JURNAL MAGISTER HUKUM UDAYANA
Jurnal Magister Hukum Udayana adalah jurnal ilmiah hukum yang mempublikasikan hasil kajian bidang hukum yang diterbitkan secara online empat kali setahun (Februari-Mei-Agustus-Nopember). Redaksi menerima tulisan yang berupa hasil kajian yang berasal dari penelitian hukum dalam berbagai bidang ilmu hukum yang belum pernah dipublikasikan serta orisinal. Jurnal ini selain memuat tulisan / kajian dari para pakar ilmu hukum (dosen, guru besar, praktisi dan lain-lain.) juga memuat tulisan mahasiswa Magister Ilmu Hukum baik yang merupakan bagian dari penulisan tesis maupun kajian lainnya yang orisinal. Tulisan yang masuk ke Redaksi akan diseleksi dan direview untuk dapat dimuat
Articles
664 Documents
<![CDATA[Position of Collective Labor Agreement as a Company Autonomous Law: Industrial Relation Dispute Settlement Approach ]]>
<![CDATA[Kadek Agus Sudiarawan]]>;
<![CDATA[Putu Ade Harriesta Martana]]>;
<![CDATA[Nyoman A. Martana]]>;
<![CDATA[Bagus Hermanto]]>
<![CDATA[ Jurnal Magister Hukum Udayana (Udayana Master Law Journal) Vol 8 No 4 (2019) ]]>
Publisher : <![CDATA[University of Udayana ]]>
Show Abstract
|
Download Original
|
Original Source
|
Check in Google Scholar
|
Full PDF (366.933 KB)
|
DOI: 10.24843/JMHU.2019.v08.i04.p02
<![CDATA[Collective Labor Agreement (CLA) is one of the main pillars that can be used in resolving disputes that occur in the company, However, there are problems concerning the implementation of CLA. The purpose of this research is to find and identify factors that can trigger disputes in the implementation of CLA, the probability of amendment of the CLA, identify the position of CLA in resolving Industrial Relation Disputes and find a mechanism of settlement in the implementation of the CLA. The research was carried out using empirical legal methods and analyzed using qualitative methods. The results are presented in a descriptive analysis report. The results of this research showed differences in interpretation, when unclear validity arrangements and adjustments of the new legislation happen were triggering disputes in the implementation of the CLA. Based on goodwill from the CLA parties, amendments could be made through negotiations in accordance with the mechanism stipulated in the Laws and Regulations. The position of CLA is an autonomous law that applies to the company and is an important element in preventing and resolving Industrial Relation Disputes. Finally, the settlement through bipartite, tripartite and Industrial Relation Court are the mechanism that can be taken for interest disputes.]]>
<![CDATA[KEBIJAKAN REHABILITASI TERHADAP PENYALAH GUNA NARKOTIKA PADA UNDANG – UNDANG NOMOR 35 TAHUN 2009 TENTANG NARKOTIKA ]]>
<![CDATA[IDA BAGUS PUTU SWADHARMA DIPUTRA]]>
<![CDATA[ Jurnal Magister Hukum Udayana (Udayana Master Law Journal) Vol 2 No 1 (2013) ]]>
Publisher : <![CDATA[University of Udayana ]]>
Show Abstract
|
Download Original
|
Original Source
|
Check in Google Scholar
|
Full PDF (109.345 KB)
|
DOI: 10.24843/JMHU.2013.v02.i01.p10
<![CDATA[Positive law states, drug users are criminals because it has met the qualifications in the law of narcotics, narcotic offenses such as drug abuse in the study of criminology can be classified as a crime without a victim or a victimless crime. This is because they will become dependent on illicit goods (narcotics), the way it deems appropriate to cure the addiction is to rehabilitate the victims of drug abuse For law journal writing, the writer uses normative legal research with one character is using secondary data, where the data consists of primary legal materials, legal materials and secondary legal materials tertiary. And the theoretical foundation that is used is the law, norms and theories appropriate to the problem The results reveal the writing on the rehabilitation policy on Narcotics has been strictly regulated in Chapter IX legislation, policies were aimed at drug addicts and victims of drug abuse, arguing that victims of drug abuse is a victim of crime narcotics and therefore the appropriate sanctions to be meted out to him is the rehabilitation of the victims will be able to return to society and become useful]]>
<![CDATA[KEWENANGAN OTORITAS JASA KEUANGAN MENGENAI PERLINDUNGAN HUKUM BAGI INVESTOR TERHADAP TINDAKAN TIPPEE YANG MELAKUKAN INSIDER TRADING DALAM PERDAGANGAN SAHAM ]]>
<![CDATA[Made Dwi Juliana]]>
<![CDATA[ Jurnal Magister Hukum Udayana (Udayana Master Law Journal) Vol 4 No 2 (2015) ]]>
Publisher : <![CDATA[University of Udayana ]]>
Show Abstract
|
Download Original
|
Original Source
|
Check in Google Scholar
|
Full PDF (361.864 KB)
|
DOI: 10.24843/JMHU.2015.v04.i02.p09
<![CDATA[One type of a criminal in the capital market is the practice of insider trading. Insider trading is an act that involves a group of insider in the capital market who deliberately exploit information that has not been released to investors with the advantages. In insider trading there are two actors such as party directly as an insider who works in the company or indirect as tippee party who obtain confidential information from an insider. Tippee is the party who receives confidential information from an insider either passively or actively against the law or not against the law for personal gain in the stock trading. This is very detrimental to the investors in the stock trading. Because of that if needs the protection for investors against the actions of the Tippee. This study discusses two (2) problem first about the subject matter of the action form Tippee in insider trading to the stock at Indonesia and the second about OJK authority on legal protection for investors in case of insider trading by the Tippee in capital market activities. This research is a normative law. The Method approach is the approach of legislation, conceptual approach and comparative approach. Legal materials used are primary and secondary legal materials. Mechanical collection of legal materials is through the study of literature that further uses analysis techniques that description techniques and interpretation. The results shows that this form of action Tippee can be done actively and passively. Actively to perform an unlawful act such as stealing information. In is not trying to fight the law, but to obtain inside information and legal safeguards for investors to act with regard to insider trading Tippee do give legal certainty through legislation and legal certainty by the OJK through law enforcement]]>
<![CDATA[INTEGRASI LEMBAGA PENYELESAIAN SENGKETA ALTERNATIF DALAM PROSES ACARA PERADILAN PERDATA: STUDI TENTANG PUTUSAN PENGADILAN YANG DI MEDIASI BERDASARKAN PERMA NOMOR 1 TAHUN 2008 ]]>
<![CDATA[AAN Roy Sumardika]]>
<![CDATA[ Jurnal Magister Hukum Udayana (Udayana Master Law Journal) Vol 3 No 3 (2014) ]]>
Publisher : <![CDATA[University of Udayana ]]>
Show Abstract
|
Download Original
|
Original Source
|
Check in Google Scholar
|
Full PDF (249.894 KB)
|
DOI: 10.24843/JMHU.2014.v03.i03.p11
<![CDATA[Mediation process means dispute resolution through negotiation process for obtaining a peace agreement between the parties by using a third party in settling the dispute. Article 130 HIR/154 RBg determines peace efforts may use since the trial began before a judge hands down the dispute. Mediation as part of the Alternative Dispute Resolution is a process outside the court, but Indonesian Supreme Court Rules No. 1/2008 integrates it in the court proceedings and allows the mediation process at the level of legal remedy. So the problem investigated is the court decision re-mediated and the peace agreement mediation results. The method used normative legal research by Legislation Approach and to deepen the research study also use a Legal Concept Analysis Approach which is intended to establish a view and legal arguments in solving the problem at hand. Case that has been decided by the courts is not possible to re-mediated. The mediation process at the level of legal remedy is contrary to the law, especially the provisions of Article 130 HIR / 154 RBg. Indonesian Supreme Court Rules as rules are hierarchically under the law (HIR/RBg) not justified material being regulated substance exceeding material are governed by higher laws. So Indonesian Supreme Court Rules No. 1/2008 can not be a legal basis to regulate the integration of mediation into the docket particularly about mediation at the level of legal remedy because the principle of lex superiori derogat legi inferiori and the principle of lex specialis derogat legi generali not met.]]>
<![CDATA[KEABSAHAN PENYIDIKAN BADAN NARKOTIKA NASIONAL (BNN) ]]>
<![CDATA[Made Dwi Kurniahartawan]]>
<![CDATA[ Jurnal Magister Hukum Udayana (Udayana Master Law Journal) Vol 5 No 1 (2016) ]]>
Publisher : <![CDATA[University of Udayana ]]>
Show Abstract
|
Download Original
|
Original Source
|
Check in Google Scholar
|
Full PDF (396.724 KB)
|
DOI: 10.24843/JMHU.2016.v05.i01.p08
<![CDATA[Penelitian ini merupakan penelitian Hukum Normatif yang beranjak dari adanya kekosongan norma atau asas hukum. Kekosongan norma hukum dalam penelitian ini terdapat dalam ketentuan Pasal 6 dan lampiran golongan I, II, dan III Undang-Undang Nomor 35 Tahun 2009 tentang Narkotika. Narkotika New Psikoaktif Substances (NPS) belum diatur dalam daftar berbagai jenis golongan serta turunannya dalam ketentuan Undang-undang Nomor 35 Tahun 2009 tentang Narkotika juncto Peraturan Pemerintah Nomor 44 Tahun 2010 Tentang Prekursor Narkotika. Narkotika New Psikoatif Substances (NPS) salah satu jenisnya terdapat dalam kasus Raffi Ahmad. Penelitian ini juga membahas keabsahan penyidikan Badan Narkotika Nasional (BNN) dalam tindak pidana narkotika dikaji berdasarkan Keputusan Presiden Nomor 23 Tahun 2010 tentang Badan Narkotika Nasional. Pendekatan yang digunakan adalah pendekatan perundang-undangan, pendekatan analitis & konseptual hukum dan pendekatan kasus. Kesimpulan dari penelitian ini adalah keabsahan kewenangan penyidikan Badan Narkotika Nasional (BNN) dalam tindak pidana narkotika adalah tidak sah karena Badan Narkotika Nasional dibentuk berdasarkan Keputusan Presiden Nomor 23 Tahun 2010 dengan mengacu pada Pasal 149 UU Nomor 35 Tahun 2009 tentang Narkotika. Keabsahan wewenang penyidikan Badan Narkotika Nasional (BNN) dalam kasus Raffi Ahmad adalah tidak sah dan tidak bisa dipertanggungjawabkan secara pidana karena tidak terpenuhinya unsur pertanggung jawaban pidana khususnya unsur-unsur obyektif yakni perbuatannya dapat dihukum karena tidak diatur secara tegas dalam ketentuan undang-undang dan bertentangan dengan asas legalitas.]]>
<![CDATA[KLHS SEBAGAI BENTUK INTEGRASI PRINSIP PEMBANGUNAN BERKELANJUTAN DALAM PERENCANAAN TATA RUANG WILAYAH ]]>
<![CDATA[I Gusti Ayu Jatiana Manik wedanti]]>
<![CDATA[ Jurnal Magister Hukum Udayana (Udayana Master Law Journal) Vol 5 No 3 (2016) ]]>
Publisher : <![CDATA[University of Udayana ]]>
Show Abstract
|
Download Original
|
Original Source
|
Check in Google Scholar
|
Full PDF (395.592 KB)
|
DOI: 10.24843/JMHU.2016.v05.i03.p09
<![CDATA[Strategic Environmental Assessment (SEA) is used as the first instrument in the provisions of Article 14 of Law No. 32 of 2009 on the Protection and Environmental Management is based on a consideration that environmental degradation causality generally across the regions and between sectors. However, the SEA is only integrated in the instrument spatial plan. The issue here is what is the relationship between the SEA with Spatial in relation to the establishment of policies, plans and programs Spatial plan and whether SEA is a form of integration of sustainable development principles in the preparation or evaluation of policies, plans and programs of the layout. Using the method of normative legal research through an approach to legislation and approach to the concept, it can be concluded that the SEA and spatial planning are complementary to each other as well as the SEA be one of the instruments that help improve framework spatial planning to address environmental problems. SEA is also a form of integration of sustainable development principles in any preparation and / or evaluation of policies, plans and / or development programs, especially in spatial planning. Kajian Lingkungan Hidup Strategis (KLHS) digunakan sebagai instrument pertama dalam ketentuan Pasal 14 Undang-Undang No. 32 Tahun 2009 Tentang Perlindungan dan Pengelolaan Lingkungan Hidup didasarkan pada suatu pertimbangan bahwa degradasi lingkungan hidup umumnya bersifat kausalitas lintas wilayah dan antar sektor. Namun demikian, KLHS hanya terintegrasi dengan instrumen rencana tata ruang wilayah. Permasalahannya disini adalah apa hubungan antara KLHS dengan Tata Ruang dalam kaitannya dengan pembentukan kebijakan, rencana dan program rencana RTRW dan apakah KLHS merupakan bentuk integrasi prinsip pembangunan berkelanjutan dalam penyusunan atau evaluasi kebijakan, rencana dan program tata ruang. Menggunakan metode penelitian hukum normatif melalui pendekatan perundangan-undangan dan pendekatan konsep maka dapat disimpulkan bahwa KLHS dengan tata ruang bersifat saling melengkapi satu sama lain serta KLHS menjadi salah satu instrumen yang membantu memperbaiki kerangka pikir perencanaan tata ruang wilayah untuk mengatasi persoalan lingkungan hidup. KLHS juga merupakan bentuk integrasi prinsip pembangunan berkelanjutan dalam setiap penyusunan dan/atau evaluasi kebijakan,rencana dan/atau program pembangunan khususnya dalam tata ruang.]]>
<![CDATA[Gugatan Pihak Ketiga Terhadap Eksekusi Barang Sitaan dalam Perkara Tindak Pidana Korupsi ]]>
<![CDATA[Tedhy Widodo]]>
<![CDATA[ Jurnal Magister Hukum Udayana (Udayana Master Law Journal) Vol 7 No 2 (2018) ]]>
Publisher : <![CDATA[University of Udayana ]]>
Show Abstract
|
Download Original
|
Original Source
|
Check in Google Scholar
|
Full PDF (267.31 KB)
|
DOI: 10.24843/JMHU.2018.v07.i02.p08
<![CDATA[The criminal act of corruption is a financial and humanitarian crime that harms the state and reduces the people's right to better access to welfare. The settlement of corruption cases often involves many parties, including good third parties related to the evidence seized by the Prosecutor. Judgments in judicial practice still cause new problems. The Panel of Judges imposed a crime in the form of appropriation of property in the control of a well-intentioned third party. The purpose of this paper is to examine the legal status of a third party who has good faith in the execution of confiscated goods in the case of corruption and the role of the prosecutor in a third-party lawsuit related to the execution of confiscated goods in the case of corruption. The research method used is normative legal research with statutes approach and case approach. The study indicates that the legal measures that can be done by a good third party against the confiscated objects in the case of corruption must be in accordance with Article 19 of the Anti-Corruption Eradication Act. The role of the public prosecutor in a civil case is not a public prosecutor or executor but in a lawsuit as a State Attorney Attorney under Article 30 Paragraph (2) of Law Number 16 Year 2004 regarding the Attorney General of the Republic of Indonesia. Tindak pidana korupsi adalah kejahatan keuangan dan kemanusiaan yang merugikan negara dan mengurangi hak rakyat untuk mendapat akses kesejahteraan yang lebih baik. Penyelesaian perkara tindak pidana korupsi seringkali melibatkan banyak pihak, termasuk pihak ketiga yang beritikad baik terkait dengan barang bukti yang disita oleh Penuntut Umum. Putusan-putusan dalam praktek peradilan masih menimbulkan masalah baru. Majelis Hakim menjatuhkan pidana berupa perampasan harta dalam penguasaan pihak ketiga yang beritikad baik. Tujuan penulisan ini untuk mengkaji kedudukan hukum pihak ketiga yang beritikad baik dalam eksekusi barang sitaan dalam perkara tindak pidana korupsi dan peranan jaksa dalam gugatan pihak ketiga terkait eksekusi barang sitaan dalam perkara tindak pidana korupsi. Metode penelitian yang digunakan adalah penelitian hukum normatif dengan pendekatan perundang-undangan dan pendekatan kasus. Hasil studi menunjukkan bahwa Upaya Hukum yang dapat dilakukan oleh pihak ketiga yang beritikad baik terhadap benda sitaan dalam perkara tindak pidana korupsi harus sesuai dengan Pasal 19 Undang-undang Pemberantasan Tindak Pidana Korupsi. Peran jaksa dalam perkara perdata bukan sebagai penuntut umum atau eksekutor akan tetapi dalam perkara gugatan sebagai Jaksa Pengacara Negara berdasarkan Pasal 30 Ayat (2) Undang-undang Nomor 16 Tahun 2004 tentang Kejaksaan Republik Indonesia.]]>
<![CDATA[KEKUATAN MENGIKAT PERJANJIAN NOMINEE DALAM PENGUASAAN HAK MILIK ATAS TANAH ]]>
<![CDATA[I Wayan Werasmana Sancaya]]>
<![CDATA[ Jurnal Magister Hukum Udayana (Udayana Master Law Journal) Vol 2 No 3 (2013) ]]>
Publisher : <![CDATA[University of Udayana ]]>
Show Abstract
|
Download Original
|
Original Source
|
Check in Google Scholar
|
Full PDF (206.64 KB)
|
DOI: 10.24843/JMHU.2013.v02.i03.p10
<![CDATA[Nominee Agreement or trustee is an agreement that use authority which is used the name of Indonesian residents name and the Indonesian residents give power of attorney to the foreigner to make them do an legal act towards their land. Nominee agreement often called with representation or borrowed name,depend on the letter of statement or power of attorney that made by both of the side, foreigner borrow names from Indonesian to be written as the land’s owner on the certificate, but then the Indonesian depend on the deed of declaration they have made ignore that the real owner of the land and its authorization do or represented to that foreigner. The validity and power of binding the nominee agreement is can’t be separated from clause 1320 and clause 1338 KUHPerdata. If the nominee agreement already notice ang fulfill the legitimate reguirement of the agreement based on clause 132 KUHPerdata and based on 1338 KUHPerdata, so that nominee agreement already have the binding power to every sides. Based on the principle of Pacta Sund Servanda, the agreement that is made by every sides, include nominee agreement has a binding power such as law for them who have made it.]]>
<![CDATA[PEMBERIAN DANA DESA KEPADA DESA ADAT DI BALI ]]>
<![CDATA[Ni Putu Wilda Karismawati]]>
<![CDATA[ Jurnal Magister Hukum Udayana (Udayana Master Law Journal) Vol 4 No 3 (2015) ]]>
Publisher : <![CDATA[University of Udayana ]]>
Show Abstract
|
Download Original
|
Original Source
|
Check in Google Scholar
|
Full PDF (357.835 KB)
|
DOI: 10.24843/JMHU.2015.v04.i03.p10
<![CDATA[There are two types of villages in government system of Bali Province, these are the OfficialVillage and the Customary Village. The Financial division of these two Villages in Bali isexpected to be regulated fairly because those two villages are recognized their existences,otherwise the provision of rural funding must also be given to these two villages. Nevertheless,the Regulation of Minister of Domestic Affairs No. 113 Year 2014 concerning on FinancialManagement does not regulate the usage of funds for the Customary Village.This study applied research of normative law that beganl. From the void norm in theprovision of rural funds to the Customary Villages in Bali. Thus, the result of this researchis the provision of rural funds to the Customary Village based on the Regulation of theMinister of Domestic Affairs No. 37 year 2007 concerning on Guidelines for Rural FinancialManagement and Regulation of Minister of Rural Affairs No. 5 year 2015 about Priority ofVillage Fund Usage year 2015. Meanwhile the responsibility is undertaken by the CustomaryVillage which the funds were transferred first to Village Revenues and ExpendituresBudget (APBDes) of Oficial Village, therefore the Customary Village are obliged to makeResponsibility Report (SPJ) in each use of funds.]]>
<![CDATA[PEMBERLAKUAN ASAS RETROAKTIF DALAM PEMBERANTASAN TINDAK PIDANA KORUPSI ]]>
<![CDATA[I MADE ADI SERAYA]]>
<![CDATA[ Jurnal Magister Hukum Udayana (Udayana Master Law Journal) Vol 2 No 1 (2013) ]]>
Publisher : <![CDATA[University of Udayana ]]>
Show Abstract
|
Download Original
|
Original Source
|
Check in Google Scholar
|
Full PDF (149.442 KB)
|
DOI: 10.24843/JMHU.2013.v02.i01.p01
<![CDATA[The study entitled, "The implementation of the retroactive principle in fighting against corruption". The background of this research was derive from the fact that corruption is an extraordinary crime that needs an extra way against it. The formation of Corruption Eradication Commission (KPK) as an independent agency in the form of eradicating corruption in Indonesia has gradually demonstrated its role. But, Problems then occur when the citizen force KPK to handle the corruption cases before this constitution constructed, especially BLBI case which made this state inflict a financial loss about Rp 138,4 trillions happen during the 1997-1998. From the background it raised an issue, whether the retroactive principle can be applied by the Commission in the investigation, and prosecution of the perpetrators of corruption that occurred before the enactment of Law No. 30 Year 2002 was made on the Corruption Eradication Commission? In this discussion the retroactive principle can be applied by the Commission in making "a series of actions" which make it able to conduct an investigation and prosecution of the perpetrators of corruption despite they occurred before Law. 30 of 2002 on the Corruption Eradication Commission enacted. Besides confirming that the application of this principle is that corruption is a crime classified as an extraordinary crime which has wide negative effects to the country.]]>
