cover
Article Per Year (5 Year)
All
Home Page
OAI Link
Editorial Team
Contact
Reviewer
Google Scholar
Contact Name
-
Contact Email
-
Phone
-
Journal Mail Official
-
Editorial Address
-
Location
Kota denpasar,
Bali
INDONESIA
JURNAL MAGISTER HUKUM UDAYANA
Published by Universitas Udayana
ISSN : 25023101     EISSN : 2302528X     DOI : -
Core Subject : Social,
Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice
Jurnal Magister Hukum Udayana adalah jurnal ilmiah hukum yang mempublikasikan hasil kajian bidang hukum yang diterbitkan secara online empat kali setahun (Februari-Mei-Agustus-Nopember). Redaksi menerima tulisan yang berupa hasil kajian yang berasal dari penelitian hukum dalam berbagai bidang ilmu hukum yang belum pernah dipublikasikan serta orisinal. Jurnal ini selain memuat tulisan / kajian dari para pakar ilmu hukum (dosen, guru besar, praktisi dan lain-lain.) juga memuat tulisan mahasiswa Magister Ilmu Hukum baik yang merupakan bagian dari penulisan tesis maupun kajian lainnya yang orisinal. Tulisan yang masuk ke Redaksi akan diseleksi dan direview untuk dapat dimuat
Arjuna Subject : -
Articles 664 Documents
 55   56   57   58   59 
Quo Vadis Perlindungan Korban Tindak Pidana Kekerasan Seksual di Indonesia Ayu Mirah Iswari Karna; I Ketut Rai Setiabudhi
Jurnal Magister Hukum Udayana (Udayana Master Law Journal) Vol 12 No 3 (2023)
Publisher : University of Udayana

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.24843/JMHU.2023.v12.i03.p10

Abstract

The purpose of this study is to find out and analyze the direction of legal regulation and political protection for victims of sexual violence in Indonesia Act Number 12 of 2022 concerning the Crime of Sexual Violence. The ideas of this research are motivated by the birth of the latest legislation regarding sexual violence which is associated with the phenomenon and challenges of its enforcement. The research method used is a normative legal research method with a statue approach and analitycal and conceptual approach, and uses legal analysis techniques, namely description techniques, evaluation techniques, and argumentation techniques. The results of this study indicate that in Indonesia Act Number 12 of 2011 concerning the Crime of Sexual Violence, protection has been formally regulated for victims of sexual violence, both direct and indirect protection. It also regulates several types of criminal acts which so far have not received adequate regulation. It is hoped that in the future there will be consistency in law enforcement to ensure protection for victims of sexual violence. Tujuan penelitian ini adalah untuk mengetahui dan menganalisis arah pengaturan dan politik hukum perlindungan korban kekerasan seksual dalam Undang-Undang Nomor 12 Tahun 2022 tentang Tindak Pidana Kekerasan Seksual. Ide dan gagasan penelitian ini dilatarbelakangi lahirnya peraturan perundang-undangan terbaru mengenai kekerasan seksual yang dikaitkan dengan fenomena dan tantangan penegakannya. Metode penelitian yang digunakan adalah metode penelitian hukum normatif dengan pendekatan perundang-undangan dan pendekatan analisis dan konsep hukum dan menggunakan teknik analisis bahan hukum yaitu teknik deskripsi, teknik evaluasi, dan teknik argumentasi. Hasil dari penelitian ini menunjukkan bahwa dalam Undang-Undang Nomor 12 Tahun 2011 tentang Tindak Pidana Kekerasan Seksual secara formal telah diatur perlindungan bagi korban kekerasan seksual, baik perlindungan langsung maupun tidak langsung. Diatur pula beberapa jenis tindak pidana yang selama ini belum memperoleh pengaturan yang memadai. Diharapkan kedepan konsistensi penegakan hukum untuk menjamin perlindungan bagi korban kekerasan seksual.
Indonesian Clean Water Availability in SDGs: Analysis of Emerging Legal Problems Shelvi Rusdiana; Ninne Zahara Silviani; Sri Zanariyah; Ratna Kumala Sari
Jurnal Magister Hukum Udayana (Udayana Master Law Journal) Vol 12 No 4 (2023)
Publisher : University of Udayana

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.24843/JMHU.2023.v12.i04.p01

Abstract

The right to access clean water is a fundamental human right and an important part of SDGs. Indonesia as a country committed to developing SDGs-compliant policies to respond to climate challenges need to make sure that it has enough normative support from its legal framework. Using normative legal research method, this study analyzes the emerging legal problems regarding the Indonesian government’s responsibility to provide clean water to its citizens. To support the analysis, this study employs the statutory approach to find the normative problems contributing to a number of possible legal problems that might hinder Indonesia’s commitment to SDGs, particularly the one to make sure that every person has the right to access clean water. Analysis of this research finds that there are normative confusions within the Indonesian legal framework that are related to the government’s responsibility in providing access to clean water, along with the urgency to tackle to these normative issues to better deal with the emerging legal problems, in the face of climate change.
Kontroversi Pembayaran Royalti Atas Hak Cipta Lagu Ahmad Dhani oleh Once Mekel Rr. Aline Gratika Nugrahani
Jurnal Magister Hukum Udayana (Udayana Master Law Journal) Vol 13 No 1 (2024)
Publisher : University of Udayana

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.24843/JMHU.2024.v13.i01.p08

Abstract

This article aims to examine the articles in Law No. 28 of 2014 concerning Copyright, which was debated by Ahmad Dhani and Once as the basis for arguments regarding royalties. Ahmad Dhani is of the opinion that based on Article 9, Once as a vocalist must pay royalties when performing the songs of the Dewa band he created. Meanwhile, based on Article 23 according to Once, at a music performance, vocalists do not need to ask for permission or license and do not need to pay royalties, because there is an institution that specifically takes care of this, namely LMK (Lembaga Manajemen Kolektif). This article was written using normative research methods with a statutory and case approach. The first part discusses the background to the disagreement between Ahmad Dhani and Once, then it discusses royalties and its problems in Indonesia and the final part examines the accuracy of the articles used by Ahmad Dani and Once as the basis for arguments, so that it is found which articles should be used in resolve licensing and royalty issues. Finally, three conclusions can be drawn, first, the two articles mentioned above can be used as a basis for applying for licenses and collecting royalties for songwriters, only that Article 9 regulates in general that creators are entitled to licenses and royalties, while Article 23 delegates matters regarding licensing and withdrawal of song royalties can be done through LMK. Tulisan ini bertujuan menelaah pasal-pasal pada Undang-undang No. 28 Tahun 2014 Tentang Hak Cipta, yang dipergunakan oleh Ahmad Dhani dan Once sebagai landasan argumentasi terkait lisensi dan royalti hak cipta lagu. Ahmad Dhani berpendapat, Pasal 9 Undang-undang No. 28 Tahun 2014 Tentang Hak Cipta mewajibkan Once sebagai vokalis meminta ijin dan membayar royalti ketika membawakan lagu-lagu grup band Dewa yang diciptakannya. Sedangkan menurut once, berdasarkan Pasal 23 Undang-undang No. 28 Tahun 2014 Tentang Hak Cipta, pada sebuah pagelaran musik, vokalis tidak perlu meminta ijin dan tidak perlu membayar royati, karena telah ada Lembaga yang khusus mengurus hal tersebut yaitu Lembaga Managemen Kolektif. Tulisan ini menggunakan metode penelitian normatif dengan pendekatan perundag-undangan dan kasus. Hingga diperoleh kesimpulan bahwa kedua pasal tersebut di atas dapat dipergunakan sebagai dasar untuk pengajuan lisensi dan menarik royalti bagi pencipta lagu, hanya saja Pasal 9 mengatur secara umum bahwa pencipta berhak atas lisensi dan royalti, sedangkan Pasal 23 mendelegasikan urusan lisensi dan penarikan royalti lagu kepada Lembaga Managemen Kolektif.
Pelaksanaan Kewajiban PPAT dalam Memberikan Jasa Tanpa Memungut Biaya Kepada Seseorang yang Tidak Mampu Eva Rahayu; Muktiono Muktiono; Hendrarto Hadisuryo
Jurnal Magister Hukum Udayana (Udayana Master Law Journal) Vol 12 No 4 (2023)
Publisher : University of Udayana

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.24843/JMHU.2023.v12.i04.p15

Abstract

AT and Temporary PPAT are required to provide services without charging a fee to someone who cannot afford it in making Authentic Deeds regarding land rights or Rights of Ownership to apartments units as evidence of specific legal actions. The strength of the Authentic Deed becomes conclusive evidence for those involved, and hence, if a party raises objections, it can be proven in court. In legal existing and interpreting the legal norms governed by these regulations, multiple interpretations and uncompleted regulations can be produced regarding the intended criteria and the completeness of the required document for the involved parties. Therefore, the application for PPAT in fulfilling their obligations depends on each of them involving their standardization, as this is not regulated in the existing regulations. Hence, the next question is how far this regulation can be implemented, considering the legal subjects targeted by this regulation are less privileged or those who are unable to pay. The purpose of this research is to address the implementation of PPAT in carrying out their duties. This research analyzed the relevant regulations, literature, and conduct interviews with PPAT. This research uses a normative legal research method using a Statute Approach and a Conceptual Approach. The results of this research showed a misinterpretation in its implementation that is influenced by two factors: the absence of standardized criteria to determine an individual’s inability, and requirements specified are not sufficiently accurate to guarantee the validity. AT dan PPAT Sementara wajib memberikan jasa tanpa memungut biaya kepada seseorang yang tidak mampu dalam hal membuat Akta Autentik mengenai hak atas tanah atau Hak Milik Atas Satuan Rumah Susun sebagai bukti telah dilakukannya suatu perbuatan hukum tertentu. Kekuatan Akta Autentik yang dihasilkan merupakan pembuktian sempurna bagi para pihak, sehingga apabila suatu pihak mengajukan keberatan dapat dibuktikan dalam meja pengadilan. Dengan kondisi hukum (legal existing) yang mengatur, penafsiran dari Norma hukumnya yang diatur dalam peraturan-peraturan tersebut dapat menimbulkan multitafsir serta ditemukan ketidaklengkapan peraturan baik dalam hal kriteria yang dituju maupun kelengkapan persyaratan dokumen yang diperlukan bagi pihak yang berkepentingan. Maka penerapannya bagi Pejabat Pembuat Akta Tanah (PPAT) dalam menjalankan kewajibannya tergantung dari yang bersangkutan dengan menerapkan standarisasi berdasarkan versinya karena hal tersebut tidak diatur dalam peraturan yang berlaku. Sehingga yang menjadi pertanyaan selanjutnya sejauh mana peraturan ini dapat terlaksana, mengingat sasaran yang menjadi subjek hukum dalam peraturan tersebut ialah Masyarakat/Seseorang yang tidak mampu. Tujuan penelitian ini untuk menjawab terkait bagaimana pelaksanaan kewajiban Pejabat Pembuat Akta Tanah (PPAT) dalam menjalankan kewajibannya, penelitian ini diarahkan untuk menganalisis peraturan terkait, literatur, serta melakukan wawancara dengan Pejabat Pembuat Akta Tanah (PPAT). Penelitian ini menggunakan jenis penelitian hukum normatif. Dari hasil penelitian pada pelaksanaanya terdapat kesalahan penafsiran yang dipengaruhi oleh 2 faktor yaitu; tidak ada standar baku untuk menentukan kriteria seseorang tidak mampu; persyararatan yang ditentukan tidak cukup akurat untuk menjamin kebenarannya;
Relation Between Plea of Guilty and Defendants Right in RUU KUHAP (An Overview Through “Jalur Khusus” System) Intan Khoirun Nisa'; Abdul Madjid; Setiawan Noerdajasakti
Jurnal Magister Hukum Udayana (Udayana Master Law Journal) Vol 12 No 4 (2023)
Publisher : University of Udayana

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.24843/JMHU.2023.v12.i04.p06

Abstract

The stacks of cases in judicial institutions hinder achieving the principles of fast, simple, low-cost justice. Through the Drafting Team for the Criminal Procedure Code Draft, the intention is to try to adopt a system that commonly applies in the common law legal system, namely plea bargaining “jalur khusus”” which is shown in Article 199 of the RUU KUHAP. This research intends to examine the concept of plea of guilty used in special channels and to look for the relationship between giving a plea of guilty and the rights of the defendant. This research uses normative juridical research methods or library legal research using conceptual and analytical approaches. The technique for collecting legal materials used is the library research model. From this research it can be concluded that the plea of guilty given by the defendant to the indictment by the public prosecutor must be voluntary, in this case, the judge will assess the truth of the Plea of Guilty. It brings consequences that the trial process will faster for the defendant. However, ““jalur khusus”” do not specifically regulate what defendant right will release if he confesses to the charges, moreover there is a gap that need to be resolve. This has the potential for uncertainty for the defendant. Apart from that, there is no regulation regarding the right to file legal action which will have an impact on the defendant's right to obtain legal certainty regarding efficient time to achieve a speedy trial.
Hak Menggugat pada Perusahaan Daerah Air Minum atas Pemenuhan Air yang Tidak Bersih / Tidak Sanitasi Wulanmas Anna Patricya Gracya Frederik; Elko Mamesah
Jurnal Magister Hukum Udayana (Udayana Master Law Journal) Vol 13 No 1 (2024)
Publisher : University of Udayana

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.24843/JMHU.2024.v13.i01.p13

Abstract

The goal of this research is to identify and analyze legal protection for customers of the Regional Drinking Water Company (PDAM) to ensure the availability of clean, safe, and healthy water, as well as legal protection for clients of the Regional Drinking Water Company (DPAM) regarding the availability of unclean and unfit for consumption water. This research is empirically juridical in nature, with an empirical data approach in the form of interviews and distributing questionnaires and secondary data. According to this research, customers of Regional Drinking Water Companies (PDAM) need legal protection to ensure that they maintain their rights to clean water and safe sanitation. Republic of Indonesia Government Regulation no. 122 regulates drinking water supply systems as a means of realizing the human right to safe, healthy and clean water. In addition, the customer's right to file a lawsuit against the Public Drinking Water Company (PDAM) is a claim regarding PDAM's failure to respect customers' rights to clean and healthy water. Tujuan dari penelitian ini adalah untuk mengidentifikasi dan menganalisis perlindungan hukum bagi pelanggan Perusahaan Air Minum Regional (PDAM) untuk memastikan ketersediaan air bersih, aman, dan sehat, serta pertahanan hukum bagi klien Perusahaan air minum regional (DPAM) sehubungan dengan ketersediaannya air yang tidak bersih dan tidak cocok untuk konsumsi. Penelitian ini bersifat Yuridis Empiris, dengan pendekatan Data Empiris berupa wawancara dan pengedaran kuesener serta Data Sekunder. Menurut penelitian ini, pelanggan Perusahaan Daerah Air Minum (PDAM) membutuhkan perlindungan hukum untuk memastikan bahwa mereka mempertahankan hak mereka terhadap air bersih dan sanitasi yang aman. Peraturan Pemerintah Republik Indonesia No. 122 mengatur sistem pasokan air minum sebagai sarana untuk mewujudkan hak asasi manusia terhadap air yang aman, sehat dan bersih. Selain itu, hak pelanggan untuk mengajukan gugatan kepada Perusahaan Air Minum Publik (PDAM) adalah klaim atas kegagalan PDAM untuk menghormati hak pelanggan terhadap air bersih dan sehat.
The Balancing Innovation and Regulation: Legal Protections for Consumers in Indonesia’s Rapidly Expanding E-Commerce Sector Putu Eka Trisna Dewi
Jurnal Magister Hukum Udayana (Udayana Master Law Journal) Vol 13 No 1 (2024)
Publisher : University of Udayana

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.24843/JMHU.2024.v13.i01.p04

Abstract

E-commerce transactions have a significant role in fostering sustainable economic growth, advancing national development implementation in order to achieve equitable development, and preserving national stability. E-commerce has significant advantages, but it also introduces risk and uncertainty. Consumers are often harmed by e-commerce transaction procedures, which also give rise to a number of legal difficulties. This study employs a statutory approach combined with a literature review as a legal research methodology. The Act Number 19 of 2016 concerning amendments to the Act Number 11 of 2008 concerning Information and Electronic Transactions, the Government Regulation Number 71 of 2019 about Operation of Electronic Systems and Transactions, and the Act Number 8 of 1999 about Consumer Protection all regulate consumer protections in E-commerce transactions. The aforementioned rules work to safeguard consumers' rights during business transactions.
Tanggung Jawab Notaris dalam Kewenangannya Melakukan Legalisasi Perjanjian di Bawah Tangan Ninik Darmini
Jurnal Magister Hukum Udayana (Udayana Master Law Journal) Vol 12 No 4 (2023)
Publisher : University of Udayana

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.24843/JMHU.2023.v12.i04.p11

Abstract

rivate deed legalization is a Notary’s authority to serve the community based on the Notary Act. Legalization that is conducted without good faith and circumspection could bring a Notary into trouble. This research aims to understand and analyze the liability of a Notary in private deed legalization. This descriptive doctrinal legal research uses secondary data that is supported by primary data which were then analyzed qualitatively. This research concludes that, first, legalization by a Notary who by his/her mistake causes harm to another party consequently brings administrative, civil, and/or criminal liability. The administrative liability is based on Article 16 paragraph (1) letter a jis. Article 16 paragraph (11), and 73 paragraph (1) letter e of the Notary Act; the civil liability is based on Article 1365 of the Indonesian Civil Code on civil wrongdoing; while the criminal liability is based on Article 55 of the Indonesian Criminal Code on deelneming and Article 263 on document falsification. Second, good faith ought to be a Notary’s guidance in carrying out his/her position as it would prevent him/her from either administrative, civil, or criminal sanctions. Third, it is necessary for a Notary to apply circumspection by not getting involved in the contract-making of the private deed; observing the private deed contents to ensure that it is not against the law; and documenting the legalization properly, although a legalization is passive in nature. galisasi perjanjian di bawah tangan merupakan kewenangan Notaris yang diatur dalam Undang-Undang Jabatan Notaris. Legalisasi yang dilakukan tanpa itikad baik dan kehati-hatian dapat membawa Notaris ke dalam masalah. Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk memahami dan menganalisis tanggung jawab Notaris dalam legalisasi perjanjian di bawah tangan. Penelitian hukum normatif yang bersifat deskriptif ini menggunakan data sekunder yang didukung dengan data primer, kemudian dianalisis secara kualitatif. Penelitian ini menemukan bahwa, pertama, legalisasi oleh Notaris yang oleh karena kesalahannya merugikan pihak lain berakibat pada pertanggungjawaban secara administratif, perdata, dan/atau pidana. Pertanggungjawaban administratif didasarkan pada Pasal 16 ayat (1) huruf a jis. Pasal 16 ayat (11) dan Pasal 73 ayat (1) huruf e UU Notaris; pertanggungjawaban perdata didasarkan pada Pasal 1365 KUHPerdata tentang Perbuatan Melawan Hukum; sedangkan pertanggungjawaban pidana didasarkan pada Pasal 55 KUHP tentang deelneming dan Pasal 263 KUHP tentang pemalsuan dokumen. Kedua, Notaris harus berpegang pada itikad baik dalam melaksanakan jabatannya karena hal tersebut dapat mencegahnya dari pengenaan sanksi administratif, perdata, maupun pidana. Ketiga, sangat penting bagi Notaris untuk menerapkan kehati-hatian meskipun legalisasi bersifat pasif, dengan tidak terlibat pada pembuatan perjanjian di bawah tangan; mengamati substansi perjanjian tersebut untuk memastikan tidak ada pertentangan dengan hukum; dan mendokumentasikan legalisasi dengan baik.
Reconceptualization of Rehabilitation for Recidivists in the Persective of Dignified Justice I Made Wirya Darma
Jurnal Magister Hukum Udayana (Udayana Master Law Journal) Vol 12 No 4 (2023)
Publisher : University of Udayana

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.24843/JMHU.2023.v12.i04.p02

Abstract

A relapse condition is when the former addicts and victims of narcotics abusers who have undergone treatment at a rehabilitation center may return to taking narcotics. This relapse patient in legal terms is called a recidivist. Law Number 35 of 2009 concerning Narcotics regulates sanctions for actions in the form of rehabilitation for addicts and victims of narcotics abusers, but does not regulate whether or not a recidivist can receive rehabilitation sanctions. In this study, there are three issues that will be discussed, namely rehabilitation measures in overcoming drug abuse, rehabilitation sanctions for recidivist addicts and victims of narcotics abusers and reconceptualization of rehabilitation in the perspective of dignified justice. This research is a normative juridical research that examines the void of norms regarding the imposition of rehabilitation crimes for recidivists. The research analysis was carried out qualitatively. The rehabilitation action is motivated by the view that addicts and victims of narcotics abusers are victims. By itself, drug abuse is a victimless crime. The Law on Narcotics does not regulate rehabilitation sanctions for recidivist addicts and victims of narcotics abusers, so that in law enforcement practice there are several people who have been sentenced to rehabilitation sanctions before and in subsequent cases are still subject to rehabilitation sanctions. Reconceptualization of rehabilitation in the perspective of dignified justice places recidivists as victims; therefore, as long as the person is only an addict and a victim of narcotics abuse, he is still entitled to receive rehabilitation sanctions.
Persamaan Pada Pokoknya atau Keseluruhannya Terkait Tingkat Daya Pembeda Merek Dagang Terdaftar Lukas Sambiono; Cokorde Istri Dian Laksmi Dewi
Jurnal Magister Hukum Udayana (Udayana Master Law Journal) Vol 13 No 1 (2024)
Publisher : University of Udayana

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.24843/JMHU.2024.v13.i01.p09

Abstract

The aim of this research was to analyze the juridical review of similarities in essence or in their entirety regarding the differentiating provisions of registered trademarks. The research method used is a normative research method. The research results show that the regulation of brands follows the constitutive principle (registration) and the first-to-file principle. This means that a trademark can only be protected if it is registered. If there are goods or services that use a trademark but are not registered, the brand will lose legal protection. Furthermore, based on this, an analysis of the similarities in essence or overall regarding the level of distinguishing power of registered trademarks shows that the Trademark Law has provided legal protection for registered trademarks at the Directorate General of Intellectual Property, Ministry of Law and Human Rights. Registered trademark owners who have good intentions should receive legal protection in accordance with statutory provisions, and parties who violate registered trademarks will be subject to strict sanctions in accordance with applicable regulations, both criminal and administrative. Tujuan penelitian ini dilakukan untuk menganalisis terkait dengan tinjauan yuridis terhadap persamaan pada pokoknya atau keseluruhannya terkait ketentuan pembeda merek dagang terdaftar. Metode penelitian yang digunakan adalah metode penelitian normatif. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa pengaturan atas merek mengikuti prinsip konstitutif (pendaftaran) dan prinsip first-to-file. Artinya merek dagang hanya dapat dilindungi jika didaftarkan. Apabila terdapat produk barang atau jasa yang menggunakan merek dagang tetapi tidak didaftarkan, maka merek tersebut akan kehilangan perlindungan hukum. Selanjutnya berdasarkan hal tersebut kemudian analisis persamaan pada pokoknya atau keseluruhannya terkait tingkat daya pembeda merek dagang terdaftar bahwa Undang-Undang Merek telah memberikan perlindungan hukum atas merek terdaftar pada Direktorat Jenderal Kekayaan Intelektual Kementerian Hukum dan Hak Asasi Manusia. Pemilik merek yang terdaftar dan beriktikad baik agar mendapatkan perlindungan hukum sesuai dengan ketentuan peraturan perundang-undangan, dan para pihak yang melakukan pelanggaran terhadap merek terdaftar dikenai sanksi yang tegas sesuai aturan yang berlaku baik itu pidana maupun administrasi.

Page 57 of 67 | Total Record : 664

 55   56   57   58   59 

Filter by Year

2012 2025


Reset
Filter By Issues
All Issue Vol 14 No 2 (2025) Vol 14 No 1 (2025) Vol 13 No 4 (2024) Vol 13 No 3 (2024) Vol 13 No 2 (2024) Vol 13 No 1 (2024) Vol 12 No 4 (2023) Vol 12 No 3 (2023) Vol 12 No 2 (2023) Vol 12 No 1 (2023) Vol 11 No 4 (2022) Vol 11 No 3 (2022) Vol 11 No 2 (2022) Vol 11 No 1 (2022) Vol 10 No 4 (2021) Vol 10 No 3 (2021) Vol 10 No 2 (2021) Vol 10 No 1 (2021) Vol 9 No 4 (2020) Vol 9 No 3 (2020) Vol 9 No 2 (2020) Vol 9 No 1 (2020) Vol 8 No 4 (2019) Vol 8 No 3 (2019) Vol 8 No 2 (2019) Vol 8 No 1 (2019) Vol 7 No 4 (2018) Vol 7 No 3 (2018) Vol 7 No 2 (2018) Vol 7 No 1 (2018) Vol 6 No 4 (2017) Vol 6 No 3 (2017) Vol 6 No 2 (2017) Vol 6 No 1 (2017) Vol 5 No 4 (2016) Vol 5 No 3 (2016) Vol 5 No 2 (2016) Vol 5 No 1 (2016) Vol 4 No 4 (2015) Vol 4 No 3 (2015) Vol 4 No 2 (2015) Vol 4 No 1 (2015) Vol 3 No 3 (2014) Vol 3 No 2 (2014) Vol 3 No 1 (2014) Vol 2 No 3 (2013) Vol 2 No 2 (2013) Vol 2 No 1 (2013) Vol 1 No 1 (2012) More Issue