cover
Contact Name
Andri Putra Kesmawan
Contact Email
andriputrakesmawan@gmail.com
Phone
-
Journal Mail Official
igpa@ugm.ac.id
Editorial Address
-
Location
Kab. sleman,
Daerah istimewa yogyakarta
INDONESIA
Jurnal Kebijakan dan Administrasi Publik
ISSN : 08529213     EISSN : 24774693     DOI : -
JKAP (Jurnal Kebijakan dan Administrasi Publikasi), dengan nomor p-ISSN: 0852-9213, e-ISSN: 2477-4693, adalah jurnal multidisiplin berskala nasional yang mencakup berbagai pokok persoalan dalam kajian ilmu-ilmu administrasi publik. Secara khusus JKAP menaruh perhatian pada pokok-pokok persoalan tentang perkembangan ilmu kebijakan dan administrasi publik, administrasi pembangunan, otonomi daerah, birokrasi dan aparatur negara, desentralisasi, ilmu ekonomi dan studi pembangunan, manajemen publik, kebijakan dan pemerintahan, serta ilmu sosial lain mencakup ilmu kesehatan masyarakat, politik fiskal, dan perencanaan wilayah.
Arjuna Subject : -
Articles 566 Documents
Sound Governance in the Development of Mamminasata Metropolitan Areas in South Sulawesi Province Firdaus Firdaus
JKAP (Jurnal Kebijakan dan Administrasi Publik) Vol 20, No 1 (2016): May
Publisher : Magister Administrasi Publik

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (1026.219 KB) | DOI: 10.22146/jkap.9915

Abstract

The direction of development in Indonesia has strongly integrated with the concept of good governance started from the strengthening of international market that is both imperialist and colony thereby contradicting to the tradition of developing countries. This leads to the establishment of sound governance as an alternative concept to improve the government's capacity to innovate in policy and administration. The development of Mamminasata Metropolitan area in South Sulawesi province experiences difficulties in implementing the coordination, integration, synchronization and cannot accommodate the whole event in order to realize the interconnection of development across districts / cities, whereas the central government makes this as a National Strategic Areas (KSN) and leading area in the East Indonesia. This study aims to explore and analyze the sound governance practices in the development program of Mamminasata Metropolitan area focusing on five dimensions, namely process, structure, values, management, and policy. The results show that 1) in the process dimension, the stakeholders involved in the Mamminasata development program establish inter-regional cooperation and coordinate externally and internally of the area ranging from planning to the implementation of development activities; 2) in the structure dimension, the government has established clear organization and regulation in regulating the development process. 3) in the value dimension, Mamminasata development program is based on the responsiveness of local government and has up-holded justice in accordance with the potential of each area; 4) in the management dimension, the government personnel has already had knowledge about the Mamminasata concept, but they are still experiencing problems in the use of technology because of limited resources; and 5) in the policy dimension, the government has encouraged the public to participate directly in policy making and implementation of development programs. Therefore, it can be concluded that the five dimensions of sound governance has been practiced in the Mamminasata Metropolitan area development. 
State And Modernisation Of Public Administration In Germany Rainer Pitschas
JKAP (Jurnal Kebijakan dan Administrasi Publik) 2005: JKAP VOLUME 9 NOMOR 2, TAHUN 2005
Publisher : Magister Administrasi Publik

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (585.213 KB) | DOI: 10.22146/jkap.8327

Abstract

Setiap negara pada saat ini dihadapkan pada tantangan yang sama yaitu perlunya melakukan modernisasi sistim administmsi.Dalam perkembangan, kesamaan tantanganyang dihadapi tersebut menimbulkan trend dalam melakukan modernisasi sistem administrasi ,yaitu dengan meniru model perubahan yang dilakukan oleh negara yang dianggap berhasil. Namun demikian yang patut menjadi pemikiran adalah proses dalam melakukan perubahan tidaklah mungkin soma di setiap negara, karena hal tersebut sangat tergantung dengan karakteristik masing-maringnegara. Sebagai negara sosialis, di jerman modernisasi administrasi diletakkan sebagai proses budaya administrasi yang dibentuk dengan tradisi. Model tersebut menitikberatkan pada perubahan dalam pola hubungan antara masyarakat dengan negara, dimana tidak semua hal diurusi negara, namun pada hal tertentu terdapat kebebasan bagi rakyat uniuk mengurusnya sendirilCarakteristik dari model tersebut adalah dengan dilakukannya rasionaliasasi ke dalam elan privatisasi dan pengaturan keluar. Rasionalisasi ke dalam, yaitu menciptakan model organisasi publik yang lebih independen dan tidak terikat dengan hirarki, yang selama ini menjadi kendala. 1.) Mengkaji Struktur yang lebih _fleksibel dalam menyesuaikan dengan perkembangan dan menempatkan personel7personel yang memiliki kapabilitas. 2.) Thivatisasi dan pengaturan ke luar dilakukan dengan mengurangiperan negara dalam berbagai halyang bisa dikelola mayarakat.Dengan model tersebut pemerintab lebih terlihat sebagai mangjer. Namun berbeda dengan Anglo-American dengan "new public management" and "reinventing government"-nya,yang menekankan pada hubungan antarpelaku; model modernisasi di jerman lebih mengutamak,an pelaksanaan tugas yang sudah ditetapkan, dengan terpenuhnya kebutuhan masyarakat.
The Significance of Village Data for Village Development: Students’ Community Development Program Experience (Kuliah Kerja Lapangan) – Universities Contribution to Village Development Tutik Rachmawati; Trisno Sakti Herwanto; Kristian Widya Wicaksono
JKAP (Jurnal Kebijakan dan Administrasi Publik) Vol 21, No 2 (2017): November
Publisher : Magister Administrasi Publik

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (257.024 KB) | DOI: 10.22146/jkap.26352

Abstract

It is common knowledge that development planning at the village level is rarely based on valid and updated data. Students and lecturers in the Public Administration Department Parahyangan Catholic University, who have been working with villages in West Java Province for several decades encountered situations to support that argument. It is difficult to obtain valid and updated data to use as evidence in developing initiatives and programs for the village development. Students’ Community Development Program (Kuliah Kerja Lapangan henceforth KKL themed  Universities Contribution to Village Development  was initiated with the goal of  improving  the quality of data in rural areas (Garut District) by  collecting and updating village data,  developing the capacity of  village government leaders and staff to collect and update village data on their own. This paper discusses three major works that the Students’ Community Development Program (KKN) themed Universities Contribution to Village Development have made. The three areas relate to 1) elaboration of the logic of the program; (2) discussion of the process of data collection and analysis of data in the three villages; and (3) discussion of output and outcomes of the program. Research action, as Lewin argues, has three goals: to advance knowledge; to improve a concrete situation; and to improve behavioral science methodology. This paper presents a case study that shows the existence of a problem in a community, and concrete actions taken to solve it   through the application of knowledge acquired through Community Development Program (KKL) experience of Universitas Membangun Desa. 
A Study of Good Governance Index in Yogyakarta Special Region Between 2012 and 2016 Achmad Ubaidillah
JKAP (Jurnal Kebijakan dan Administrasi Publik) Vol 21, No 1 (2017): May
Publisher : Magister Administrasi Publik

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (46.168 KB) | DOI: 10.22146/jkap.22201

Abstract

This study assesses the progress of good governance index in Yogyakarta between 2012 and 2016. Kemitraan (Partnership for Governance Reform) developed the Yogyakarta governance index of 2012 based on the IGI (Indonesia Governance Index)’s methodology. The author used the same methodology   to develop Yogyakarta governance index of 2016 based on newly collected data on government, bureaucracy, civil society and economic society in Yogyakarta. This paper compares Yogyakarta good governance index for 2012 and 2016. The index comprises scores on three levels, interalia:  the arena, principles and actual policy. The paper introduces and describes the three tier structure and index processing. Results of the comparison of the index for 2012 and 2016 shows that in general Yogyakarta governance index increased from the level of fairy good (6.80) in 2012 to good (7.93) in 2016. Subsequently, the scores that comprise the arena and principle levels were analyzed to determine the contribution of each to the total governance index, and afterwards determine the contribution of each principle to the score of each arena. The results of the analysis procedure indicates the possibility that the increase in governance index may be linked to new special status Law No.13 of 2012 for Yogyakarta. Prior to 2012, the special status of Yogyakarta special administration was shrouded in uncertainty. However, with the passage of Law No.13/2013, the special status of the province is now codified, and today forms the legal basis for   policy making in this province. This paper limits itself to indicators that point to the association between the governance and the enactment of the law, and does neither go as far as analyzing the impact that the enactment of the special status law has had on policies, nor evaluate the impact that policy changes made in the aftermath of the implementation of the special status law on the performance of the index.
An Analysis of Poverty Reduction Program Based on the Conditional Cash Transfer (CCT) (A Case of the Family Hope Program Implementation in Pandak Bantul District 2014) Ahmad Hanif
JKAP (Jurnal Kebijakan dan Administrasi Publik) Vol 20, No 1 (2016): May
Publisher : Magister Administrasi Publik

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (932.878 KB) | DOI: 10.22146/jkap.12557

Abstract

The study of this research was an analysis of the public policy implementation concerning on the implementation of the Family Hope Program (PKH) in Pandak, Bantul regency in 2014. The purposes of this study were to investigate: (1) the implementation of the Family Hope Program (PKH), (2) the performance of the Family Hope Program (PKH) and (3) factors that influence the performance of the Family Hope Program (PKH). To investigate the implementation of the Family Hope Program in Pandak, the researcher tried to analyze the processes during its implementation. While to measure the performance of the Family Hope Program in Pandak, the researcher applied policy output indicators approach from Randall B. Ripley. It consists of indicators of access, scope, accountability, be as, promptness of service and suitability of the program needs. The research used a qualitative method by using primary data and secondary data. To collect the data, the researcher used observation, interview and documentary. To analyze the data, the researcher applied inductive data analysis. PKH implementation consists of some the steps, those are: (1) determining the targets, (2) validating and preparing of the initial meeting, (3) the distributing of aid and clustering the participants of PKH,(4) commitments verification, and (5) updating the data. From the various stages taken, there is a problem related to the weaknesses of the validation process, that it is only administratively. The weak validation process leads the determination of the target program became less accurate. Based on the measurement of the policy output  indicators showed that the output performance of the Family Hope Program (PKH) in Pandak is low, it can be seen from: 1) aspect of bias, as there are still economically, some established families belonging to the members of PKH; 2) aspects of delivery service (promptness of service) as the lateness of the financial aid disbursement, and 3) aspects of the sustainability of the program with the needs of the target group, the aid criteria or the amount of aid considered to be unfair for each RTSM.The research results also showed five dominant factors toward the performance of the program, namely: 1) the lack of communication with the local village government; 2) the lack of data transparency of the PKH receiver targets; 3) the limitation of the available sources; and 4) the absence of mechanisms and rules controlling the fund spent by RTSM; and 5) the decreased compliance of RTSM in fulfilling the obligations under the rules of the program. According to these factors, there were some recommendations to increase the policy / program to be better, those are: (1) Improving the communication and involving the local village government, (2) Increasing the data transparency of the PKH receiver targets; (3) there should be an audit of the available sources; (4) Social Ministry should issue a new rule and control it to the spending of PKH financial aid by RTSM, and (5) optimizing the functions and the coordination between the supervisors and the local village government to increase the awareness of the poor society in fulfilling the specified obligations in the program.
Front Matter JKAP (Jurnal Kebijakan dan Administrasi Publik) Andri Putra Kesmawan
JKAP (Jurnal Kebijakan dan Administrasi Publik) Vol 20, No 2 (2016): November
Publisher : Magister Administrasi Publik

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (1763.554 KB) | DOI: 10.22146/jkap.29317

Abstract

Front Matter JKAP (Jurnal Kebijakan dan Administrasi Publik)
The Roles of Kulonprogo Regional Government in Developing Tourism Economy: Nature-Based Tourism Anggi Rahajeng
JKAP (Jurnal Kebijakan dan Administrasi Publik) Vol 20, No 2 (2016): November
Publisher : Magister Administrasi Publik

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (1282.869 KB) | DOI: 10.22146/jkap.16592

Abstract

Tourism development requires the roles of both regional and central government. The roles of those governments in the economic development belong to the aspects of planning, policy, regulation, and public facilities development to support the tourism industry. Kulonprogo Regency has several nature-based tourism destinations that can actually be developed, but it has not been optimal yet. This study aims in determining the roles of the Government of Kulonprogo Regency in developing the tourism economy to be optimal in their area by concerning the environmental issues. This study uses the triangulation in both the data and the methods used. The theoretical approach used is the  institutional economics based on the model of Williamson. The results of this study indicate that the roles of the all elements of government of Kulonprogo in the field of tourism economy development are the construction and the development of tourism destinations facilities, tourism marketing, tourism industry, and integrated related institutions. The determination of the prior destinations by the central government in 2017 was followed by the adoption of 5 zoning destinations/tourism strategic areas (KSPD) in Kulonprogo. Policies in the tourism sector is also followed by the policies on investment, particularly for infrastructure investment since the rapid growth of the investment climate and the development of mega projects in Kulonprogo (central-provincial government) to ignite the economic and the tourism development. Programs that are conducted by Kulonrogo Government through the Department of Tourism, Youth, and Sports in tourism are expected to affect the behavior/mindset of the tourism actors to concern and be more aware of tourism issues in anticipating the livelihood changes of most people in Kulonprogo (non-tourism changes into the tourism). The government should monitor and control the tourism destination development by concerning the issues of capacity, supporting capacity, and the environmental sustainability, especially around the nature-based tourism resorts.
Investigating Digital (Dis)engagement of Open Government: Case Study of One Data Indonesia Agie Nugroho Soegiono
JKAP (Jurnal Kebijakan dan Administrasi Publik) Vol 22, No 1 (2018): May
Publisher : Magister Administrasi Publik

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (565.378 KB) | DOI: 10.22146/jkap.31848

Abstract

Over the last decade, Indonesia has achieved remarkable progress in promoting transparent andinclusive development through implementing open government principles. This research investigatesone of the open government projects in Indonesia- One Data Indonesia (ODI), a one-stop opengovernment data portal that provides accurate, reliable, and interoperable single-reference datafor the public to use and redistribute without any limitation. The study aims to highlight thecurrent updates on open data implementation in Indonesia and the challenges that may hinder itsapplication in future. The study is an action research, conducted through the participation of theauthor in a three-month internship programme at the Executive Office of the President Republic ofIndonesia. Data on the portal’s engagement was based on Google Analytics. This study finds thatthere is disengagement in open data implementation, which is reflected by a small percentage ofavailable datasets and an imbalance in user access across Indonesia. This study argues that thedisengagement is due to several factors, including irrelevant and uncertain regulatory frameworks,confusion over setting priority goals, inadequate data infrastructure, and limited digital-literatehuman resource. Despite high investment and expectations from the portal, the benefits and civicengagement it has generated so far remain questionable.
Evaluating The Use of Paralegal Approach in Policy Advocacy Ramaditya Rahardian; Rina Herlina Haryanti; Nadya Audina S Kurnia
JKAP (Jurnal Kebijakan dan Administrasi Publik) Vol 22, No 1 (2018): May
Publisher : Magister Administrasi Publik

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (411.801 KB) | DOI: 10.22146/jkap.28337

Abstract

The purpose of this paper is to explore the approach adopted by workers’ organizations in Surakarta city to use paralegal services in an effort to change the formula used in calculating minimum wage in government regulation No.  78 / 2015.  Data were collected using interview and documentation techniques.  Data obtained in the field were analyzed using qualitative methods, that by understanding meaning of the phenomenon and making theoretical interpretation.  Results of the research showed that advocacy to reject the formula used in calculating the minimum wage based on government regulation No.78/2015 using several ways that included influencing policy implementation, managing   public opinion and creating space for a movement that opposes the policy. The study shows that workers who were strongly opposed to government regulation No.78/2015, used various policy advocacy channels to press their case, that included  attempt to influence the implementation of the regulation, influence public opinion of the adverse impact of the regulation on worker wellbeing, and portraying the poor condition of workers’ welfare that requires government through actions that support higher wages  rather than efforts that reduce their future incomes. 
Front Matter JKAP (Jurnal Kebijakan dan Administrasi Publik) Haening Ratna Sumiar
JKAP (Jurnal Kebijakan dan Administrasi Publik) Vol 21, No 2 (2017): November
Publisher : Magister Administrasi Publik

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (1856.483 KB) | DOI: 10.22146/jkap.36933

Abstract

Front Matter JKAP (Jurnal Kebijakan dan Administrasi Publik)

Filter by Year

1996 2026


Filter By Issues
All Issue Vol 30, No 1 (2026): May Vol 29, No 2 (2025): November Vol 29, No 1 (2025): May Vol 28, No 1 (2024): May 2024 Vol 28, No 2 (2024): November Vol 27, No 2 (2023): November Vol 27, No 1 (2023): May Vol 26, No 1 (2022): May 2022 Vol 26, No 2 (2022): November Vol 26, No 1 (2022): May Vol 25, No 1 (2021): May, 2021 Vol 25, No 2 (2021): November Vol 24, No 2 (2020): November Vol 24, No 1 (2020): May Vol 23, No 2 (2019): November Vol 23, No 1 (2019): May Vol 22, No 2 (2018): November Vol 22, No 1 (2018): May Vol 21, No 2 (2017): November Vol 21, No 1 (2017): May Vol 20, No 2 (2016): November Vol 20, No 1 (2016): May 2015: JKAP Volume 19 Nomor 2, November Tahun 2015 2015: JKAP Volume 19 Nomor 1, Mei Tahun 2015 Vol 19, No 2 (2015): November Vol 19, No 1 (2015): May 2014: JKAP Volume 18 Nomor 2, November Tahun 2014 2014: JKAP Volume 18 Nomor 1, Mei Tahun 2014 Vol 18, No 2 (2014): November Vol 18, No 1 (2014): May 2013: JKAP Volume 17 Nomor 2, Tahun 2013 2013: JKAP Volume 17 Nomor 1, Tahun 2013 Vol 17, No 2 (2013): November Vol 17, No 1 (2013): May 2012: JKAP VOLUME 16 NOMOR 2, TAHUN 2012 2012: JKAP VOLUME 16 NOMOR 1, TAHUN 2012 Vol 16, No 2 (2012): November Vol 16, No 1 (2012): May 2011: JKAP VOLUME 15 NOMOR 1, TAHUN 2011 Vol 15, No 1 (2011): May 2010: JKAP VOLUME 14 NOMOR 2, TAHUN 2010 2010: JKAP VOLUME 14 NOMOR 1, TAHUN 2010 Vol 14, No 2 (2010): November Vol 14, No 1 (2010): May 2009: JKAP VOLUME 13 NOMOR 2, TAHUN 2009 2009: JKAP VOLUME 13 NOMOR 1, TAHUN 2009 Vol 13, No 2 (2009): November Vol 13, No 1 (2009): May 2008: JKAP VOLUME 12 NOMOR 2, TAHUN 2008 2008: JKAP VOLUME 12 NOMOR 1, TAHUN 2008 2008: JKAP VOLUME 12 NOMOR 1, TAHUN 2008 Vol 12, No 2 (2008): November Vol 12, No 1 (2008): May 2007: JKAP VOLUME 11 NOMOR 2, TAHUN 2007 2007: JKAP VOLUME 11 NOMOR 2, TAHUN 2007 2007: JKAP VOLUME 11 NOMOR 1, TAHUN 2007 2007: JKAP VOLUME 11 NOMOR 1, TAHUN 2007 2006: JKAP VOLUME 10 NOMOR 2, TAHUN 2006 2006: JKAP VOLUME 10 NOMOR 2, TAHUN 2006 2006: JKAP VOLUME 10 NOMOR 1, TAHUN 2006 2006: JKAP VOLUME 10 NOMOR 1, TAHUN 2006 2005: JKAP VOLUME 9 NOMOR 2, TAHUN 2005 2005: JKAP VOLUME 9 NOMOR 2, TAHUN 2005 2005: JKAP VOLUME 9 NOMOR 1, TAHUN 2005 2005: JKAP VOLUME 9 NOMOR 1, TAHUN 2005 2004: JKAP VOLUME 8 NOMOR 2, TAHUN 2004 2004: JKAP VOLUME 8 NOMOR 2, TAHUN 2004 2004: JKAP VOLUME 8 NOMOR 1, TAHUN 2004 2004: JKAP VOLUME 8 NOMOR 1, TAHUN 2004 2003: JKAP VOLUME 7 NOMOR 2, TAHUN 2003 2003: JKAP VOLUME 7 NOMOR 2, TAHUN 2003 2003: JKAP VOLUME 7 NOMOR 1, TAHUN 2003 2003: JKAP VOLUME 7 NOMOR 1, TAHUN 2003 2002: JKAP VOLUME 6 NOMOR 2, TAHUN 2002 2002: JKAP VOLUME 6 NOMOR 2, TAHUN 2002 2002: JKAP VOLUME 6 NOMOR 1, TAHUN 2002 2002: JKAP VOLUME 6 NOMOR 1, TAHUN 2002 2001: JKAP VOLUME 5 NOMOR 2, TAHUN 2001 2001: JKAP VOLUME 5 NOMOR 2, TAHUN 2001 2001: JKAP VOLUME 5 NOMOR 1, TAHUN 2001 2001: JKAP VOLUME 5 NOMOR 1, TAHUN 2001 2000: JKAP VOLUME 4 NOMOR 2, TAHUN 2000 2000: JKAP VOLUME 4 NOMOR 2, TAHUN 2000 2000: JKAP VOLUME 4 NOMOR 1, TAHUN 2000 2000: JKAP VOLUME 4 NOMOR 1, TAHUN 2000 1999: JKAP VOLUME 3 NOMOR 2, TAHUN 1999 1999: JKAP VOLUME 3 NOMOR 2, TAHUN 1999 1999: JKAP VOLUME 3 NOMOR 1, TAHUN 1999 1999: JKAP VOLUME 3 NOMOR 1, TAHUN 1999 1998: JKAP VOLUME 2 NOMOR 2, TAHUN 1998 1998: JKAP VOLUME 2 NOMOR 2, TAHUN 1998 1998: JKAP VOLUME 2 NOMOR 1, TAHUN 1998 1998: JKAP VOLUME 2 NOMOR 1, TAHUN 1998 1997: JKAP VOLUME 1 NOMOR 2, TAHUN 1997 1997: JKAP VOLUME 1 NOMOR 2, TAHUN 1997 1996: JKAP VOLUME 1 NOMOR 1, TAHUN 1996 1996: JKAP VOLUME 1 NOMOR 1, TAHUN 1996 More Issue