive and significant influence Attention Parents for Economic Learning Outcomes A student kuntansi Semester Class XI IPS School 10 Bandar Lampung High School Academic Year 2011/2012. 4.Ada a positive and significant influence of Independence Learning, Learning Activities, and Attention Parents for Student Learning Outcomes Economic Accounting Semester Class XI IPS School 10 Bandar Lampung High School Academic Year 2011/2012.Metode yang digunakan di dalam penelitian ini adalah metode penelitian deskriptif verifikatif dengan pendekatan ex post facto dan survei. Berdasarkan analisis diperoleh hasil penelitian sebagai berikut. 1.Ada pengaruh yang positif dan signifikan Kemandirian Belajar terhadap Hasil Belajar Ekonomi Akuntansi Siswa Kelas XI IPS Semester Genap SMA Negeri 10 Bandar Lampung Tahun Pelajaran 2011/2012. 2.Ada pengaruh yang positif dan signifikan Aktivitas Belajar terhadap Hasil Belajar Ekonomi Akuntansi Siswa Kelas XI IPS Semester Genap SMA Negeri 10 Bandar Lampung Tahun Pelajaran 2011/2012. 3.Ada pengaruh yang positif dan signifikan Perhatian Orang Tua terhadap Hasil Belajar Ekonomi A kuntansi Siswa Kelas XI IPS Semester Genap SMA Negeri 10 Bandar Lampung  Tahun Pelajaran 2011/2012. 4.Ada pengaruh yang positif dan signifikan Kemandirian Belajar, Aktivitas Belajar, dan Perhatian Orang Tua terhadap Hasil Belajar Ekonomi Akuntansi Siswa Kelas XI IPS  Semester Genap SMA Negeri 10 Bandar Lampung Tahun Pelajaran 2011/2012. Kata Kunci:  Kemandirian, Aktivitas, Perhatian, Hasil Belajar
STUDI PERBANDINGAN HASIL BELAJAR EKONOMI DENGAN MENGGUNAKAN MODEL PEMBELAJARAN KOOPERATIF TIPE GI ( Group Investigation) DAN TIPE PBL (Problem Based Learning) eri purwanti; Teddy Rusman; Nurdin Nurdin
JEE (Jurnal Edukasi Ekobis) Vol 1, No 2 (2013): JEE (Jurnal Edukasi Ekobis)
Publisher : FKIP Unila

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar

Abstract

Objective of this research is to find out the differences of economy learning results by using group investigation (GI) and problem based learning (PBL) cooperative learning. This was a comparative research with quasi experiment approach.Population in this research was 245 Grade X students in SMA Negeri 1 in Kalirejo.70 samples from two different classrooms were taken using cluster random sampling technique. Data were collected with pretest and posttest. Data were analyzed using t-test formula for two big samples that were mutually uncorrelated.The hypothesis test results showed that: (1) there were differences of economy learning results between using GI and PBL cooperative learning models; (2) the average of economy learning results by using GI cooperative learning model, as much as 79.37 were higher than economy learning results by using PBL, cooperative learning model, as much as 75.17, with mean difference as much as 4.200 and tcount 3.873 ttable 1.667. thus, H0 was refused and H1 was accepted.Keywords : learning result, cooperative learning model, GI, PBL.
PENGARUH DISIPLIN BELAJAR, MOTIVASI BELAJAR, LINGKUNGAN BELAJAR DI SEKOLAH TERHADAP HASIL BELAJAR Leni Asnawati; I Komang Winatha; Tedi Rusman
JEE (Jurnal Edukasi Ekobis) Vol 2, No 7 (2014): JEE (Junal Edukasi Ekobis)
Publisher : FKIP Unila

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar

Abstract

This research aims to find out the effect of learning discipline, learning motivation, and learning environment at school towards Economics learning results. The method used in this research is descriptive verificative method with an ex post facto approach and survey. The population of this research are 94 students. The sample of this research are 72 students. Data collecting techniques used are observation, questionnaires, and documentation. Based on the analysis of data, the results show that: (1) there is an effect of learning discipline towards Economics learning. (2) there is an effect of learning motivation towards economics learning result. (3) there is an effect of learning environment at school towards Economics learning result. (4) there are some effects of learning discipline learning motivation and learning environment atschool towards economic.Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk mengetahui pengaruh disiplin belajar, motivasi belajar dan lingkungan belajar di sekolah terhadap hasil belajar ekonomi. Metode yang digunakan dalam penelitian ini adalah metode deskriptif verifikatif dengan pendekatan ex post facto dan survey. Populasi dalam penelitian ini berjumlah 94 siswa.Sampel dalam penelitian ini berjumlah 72 siswa. Teknik pengumpulan data yang digunakan adalah observasi, angket (kuisioner), dandokumentasi. Berdasarkan analisis data hasil penelitian yang menunjukkan bahwa: (1) Ada pengaruh disiplin belajar terhadap hasil belajar ekonomi. (2) Ada pengaruh motivasi belajar terhadap hasil belajar ekonomi. (3) Ada pengaruh lingkungan belajar di sekolah terhadap hasil belajar ekonomi. (4) Ada pengaruh disiplin belajar, motivasi belajar dan lingkungan belajar di sekolah terhadap hasil belajar ekonomi.Kata kunci: hasil belajar, disiplin belajar, lingkungan belajar di sekolah, motivasi belajar
PENGARUH PENGAWASAN, LINGKUNGAN KERJA, DAN KOMPENSASI TERHADAP KINERJA PADA GURU SERTIFIKASI Putri Nur Rizky; Yon Rizal; Samsi Samsi
JEE (Jurnal Edukasi Ekobis) Vol 2, No 4 (2014): JEE (jurnal Edukasi Ekobis)
Publisher : FKIP Unila

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar

Abstract

This study was aimed to find whether there was an effect of supervision, working environment, and compensation towards the performance of certificated teachers at SMP Teluk Betung Utara Subdistrict and Tanjung Karang Barat Subdistrict, Bandar Lampung 2013/2014. The method used is the ex post facto and descriptive research survey with verification. The population consists of 124 teachers chosen by nomogram harry king formula amount of 101 persons. The unit of analysis is simple linear regression and multiple linear regression. The hypothesis 1 and 2 tested by using simple linear regression and multiple linear regression for the third. The analysis showed that: (1) There is an effect of supervision on the certificated teachers’ performance; (2) There is an influence of the work environment on the certificated teachers’ performance; (3) There are effect of compensation on the certificated teachers’ performance; (4) There is an influence of supervision, work environment, and compensation for the performance of certificated teachers. Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk mengetahui apakah ada pengaruh pengawasan, lingkungan kerja, dan kompensasi terhadap kinerja pada guru sertifikasi SMP Kecamatan Teluk Betung Utara dan Kecamatan Tanjung Karang Barat Bandar Lampung Tahun Pelajaran 2013/2014. Metode yang digunakan adalah ex post facto dan survey dengan jenis penelitian deskriptif verifikatif. Populasi penelitian ini berjumlah 124 orang guru dengan jumlah sampel berdasarkan rumus nomogram harry king sebanyak 101 orang guru. Untuk menguji hipotesis 1 dan 2 menggunakan regresi linier sederhana dan hipotesis 3 dengan menggunakan regresi linier multiple. Hasil analisis menunjukkan bahwa: (1) Ada pengaruh pengawasan terhadap kinerja pada guru sertifikasi; (2) Ada pengaruh lingkungan kerja terhadap kinerja pada guru sertifikasi; (3) Ada pengaruh kompensasi terhadap kinerja pada guru sertifikasi; (4) Ada pengaruh pengawasan, lingkungan kerja, dan kompensasi terhadap kinerja pada guru sertifikasi. Kata kunci: kinerja, kompensasi, lingkungan kerja, pengawasan

Page 5 of 62 | Total Record : 620

 3   4   5   6   7 

Filter by Year

2013 2022


Reset
Filter By Issues
All Issue Vol 9, No 2 (2022): JEE (Jurnal Ekonomi Ekobis) Vol 9, No 1 (2022): JEE (Jurnal Ekonomi Ekobis) Vol 8, No 2 (2021): Jurnal Edukasi Ekobis (JEE) Vol 8, No 1 (2021): Jurnal Edukasi Ekobis (JEE) Vol 8, No 1 (2020): JEE (Jurnal Edukasi Ekobis) Vol 7, No 5 (2019): JEE (Jurnal Edukasi Ekobis) Vol 7, No 4 (2019): JEE (Jurnal Edukasi Ekobis) Vol 7, No 3 (2019): JEE (Jurnal Edukasi Ekobis) Vol 7, No 2 (2019): JEE (Jurnal Edukasi Ekobis) Vol 7, No 1 (2019): JEE (Jurnal Edukasi Ekobis) Vol 6, No 9 (2018): JEE (Jurnal Edukasi Ekobis) Vol 6, No 8 (2018): JEE (Jurnal Edukasi Ekobis) Vol 6, No 7 (2018): JEE (Jurnal Edukasi Ekobis) Vol 6, No 6 (2018): JEE (Jurnal Edukasi Ekobis) Vol 6, No 5 (2018): JEE (Jurnal Edukasi Ekobis) Vol 6, No 4 (2018): JEE (Jurnal Edukasi Ekobis) Vol 6, No 3 (2018): JEE (Jurnal Edukasi Ekobis) Vol 6, No 2 (2018): JEE (Jurnal Edukasi Ekobis) Vol 6, No 1 (2018): JEE (Jurnal Edukasi Ekobis) Vol 5, No 9 (2017): JEE (Jurnal Edukasi Ekobis) Vol 5, No 8 (2017): JEE (Jurnal Edukasi Ekobis) Vol 5, No 7 (2017): JEE (Jurnal Edukasi Ekobis) Vol 5, No 6 (2017): JEE (Jurnal Edukasi Ekobis) Vol 5, No 5 (2017): JEE (Jurnal Edukasi Ekobis) Vol 5, No 4 (2017): JEE (Jurnal Edukasi Ekobis) Vol 5, No 3 (2017): JEE (Jurnal Edukasi Ekobis) Vol 5, No 2 (2017): JEE (Jurnal Edukasi Ekobis) Vol 5, No 1 (2017): JEE (Jurnal Edukasi Ekobis) Vol 4, No 8 (2016): JEE (Jurnal Edukasi Ekobis) Vol 4, No 7 (2016): JEE (Jurnal Edukasi Ekobis) Vol 4, No 6 (2016): JEE (Jurnal Edukasi Ekobis) Vol 4, No 5 (2016): JEE (Jurnal Edukasi Ekobis) Vol 4, No 4 (2016): JEE (Jurnal Edukasi Ekobis) Vol 4, No 3 (2016): JEE (Jurnal Edukasi Ekobis) Vol 4, No 2 (2016): JEE (Jurnal Edukasi Ekobis) Vol 4, No 1 (2016): JEE (Jurnal Edukasi Ekobis) Vol 3, No 10 (2015): JEE (Jurnal Edukasi Ekobis) Vol 3, No 9 (2015): JEE (Jurnal Edukasi Ekobis) Vol 3, No 8 (2015): JEE (Jurnal Edukasi Ekobis) Vol 3, No 7 (2015): JEE (Jurnal Edukasi Ekobis) Vol 3, No 6 (2015): JEE (Jurnal Edukasi Ekobis) Vol 3, No 5 (2015): JEE (Jurnal Edukasi Ekobis) Vol 3, No 4 (2015): JEE (Jurnal Edukasi Ekobis) Vol 3, No 3 (2015): JEE (Jurnal Edukasi Ekobis) Vol 3, No 2 (2015): JEE (Jurnal Edukasi Ekobis) Vol 3, No 1 (2015): JEE (Jurnal Edukasi Ekobis) Vol 2, No 8 (2014): JEE (Jurnal Edukasi Ekobis) Vol 2, No 7 (2014): JEE (Junal Edukasi Ekobis) Vol 2, No 6 (2014): JEE (Jurnal Edukasi Ekobis) Vol 2, No 5 (2014): JEE (jurnal Edukasi Ekobis) Vol 2, No 4 (2014): JEE (jurnal Edukasi Ekobis) Vol 2, No 3 (2014): JEE (Jurnal Edukasi Ekobis) Vol 2, No 2 (2014): JEE (Jurnal Edukasi Ekobis) Vol 2, No 1 (2014): JEE (jurnal Edukasi Ekobis) Vol 1, No 8 (2013): JEE (jurnal Edukasi Ekobis) Vol 1, No 7 (2013): JEE (jurnal Edukasi Ekobis) Vol 1, No 6 (2013): JEE (jurnal Edukasi Ekobis) Vol 1, No 5 (2013): JEE (jurnal Edukasi Ekobis) Vol 1, No 4 (2013): JEE (jurnal Edukasi Ekobis) Vol 1, No 3 (2013): JEE (Jurnal Edukasi Ekobis) Vol 1, No 2 (2013): JEE (Jurnal Edukasi Ekobis) Vol 1, No 1 (2013): JEE (Jurnal Edukasi Ekobis) More Issue