cover
Article Per Year (5 Year)
All
Home Page
OAI Link
Editorial Team
Contact
Reviewer
Google Scholar
Contact Name
-
Contact Email
-
Phone
-
Journal Mail Official
-
Editorial Address
-
Location
Kota denpasar,
Bali
INDONESIA
JURNAL MAGISTER HUKUM UDAYANA
Published by Universitas Udayana
ISSN : 25023101     EISSN : 2302528X     DOI : -
Core Subject : Social,
Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice
Jurnal Magister Hukum Udayana adalah jurnal ilmiah hukum yang mempublikasikan hasil kajian bidang hukum yang diterbitkan secara online empat kali setahun (Februari-Mei-Agustus-Nopember). Redaksi menerima tulisan yang berupa hasil kajian yang berasal dari penelitian hukum dalam berbagai bidang ilmu hukum yang belum pernah dipublikasikan serta orisinal. Jurnal ini selain memuat tulisan / kajian dari para pakar ilmu hukum (dosen, guru besar, praktisi dan lain-lain.) juga memuat tulisan mahasiswa Magister Ilmu Hukum baik yang merupakan bagian dari penulisan tesis maupun kajian lainnya yang orisinal. Tulisan yang masuk ke Redaksi akan diseleksi dan direview untuk dapat dimuat
Arjuna Subject : -
Articles 664 Documents
 49   50   51   52   53 
Mediation Without Giving in: Critical Analysis on The UN Convention on Mediation From The Asean Perspective Herliana Herliana
Jurnal Magister Hukum Udayana (Udayana Master Law Journal) Vol 11 No 4 (2022)
Publisher : University of Udayana

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.24843/JMHU.2022.v11.i04.p01

Abstract

The Mediation Convention is a legal instrument represents final and conclusive dispute resolution outcomes which may be recognized and enforced in accordance with international law. More than 50 countries have ratified the Convention. However, among ASEAN member countries, Indonesia, Thailand, Vietnam, Cambodia and Myanmar have not ratified it. This paper critically examines what are the legal implications and benefits of the Mediation Convention to ASEAN in the context of an integrated economic community. This study employs a normative method by doing a library research to obtain secondary data. Data collecting method uses documentary study towards relevant legal materials. The data analysis employs qualitative analysis involving grouping similar kinds of information together in categories. This research concludes that ratification of the Mediation Convention will promote international business and investment in the region. Moreover, to reap benefits of the Convention, ASEAN countries shall meet requirements as follows: supportive external condition, power balance, inclusivity, adaptation to local norm and coherence.
Tindak Pidana Korupsi oleh Pejabat Negara Perspektif Hukum Pidana Politik Anton Jaksa Trisakti; Pujiyono Pujiyono
Jurnal Magister Hukum Udayana (Udayana Master Law Journal) Vol 11 No 4 (2022)
Publisher : University of Udayana

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.24843/JMHU.2022.v11.i04.p06

Abstract

Political crimes or political criminal law in Indonesia are known in the Criminal Code, namely crimes against state security in Book Two of Chapter I. Meanwhile, the notion of political crime in Indonesia has not been explicitly defined in the legislation, giving rise to a wide understanding of the forms of political crimes. Corruption is a white-collar crime, it is necessary to study from the perspective of political criminal law whether corruption by state officials is a political crime. The purpose of this paper is to see whether a criminal act of corruption is a political crime and how is the punishment of criminal acts of corruption by state officials in the perspective of political criminal law. Normative juridical writing method with a conceptual approach. This study found that corruption by state officials is a political crime according to the categorization of the concept of political crime proposed by Dionysios Spinellis, namely crimes committed by power holders in accordance with Law Number 31 of 1999 concerning Corruption Crimes (UUTPK) Article 3 which states that the crime of corruption is a criminal act committed by a person who with the authority of his position or position is detrimental to state finances or the state economy. The punishment of a state official who commits a political crime, in this case a criminal act of corruption, may be subject to the provisions of Article 3 of the Corruption Crime Act in the form of imprisonment and/or a fine. Kejahatan politik atau hukum pidana politik di Indonesia dikenal dalam KUHP yaitu tindak pidana terhadap keemanan negara pada Buku Kedua Bab I. Sedangkan pengertian kejahatan politik di Indonesia belum didefiniskan secara eksplisit dalam perundang-undangan sehingga menimbulkan pemahaman yang begitu banyak mengenai bentuk dari kejahatan politik. Tindak Pidana Korupsi merupakan kejahatan kerah putih, maka perlu dikaji dari perspektif hukum pidana politik apakah kejatan korupsi oleh pejabat negara merupakn kejahatan politik. Tujuan penulisan ini untuk melihat apakah suatu tindak pidana korupsi merupakan kejahatan politik dan bagaimana pemidanaan terhadap tindak pidana korupsi oleh pejabat negara dalam perspektif hukum pidana politik. Metode penulisan yuridis normatif dengan pendekatan konseptual. Penelitian ini menemukan bahwa korupsi oleh pejabat negara merupakan kejahatan politik sesuai ketegorisasi konsep kejahatan politik yang dikemukan Dionysios Spinellis, yaitu kejahatan dilakukan pemegang kekuasaan sesuai dalam Undang-Undang Nomor 31 Tahun 1999 tentang Tindak Pidana Korupsi (UUTPK) Pasal 3 yang berbunyi bahwa tindak pidana korupsi merupakan suatu tindak pidana yang dilakukan oleh seseorang yang dengan kewenangan jabatan atau kedudukannya merugikan keuangan negara atau perekonomian negara. Pemidanaan terhadap pejabat negara yang melakukan tindak pidana politik dalam hal ini tindak pidana korupsi dapat dikenakan ketentuan Pasal 3 Undang-Undang Tindak Pidana Korupsi berupa pidana penjara dan/atau pidana denda.
Conflict of Interest Transactions on Equity Crowdfunding Based Funding Activities in Indonesia Anak Agung Yuka Taurusia Eny; Made Cinthya Puspita Shara
Jurnal Magister Hukum Udayana (Udayana Master Law Journal) Vol 11 No 4 (2022)
Publisher : University of Udayana

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.24843/JMHU.2022.v11.i04.p02

Abstract

This research aims to understand the difference between transactions in equity crowdfunding and transactions in the capital market and to determine the urgency of managing the risk of conflict of interest in equity crowdfunding transactions. The method used in this research is normative legal research with a statute approach that is relevant to the object of research and an analytical approach. The resulst of the research conducted a conclusion that in fact equity crowdfunding is part of the capital market, but there are differences in substance that cause both of them to face different mechanisms and risks of implementing financing activities. POJK No. 57/POJK.04/2020 has not fully accommodated the legal needs related to the risk of conflict of interest in the equity crowdfunding sector as Law Number 8 of 1995 regarding the Capital Market has regulated the conflict of interest in the capital market sector.
Legal Certainty of Implementing Telemedicine Services in Indonesia as Effort Towards Renewal of National Health Law Yussy Adelina Mannas; Siska Elvandari
Jurnal Magister Hukum Udayana (Udayana Master Law Journal) Vol 11 No 4 (2022)
Publisher : University of Udayana

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.24843/JMHU.2022.v11.i04.p07

Abstract

Digital health services are carried out without direct interaction between doctors and patients, where patients only need to consult with doctors in virtual rooms, such as through electronic media and social media, known as Telemedicine. Apart from the hope that telemedicine promises various conveniences and opportunities so that it can be used as a solution in overcoming health problems, it is also realized that telemedicine brings potential legal problems in medical practice. Many of the legal implications of medicolegal telemedicine Other important aspects are the doctor-patient relationship, standard of care and informed consent. The formulation of the problem that will be raised in this study, namely: First, how is the legal certainty of the regulation of telemedicine services in terms of the laws and regulations in the field of health law in Indonesia? and Second, what is the concept of the right telemedicine regulation in the provision of health services based on the principle of legal certainty in Indonesia? The purpose of this research is to find out the legal certainty regarding the regulation of telemedicine services in Indonesia, and to find out the concept of the right telemedicine regulation based on the principle of legal certainty in Indonesia. The research method in writing this proposal uses a normative juridical approach. The result of this research is that legal certainty is needed to regulate telemedicine. There is no specific law that regulates telemedicine, and without legal certainty this will certainly have an impact on legal protection.
Pertanggungjawaban terhadap Tindak Pidana Pelaku Insider Trading Menurut Undang-Undang No. 8 Tahun 1995 tentang Pasar Modal Agus Ryan Pravanta; A.A.A.N Sri Rahayu Gorda
Jurnal Magister Hukum Udayana (Udayana Master Law Journal) Vol 11 No 4 (2022)
Publisher : University of Udayana

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.24843/JMHU.2022.v11.i04.p13

Abstract

This study aims to examine the regulation regarding insider trading (Insider trading) in Indonesia which has several statutory provisions such as the Criminal Code and Law No. 8 of 1995 concerning capital markets. This study also analyzes criminal liability for corporations that carry out insider trading based on the laws and regulations in force in Indonesia. This study uses a normative juridical research method with a statutory approach and a conceptual approach. The results of the study show that arrangements regarding insider trading in Indonesia are regulated in Law No. 8 of 1995 concerning Capital Markets. The thing that makes it a capital market crime is that when buying and selling shares, insiders base their actions on information about material facts about the company that has not been informed to the public, for example about the company's plan to merge or plan to acquire other companies that will make the company's value will increase. This kind of behavior is categorized as insider trading. As for criminal liability for corporations that carry out insider trading contained in Article 104 UUPM, liability is limited to the imposition of a maximum fine of IDR 15,000,000,000.00 (fifteen billion rupiah). Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk mengkaji pengaturan mengenai perdagangan orang dalam (Insider trading) di Indonesia memiliki beberapa ketentuan undang-undang seperti KUHP dan Undang-undang No.8 Tahun 1995 tentang pasar modal. Penelitian ini juga menganalisa pertanggung jawaban pidana bagi korporasi yang melakukan insider trading berdasarkan peraturan perundang-undangan yang berlaku di Indonesia. Penelitian ini menggunakan metode penelitian yuridis normatif dengan pendekatan peraturan perundang-undangan (statutory approach) dan pendekatan konsep (conceptual approach). Hasil studi menunjukkan bahwa pengaturan mengenai perdagangan orang dalam (Insider trading) di Indonesia diatur dalam Undang-undang No.8 Tahun 1995 tentang Pasar Modal. Adapun hal yang membuatnya menjadi tindak pidana pasar modal adalah apabila dalam melakukan pembelian dan penjualan saham, insiders saham, insiders itu mendasarkan perbuatannya kepada adanya informasi mengenai fakta materil perusahaan yang belum diinformasikan kepada publik, misalnya tentang rencana perusahaan untuk melakukan merger, atau rencana akan mengakuisisi perusahaan lain yang akan membuat nilai perusahaan itu akan menjadi naik. Perbuatan yang demikian inilah yang dikategorikan sebagai insider trading. Adapun pertanggungjawaban pidana bagi korporasi yang melakukan insider trading terdapat pada Pasal 104 UUPM maka pertanggungjawaban hanya terbatas pada penjatuhan pidana denda maksimal Rp 15.000.000.000,00 (lima belas miliar rupiah).
Rekonstruksi Pemahaman Atas Nilai-Nilai Pancasila Dalam Kehidupan Berbangsa Dan Bernegara I Wayan Sudirta; John Pieris; FX Adji Samekto; R Benny Riyanto
Jurnal Magister Hukum Udayana (Udayana Master Law Journal) Vol 11 No 4 (2022)
Publisher : University of Udayana

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.24843/JMHU.2022.v11.i04.p09

Abstract

This paper is library research that tries to explore the philosophical construction of Pancasila as the philosophical basis of the Indonesian state. This study retrieves and traces documents and conducts analysis using a hermeneutic approach to explain the construction of Pancasila values since its birth on June 1, 1945, with the actualization of the existence of Pancasila as the foundation of the nation and state of Indonesia which is multicultural. Research shares the perspective that the values of Pancasila as the philosophical foundation of nation and state are the basis for nationhood and statehood, the five principles of Pancasila need to be further actualized by the Indonesian people to strengthen and strengthen national identity. Tulisan ini merupakan penelitian kepustakaan yang mencoba mengeksplorasi konstruksi filosofis Pancasila sebagai dasar filosofis negara Indonesia. Penelitian ini mengambil dan melacak dokumen serta melakukan analisis dengan menggunakan pendekatan hermeneutik untuk menjelaskan konstruksi nilai-nilai Pancasila sejak kelahirannya 1 Juni 1945 dengan aktualisasi keberadaan Pancasila sebagai landasan berbangsa dan bernegara Indonesia yang multikultural. Penelitian berbagi perspektif bahwa nilai-nilai Pancasila sebagai landasan filosofis berbangsa dan bernegara menjadi landasan dalam berbangsa dan bernegara, kelima sila Pancasila perlu diaktualisasikan lebh lanjut oleh bangsa Indonesia untuk memperkuat dan mempererat identitas kebangsaan.
Tarian Joged Bumbung: Diskursus Konsep Hukum Warisan Budaya Tak Benda Ni Gusti Ayu Dyah Satyawati
Jurnal Magister Hukum Udayana (Udayana Master Law Journal) Vol 11 No 4 (2022)
Publisher : University of Udayana

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.24843/JMHU.2022.v11.i04.p14

Abstract

Joged bumbung dance performances in Bali often lead to pornographic acts. This is regarded as an infringement of intangible cultural heritage. This article is outlined as a sociolegal study that aims to present an analysis of the joged bumbung phenomenon with reference to the legal concept of intangible cultural heritage, discusses the fulfillment of obligations and the role of the government, and discusses legal efforts to protect it through the imposition of legal sanctions. It suggested that the legal protection of intangible cultural heritage is contained in laws and regulations at the national level, including international legal instruments that have been ratified, and at the local level. The protection can be in the form of registration as well as other forms of protection carried out in accordance with norms, standards, procedures, and criteria in the field of culture which pay attention to aspects of religious values, traditions, values, norms, ethics, and customary law. Legal efforts to protect intangible cultural heritage in the form of the joged bumbung dance can be carried out by imposing customary, administrative, and/or criminal sanctions. However, there is a tendency for preventive efforts and supervision approaches in responding to the practice of joged bumbung. Pagelaran tarian Joged Bumbung di Bali kerap kali mengarah pada pornoaksi. Hal ini dipandang sebagai suatu pelecehan terhadap warisan budaya tak benda. Artikel ini disusun sebagai suatu penelitian sosiolegal yang bertujuan untukmenyajikan analisis fenomena joged bumbung dengan merujuk pada konsep hukum warisan budaya tak benda, membahas pemenuhan kewajiban dan peran pemerintah, serta mendiskusikan upaya hukum perlindungannya melalui pengenaan sanksi hukum. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa perlindungan hukum terhadap warisan budaya tak benda tertuang di dalam peraturan perundang-undangan di tingkat nasional, termasuk instrumen hukum internasional yang telah diratifikasi, dan di tingkat daerah. Bentuk perlindungan dapat berupa pendaftaran serta bentuk perlindungan lain yang dilaksanakan sesuai norma, standar, prosedur, dan kriteria bidang kebudayaan yang memperhatikan aspek nilai agama, tradisi, nilai, norma, etika, dan hukum adat. Upaya hukum melindungi warisan budaya tak benda berupa tarian joged bumbung dapat dilakukan dengan menerapkan sanksi adat, sanksi, administrasi, dan/atau sanksi pidana. Hanya saja, terdapat kecenderungan upaya preventif dan pendekatan yang bersifat pembinaan dalam merespon praktik joged bumbung.
Pengaturan Pembagian Harta Bersama Berdasarkan Putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi No. 69/PUU-XIII/2015 I Gusti Ngurah Adi Prabawa; I Ketut Westra
Jurnal Magister Hukum Udayana (Udayana Master Law Journal) Vol 11 No 4 (2022)
Publisher : University of Udayana

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.24843/JMHU.2022.v11.i04.p10

Abstract

The purpose of this research is to study juridically regarding the division of joint assets both before and after the decision of the constitutional court no. 69/puu-xiii/2015. This paper uses normative legal research. The results of this study show that joint property arrangements before the Constitutional Court Decision No.69/PUU-XIII/2015 used the Marriage Law as a legal basis, where joint assets are regulated in article 35 paragraph (1) that assets acquired during marriage become joint property. Likewise with marriage agreements that must be made before the marriage takes place and or can be made in the form of an authentic deed in front of a notary, because there is no marriage agreement made before the marriage is carried out, then all the assets of the husband and wife, the mixing of this marriage agreement has been determined in the regulations laws and regulations as long as they do not violate the social order and general order prevailing in society. Implementation of the division of joint assets after the Constitutional Court Decision No. 69/PUU-XIII/2015 during the marriage period and after the divorce, where before or in progress of the marriage, may also be made after the marriage is carried out or while in a marital relationship it is permissible to make a marriage agreement. So when in the future there is a legal event in the form of divorce, there will be a separation of joint assets. Tujuan penelitian ini mengkaji pengaturan pembagian harta bersama baik itu sebelum dan pasca putusan mahkamah konstitusi no. 69/puu-xiii/2015. Tulisan ini mempergunakan peneitian hukum normatif. Hasil penelitian ini menunjukan pengaturan harta bersama sebelum adanya Putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi No.69/PUU-XIII/2015 menggunakan UU Perkawinan sebagai landasan hukum, dimana harta bersama diatur pada pasal 35 ayat (1) bahwa Harta benda yang diperoleh selama perkawinan menjadi harta Bersama. Begitu juga dengan perjanjian perkawinan yang harus dilakukan sebelum perkawinan dilangsungkan dan atau dapat dibuat dalam bentuk akta otentik dimuka notaris, oleh sebab tidak ada perjanjian perkawinan yang dibuat sebelum perkawinan dilakukan maka semua harta suami dan isteri tersebut maka terjadinya perbauran perjanjian perkawinan ini telah ditentukan dalam peraturan perundang–undangan sepanjang tidak menyalahi tata susila dan ketentraman umum yang berlaku dalam masyarakat. Pelaksanaan pembagian harta bersama pasca adanya Putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi No.69/PUU-XIII/2015 selama masa perkawinan dan setelah perceraian, dimana sebelum atau sedang berlangsungnya perkawinan, boleh juga dibuat pasca perkawinan dilakukan atau selama dalam hubungan perkawinan diperbolehkan membuat perjanjian perkawinan. Sehinngga Ketika dikemudian hari terjadi peristiwa hukum berupa perceraian maka terjadi pemisahan harta Bersama.
Kebijakan Legislasi Pembaruan Pemidanaan Kitab Undang-Undang Hukum Pidana Faisal Faisal; Anri Darmawan; Muh. Rustamaji; M. Witsa Firdaus; Rahmaddi Rahmaddi
Jurnal Magister Hukum Udayana (Udayana Master Law Journal) Vol 11 No 4 (2022)
Publisher : University of Udayana

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.24843/JMHU.2022.v11.i04.p15

Abstract

The Dutch Colonial Criminal Code was born in the classical era. So that the concept of punishment is oriented towards acts with the argument of retaliation. So that criminal law enforcement is not in line with the development of national insight and global insight. The purpose of this research is to find out the renewal of the basic ideas of sentencing legislation policies, and the formulation of sentencing guidelines in the recently passed Criminal Code. The research method uses normative research. The results of the study show that legislation policy has a vision of building a national criminal law with the main mission of decolonization through systemic open codification. The basic idea of ??punishment reflects national goals and the value of balance. The purpose of sentencing is a rational choice that is formulated as a means of prevention, protection, protection and guidance. The Punishment Guidelines serve as a guide for judges to convict, pardon judges by not convicting, and impose sentences even though there are reasons for abolishing crimes Kitab Undang-Undang Hukum Pidana Kolonial Belanda lahir dalam era klasik. Sehingga konsep pemidanaan berorientasi pada perbuatan dengan dalil pembalasan. Sehingga penegakan hukum pidana tidak sejalan dengan perkembangan wawasan nasional dan wasasan global. Tujuan penelitian untuk mengetahui pembaruan ide dasar dari kebijakan legislasi pemidanaan, dan formulasi pedoman pemidanaan dalam Kitab Undang-Undang Hukum Pidana yang baru disahkan. Metode penelitian menggunakan penelitian normatif. Hasil kajian menunjukkan bahwa kebijakan legislasi memiliki visi membangun hukum pidana nasional dengan misi utama dekolonialisasi melalui kodifikasi terbuka bersifat sistemik. Ide dasar pemidanaan merefleksikan tujuan nasional dan nilai keseimbangan. Tujuan pemidanaan merupakan pilihan rasional yang diformulasikan sebagai sarana pencegahan, perlindungan, pengayoman, dan pembinaan. Pedoman Pemidanaan menjadi panduan hakim memidana, pemaafan hakim dengan tidak memidana, dan menjatuhkan pidana meskipun ada alasan penghapus pidana.
Pelaksanaan Proses Arbitrase Online di Indonesia Kt. Lanang Sukawati P. Perbawa
Jurnal Magister Hukum Udayana (Udayana Master Law Journal) Vol 11 No 4 (2022)
Publisher : University of Udayana

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.24843/JMHU.2022.v11.i04.p11

Abstract

The purpose of this paper was to analyze, identify and elaborate on the limitations and principles in determining the choice of law used in the dispute resolution process in arbitration and the online arbitration dispute resolution mechanism based on the laws and regulations in Indonesia. This research was normative research using a statutory approach, a conceptual approach and an analytical approach. The results of the study indicated that the selection of the applicable law in the agreement and the choice of forum must be made by the parties in good faith by seeing the real connection between the law chosen and legal events, in accordance with public order and not only benefiting one party. The online trial procedure can be carried out in the event of a disaster emergency and special circumstances when a party will apply for arbitration, an arbitration trial will be held or is in progress in accordance with the Law on Arbitration and Alternative Dispute Resolution and the Law on Disaster Management. Tujuan penulisan ini adalah untuk menganalisa, mengidentifikasi dan mengelaborasi batasan dan prinsip dalam menentukan pilihan hukum yang digunakan dalam proses penyelesaian sengketa dalam arbitrase serta mekanisme penyelesaian sengketa arbitrase secara online berdasarkan peraturan perundang-undangan di Indonesia. Penelitian ini adalah penelitian normatif dengan menggunakan pendekatan peraturan perundang-undangan, pendekatan konsep, dan pendekatan analisis. Hasil studi menunjukkan bahwa pemilihan hukum yang yang berlaku dalam perjanjian dan pilihan forum harus dilakukan oleh para pihak dengan ikhtikad baik dengan melihat adanya hubungan nyata antara hukum yang dipilih dengan peristiwa hukum, sesuai dengan ketertiban umum dan tidak hanya menguntungkan salah satu pihak saja. Prosedur persidangan secara online dapat dilakukan apabila terjadi suatu keadaan darurat bencana dan keadaan khusus ketika suatu pihak akan mengajukan permohonan arbitrase, suatu persidangan arbitrase akan dilaksanakan atau sedang berlangsung sesuai dengan UU Arbitrase dan Alternatif Penyelesaian Sengketa dan UU Penanggulangan Bencana.

Page 51 of 67 | Total Record : 664

 49   50   51   52   53 

Filter by Year

2012 2025


Reset
Filter By Issues
All Issue Vol 14 No 2 (2025) Vol 14 No 1 (2025) Vol 13 No 4 (2024) Vol 13 No 3 (2024) Vol 13 No 2 (2024) Vol 13 No 1 (2024) Vol 12 No 4 (2023) Vol 12 No 3 (2023) Vol 12 No 2 (2023) Vol 12 No 1 (2023) Vol 11 No 4 (2022) Vol 11 No 3 (2022) Vol 11 No 2 (2022) Vol 11 No 1 (2022) Vol 10 No 4 (2021) Vol 10 No 3 (2021) Vol 10 No 2 (2021) Vol 10 No 1 (2021) Vol 9 No 4 (2020) Vol 9 No 3 (2020) Vol 9 No 2 (2020) Vol 9 No 1 (2020) Vol 8 No 4 (2019) Vol 8 No 3 (2019) Vol 8 No 2 (2019) Vol 8 No 1 (2019) Vol 7 No 4 (2018) Vol 7 No 3 (2018) Vol 7 No 2 (2018) Vol 7 No 1 (2018) Vol 6 No 4 (2017) Vol 6 No 3 (2017) Vol 6 No 2 (2017) Vol 6 No 1 (2017) Vol 5 No 4 (2016) Vol 5 No 3 (2016) Vol 5 No 2 (2016) Vol 5 No 1 (2016) Vol 4 No 4 (2015) Vol 4 No 3 (2015) Vol 4 No 2 (2015) Vol 4 No 1 (2015) Vol 3 No 3 (2014) Vol 3 No 2 (2014) Vol 3 No 1 (2014) Vol 2 No 3 (2013) Vol 2 No 2 (2013) Vol 2 No 1 (2013) Vol 1 No 1 (2012) More Issue