JURNAL MAGISTER HUKUM UDAYANA
Jurnal Magister Hukum Udayana adalah jurnal ilmiah hukum yang mempublikasikan hasil kajian bidang hukum yang diterbitkan secara online empat kali setahun (Februari-Mei-Agustus-Nopember). Redaksi menerima tulisan yang berupa hasil kajian yang berasal dari penelitian hukum dalam berbagai bidang ilmu hukum yang belum pernah dipublikasikan serta orisinal. Jurnal ini selain memuat tulisan / kajian dari para pakar ilmu hukum (dosen, guru besar, praktisi dan lain-lain.) juga memuat tulisan mahasiswa Magister Ilmu Hukum baik yang merupakan bagian dari penulisan tesis maupun kajian lainnya yang orisinal. Tulisan yang masuk ke Redaksi akan diseleksi dan direview untuk dapat dimuat
Articles
16 Documents
Search results for
, issue
"Vol 12 No 3 (2023)"
:
16 Documents
clear
<![CDATA[Lavering Process Mistakes: An Analysis of Contractual Liability Burdening Marketplace Consumers ]]>
<![CDATA[Aan Aswari]]>;
<![CDATA[Muhammad Nur Asrul Azis]]>;
<![CDATA[Andika Prawira Buana]]>
<![CDATA[ Jurnal Magister Hukum Udayana (Udayana Master Law Journal) Vol 12 No 3 (2023) ]]>
Publisher : <![CDATA[University of Udayana ]]>
Show Abstract
|
Download Original
|
Original Source
|
Check in Google Scholar
|
DOI: 10.24843/JMHU.2023.v12.i03.p01
<![CDATA[This research aims to describe the urgency of consumer rights in a consumer protection, especially related to services in the process or period of carrying out the obligation to deliver goods that are not complete when consumer obligations have been carried out, there is a period of control of the object on the delivery service that risks defects in part or all of the things promised. Observation and interviews are used as research methods for this article to find legal actions. The results of this study reveal the urgency of consumer rights must continue to be maintained and developed because there is a period of control of the object transacted in the lavering process resulting in one of the obligations of the entire series of obligations on the agreed object not being carried out, normatively still providing legal protection to consumers. The factor of inadequate facilities to accommodate comments addressed to the party that should be responsible for errors, the factor of lack of public knowledge in determining the legal subject that should be responsible. The recommendation of this article is that the provider of the transacted object gives a report to the organizing agent to pay attention to consumer input in the feedback column so that justice for the seller and buyer can be realized, not the other way around, namely the seller getting a bad reputation from the buyer, and the buyer losing the wealth he has spent due to an untrustworthy courier service.]]>
<![CDATA[Penggunaan Sertifikat Vaksin Covid-19 Dalam Pencatatan Administrasi Kependudukan Ditinjau Melalui Equality Before The Law ]]>
<![CDATA[Wishwanata Adi Darma]]>;
<![CDATA[Gede Erlangga Gautama]]>
<![CDATA[ Jurnal Magister Hukum Udayana (Udayana Master Law Journal) Vol 12 No 3 (2023) ]]>
Publisher : <![CDATA[University of Udayana ]]>
Show Abstract
|
Download Original
|
Original Source
|
Check in Google Scholar
|
DOI: 10.24843/JMHU.2023.v12.i03.p15
<![CDATA[The discourse on the mandatory requirements for a Covid-19 vaccine certificate in the management of population administration has become a polemic in the community. The purpose of this research is to find out about the policy regarding the mandatory requirements for the Covid-19 vaccine certificate, which is reviewed through the principle of equality before the law. This research method uses normative legal research. The results of the research study in the discussion are that the regulation of vaccination implementation is regulated in the President of the Republic of Indonesia Number 99 of 2020 concerning Vaccine Procurement and Vaccination Implementation in the Context of Combating the Corona Virus Disease 2019 (COVID-19) Pandemic as amended by Presidential Regulation of the Republic of Indonesia Number 14 of 2021 concerning Changes on Presidential Regulation of the Republic of Indonesia Number 99 of 2020 concerning Vaccine Procurement and Vaccination Implementation in the Context of Combating the Corona Virus Disease 2019 (COVID-19) Pandemic. The discourse on the mandatory use of the Covid-19 vaccine certificate in the administration of population administration and the presidential regulation sanctioning the termination of government administration services cannot be enforced because the policy is a discriminatory measure that will later be able to distinguish between those who have been vaccinated and those who have not been vaccinated and is not in accordance with the principle of Equality before. the law contained in the Indonesian constitution, namely the 1945 Constitution. Wacana syarat wajib sertifikat vaksin covid-19 dalam pengurusan administrasi kependudukan menjadi polemik dalam masyarakat. Tujuan penlitian ini untuk mengetahui wacana kebijakan syarat wajib sertifikat vaksin covid-19 di tinjau melalui asas equality before the law. Metode penelitian ini menggunakan penelitian hukum normatif. Hasil kajian penelitian dalam pembahasannya ialah Pengaturan pelaksaan vaksinasi diatur dalam Presiden Republik Indonesia Nomor 99 Tahun 2020 tentang Pengadaan Vaksin dan Pelaksanaan Vaksinasi Dalam Rangka Penanggulangan Pandemi Corona Virus Disease2019 (COVID-19) sebagaimana telah diubah dengan Peraturan Presiden Republik Indonesia Nomor 14 Tahun 2021 tentang Perubahan atas Peraturan Presiden Republik Indonesia Nomor 99 Tahun 2020 tentang Pengadaan Vaksin dan Pelaksanaan Vaksinasi Dalam Rangka Penanggulangan Pandemi Corona Virus Disease 2019 (COVID-19). Wacana syarat wajib penggunaan sertifikat vaksin covid-19 dalam pengurusan administrasi kependudukan dan sanksi perpres tentang penghentian layanan adminsitrasi pemerintahan tidak dapat diberlakukan karena kebijakan tersebut merupakan tindakan diskrimintaif yang nantinya dapat membedakan golongan yang sudah divaksin dan yang belum divaksin serta tidak sesuai dengan asas equality before the law yang terdapat dalam kosntitusi Indonesia yaitu UUD 1945.]]>
<![CDATA[The The ASEAN Cross-Border Personal Data Transfer Instrument: Has Indonesian’s Personal Data Protection Law Followed it? ]]>
<![CDATA[Merlita Yuli Safitri]]>;
<![CDATA[Mahfud Mahfud]]>
<![CDATA[ Jurnal Magister Hukum Udayana (Udayana Master Law Journal) Vol 12 No 3 (2023) ]]>
Publisher : <![CDATA[University of Udayana ]]>
Show Abstract
|
Download Original
|
Original Source
|
Check in Google Scholar
|
DOI: 10.24843/JMHU.2023.v12.i03.p06
<![CDATA[Nowadays, the use and transfer of personal data in various countries have increased. ASEAN has formed a regional instrument called ASEAN Framework on Personal Data Protection that is expected to become a standard legal system in cross-border data transfer. Indonesia has just ratified Law Number 27 of 2022 on personal data protection, which in this law also regulates the transfer mechanism of personal data outside the Indonesian territory. The more personal data flows outside the territory of Indonesia, the more important it should get adequate protection. This research aims to identify whether ASEAN has provided a sufficient legal system to protect the flow of international data transfers and to explore an adequate legal system in Indonesia that are compatible with the ASEAN framework on PDP towards cross-border data transfer. This is doctrinal legal research with a conceptual and statutory approach The research shows that ASEAN has faced the issues of asymmetric legislation in the region by proposing any acts that could strengthen the cyber system in Southeast Asia, especially in the cross-border data flow. One of the mechanisms that have been proposed is ASEAN Model Contractual Clauses (MCC). By applying MCC, countries including Indonesia can carry out the personal data transfer across borders with the countries that do not yet have laws that are equal to the PDP Law. Indonesia can also harmonize the contents of the contract in line between domestic laws and regional instruments.]]>
<![CDATA[Pengaturan Pelekatan Sidik Jari Dalam Minuta Akta Bagi Penyandang Tuna Daksa ]]>
<![CDATA[Merry Rosari Kurniawati Weo]]>;
<![CDATA[Dewi Cahyandari]]>
<![CDATA[ Jurnal Magister Hukum Udayana (Udayana Master Law Journal) Vol 12 No 3 (2023) ]]>
Publisher : <![CDATA[University of Udayana ]]>
Show Abstract
|
Download Original
|
Original Source
|
Check in Google Scholar
|
DOI: 10.24843/JMHU.2023.v12.i03.p11
<![CDATA[This study aims to understand and analyze related changes to the provisions in the Law on Notary Office and the urgency of Reconstructing the Legal Reconstruction of Attaching Fingerprints in Minutes of Deeds for Persons with Physical Disabilities. The research method used in this study is a normative legal research method with a statutory and conceptual approach. The results of this study explain that there have been several changes in the UUJN. The points that have changed in the latest UUJN are: the existence of a Special Substitute Notary; notary candidate apprentice; notary retirement age and its relation to the extension of retirement age; Notary authority in making deeds related to land; the authority of the Notary in making the minutes of the auction deed; Notary who is appointed as a State Official; and Implementation of notary position supervision. The urgency of the need for legal reconstruction is in order to achieve legal certainty from the implementation of the contents of Article 16 paragraph 1 letter (c). By reconstructing the contents of this article, the implementation can be carried out properly by a notary who is required to attach his fingerprints, especially for appearers at a notary who has physical limitations, namely the disabled. Studi ini bertujuan untuk untuk memahami dan menganalisis terkait perubahan pada ketentuan-ketentuan dalam Undang-Undang Jabatan Notaris serta urgensi Rekonstruksi Hukum Pelekatan Sidik Jari Dalam Minuta Akta Bagi Penyandang Tuna Daksa. Metode penelitian yang digunakan dalam penelitian ini adalah metode penelitian hukum normatif dengan pendekatan perundang-undangan dan pendekatan konseptual. Hasil dari penelitian ini menjelaskan bahwa Terdapat beberapa perubahan dalam UUJN, Adapun point-point yang ada perubahan dalam UUJN terbaru yakni: keberadaan Notaris Pengganti Khusus; magang calon Notaris; usia pensiun Notaris dan kaitannya dengan perpanjangan usia pensiun; kewenangan Notaris dalam membuat akta yang berkaitan dengan pertanahan; kewenangan Notaris dalam membuat akta risalah lelang; Notaris yang diangkat menjadi Pejabat Negara; dan Pelaksanaan pengawasan jabatan Notaris. Urgensi diperlukannya rekonstruksi hukum ini adalah agar mencapai kepastian hukum dari pelaksanaan isi pasal 16 ayat 1 huruf ( c ). Dengan di rekonstruksi isi dari pasal ini maka dalam pelasanaannya dapat dijalankan dengan baik oleh notaris yang diwajibkan melekatkan sidik penghadap nya, khususnya bagi penghadap di notaris yang memiliki keterbatasan fisik yakni tuna daksa.]]>
<![CDATA[Scopping the Dispute Submitted Before Indonesia Arbitration ]]>
<![CDATA[I Gusti Agung Ayu Gita Pritayanti Dinar]]>;
<![CDATA[I Nyoman Bagiastra]]>;
<![CDATA[I Nyoman Gede Sugiartha]]>
<![CDATA[ Jurnal Magister Hukum Udayana (Udayana Master Law Journal) Vol 12 No 3 (2023) ]]>
Publisher : <![CDATA[University of Udayana ]]>
Show Abstract
|
Download Original
|
Original Source
|
Check in Google Scholar
|
DOI: 10.24843/JMHU.2023.v12.i03.p02
<![CDATA[The problem of equating the concepts of dispute and default results as legal practitioners tending to assume that every case with an arbitration clause is a dispute that must be examined at an arbitration institution even though the case is not necessarily a dispute because cases, disputes and default have different concepts, nature and causes. According to international instrument, arbitration clause is mandatory for cases that submitted to the arbitration. It shall have clearly regulated under agreement of the parties to the dispute. Thus if there a dispute when implementing their agreement then the settlement brought before arbitration. Unfortunately in the reality is different. This research is used normative legal research methods with approaches: (1) Analitical and Conceptual Approach, and (2) The Statue Approach. The result of this research is between arbitration institutions and general justice must implimentated in harmony and must contribute to each other in creating justice, certainty and benefit of the law in carrying out their duties. Only with this harmony will creating a suitability of judicial competence which is fair to all parties. Regulation regarding the definition of arbitration dispute should be clearly and explicitly stipulated in the general provisions of the Arbitration Law and Alternative Dispute Resolution so that all parties may understanding to and the justice, legal certainty in determining in related cases of the competence of arbitration can be achieved.]]>
<![CDATA[Reformulasi Ketentuan Eksekusi Jaminan Fidusia dan Relevansinya dengan Pemenuhan Prinsip Keadilan, Kemanfaatan dan Kepastian Hukum ]]>
<![CDATA[Hasanuddin Muhammadin]]>;
<![CDATA[M. Yasin Al Arif]]>
<![CDATA[ Jurnal Magister Hukum Udayana (Udayana Master Law Journal) Vol 12 No 3 (2023) ]]>
Publisher : <![CDATA[University of Udayana ]]>
Show Abstract
|
Download Original
|
Original Source
|
Check in Google Scholar
|
DOI: 10.24843/JMHU.2023.v12.i03.p16
<![CDATA[This paper is a normative research that tries to decipher the differences regarding changes to the provisions of the execution of fiduciary guarantees after the decision of the Constitutional Court. The debate is based on the opinion that the Constitutional Court's decision changes the characteristics of executing fiduciary guarantees to become more complicated because it costs more and takes a longer time. The data source for this paper is in the form of Constitutional Court Decisions and laws and regulations. The author uses interpretation techniques to examine and analyze the problems in this article. As a result, the reformulation of the provisions on the execution of fiduciary guarantees carried out by the Constitutional Court is by the principles of justice, benefit, and legal certainty. The Constitutional Court has determined that the execution of a fiduciary guarantee object can only held if there is an agreement regarding the breach of contract and there is a willingness to surrender the fiduciary guarantee. They are regulated so that debtors are not treated arbitrarily by creditors. The decision provides options to maximize simple lawsuits and utilize electronic court and trial administration. Tulisan ini merupakan penelitian normatif yang mencoba menguraikan perbedatan mengenai perubahan ketentuan eksekusi jaminan fidusia pasca putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi. Perdebatan tersebut didasarkan pada pendapat bahwa putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi mengubah karakteristik eksekusi jaminan fidusia menjadi lebih rumit karena mengeluarkan biaya lebih besar dan waktu yang lebih lama. Sumber data tulisan ini berupa Putusan Mahkama Konsitusi maupun peraturan perundang-undangan. Penulis menggunakan teknik interpretasi untuk menalaah dan menganalisa masalah dalam artikel ini. Hasilnya reformulasi ketentuan eksekusi jaminan fidusia yang dilakukan oleh Mahkamah Konsitusi sudah sesuai dengan prinsip keadilan, kemanfaatan dan kepasatian hukum. Mahkamah Konsitusi telah menetapkan bahwa eksekusi objek jaminan fidusia hanya dapat dilakukan apabila ada kesepakatan mengenai cidera janji dan ada kerelaan menyerahkan jaminan fidusia. Hal ini diatur agar Debitur agar tidak diperlakukan secara sewenang-wenang oleh Kreditur. Putusan tersebut memberi pilihan untuk memaksimalkan gugatan sederhana dan memanfaatkan administrasi perkaran dan persidangan secara elektronik.]]>
<![CDATA[Doktrin Corporate Negligence Pertanggunggugatan Entitas Hukum Rumah Sakit di Indonesia ]]>
<![CDATA[Theodorus Hendrik Willem Lumunon]]>;
<![CDATA[Ronny A Maramis]]>
<![CDATA[ Jurnal Magister Hukum Udayana (Udayana Master Law Journal) Vol 12 No 3 (2023) ]]>
Publisher : <![CDATA[University of Udayana ]]>
Show Abstract
|
Download Original
|
Original Source
|
Check in Google Scholar
|
DOI: 10.24843/JMHU.2023.v12.i03.p07
<![CDATA[Article 46 of Law No. 44 of 2009 on Hospitals regulates corporate counterclaims involving hospitals as legal entities under the vicarious liability doctrine. However, these regulations do not fully align with hospitals' distinct characteristics. Hospitals have a unique structure with three functional units: the supervisory board, the board of directors, and various professional groups, each with distinct responsibilities. This writing examines issues surrounding Article 46, including whether hospitals should be held accountable for damages caused by healthcare human resources. It explores when hospital corporations should face litigation and when healthcare human resources should assume liability based on professional responsibility. Despite the clarity of Article 46's text, its application doesn't entirely consider hospitals' organizational uniqueness. The objective is to establish regulations and legal principles to address challenges in applying Article 46, contributing to an ideal concept of corporate counterclaims involving hospitals. The research adopts a normative juridical approach, including legislative analysis, conceptual exploration, case study, and comparative law. The research suggests a concept of hospital liability as a legal entity, contingent on four conditions: the hospital has an obligation based on the corporate negligence doctrine, breach of these obligations occurs, quantifiable losses result, and a demonstrable causal connection exists between the breach and resulting damages.]]>
<![CDATA[Peran dan Kedudukan Komisaris pada Perseroan Perorangan ]]>
<![CDATA[Anak Agung Sintya Iswari]]>;
<![CDATA[Dewa Gde Rudy]]>
<![CDATA[ Jurnal Magister Hukum Udayana (Udayana Master Law Journal) Vol 12 No 3 (2023) ]]>
Publisher : <![CDATA[University of Udayana ]]>
Show Abstract
|
Download Original
|
Original Source
|
Check in Google Scholar
|
DOI: 10.24843/JMHU.2023.v12.i03.p12
<![CDATA[The purpose of this writing is to determine the functions and authorities of commissioners in limited liability companies and to analyze the position of commissioners in individual companies. The research methods used are normative legal research with a statutory approach and a concept approach. The results showed that the Commissioner is an organ of the Company in charge of carrying out supervision either in general or specifically in accordance with the articles of association and providing advice to the Board of Directors. In an Individual Company that only consists of 1 (one) person and without the role of Commissioner as supervisor, it will tend to be unlimited liability like an unincorporated business entity. Tujuan penulisan ini adalah untuk mengetahui fungsi dan kewenangan komisaris di dalam perseroan terbatas serta untuk menganalisa kedudukan komisaris dalam perseroan perorangan. Adapun metode penelitian yang dipergunakan yakni penelitian hukum normatif dengan pendekatan peraturan perundang-undangan dan pendekatan konsep. Hasil penelitian menunjukan bahwa Komisaris merupakan Organ Perseroan yang bertugas melaksanakan pengawasan baik secara umum atau khusus sesuai dengan anggaran dasar dan memberikan nasihat kepada Direksi. Dalam Perseroan Perorangan yang hanya beranggotakan 1 (satu) orang dan tanpa adanya peran Komisaris selaku pengawas maka akan cenderung menjadi tanggung jawab tidak terbatas layaknya badan usaha yang tidak berbadan hukum.]]>
<![CDATA[The Completion of Non-Performing Loans in Financial Technology Peer to Peer Lending ]]>
<![CDATA[Kadek Januarsa Adi Sudharma]]>;
<![CDATA[I Gede Agus Kurniawan]]>;
<![CDATA[Mario Binsar Martua Sihombing]]>
<![CDATA[ Jurnal Magister Hukum Udayana (Udayana Master Law Journal) Vol 12 No 3 (2023) ]]>
Publisher : <![CDATA[University of Udayana ]]>
Show Abstract
|
Download Original
|
Original Source
|
Check in Google Scholar
|
DOI: 10.24843/JMHU.2023.v12.i03.p03
<![CDATA[This study aimed at defining the forms of disputes resolution conducted by the parties involved in peer to peer lending fintech business. article aims to analyze the forms of dispute resolution that can be taken by the parties in the peer to peer lending fintech business. This article uses normative legal research with statutue approach. The results show that the parties in the dispute on bad loans in the Peer to Peer Lending Fintech business can take two forms of dispute resolution, namely litigation and non-litigation. The litigation route is to file a simple lawsuit or by Parate Executie, while through the non-litigation route, it could yo use the Alternative Dispute Resolution Institution for the Financial Service Sector.]]>
<![CDATA[Kewenangan Masyarakat Desa Pakraman Sebagai Subjek Hak Milik Komunal Atas Tanah ]]>
<![CDATA[Bagus Reyzaldy Hasandinata]]>;
<![CDATA[R.A. Retno Murni]]>
<![CDATA[ Jurnal Magister Hukum Udayana (Udayana Master Law Journal) Vol 12 No 3 (2023) ]]>
Publisher : <![CDATA[University of Udayana ]]>
Show Abstract
|
Download Original
|
Original Source
|
Check in Google Scholar
|
DOI: 10.24843/JMHU.2023.v12.i03.p08
<![CDATA[The purpose of this study is to determine and analyze the authority to manage assets by Pakraman Village and the new rights and obligations that arise after the appointment of Pakraman Village as the subject of communal (communal) property rights on land. The type of research used in this article is normative legal research conducted by reviewing applicable laws and regulations and using secondary data as primary data. Based on the results of the research, conclusions can be formulated as follows: (1) The authority possessed by Pakraman Village as the holder of Joint (Communal) Property Rights on land, is closer to the authority of use rights without a period of time/as long as they are used; and (2) the appointment of Pakraman Village to be subject to communal (shared) property rights on land according to the Ministerial Decree of ATR/BPN No. 276/2017, to provide protection and legal certainty for the existence of the druwe land position in Pakraman village. Tujuan dari penelitian ini adalah untuk mengetahui dan menganalisis kewenangan mengelola harta kekayaan oleh Desa Pakraman dan hak dan kewajiban baru yang timbul setelah ditunjuknya Desa Pakraman sebagai subyek hak milik bersama (komunal) atas tanah. Jenis penelitian yang digunakan dalam artikel ini adalah penelitian hukum normatif yang dilakukan dengan mengkaji peraturan perundang-undangan yang berlaku serta menggunakan data sekunder sebagai data utama. Berdasarkan hasil penelitian, dapat dirumuskan kesimpulan sebagai berikut: (1) Kewenangan yang dimiliki oleh desa pakraman sebagai pemegang Hak Milik Bersama (Komunal) atas tanah, lebih dekat kewenangan hak pakai tanpa jangka waktu/selama dipergunakan; dan (2) Penunjukan Desa Pakraman menjadi subyek Hak Milik Bersama (komunal) atas tanah menurut Kepmen ATR/BPN No. 276/2017, untuk memberikan perlindungan serta kepastian hukum terhadap eksistensi dari kedudukan tanah druwe desa pakraman.]]>
