Garuda - Garba Rujukan Digital

Article Per Year (5 Year)

All

JURNAL MAGISTER HUKUM UDAYANA

jmhu
Website

Published by Universitas Udayana

ISSN : 25023101 EISSN : 2302528X DOI : -

Core Subject : Social,

Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice

Jurnal Magister Hukum Udayana adalah jurnal ilmiah hukum yang mempublikasikan hasil kajian bidang hukum yang diterbitkan secara online empat kali setahun (Februari-Mei-Agustus-Nopember). Redaksi menerima tulisan yang berupa hasil kajian yang berasal dari penelitian hukum dalam berbagai bidang ilmu hukum yang belum pernah dipublikasikan serta orisinal. Jurnal ini selain memuat tulisan / kajian dari para pakar ilmu hukum (dosen, guru besar, praktisi dan lain-lain.) juga memuat tulisan mahasiswa Magister Ilmu Hukum baik yang merupakan bagian dari penulisan tesis maupun kajian lainnya yang orisinal. Tulisan yang masuk ke Redaksi akan diseleksi dan direview untuk dapat dimuat

Arjuna Subject : -

Articles 664 Documents

22 23 24 25 26

Pertanggungjawaban Pidana Perusahaan Teknologi atas Tindak Pidana Kecelakaan Lalu Lintas oleh Pengemudi Ojek Online Ratna Kumala Sari; Nyoman Serikat Putra Jaya
Jurnal Magister Hukum Udayana (Udayana Master Law Journal) Vol 8 No 1 (2019)
Publisher : University of Udayana

Act No. 22 the year 2009 about Lalu Lintas dan Angkutan Jalan (road traffic and transportation) raises perspectives in criminal law regarding criminal liability for public transportation companies. Furthermore, it raises problems on how criminal liability of technology companies for traffic accidents and how law enforcement practice. The purpose of this study is to analyze and describe the criminal liability of technology companies for traffic accident by online motorcycle taxi drivers and for criticizing law enforcement. Normative research methods will be used to answer the problem. There are two approaches to assess the problem, namely case approach the and law approach. The conclusion is that technology companies can be criminally accounted for by the vicarious liability perspective and the Road Traffic and Transportation Act. Undang-Undang No. 22 Tahun 2009 tentang Lalu Lintas dan Angkutan Jalan (UULLAJ) memunculkan perspektif dalam hukum pidana menyangkut pertanggungjawaban pidana bagi perusahaan angkutan umum. Selanjutnya memunculkan permasalahan mengenai bagaimana pertanggungjawaban pidana perusahaan teknologi atas tindak pidana kecelakaan lalu lintas dan bagaimana praktek penegakan hukumnya. Tujuan penelitian ini untuk menganalisis dan mendeskripsikan mengenai pertanggungjawaban pidana perusahaan teknologi atas tindak pidana kecelakaan lalu lintas oleh pengemudi ojek online dan untuk mengkritisi penegakan hukumnya. Metode penelitian normatif yang akan digunakan untuk menjawab permasalahan ini. Terdapat dua pendekatan untuk mengkaji permasalahan ini yaitu pendekatan kasus dan pendekatan undang-undang. Dari hasil pembahasan dapat disimpulkan bahwa perusahaan teknologi dapat dipertanggungjawabkan secara pidana dengan perspektif vicarious liability dan Undang-Undang Lalu Lintas dan Angkutan Jalan.

PELANGGARAN MEREK TERKENAL DAN PERLINDUNGAN HUKUM BAGI PEMEGANG HAK DALAM PERSPEKTIF PARIS CONVENTION, TRIPS AGREEMENT DAN UU MEREK INDONESIA Dayu Windari
Jurnal Magister Hukum Udayana (Udayana Master Law Journal) Vol 3 No 3 (2014)
Publisher : University of Udayana

Legal protection for well-known mark owner is important to study because many well-known mark have been infringed domestically and internationaly causing damage to the well-known mark owner. This research discusses 2 (two) main issues namely the legal protection for well-known mark owner and legal action and sanctions imposed against to the infringer by the Paris Convention, TRIPs Agreement and Indonesia Trademark Law. This research applies normative research method. Meanwhile the approach method use statute approach method and comparative approach method which is compares The Paris Convention, TRIPs Agreement and Indonesia Trademark Law regarding the protection of well-known mark. Analysis technique use qualitative analysis. The study shows, from the perspective of the Paris Convention, TRIPs Agreement and Indonesia Trademark Law, well-known mark owner have legal protection in the form of exclusive rights through registration process to obtain legal certainty. When well-known mark infringement occured, the legal action can be done are litigation and non litigation process. The form of legal sanction are payment of compensation and criminal sanction, determined by each member state but still refer to the provisions of the Paris Convention and TRIPs Agreement. However, Indonesia set up more details about the sanctions that can be imposed for the infringemer in the form of penalties or criminal sanction ranging from 4 (four) to 5(five) years and a fine of Rp. 800.000.000 up to Rp. 1.000.000.000

PERLINDUNGAN HUKUM TERHADAP REKAM MEDIS PASIEN DI RUMAH SAKIT Made Dwi Mariani
Jurnal Magister Hukum Udayana (Udayana Master Law Journal) Vol 4 No 2 (2015)
Publisher : University of Udayana

Patient as consumers of health service have rights one of the rights is the state of the patients health is being concealed forever including medical data and medical records. Regarding to that, hospital as the health care provider obliged to provide legal protection to all kind of information in the medical record to the possibility of loss of information, data falsification or used by the undue. Based on that, the problem to be studied is: how is the medical record management in the hospital? And how is the medical record legal protection, which is given by the hospital? This study use normative legal research with statue approach. All of the legal resources based on library research and supported by primary and secondary legal material. Legal research analysis technique in this study use descriptive technique. The study result showed that the medical record management in the hospital have to based on health minister regulation 269/MENKES/PER/III/2008 about medical records. The management of medical record started from the time patient came to the hospital with record all action that given to the patient until all the treatment completed. The data and information on the medical record, hospital has an obligation of giving legal protection about the confidentiality based on Articles 10 health minister regulation 269/MENKES/PER/III/2008 with form of preventive and repressive protection.

TANGGUNG GUGAT DEBITUR ATAS JAMINAN FIDUSIA DALAM BENTUK BENDA PERSEDIAAN DAN KETERKAITANNYA DENGAN AKTA JAMINAN FIDUSIA Kezia Damayanti Aron
Jurnal Magister Hukum Udayana (Udayana Master Law Journal) Vol 6 No 3 (2017)
Publisher : University of Udayana

In the implementation of the assesment of fiduciary collateral on the inventory goods begins with the making of a credit agreement as the main agreement which is continued with the making of additional agreements called as/known as/namely Act of Fiduciary and registration of fiduciary assurance at the fiduciary registration office. With the registration of fiduciary assurance, fiduciary certificates come out as collateral for creditors. The registration of fiduciary assurance gives the creditor preference rights compare to other creditors including in the case where the debtor declared bankrupt. In the fiduciary assurance of inventory there are some obstacles that may be seen as disadvantage for the creditor, among others, proof of ownership is not strong and inventory goods are fast moving products which are easy to be move around so that debtors who do not have good faith can do fraud and other things that can be disadvantage forcreditors. Therefore, in reference to these risks, it is necessary to have several clauses in the Act of Fiduciary which can guarantee legal certainty for creditors against fiduciary assurance of inventory items. Di dalam pelaksanaan pembebanan jaminan fidusia atas benda persediaan diawali dengan dibuatnya perjanjian kredit sebagai perjanjian pokok yang kemudian dilanjutkan dengan pembuatan perjanjian tambahan yaitu akta jaminan fidusia dan pendaftaran jaminan fidusia di kantor pendaftaran fidusia. Dengan didaftarnya jaminan fidusia maka keluarlah sertipikat fidusia sebagai jaminan bagi kreditor. Pendaftaran jaminan fidusia memberikan hak preferen kepada kreditor terhadap kreditor-kreditor lainnya termasuk dalam hal debitor dinyatakan pailit. Dalam Jaminan fidusia atas benda persediaan mengalami beberapa kendala yang dapat merugikan kreditor, antara lain bukti kepemilikan tidak kuat dan benda persediaan merupakan barang bergerak yang mudah dipindah-pindahkan sehingga debitor yang tidak mempunyai itikad baik dapat melakukan kecurangan dan hal-hal lain yang dapat merugikan kreditor. Maka merujuk pada risiko tersebut, perlu adanya klausul-klausul yang dapat menjamin kepastian hukum bagi kreditor terhadap jaminan fidusia benda persediaan.

Kepatuhan Wajib Pajak Kendaraan Bermotor: Studi Kritis Empiris di Daerah Khusus Istimewa Jakarta Maulana Ghiffahri Jainuri
Jurnal Magister Hukum Udayana (Udayana Master Law Journal) Vol 8 No 3 (2019)
Publisher : University of Udayana

Based on DKI Jakarta Regulation No. 2 Of 2015 On Vehicle Tax, the rider obligate to pay taxes to the Government of DKI Jakarta, All specifications are at different law including the payment method. While the laws are changing year to year depending on markets, is that what called infectivity of law. Unplumming of the rate of people paying taxes in DKI Jakarta makes governor have amnesty such as a free fine to those paying taxes. The purpose of this research is to bring you an insight of the unscattered regulations in DKI Jakarta on vehicle tax. As if we can get you through this research, we may give you some clue on how good to pay taxes. This research uses the statue approach and comparative approach. Statue approach is used to deliberate the laws systematically while comparative approach makes you slide on to Singapore tax law/policy regarding vehicle tax. The result of this research found that the laws of DKI Jakarta on vehicle tax are overlapping while the toughness of mechanism and doubled-penalty Singaporean would have as if doesn’t pay taxes. Berdasarkan Peraturan Daerah Ibukota Jakarta Nomor 2 Tahun 2015 atas Perubahan Peraturan daerah Nomor 8 Tahun 2010 tentang Pajak Kendaraan Bermotor pengendara wajib membayar pajak sesuai dengan jenis kendaraan masing-masing kepada pemerintah daerah DKI Jakarta. Ketentuan mengenai besaran tarif erta mekanisme pembayaran dapat dilihat di dalam peraturan yang berbeda. Adapun aturan hukum terkait dengan pajak kendaraan bermotor selalu berubah tiap tahunnya, mengikuti dinamika pasar yang ada. Apakah hal ini dapat dikatakan sebagai inefektivitas hukum. rendahnya warga DKI Jakarta membuat aparat penegak memberikan “amnesty” kepada para wajib pajak, diantaranya pemotongan denda secara berkala. Tujuan studi ini bertujuan untuk memberikan pandangan terkait dengan fenomena tumpang-tindih peraturan pajak kendaraan bermotor yang berada di wilayah DKI Jakarta, sehingga dapat memberikan pandangan secara komprehensif terhadap masyarakat selaku wajib pajak untuk membayar pajak. Studi ini menggunakan penelitian yuridis normatif dengan melakukan pendekatan perundang-undangan (statue approach) dan pendekatan perbandingan hukum (comparative approach). Adapun dalam statue approach akan dijabarkan secara sistematis dan komprehensif akan peraturan pajak kendaraan bermotor DKI Jakarta. Sedangkan akan dilakukan perbandingan hukum terhadap Undang-Undang Pajak Singapura untuk kemudian dilihat akan lapisan tiap-tiap aturan hukum pajak. Hasil studi menemukan rendahnya ketaatan bayar pajak di DKI Jakarta serta adanya overlapping diantara aturan. Sementara di Singapura ditemukan kewajiban penalti yang tinggi bagi wajib pajak apabila tidak membayar dan mekanisme serta biaya yang tinggi untuk mendapatkan hak milik atas kendaraan.

PENGAWASAN NOTARIS OLEH MAJELIS PENGAWAS NOTARIS DAERAH PASCA PUTUSAN M.K.NO. 49/PUU-X/2012 Dewa Nyoman Rai Asmara Putra; Sagung Putri M.E Purwani
Jurnal Magister Hukum Udayana (Udayana Master Law Journal) Vol 5 No 4 (2016)
Publisher : University of Udayana

Undang-Undang Jabatan Notaris (UUJN) No 30 Tahun 2014, pengawasan notaris dilakukan oleh Menteri, dan kata pengawasan di dalamnya termasuk juga mengenai pembinaan. Untuk melaksanakan tugas dimaksud oleh menteri, dalam hal ini Menteri Hukum dan Hak Asasi Manusia dibentuk Majelis Pengawas Notaris, yaitu suatu badan yang mempunyai kewenangan dan kewajiban untuk melakukan pengawasan dan pembinaan terhadap notaris. Pasal 66 ayat (1) UUJN menentukan: Untuk kepentingan proses peradilan, penyidik, penuntut umum, mengambil fotokopi minuta akta dan/atau surat-surat yang dilekatkan dalam minuta akta atau protokol notaris, serta pemanggilan notaris untuk hadir dalam pemeriksaan berkaitan dengan akta yang dibuatnya, atau protokol notaris, dengan persetujuan MPD. Mahkamah Konstitusi dalam putusan nya Nomor 49/PUU-X/2012, menyatakan frase “dengan persetujuan Majelis Pengawas Daerah” pada Pasal 66 UUJN, adalah bertentangan dengan UUD 1945 dan tidak mempunyai kekuatan hukum. Permasalahan yuridis nya adalah: Apa saja wewenang MPD pasca putusan MK No. 49/PUU-X/2012 ? dan Bagaimana mekanisme pemeriksaan notaris oleh MPD? Dengan jenis penelitian hukum normatif permasalahan tersebut terjawab, bahwa Tugas dan wewenang MPD pasca Putusan MK. No. 49/PUU-X/2012 hanya untuk melakukan pemeriksaan berkala dan/atau jika dipandang perlu, serta melakukan pemeriksaan notaris jika ada pengaduan dari masyarakat. Tugas dan kewenangan notaris sebagaimana Pasal 66 UUJN, berdasarkan No. 2 Tahun 2014 sebagai UU Perubahan atas UUJN dilakukan oleh Majelis Kehormatan Notaris. Mengenai mekanisme pemeriksaan Notaris harus dilakukan sesuai dengan UUJN Nomor 30 Tahun 2004, UU Per UUJN No 2 Tahun 2014, Peraturan Menteri Hukum dan Hak Asasi Manusia Republik Indonesia Nomor M.02.PR.08.10 Tahun 2004 Tentang Tata Cara Pengangkatan Anggota, Pemberhentian Anggota, Susunan Organisasi, Tata Kerja, Dan Tata Cara Pemeriksaan Notaris; dan Keputusan Menteri Hukum Dan Hak Asasi Manusia Republik Indonesia No. M.39-PW.07.10 Tahun 2004 Tentang Pedoman Pelaksanaan Tugas Majelis Pengawas Notaris. The Law on Position of Notary (UUJN) No 30 Year 2014, the supervision of a notary is conducted by the Minister, and the supervisory word in it also includes the guidance. To carry out the duties referred to by the minister, in this case the Minister of Justice and Human Rights established the Supervisory Board of Notary, which is an agency having the authority and obligation to conduct supervision and guidance on the notary. Article 66 Paragraph (1) UUJN determines: For the purposes of the judicial process, investigators, prosecutors, taking photocopies of minas deeds and / or letters embedded in minority deed or notary protocols, and notarial notes to be present in the examination relating to the deeds they make , Or notary protocol, with the approval of the MPD. The Constitutional Court in its decision No. 49 / PUU-X / 2012 states that the phrase "with the approval of the Regional Supervisory Board" in Article 66 UUJN, is contradictory to the 1945 Constitution and has no legal force. The juridical issue is: What are the powers of the MPD after the Constitutional Court's decision No. 49 / PUU-X / 2012? And What is the mechanism of notary examination by MPD? With this type of normative legal research the problem is answered, that the task and authority of the MPD after the Constitutional Court Decision. No. 49 / PUU-X / 2012 only to conduct periodic and / or deemed necessary inspections and to conduct a notary examination if there is a complaint from the public. Duties and authorities of a notary as referred to in Article 66 UUJN, based on No. 2 of 2014 as Law on Amendment of UUJN is conducted by the Honorary Board of Notary. Regarding the mechanism of inspection of a Notary must be done in accordance with UUJN Number 30 Year 2004, UU Per UUJN No 2 Year 2014, Regulation of the Minister of Justice and Human Rights of the Republic of Indonesia Number M.02.PR.08.10 Year 2004 About Procedures for Member Appointment, Dismissal of Members, Organizational Structure, Work Procedures, and Procedure of Notary Inspection; And Decree of the Minister of Justice and Human Rights of the Republic of Indonesia No. M.39-PW.07.10 of 2004 on Guidelines for the Implementation of Duties of the Notary Supervisory Board.

Penetapan Asas Kearifan Lokal Sebagai Kebijakan Pidana dalam Pengelolaan Lingkungan Hidup di Aceh Muhammad Natsir; Andi Rachmad
Jurnal Magister Hukum Udayana (Udayana Master Law Journal) Vol 7 No 4 (2018)
Publisher : University of Udayana

Aceh is a special autonomous region that was established based on Law Number 11 of 2006 concerning the Government of Aceh. Based on the regulation, Aceh was given specialization in the implementation of Islamic shari'a. One of them is environmental management as stipulated in Aceh Qanun Number 2 of 2011 concerning Environmental Management (PLH). The principle of environmental management in Aceh is specifically based on local wisdom, including in the implementation of a settlement of environmental crime. In the Islamic Shari'a, there are several methods for resolving criminal cases, namely diyat, sayam and suloh (peace). The purpose of this study was to explain the criminal law policy adopted in the PLH Qanun. The next objective of this research was that the Qanun for environmental management could adopt adopting the principles of local wisdom in Aceh. This study uses a normative legal research method with a statutory approach. The results of the study that the PLH Qanun made local wisdom a part of the substance of the Qanun. Local wisdom that must be adopted is diyat or dheit and sayam and Suloh (peace) as a dispute resolution technique that can be considered in resolving environmental disputes in Aceh. Aceh adalah daerah otonomi khusus yang ditetapkan berdasarkan Undang-Undang Nomor 11 Tahun 2006 tentang Pemerintahan Aceh. Berdasarkan regulasi tersebut, Aceh diberikan kekhususan dalam pelaksanaan syari’at Islam. Salah satunya adalah pengelolaan lingkungan hidup yang diatur dalam Qanun Aceh Nomor 2 Tahun 2011 tentang Pengelolaan Lingkungan Hidup (PLH). Asas pengelolaan lingkungan hidup di Aceh dikhususkan berbasis kearifan lokal, termasuk dalam penerapan penyelesaian tindak pidana lingkungan. Dalam syari’at Islam dikenal beberapa metode penyelesaian perkara pidana yaitu diyat, sayam dan suloh (perdamaian). Tujuan Penelitian ini adalah untuk menjelaskan mengenai kebijakan hukum pidana yang dianut di dalam Qanun PLH Tujuan selanjutnya penelitian ini adalah agar Qanun pengelolaan lingkungan hidup dapat mengadopsi mengadopsi asas kearifan lokal di Aceh. Studi ini menggunakan metode penelitian hukum normatif dengan pendekatan peraturan perundang-undangan. Hasil penelitian bahwa Qanun PLH menjadikan kearifan lokal sebagai bagian dari substansi Qanun tersebut. Kearifan lokal yang harus diadopsi adalah diyat atau dheit dan sayam serta Suloh (perdamaian) sebagai teknik penyelesaian sengketa yang dapat dipertimbangkan dalam penyelesaian sengketa lingkungan hidup di Aceh.

VONIS SANKSI PIDANA TAMBAHAN OLEH HAKIM BERUPA PENGEMBALIAN KERUGIAN KEUANGAN NEGARA OLEH TERPIDANA TINDAK PIDANA KORUPSI DI PENGADILAN NEGERI DENPASAR I Ketut Rai Setiabudhi
Jurnal Magister Hukum Udayana (Udayana Master Law Journal) Vol 3 No 2 (2014)
Publisher : University of Udayana

Corruption in Indonesia has been so severed and widespread in thecommunity and very alarming, its development continues to increase from year toyear, both in number of cases and the amount of state financial losses and interms of quality. These criminal offenses commit more systematic and scope intoall aspects of life, Starting from lower level of the dominant and state officials orlaw enforcement. Judge in imposing sanctions not only imprisonment and alsofined an additional punishment, including the return of financial loss to the stateby state corruption, as well as some Denpasar District Court and the Court ofCriminal Acts of Corruption (TIPIKOR) Denpasar. Legal basis of corruption inthe judicial process is used by judges Act NO: 31 Jo Act 1999 NO: 20 of 2001 onEradication of Corruption.

PERANAN SIDIK JARI DALAM MENGUNGKAP PELAKU TINDAK PIDANA DI TINGKAT PENYELIDIKAN POLDA BALI Made Gede Arthadana
Jurnal Magister Hukum Udayana (Udayana Master Law Journal) Vol 4 No 4 (2015)
Publisher : University of Udayana

The scientific paper entitled fingerprint role in uncovering criminal investigation at Polda Bali. The method used is the method of empirical research with normative and empirical approaches, legal materials used are the primary legal materials do research at Polda Bali and secondary legal materials using literature and official documents. The investigation by the police is to obtain the truth based on actual facts. One of the investigation conducted by the police using fingerprint identification. Fingerprints have two properties namely latent fingerprint and a real fingerprint. Methods fingerprints obtained by gathering evidence at crime scenes. But the weakness of the fingerprint that is easily damaged and quickly disappear, therefore the police must stand guard the crime scene in order to collect fingerprint evidence.

PERJANJIAN BAKU DALAM JUAL BELI KREDIT SEPEDA MOTOR DITINJAU DARI UNDANG-UNDANG NOMOR 8 TAHUN 1999 Anak Agung Adi Lestari
Jurnal Magister Hukum Udayana (Udayana Master Law Journal) Vol 5 No 2 (2016)
Publisher : University of Udayana

The title of this legal writing is standard agreemant in motorcycle sale-purchase credit based on Law No. 8 of 1999. This writing has a background on the development of technologies that helps humans more easily to fulfill the porpuse in their lives. This is about transportations means of motorcycle. The various types of vehicles to be marketed provide a portion of the position in the agreemant. One of the agreements can be seen in the field of motorcycle sale-purchases credit which become increasingly importantand a agreement is needed so that there is a legal certainty for the purchas. In a sale-pruchase agreement, there is a standard agreemant often used by business people to make a profit. In this case the party much involved with accountability is the consumer, i.e as and user of goods and services has a powerless position against the standard agreement given by the business people. In this case the business propietors are given the operating restriction and liability for losses suffered by consumers which are poured into the prevailing legislations. The method in this study used empirical methods. The legal protection on consumers in motorcycle sale-purchase credits is guided by the Law No. 8 of 1999, which regulates the rights and obligations of consumers and business people. The application of standard agreements in motorcycle sale-purchase credit must be in accordance with the Consumer Protection Act. Adapun judul penulisan hukum ini adalah perjanjian baku dalam jual beli kredit sepeda motor ditinjau dari Undang-Undang Nomor 8 Tahun 1999 . Penulisan ini memiliki latar mengenai perkembangan teknologi yang telah manusia semakin mudah memenuhi tujuannya dalam hidupnya. Hal ini mengenai alat transportasi sepeda motor. Adanya jenia-jenis kendaraan yang beraneka ragam dipasarkan, hal tersebut akan memberikan porsi kedudukan dalam perjanjian. Salah satu perjanjian dapat dilihat pada bidang jual beli kredit terhadap transportasi kendaraan sepeda motor semakin penting artinya suatu perjanjian diperlukan agar terdapat kepastian hukum terhadap jual beli. Dalam suatu perjanjian jual beli dikenal adanya perjanjian baku yang sering dipergunakan oleh pelaku usaha untuk memperoleh keuntungan. Hal ini pihak yang banyak terlibat dengan pertanggung jawaban adalah konsumen, yaitu sebagai pemakai terakhir barang dan jasa mempunyai kedudukan yang tidak berdaya menghadapi perjanjian baku yang di berikan oleh pengusaha. Dalam hal ini para pelaku usaha diberikan batasan serta tanggung jawab atas kerugian yang dialami oleh konsumen yang dituangkan kedalam peraturan perundang-undangan yang berlaku. Adapun metode pada penelitian hukum ini menggunakan metode empiris.Perlindungan hukum terhadap konsumen dalam jual beli kredit sepeda motor berpedoman pada Undang-Undang Nomor 8 Tahun 1999, yang mengatur tentan hak dan kewjiban konsumen dan pelaku usaha. Penerapan perjanjian baku dalam jual beli kredit sepeda motor harus sesuai dengan Undang-Undang Perlindungan konsumen.

Page 24 of 67 | Total Record : 664

22 23 24 25 26

Filter by Year

2012 2025

Filter By Issues

All Issue Vol 14 No 2 (2025) Vol 14 No 1 (2025) Vol 13 No 4 (2024) Vol 13 No 3 (2024) Vol 13 No 2 (2024) Vol 13 No 1 (2024) Vol 12 No 4 (2023) Vol 12 No 3 (2023) Vol 12 No 2 (2023) Vol 12 No 1 (2023) Vol 11 No 4 (2022) Vol 11 No 3 (2022) Vol 11 No 2 (2022) Vol 11 No 1 (2022) Vol 10 No 4 (2021) Vol 10 No 3 (2021) Vol 10 No 2 (2021) Vol 10 No 1 (2021) Vol 9 No 4 (2020) Vol 9 No 3 (2020) Vol 9 No 2 (2020) Vol 9 No 1 (2020) Vol 8 No 4 (2019) Vol 8 No 3 (2019) Vol 8 No 2 (2019) Vol 8 No 1 (2019) Vol 7 No 4 (2018) Vol 7 No 3 (2018) Vol 7 No 2 (2018) Vol 7 No 1 (2018) Vol 6 No 4 (2017) Vol 6 No 3 (2017) Vol 6 No 2 (2017) Vol 6 No 1 (2017) Vol 5 No 4 (2016) Vol 5 No 3 (2016) Vol 5 No 2 (2016) Vol 5 No 1 (2016) Vol 4 No 4 (2015) Vol 4 No 3 (2015) Vol 4 No 2 (2015) Vol 4 No 1 (2015) Vol 3 No 3 (2014) Vol 3 No 2 (2014) Vol 3 No 1 (2014) Vol 2 No 3 (2013) Vol 2 No 2 (2013) Vol 2 No 1 (2013) Vol 1 No 1 (2012) More Issue

Home Page

OAI Link

Editorial Team

Contact

Reviewer

Google Scholar

Contact Name
-

Contact Email
-

Phone
-

Journal Mail Official
-

Editorial Address
-

Location
Kota denpasar,

Bali

INDONESIA

Abstract

Abstract

Abstract

Abstract

Abstract

Abstract

Abstract

Abstract

Abstract

Abstract

Home Page

OAI Link

Editorial Team

Contact

Reviewer

Google Scholar

Contact Name -

Contact Email -

Phone -

Journal Mail Official -

Editorial Address -

Location Kota denpasar, Bali INDONESIA

Abstract

Abstract

Abstract

Abstract

Abstract

Abstract

Abstract

Abstract

Abstract

Abstract

Contact Name
-

Contact Email
-

Phone
-

Journal Mail Official
-

Editorial Address
-

Location
Kota denpasar,

Bali

INDONESIA