Articles
15 Documents
Search results for
, issue
"Vol 1 No 2 (2016)"
:
15 Documents
clear
<![CDATA[PEWARISAN PADA MASYARAKAT ADAT BALI TERKAIT AHLI WARIS YANG BERALIH AGAMA ]]>
<![CDATA[I G. A. Mas Rwa Jayantiari]]>;
<![CDATA[Ida Bagus Putra Atmadja]]>;
<![CDATA[Ni Nyoman Sukerti]]>;
<![CDATA[I G. A. Tirta Sari Dewi]]>;
<![CDATA[I G. A Bagus Agastya Pradnyana]]>
<![CDATA[ Acta Comitas Vol 1 No 2 (2016) ]]>
Publisher : <![CDATA[Universitas Udayana ]]>
Show Abstract
|
Download Original
|
Original Source
|
Check in Google Scholar
|
DOI: 10.24843/AC.2016.v01.i02.p01
<![CDATA[Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk menggali dan menganlisis tentang kedudukan ahli waris yang beralih agama dalam hal hak dan kewajibannya baik dalam keluarga maupun dalam masyarakat adat serta akibat hukum yang timbul terkait ahli waris yang beralih agama tersebut. Penelitian ini merupakan penelitian hukum empiris, dengan pendekatan non doktrinal (socio legal reseach). Data digali dengan metode wawancara, selanjutnya dianalisis secara kualitatif. Hasil penelitian menunjukan bahwa ahli waris yang beralih agama tidak lagi berkedudukan ahli waris. Akibatnya ahli waris yang bersangkutan gugur hak warisnya dari orang tuanya. Gugurnya hak mewaris berakibat tidak ada kewajiban-kewajiban yang harus dipikulnya baik kewajiban terhadap keluarga maupun terhadap masyarakat adat. Ahli waris yang beralih agama dikaji dari teorinya Lawrence M. Friedman tentang sistem hukum terdiri dari tiga unsur yaitu struktur hukum, substansi hukum dan budaya hukum, dimana dari ketiga unsur itu tidak mengalami perkembangan. Dengan demikian hukum adat waris Bali masih dipertahankan secara utuh.]]>
<![CDATA[IMPLEMENTASI PASAL 11 AYAT (1) UNDANG-UNDANG NOMOR 42 TAHUN 1999 TENTANG JAMINAN FIDUSIA : PERSPEKTIF PERJANJIAN KREDIT DENGAN JAMINAN FIDUSIA PADA PERUSAHAAN PERSEROAN PEGADAIAN ]]>
<![CDATA[Ni Wayan Tirtawati]]>;
<![CDATA[I Dewa Gde Atmadja]]>;
<![CDATA[Gde Marhendra Wijaatmadja]]>
<![CDATA[ Acta Comitas Vol 1 No 2 (2016) ]]>
Publisher : <![CDATA[Universitas Udayana ]]>
Show Abstract
|
Download Original
|
Original Source
|
Check in Google Scholar
|
DOI: 10.24843/AC.2016.v01.i02.p15
<![CDATA[Pawnshop Company is a State Owned Enterprises (SOEs), which is engaged in the business of providing credit services and applicable statutory lien for anyone with a moving objects collateral requirement. In order to develop the business, so Government Regulation No. 103 of 2000 was issued, stated of the granting of the loan based on the collateral of fiduciary money. As an institution that provides credit to guarantee the fiduciary shall comply with the provisions set out in Law No. 42 of 1999, especially Article 11, paragraph (1) which states that the objects are burdened with fiduciary collateral required to be registered, but in reality there is no Pawnshop Company comply with Article 11 paragraph (1) of Law No. 42 of 1999 on Fiduciary. Based on the gap das sein and das sollen, then can be formulated the problem of how fiduciary guarantee enrollment application pursuant to Article 11 paragraph (1) of Law No. 42 of 1999 on Company Pawnshop and how execution of fiduciary insurance company that is not registered by the Company Pawnshop when borrowers are in default. Empirical legal research is used in this thesis, because it’s getting out of the gap between das Sein and das sollen. The approach used in this thesis is the legislation approach, case-based approach, and the analytical approach. The nature of the research in this study was a descriptive study, sites in the Pawnshop Company branch Denpasar and Tabanan. The data used in this thesis is the primary data / field data and secondary data / literature. Data collecting techniques used in this thesis is planned interview techniques and reading literature. Sampling techniques used in this thesis is purposive sampling and the data obtained are presented in descriptive qualitative. The results of this problem study is application of fiduciary guarantee enrollment on the Pawnshops Company, that disobedience to law number 42 of 1999 Article 11 paragraph (1) was happened, while the execution of fiduciary insurance company that is not registered by Pawnshop Company if debtor in default is done by a family way.]]>
<![CDATA[THE AUTHORITY OF VILLAGE CREDIT UNION AS THE SUBJECT OF LIABILITY RIGHTS ]]>
<![CDATA[I Gusti Ngurah Wairocana]]>;
<![CDATA[Putu Gede Arya Sumerthayasa]]>;
<![CDATA[Jeanne Wiryandani Ratmaningrum]]>
<![CDATA[ Acta Comitas Vol 1 No 2 (2016) ]]>
Publisher : <![CDATA[Universitas Udayana ]]>
Show Abstract
|
Download Original
|
Original Source
|
Check in Google Scholar
|
DOI: 10.24843/AC.2016.v01.i02.p06
<![CDATA[According to the Bali Provincial Regulation No. 8 concerning Village Credit Union (hereinafter referred to as LPD) Article 2 paragraph (1) states that: LPD is a village-owned financial union conducting business in the village and for the benefit of the villagers. This is confirmed by the presence of the Decision of the Third Big Meeting by Village Assembly (MDP) Bali No. 009 / SK-PA III / MDP Bali /Vffl /2014 Article I paragraph (1), namely, the Village Credit Union is one of the possessions of the village. This type of research used in this thesis is a normative study. Normative study is the one that examines the level of legal norms, finding the non-existence of the LPD status as a legal subject of liability rights, so there is a legal vacuum in which the status of the LPD as the subject of a liability rights is not stipulated in the legislation and these problems will be a legal discovery. LPD is the possession of the village, so LPD cannot be the legal subject of liability right because the village itself has not been the subject of law. So the security liability agreement made by LPD is invalid because it does not qualify his legitimate agreements written in Article 1320 paragraph (4) of Civil Code regarding lawful cause or legal cause.]]>
<![CDATA[SURAT KUASA MEMBEBANKAN HAK TANGGUNGAN (SKMHT) DALAM PERJANJIAN KREDIT PERBANKAN DI KOTA DENPASAR ]]>
<![CDATA[I Putu Deny Wiryanta]]>;
<![CDATA[I Ketut Mertha]]>;
<![CDATA[I Made Puryatma]]>
<![CDATA[ Acta Comitas Vol 1 No 2 (2016) ]]>
Publisher : <![CDATA[Universitas Udayana ]]>
Show Abstract
|
Download Original
|
Original Source
|
Check in Google Scholar
|
DOI: 10.24843/AC.2016.v01.i02.p11
<![CDATA[The Law No. 4 of 1996 on Encumbrance Right (UUHT) aims to provide a foundation that enabling enactment of a powerful Encumbrance Right institutions, including the position of Procuration of Encumbrance Right Charging (SKMHT). In Article 15, Paragraph (3) and (4) UUHT declared a period of time for SKMHT for land rights were already registered and not registered yet. In fact, losses experienced by the debtor often occur as a result of that provision. The losses were partly a result of the expiration of SKMHT because of Encumbrance Right Deed (APHT) getting process had been exceeded the period of SKMHT validity, so that creditors do not have yet a certain guarantee binding deed of the guarantee provided by the debtor, which resulted in the arrest of the funds that will be allocated to debtor and the debtor it is becoming difficult to practice business activities. Based on this problem, the problem that can be formulated is how the legal result of the implementation of the Procuration of Encumbrance Right Charging (SKMHT) in banking loan agreement and What are the constraints in the implementation of the Procuration of Encumbrance Right Charging (SKMHT) in banking loan agreement as well as how to overcome the efforts in particular in Denpasar City. This type of research used in this thesis is empirical legal research with the consideration that the starting point of the research is the analysis of the gap between das sein sollen and the effectiveness SKMHT in which the banking loan agreement whereas SKMHT regulated under Article 15 UUHT. In Article 15, Paragraph (3) and (4) UUHT declared a period of time for SKMHT to land rights were already registered and not registered. In fact,losses experienced by the debtor often occur as a result of that provision. The losses were partly a result of the expiration of SKMHT because of Encumbrance Right Deed (APHT) getting process had been exceeded the period of SKMHT validity. The resultsof research areeffortsundertakento overcomethese obstacles, by renewingSKMHTwhichhas expired. Thus, overcomingbothof these obstaclesis only can be done byrenewingSKMHTwhile waiting the certificating process ofunregistered SKMHTobject. Once thecertificate of land rightis issued, thenbasedon SKMHT, the encumbrance right charging of SKMHT object is done so it became the object of encumbrance right.]]>
<![CDATA[AKIBAT HUKUM AKTA PERJANJIAN NOMINEE TERHADAP PIHAK KETIGA ]]>
<![CDATA[I Gede Yusa]]>;
<![CDATA[I Dewa Gede Atmadja]]>;
<![CDATA[I Made Arya Utama]]>;
<![CDATA[I Made Dedy Prianto]]>;
<![CDATA[Gede Prapta Wiguna]]>;
<![CDATA[I Gede Tresna Pratama Wijaya]]>
<![CDATA[ Acta Comitas Vol 1 No 2 (2016) ]]>
Publisher : <![CDATA[Universitas Udayana ]]>
Show Abstract
|
Download Original
|
Original Source
|
Check in Google Scholar
|
DOI: 10.24843/AC.2016.v01.i02.p02
<![CDATA[Secara umum proses dibuatnya akta oleh notaris adalah atas kehadiran para pihak yang akhirnya saat penandatanganan akta menjadi penghadap/ para penghadap atas kesadaran sendiri dan mengutarakan maksudnya serta keinginannya dihadapan notaris yang kemudian dituangkan ke dalam bentuk akta Notaris sesuai aturan hukum berlaku. Adakalanya para pihak yang datang ke notaris tidak menyampaikan secara jujur mengenai kondisi atau alasan mereka mebuat akta, akan tetapi disisi lain notaris tidak mempunyai kewenangan untuk mengoreksi dan seolah-olah bertindak sebagai seorang penyidik untuk mengetahui secara materiil apa yang sebenarnya terjadi, namun hanya dapat diketahui dengan analisa dari notaris itu sendiri sebelum memutuskan untuk membuat akta yang sesuai dengan alasan yang disampaikan oleh para pihak. Subjek yang menjadi pihak dalam pembuatan akta notaris seringkali pula melibatkan orang asing yang memang melakukan perbuatan hukum tertentu di wilayah hukum Repubik Indonesia. Perbuatan hukum yang menjadi pilihan mereka justru yang sebenarnya melanggar ketentuan yang berlaku di Indonesia, diantaranya perjanjian nominee. Dilihat dalam ketentuan yang diatur dalam UUPA, bahwa Pasal 2 (ayat 1) menentukan bahwa hanya warga negara Indonesia yang dapat mempunyai hak milik. Dan dari Pasal 42 UUPA dapat diketahui bahwa orang asing yang berkedudukan di Indonesia dapat mempunyai hak pakai. Dari sinilah bermula terjadinya perjanjian nominee, karena di satu sisi orang asing (WNA) ingin mempunyai hak milik yang sudah jelas-jelas hanya bisa dimiliki oleh orang Indonesia (WNI) dan akhirnya untuk mengamankan hak-haknya WNA ini ditunjuklah orang Indonesia yang menurut mereka bisa memberikan rasa aman dan mempunyai kedekatan hubungan tertentu untuk dipinjam namanya pada saat mereka membeli objek hak atas tanah, akan tetapi seluruh dana utnuk pembelian maupun proses baliknamanya ke atas nama WNI ditanggung oleh si WNA Penelitian ini merupakan penelitian hukum normatif yang meneliti bahan-bahan hukum terkait dengan pembuatan akta perjanjian nominee dan mengkaitkannya dengan aturan hukum yang berlaku berkenaan dengan penguasaan hak atas tanah yang dapat dimiliki oleh orang asing menurutt aturan hukum pertanahan yang berlaku di Indonesia. Pilihan perbuatan hukum ini sudah tentu merupakan pelanggaran hukum, selain itu perjanian nominee ini akan dapat menimbulkan kerugian bagi para pihak maupun bagi pihak ketiga.]]>
<![CDATA[PERLINDUNGAN HUKUM BAGI BANK TERKAIT PERJANJIAN KREDIT KEPEMILIKAN RUMAH DENGAN PENGIKATAN SURAT KUASA MEMBEBANKAN HAK TANGGUNGAN DISERTAI PERJANJIAN BUY BACK GUARANTEE DI KOTA DENPASAR ]]>
<![CDATA[Ni Ketut Supasti Darmawan]]>;
<![CDATA[I Nyoman Sumardika]]>;
<![CDATA[I Nyoman Gede Paramartha]]>
<![CDATA[ Acta Comitas Vol 1 No 2 (2016) ]]>
Publisher : <![CDATA[Universitas Udayana ]]>
Show Abstract
|
Download Original
|
Original Source
|
Check in Google Scholar
|
DOI: 10.24843/AC.2016.v01.i02.p07
<![CDATA[Home ownership credit faciliities are very much needed by the people who have low and medium buying power. In theory, as set forth in Article 1, paragraph (2) of the Regulation of the State Minister of Agrarian Services/Head of National Body for Land Affairs (BPN) No. 4 of 1996, with the binding of SKMHT is only granted to secure certain credits ,i.e. to finance simple ownership , modest homes, condominiums with land area of 200m2 and the building has not more than 70m2. In practice many home ownership credit facilities are granted to buy a house with a land area of more than stated by the provision above. Problems also occurs with the provisions of Article 15 paragraph (1) of UUHT which require SKMHT regarding land rights which are already registred, SKMHT must be followed by the making of APHT as late as 1(one) month. Rights to land that has not been registered, should be followed by creating APHT as late as 3(three) months after the SKMHT is granted in accordance with Article 15 of UUHT paragraph (2). However, in granting Home ownership credit, the provision applied is Article 1, paragraph (2) of the Regulation of the State Minister of Agrarian Services/Head of Nation Body for Land Affairs (BPN) No. 4 of 1996 confirming that SKMHT is not mandatory until the end of the principal agreement. The principle issue in this study is the factors that cause the developer defaults on the SKMHT agreement completed with buy back guarantee and the efforts made by a bank if a developer defaults on yhe agreement of buy back guarantee. Type of research used in this thesis was empirical legal research, which departed from the gap between Government Regulation State Minister of Agrarian Services/Head of Nation Body for Land Affairs (BPN) No. 4 of 1996, and the prevailing reality. The Approach used was a qualitative approach. Primary data collection technique was conducted using the method of taking sample interview with the Non-Random Sampling; secondary data collection was done through the technique of documentary studies and tertiary legal materials in the form of dictionaries and encyclopedias. The results showed that the factors that caused the developer defaults on the agreement of SKMHT equipped with buyback guarantee are internal and external factors. The internal factor is the missue of credit facilities and bad character of developers. External factors that make economic recession are that the bank interest rate jump dramatically, as a result many debitors are unable to pay loans. Efforts made by the bank if a developer defaults on the agreement of buy back guarantee can be an effort in litigation and non-litigation paths. The best solution for creditors is through non-litigation paths.]]>
<![CDATA[IMPLIKASI HUKUM PEMBEBANAN HAK TANGGUNGAN ATAS TANAH HAK GUNA BANGUNAN DI ATAS TANAH HAK PENGELOLAAN YANG IJIN PEMANFAATAN TANAHNYA DICABUT OLEH GUBERNUR ]]>
<![CDATA[A.A.Ayu Ray Saraswati]]>;
<![CDATA[I Dewa Gede Atmadja]]>;
<![CDATA[I Nyoman Suyatna]]>
<![CDATA[ Acta Comitas Vol 1 No 2 (2016) ]]>
Publisher : <![CDATA[Universitas Udayana ]]>
Show Abstract
|
Download Original
|
Original Source
|
Check in Google Scholar
|
DOI: 10.24843/AC.2016.v01.i02.p12
<![CDATA[Governor as the head of the province has the authority to regulate the allocation and use of assets held by the provincial government, including land management rights. The purpose of management rights titled land is to be given to a third party. This provision is based on the Decree of the Governor in form of land utilization permit. Furthermore, over that given land, the rights of land can be applied above it, for example Building Right Title. Problem that occur is if the Governor as concessionaires strip the utilization permit that has been granted, as in the case of Management Rights Titled Land No.2 with the Building Right Title Land No. 80 on behalf of PT. Abdi Persada Nusantara in Kesiman Petilan Village, Denpasar. What about the legal status of land rights that existed on the management rights titled land and the legal consequences of the burdening the liability right to management rights titled land after the revocation of the land utilization permit. This type of research in this thesis is a normative legal research, the research that seek answers by examining the problems of legal materials and the use of primary and secondary theoretical foundation as one of the characteristics of a normative study. The approach used in this study is the Regulation Approach, Legal Concepts Analysis Approach and the Case Approach, furthermore the discussion done by descriptive analysis way by describing and analyzing the results obtained from the legal materials, systematically arranged so that the conclusion can be obtained. Result of study of the prooblems studied is the legal status of land rights on management rights titled land that it’s utilization permit has been stripped by the concessionaires became abolished. Abolishment of the land rights led to liability rights does not lead to the abolishment of the secured debt. Receivables creditors still there, but no longer as claims that guaranteed specifically by the special position of the creditor (lender preferred)]]>
<![CDATA[KEKUATAN HUKUM PEMBUKTIAN WAARRMERKEN (AKTA DI BAWAH TANGAN YANG DIDAFTARKAN) DI NOTARIS ]]>
<![CDATA[I Ketut Tjukup]]>;
<![CDATA[I Wayan Bela Siki Layang]]>;
<![CDATA[Nyoman A. Martana]]>;
<![CDATA[Dewa Nyoman Rai Asmara Putra]]>;
<![CDATA[I Putu Rasmadi Arsha Putra]]>;
<![CDATA[I Gusti Agung Tirta Sari Dewi]]>;
<![CDATA[Ni Made Devi Jayanthi]]>
<![CDATA[ Acta Comitas Vol 1 No 2 (2016) ]]>
Publisher : <![CDATA[Universitas Udayana ]]>
Show Abstract
|
Download Original
|
Original Source
|
Check in Google Scholar
|
DOI: 10.24843/AC.2016.v01.i02.p03
<![CDATA[Notary as a public official the only one authorized to make authentic act of the deeds , agreements and determination required by a general rule or by the concerned desired to be declared in an authentic document , ensure certainty the date, saveing , all along the deed was not also be assigned or excluded to the officer or others . As a public official duties and notary work not only makes authentic act but also to register and certify (waarrmerken) letters under a hand. This research is empirical nature of this research is descriptive. Data studied were the primary data (primary data) and secondary data (Secondary data). Sembung research sites in the village. Data collection techniques are literature research and interview techniques . Non probality Sampling Sampling techniques . Data analysis method is a method of qualitative analysis . Waarmerken deed made under the deed of hand function are made under the hand guarantees about the date and the signatures of the parties concerned on the evidence. Deed under the hand that has obtained waarmerken of Notaries has the force of law under these conditions, the deed under the hand that received waarmerken of notary can assist judges in terms of evidence, due to the recognition of the signature , then the contents of the deed was regarded as the agreement of the parties , because the deed under the hand the truth lies in the signature of the parties to the recognition of the signature by the parties and to those who acknowledge his signature on the letter means he also recognizes the contents of the letter that is above his signature that the certificate is a proof of perfect .]]>
<![CDATA[PERLINDUNGAN HUKUM BAGI KONSUMEN DALAM PERJANJIAN BAKU JUAL BELI PERUMAHAN DENGAN PIHAK PENGEMBANG DI BALI ]]>
<![CDATA[A.A Gde Agung Brahmanta]]>;
<![CDATA[Ibrahim. R]]>;
<![CDATA[I Made Sarjana]]>
<![CDATA[ Acta Comitas Vol 1 No 2 (2016) ]]>
Publisher : <![CDATA[Universitas Udayana ]]>
Show Abstract
|
Download Original
|
Original Source
|
Check in Google Scholar
|
DOI: 10.24843/AC.2016.v01.i02.p08
<![CDATA[The rapid population growth makes the need for homes also increase. There are many emerging developer companies that offer home that could be obtained on credit. Real Estate Developer parties usually make an agreement with consumers in the form of standard contract, so that the consumers here have no bargaining power but to accept what is specified by the developer. This causes consumer to have less legal protection as opposed to what is contained in the provisions of Law No. 8 of 1999 concerning Consumer Protection. The problem faced is how the position of the buyers as consumers in the purchase of standard agreement of housing, as well as how the legal protection that can be provided to the consumer in the standard housing sale and purchase agreement with developers in Bali. This research is empirical legal research whose objects of study are the terms and provisions regarding the enforcement or implementation of normative law (codification, law or contract) is in action / in abstracto on any legal events that occur in the community (in concreto). The data source used in this study is primary data and secondary data. The results of this study indicate that the Status of the buyer as a consumer in the standard housing sale and purchase agreement has a weaker position compared to the business party (developer), this is because the purchase agreement offered by the business is made in the standard contract format so that consumers do not have bargaining power over what is contained in the clauses of the home purchase agreement. Legal protection that can be provided to the consumer in standard housing sale and purchase agreement with developers in Bali, namely if in the field there is a breach of the provisions set out in the Consumer Protection Act, a developer as the party carrying out the business can legally be sued by consumers as parties who feel aggrieved, then other measures are that a developer must also adjust the standard clause in the purchase and sale agreement that it offers is still at odds with this Law.]]>
<![CDATA[PERLINDUNGAN HAK-HAK KREDITUR DALAM HAL ADANYA PENGALIHAN BENDA JAMINAN OLEH PIHAK DEBITUR ]]>
<![CDATA[Lidya Mahendra]]>;
<![CDATA[R.A. Retno Murni]]>;
<![CDATA[Putu Gede Arya Sumertayasa]]>
<![CDATA[ Acta Comitas Vol 1 No 2 (2016) ]]>
Publisher : <![CDATA[Universitas Udayana ]]>
Show Abstract
|
Download Original
|
Original Source
|
Check in Google Scholar
|
DOI: 10.24843/AC.2016.v01.i02.p13
<![CDATA[The development of era requires people to move forward. One of them is the progress in the field of business that requires additional funding from the Bank. Extension of credit by the Bank generally will be accompanied by additional collateral in the form of movable or immovable objects. Collateral with moving objects is referred to as fiduciary collateral. Article 23 paragraph (2) of the Fiduciary Law No. 42 of 1999 states that the Giver of Fiduciary may not assign, pledge, or lease to another party objects into objects that do not constitute Fiduciary inventory objects, except with the prior written consent of the Beneficiary of Fiduciary . In fact, there are debtors who transfer their objects of collateral that resulted in losses to the Bank. Based on the gap between the das Sein and the das Solen, then it can be formulated problems of how the protection of the rights of creditors in the case of the transfer of collateral objects by the debtors to a third party and what legal actions can be taken by the creditors in the event of the objects of fiduciary collateral are transferred to any third parties by the debtors at the time of execution of the fiduciary security object.]]>
