cover
Article Per Year (5 Year)
All
Home Page
OAI Link
Editorial Team
Contact
Reviewer
Google Scholar
Contact Name
-
Contact Email
-
Phone
-
Journal Mail Official
-
Editorial Address
-
Location
Kota bandung,
Jawa barat
INDONESIA
PADJADJARAN Jurnal Ilmu Hukum (Journal of Law)
Published by Universitas Padjadjaran
ISSN : -     EISSN : -     DOI : -
Core Subject : Social,
Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice
Arjuna Subject : -
Articles 518 Documents
 27   28   29   30   31 
Book Review: Airport Competition: The European Experience Garry Gumelar Pratama
PADJADJARAN Jurnal Ilmu Hukum (Journal of Law) Vol 4, No 1 (2017): PADJADJARAN Jurnal Ilmu Hukum (Journal of Law)
Publisher : Faculty of Law, Universitas Padjadjaran

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (572.459 KB)

Abstract

The competitive business environment in aviation industry has changed since European Integration. Not only airlines become more competitive after s­uch integration, but also other main infrastructure of aviation, airports. At the first stage of regional development, competition in airport industry seems to be impossible since all countries in a region still have clear jurisdictional boundaries. The other side of the coin is that airport competition becomes an important issue in a more integrated region, such as European Union (EU). This occurs because an airport owner from another country can buy other airports outside its state jurisdiction, under the same region. Articles in this book prove the claim of the existence of airport competition. Under the introductory part, the editors outlined three cases from EU: UK Civil Aviation Authority action to Heathrow Airport in 2008, Blocked Takeover of Bratislava Airport 2006 and European Commission Prohibition on Subsidies to Ryanair by Brussels South Charleroi Airport 2004. All of the cases are inevitable proofs that airport competition undoubtedly exists in Europe.  DOI: https://doi.org/10.22304/pjih.v4n1.a11
Urgensi Revisi Undang-Undang Landas Kontinen Indonesia Davina Oktivana
PADJADJARAN Jurnal Ilmu Hukum (Journal of Law) Vol 3, No 2 (2016): PADJADJARAN Jurnal Ilmu Hukum (Journal of Law)
Publisher : Faculty of Law, Universitas Padjadjaran

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (4233.742 KB)

Abstract

Pengaturan mengenai landas kontinen di Indonesia khususnya dalam menentukan batas terluar landas kontinen masih mengacu pada ketentuan Konvensi Jenewa tentang Landas Kontinen tahun 1958, yaitu menggunakan kriteria kedalaman dan kemampuan dalam melakukan eksploitasi. Sementara Indonesia telah meratifikasi Konvensi Hukum Laut 1982, dimana kriteria dalam menentukan batas terluar landas kontinen berdasarkan konvensi ini dinilai lebih menguntungkan bagi negara pantai. Keuntungan yang dimaksud adalah penggunaan kriteria topografi dasar laut dan diperbolehkannya negara pantai mengajukan perpanjangan landas kontinen. Indonesia telah mengajukan submisi perpanjangan landas kontinen yang berlokasi di barat laut Sumatera pada tahun 2008 dan disetujui oleh Komisi Batas-Batas Landas Kontinen PBB pada tahun 2010, dan saat ini sedang mempersiapkan submisi perpanjangan landas kontinen lainnya di utara Papua dan selatan Nusa Tenggara. Adanya perkembangan dan praktik tersebut tidak diikuti dengan perubahan UU Landas Kontinen Indonesia yang seharusnya mengacu pada kriteria yang lebih relevan berdasarkan Konvensi Hukum Laut 1982. Revisi UU Landas Kontinen menjadi penting karena telah mengarah pada ketidakpastian dan pertentangan dalam hukum positif di Indonesia.The Urgency of Indonesian Continental Shelf Act Revision AbstractThe definition of the outer limit of the continental shelf in Indonesian Continental Shelf Act is still referring to the 1958 Geneva Convention on the Continental Shelf, which applied the criteria of depth and the ability to exploit. On the other hand, Indonesia has ratified the 1982 Convention on the Law of the Sea, where the criteria in determining the outer limit of the continental shelf is considered more advantageous to coastal states, for instance, the application of seabed topography criteria and the admissible of coastal states to propose an extension of the continental shelf. Indonesia has submitted an extended continental shelf located in the northwest of Sumatra in 2008 and had been approved by the Commission on the Limits of the Continental Shelf of the UN in 2010, and currently preparing another submission located in the northern Papua and southern Nusa Tenggara. Notwithstanding the development and Indonesia’s practice, these situations are not followed by adjusting the Indonesian Continental Shelf Act. Thus, the urgency of revision of Indonesia’s Continental Shelf Act is necessary, due to uncertainty and contradistinction in Indonesia’s positive law.DOI: https://doi.org/10.22304/pjih.v3n2.a3
Artikel Kehormatan: Analisis Hukum Undang-Undang Nomor 8 Tahun 2010 tentang Pencegahan dan Pemberantasan Tindak Pidana Pencucian Uang Romli Atmasasmita
PADJADJARAN Jurnal Ilmu Hukum (Journal of Law) Vol 3, No 1 (2016): PADJADJARAN Jurnal Ilmu Hukum (Journal of Law)
Publisher : Faculty of Law, Universitas Padjadjaran

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (1893.437 KB)

Abstract

Pencucian uang merupakan jenis tindak pidana baru dalam referensi hukum pidana, keuangan, dan perbankan. Pengaturan terkait tindak pidana pencucian uang di ndonesia telah diatur dalam suatu peraturan perundang-undangan dan telah beberapa kali mengalami perubahan. Undang-Undang Nomor 8 Tahun 2010 tentang Pencegahan dan Pemberantasan Tindak Pidana Pencucian Uang merupakan peraturan terbaru. Namun demikian, pada undang-undang ini ditemukan penggunaan pendekatan-pendekatan dan asas-asas dalam hukum pidana yang kurang cocok diterapkan. Selain itu juga terdapat tumpang tindih pemberian wewenang institusi dalam penanganan tindak pidana pencucian uang. Artikel ini juga akan membahas perbandingan pengaturan tentang pencucian uang di beberapa negara lain.Legal Analysis on Law Number 8 Year 2010 concerning the Prevention and Eradication of Money LaunderingAbstractMoney laundering is a new type of crime in criminal law, finance law, and banking law. The regulation of money laundering in Indonesia is regulated in a specific law which has been revised for several times. The newest version is Law Number 8 Year 2010 concerning the Prevention and Eradication of Money Laundering. Nonetheless, the approach and elements of criminal law used in this law is not suitable to be applied in money laundering regulation. Instution's overlapping authorities are also found in this regulation. This article also elaborated Comparation of money laundering regulation in other countries. DOI: https://doi.org/10.22304/pjih.v3n1.a1
The Rise of the Spirit of National Interest and the Existence of World Trade Organization Agreement: A Case Study of Indonesia I Gusti Ngurah Parikesit; I Gusti Ngurah Wairocana
PADJADJARAN Jurnal Ilmu Hukum (Journal of Law) Vol 4, No 2 (2017): PADJADJARAN Jurnal Ilmu Hukum (Journal of Law)
Publisher : Faculty of Law, Universitas Padjadjaran

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (655.517 KB)

Abstract

There has been an anxiety over the rise of the spirit of national interest on the existence of World Trade Organization. This spirit that has been reflected from domestic trade policy, to some extent, has undermined trade negotiation process under the WTO as shown by the failure of the Doha Round to conclude significant trade deals. Countries also started concluding bilateral and regional trade agreements instead of the WTO. This article aimed to analyze whether the rise of the spirit of national interest has threaten the existence of the WTO agreements, putting Indonesia as a case study. This article is a normative research, analyzing the dynamics development of the national interest under the WTO, especially Indonesia, and how the judicial body has responded the rise of this spirit in its decisions. This article argues that the spirit of national interest will not threaten the existence of WTO as this spirit has been exist from the early establishment of the General Agreement on Tariffs and Trade in 1947 to the latest WTO negotiation. Moreover, the existence of the WTO judicial body will secure the existence of the WTO, especially because it has successfully controlled the overwhelming spirit of national interest of its members through its decisions. Kebangkitan Semangat Kepentingan Nasional dan Eksistensi Persetujuan World Trade Organization: Studi Kasus Indonesia AbstrakTelah timbul suatu kekhawatiran atas bangkitnya semangat kepentingan nasional terhadap eksistensi persetujuan WTO. Semangat ini yang tercermin dari kebijakan perdagangan domestik  telah menghambat proses negosiasi perdagangan di bawah WTO sebagaimana ditunjukkan oleh kegagalan Putaran Doha dalam menyetujui kesepakatan perdagangan. Negara-negara juga mulai menyetujui kesepakatan perdagangan yang lebih bersifat bilateral dan regional. Artikel ini bertujuan untuk menganalisis apakah bangkitnya semangat kepentingan nasional telah mengancam eksistensi kesepakatan WTO, dengan menjadikan Indonesia sebagai studi kasus. Artikel ini adalah penelitian normatif, menganalisis perkembangan dinamika kepentingan nasional di bawah WTO, khususnya Indonesia, dan bagaimana badan judisial merespon bangkitnya semangat ini dalam keputusannya. Artikel ini berpendapat bahwa semangat kepentingan nasional tidak akan mengancam keberadaan WTO karena semangat ini telah ada sejak awal berdirinya GATT di 1947 sampai negosiasi WTO terakhir.  Melalui keputusan-keputusan yang telah dihasilkan, keberadaan badan penyelesaian sengketa dalam WTO akan menjamin eksistensi WTO, terutama karena telah berhasil mengendalikan semangat kepentingan nasional dari anggota WTO. Kata kunci: studi kasus, Indonesia, perjanjian internasional, semangat kepentingan nasional, WTO. DOI: https://doi.org/10.22304/pjih.v4n2.a6
Hubungan Kewenangan Pusat dan Daerah Menurut Undang-Undang Nomor 23 Tahun 2014 tentang Pemerintahan Daerah Yusdianto Yusdianto
PADJADJARAN Jurnal Ilmu Hukum (Journal of Law) Vol 2, No 3 (2015): PADJADJARAN Jurnal Ilmu Hukum (Journal of Law)
Publisher : Faculty of Law, Universitas Padjadjaran

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (618.382 KB)

Abstract

AbstrakHubungan antara kewenangan pusat dengan daerah di Indonesia mengalami pasang surut sesuai rezim penyelenggaraan negara. Sejak reformasi, telah terdapat beberapa kali perubahan format otonomi daerah. Dalam Pasal 18 Undang-Undang Dasar Negara Republik Indonesia 1945 sebagai landasan konstitusi dan dasar instrumen pemerintahan daerah dalam pelaksanaannya selalu tidak konsisten mengenai dekonsentrasi, desentralisasi, dan medebewind. Setelah dilakukan penelaahan terhadap Undang-Undang Nomor 23 Tahun 2014 tentang Pemerintahan Daerah dapat diketahui beberapa pokok dalam undang-undang tersebut. Pertama, perumus dan pelaksana undang-undang berusaha menyeimbangkan kontekstualitas dan eksistensi pemerintah daerah lebih prudent atau sebaliknya kembali dalam skema shadow sentralisasi. Hal ini didukung dalam Pasal 9 menyebutkan urusan pemerintahan dibagi menjadi 3 (tiga) yang terdiri atas urusan pemerintahan absolut, konkuren, dan umum. Bentuk negara kesatuan (unitary state) diartikan sebagai penyeragaman daripada perbedaan. Kedua, lebih digunakannya konsep otonomi daerah melalui sistem rumah tangga materiil daripada sistem rumah tanggal formal dan nyata (riil). Sehingga, dengan dekonsentrasi maka suatu sistem pemerintah memiliki kewenangan luas dalam melaksanakan isu strategis di daerah. Ketiga, pemerintah pusat dengan provinsi diberikan kewenangan besar untuk mengawasi kotamadya atau kabupaten. Provinsi yang sebelumnya memiliki daya tawar lemah dan terbatas, diperkuat dengan penambahan fungsi dan kewenangan kepada gubernur. Keempat, efisiensi dan efektifitas lebih diutamakan dengan menggerus otonomi daerah yang luas, nyata dan bertanggung jawab. Prinsip-prinsip demokrasi, peran-serta masyarakat, pemerataan dan keadilan, serta memperhatikan potensi dan keanekaragaman daerah terabaikan.The Relation of Central and Local Authority According to the Law Number 23 of 2014 Concerning Local GovernmentAbstractThe relationship of central and local authorities in Indonesia have ups and downs in accordance regime implementation of the State. Since the reform, has many times changed the format of regional autonomy. Article 18 of the Constitution as the basis and instrument of local government in the implementation is not always consistent between deconcentration, decentralization, and medebewind. The Results of study Law 23, 2014, can be seen: First, the drafting and implementing legislation to be attempting to balance-the contextuality and the existence of local government more prudent or otherwise returned in the schema shadow centralization. Due to Article 9, said government affairs were divided into three (3) consisting of government affairs absolute, concurrent, and the public. A unitary state (unitary state) is defined as ‘harmonization’ instead of ‘difference’. Second, using the concept of regional autonomy through a system of household material rather than formal date home system and real (real). So with deconcentration, the government has broad authority to implement the strategic issues in the regions. Third, the central and provincial governments are given substantial authority to oversee the district/municipality. Provinces that previously weak and limited is reinforced by the addition of functions and powers to the governor. Fourth, efficiency and effectiveness are preferred to grind the broad regional autonomy, real and responsible. The principles of democracy, community participation, equity and justice, as well as considering the potential and diversity Regions neglected. DOI: https://doi.org/10.22304/pjih.v2n3.a4
Khazanah: Jeremy Bentham Atip Latipulhayat
PADJADJARAN Jurnal Ilmu Hukum (Journal of Law) Vol 2, No 2 (2015): PADJADJARAN Jurnal Ilmu Hukum (Journal of Law)
Publisher : Faculty of Law, Universitas Padjadjaran

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (555.005 KB)

Abstract

Jeremy Bentham (1748-1832) adalah seorang filosof dan ahli hukum Inggris yang dijuluki sebagai “Luther of the Legal World” (Luther dalam dunia hukum). Julukan ini meminjam ketokohan teolog Martin Luther yang melakukan reformasi terhadap doktrin-doktrin tertentu dalam ajaran Katolik. Bentham dianggap sebagai figur yang melakukan reformasi sistem hukum Inggris pada abad ke-18 yang dianggap ketinggalan zaman, dan bahkan cenderung korup. Bentham memberikan kritik tajam sekaligus tawaran reformasi terhadap sistem hukum Inggris. Utilitarianisme adalah tawaran Bentham untuk mendesain ulang sistem hukum Inggirs yang dinilainya dekaden. DOI: https://doi.org/10.22304/pjih.v2n2.a12
Perlindungan Merek terhadap Framing, Meta tag, dan Deep Linking Berdasarkan UU No. 15 Tahun 2001 tentang Merek dan Perbandingannya dengan Regulasi dan Praktik di Amerika Serikat Muhamad Amirulloh; Aneke Putri Kusmawati
PADJADJARAN Jurnal Ilmu Hukum (Journal of Law) Vol 1, No 3 (2014): PADJADJARAN Jurnal Ilmu Hukum (Journal of Law)
Publisher : Faculty of Law, Universitas Padjadjaran

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (780.077 KB)

Abstract

AbstrakFraming, meta tags, dan deep linking semakin marak terjadi dalam berbagai transaksi elektronik, khususnya yang berkaitan dengan pemanfaatan dan penggunaan merek dalam aktivitas di internet. Hal ini menimbulkan berbagai masalah hukum baru. Salah satu masalah yang timbul adalah penyalahgunaan merek di dunia maya dengan cara meminjam reputasi suatu merek tanpa izin dengan tujuan untuk menarik dan menyesatkan konsumen untuk mengunjungi website tersebut. Regulasi tentang dilusi merek dan putusan kasus-kasus di Amerika Serikat dijadikan bahan perbandingan. Penelitian ini menunjukan bahwa teori hukum perlindungan konsumen menerapkan framing, meta tags, dan/atau deep linking menggabungkan teori perlindungan merek tradisional dengan teori kepentingan. Prinsip-prinsip hukum yang dapat digunakan untuk melindungi merek dari framing, meta tags, dan deep linking adalah prinsip iktikad baik dan prinsip pembedaan dalam aktivitas-aktivitas penting dalam perdagangan barang dan jasa.Kata kunci: merek, framing, meta tag, deep linking, teknologi informasi dan komunikasi (TIK) Trademark Protection against Framing, Meta Tag, and Deep Linking Based on Trademark Act Number 15 of 2001 and Its Comparison with the Regulation and Practices in the United States of AmericaAbstractFraming, meta tags, and deep linking are frequently occurred in electronic transactions through the utilization and use of the mark in the activity on the internet. This raises a new form of legal problems, namely infringement of the brand in the virtual world, by leveraging the reputation (goodwill) as a brand without permission with the intention to attract and mislead consumers to visit their website. Trademark Dilution Act and Practices in United States of America is used as a comparative study. This research showed that the theory of brand protection law recognized framing, meta tags, and/or linking the theory of brand protection era of Information and Communication Technology, which combines a conventional brand protection theory with the theory of interest. Legal principles that can be used to protect the brand of the framing, meta tags, and/or deep linking is a principle of good faith, the principle of distinguishing, in the use of the principle activities of goods and/or services.Keywords: trademark, framing, meta tag, deep linking, information and communication technology (ICT).DOI: https://doi.org/10.22304/pjih.v1n3.a3
Khazanah: Feuerbach Atip Latipulhayat
PADJADJARAN Jurnal Ilmu Hukum (Journal of Law) Vol 4, No 3 (2017): PADJADJARAN Jurnal Ilmu Hukum (Journal of Law)
Publisher : Faculty of Law, Universitas Padjadjaran

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar

Abstract

For a number of years in the mid-nineteenth century Ludwig Feuerbach (1804–1872) played an important role in the history of post-Hegelian German philosophy, and in the transition from idealism to various forms of naturalism, materialism and positivism that is one of the most notable developments of this period. To the extent that he is remembered today by non-specialists in the history of nineteenth-century religious thought, it is mainly as the object of Marx’s criticism in his famous Theses on Feuerbach, originally penned in 1845 and first published posthumously by Friedrich Engels as an appendix to his book, Ludwig Feuerbach and the End of Classical German Philosophy (Engels 1888). Although never without his admirers, who have included several leading popularizers of scientific materialism in the second half the nineteenth century (cf. Gregory 1977), not to mention the theologian, Karl Barth, Feuerbach’s public influence declined rapidly after the failed revolution of 1848/49 (in approximately inverse proportion to the rising popularity of Schopenhauer). Renewed philosophical attention paid to him in the middle of the twentieth century is largely attributable to the publication, beginning in the late 1920s, of Marx’s early philosophical manuscripts, including The German Ideology, which revealed the extent of Feuerbach’s influence on Marx and Engels during the period culminating in the composition of that historic work (1845–46).
Transformasi Pengaturan Distribusi Urusan Pemerintahan dari Pemerintah Pusat Kepada Pemerintahan Daerah Dian Agung Wicaksono
PADJADJARAN Jurnal Ilmu Hukum (Journal of Law) Vol 2, No 3 (2015): PADJADJARAN Jurnal Ilmu Hukum (Journal of Law)
Publisher : Faculty of Law, Universitas Padjadjaran

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (606.723 KB)

Abstract

AbstrakPasca berlakunya Undang-Undang Nomor 23 Tahun 2014 tentang Pemerintahan Daerah dan Undang-Undang Nomor 6 Tahun 2014 tentang Desa terdapat beberapa hal yang harus dicermati, terlebih dalam hal pengaturan distribusi urusan pemerintahan yang menjadi alas pelaksanaan kewenangan pemerintahan daerah. Apabila dibandingkan dengan Undang-Undang Nomor 32 Tahun 2004, maka terdapat perubahan dalam distribusi urusan pemerintahan. Tulisan ini berusaha memberikan penjelasan terhadap pemahaman mengenai urusan pemerintahan dengan membandingkan dua undang-undang untuk membingkai kerangka pemikiran daerah dalam mengidentifikasi urusan pemerintahan. Pola distribusi urusan pemerintahan dalam politik hukum desentralisasi di Indonesia secara simultan melahirkan otonomi daerah, tidak sepatutnya hanya dimaknai sebagai strategi untuk mengelola hubungan kewenangan antara pemerintah pusat dan pemerintahan daerah. Desentralisasi yang sejatinya mendistribusikan urusan harus secara jernih dikaitkan dengan kewenangan sebagai alas pelaksanaan urusan karena konsep kewenangan dalam otonomi daerah tidak bisa ditukar pengertiannya dengan urusan yang kemudian hanya sekedar dimaknai dengan hubungan keuangan sebagaimana rezim Undang-Undang Nomor 23 Tahun 2014 tentang Pemerintahan Daerah.The Transformation in the Regulation on Distribution of Government Affairs Between Central and Local GovernmentsAbstractAfter the enactment of Law Number 23 of 2014 Concerning Local Government and Law Number 6 of 2014 Concerning Village, there are several things to be observed, specifically regarding the regulations on the distribution of government affairs upon which the authority of local government is based. Concerning government affairs, there are several missing aspects in the Law Number 23 of 2014 Concerning Local Government and Law Number 32 of 2004 Concerning Local Government. This paper seeks to compare the two regulations to determine the distribution pattern of government affairs in Indonesia’s decentralized legal politics that simultaneously spawns local autonomy should not only be interpreted as a strategy to manage the relationship of authority between central and local governments. Decentralization, which genuinely distributes affairs, should be transparently linked with authority as the legal basis of conducting the affairs and the concept of authority regarding local autonomy should not be simplified into financial matters as regulated by the Law Number 23 of 2014 Concerning Local Government. DOI: https://doi.org/10.22304/pjih.v2n3.a3
The Implication of the Globalization on the Pancasila-Based Principles of Local Democracy in Indonesia Seno Wibowo Gumbira; Jamal Wiwoho
PADJADJARAN Jurnal Ilmu Hukum (Journal of Law) Vol 6, No 2 (2019): PADJADJARAN JURNAL ILMU HUKUM (JOURNAL OF LAW)
Publisher : Faculty of Law, Universitas Padjadjaran

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (348.969 KB)

Abstract

Abstract           The liberalism principles have influenced the whole life aspects of the nation and the state of Indonesia. On the political aspect, the principles influence the elections in Indonesia from the lowest (village head election) to the highest (presidential election) levels. The liberal principles are not in accordance with the principles of Pancasila as the national philosophy and the source of law (staatsfundamental norm) of Indonesia.  The liberal democratic principles cause high cost democracy. They create the conditions of ‘free fight’ and ‘homo homini lupus’, as well as many potential corruption practices in villages. In addition, it can lead to the most worrying issue –the damage of values of Pancasila.Implikasi Pengaruh Globalisasi atas Diseminasi Prinsip-Prinsip Demokrasi Liberalisme terhadap Prinsip-Prinsip Demokrasi Lokal (Desa) berdasarkan Pancasila di Indonesia AbstrakPengaruh prinsip-prinsip liberalisme telah mempengaruhi seluruh bidang kehidupan bangsa dan negara Indonesia. Pengaruh dalam bidang politik dapat ditemukan pada pemilihan umum yang dilakukan secara voting baik tingkat pemilihan presiden hingga tingkat pemilihan kepala desa di Indonesia, tentunya hal tersebut tidak sesuai dengan Prinsip Pancasila yang merupakan falsafah bangsa dan sumber hukum (staatsfundamentalnorm) di Indonesia. Dampak diseminasi prinsip demokrasi liberalisme melalui voting menyebabkan demokrasi dengan biaya tinggi (high cost) menciptakan kondisi free fight dan homo homini lupus serta banyaknya potensi praktik korupsi di desa dan hal yang paling mengkhawatirkan adalah terjadinya pengikisan nilai-nilai yang terkandung dalam Pancasila.Kata Kunci: Globalisasi, Pancasila, Prinsip Demokrasi LiberalDOI: https://doi.org/10.22304/pjih.v6n2.a8

Page 29 of 52 | Total Record : 518

 27   28   29   30   31 

Filter by Year

2014 2025


Reset
Filter By Issues
All Issue Vol 12, No 1 (2025): PADJADJARAN JURNAL ILMU HUKUM (JOURNAL OF LAW) Vol 11, No 3 (2024): PADJADJARAN JURNAL ILMU HUKUM (JOURNAL OF LAW) Vol 11, No 2 (2024): PADJADJARAN JURNAL ILMU HUKUM (JOURNAL OF LAW) Vol 11, No 1 (2024): PADJADJARAN JURNAL ILMU HUKUM (JOURNAL OF LAW) Vol 10, No 3 (2023): PADJADJARAN JURNAL ILMU HUKUM (JOURNAL OF LAW) Vol 10, No 2 (2023): PADJADJARAN JURNAL ILMU HUKUM (JOURNAL OF LAW) Vol 10, No 1 (2023): PADJADJARAN JURNAL ILMU HUKUM (JOURNAL OF LAW) Vol 9, No 3 (2022): PADJADJARAN JURNAL ILMU HUKUM (JOURNAL OF LAW) Vol 9, No 2 (2022): PADJADJARAN JURNAL ILMU HUKUM (JOURNAL OF LAW) Vol 9, No 1 (2022): PADJADJARAN JURNAL ILMU HUKUM (JOURNAL OF LAW) Vol 8, No 3 (2021): PADJADJARAN JURNAL ILMU HUKUM (JOURNAL OF LAW) Vol 8, No 2 (2021): PADJADJARAN JURNAL ILMU HUKUM (JOURNAL OF LAW) Vol 8, No 1 (2021): PADJADJARAN JURNAL ILMU HUKUM (JOURNAL OF LAW) Vol 7, No 3 (2020): PADJADJARAN JURNAL ILMU HUKUM (JOURNAL OF LAW) Vol 7, No 2 (2020): PADJADJARAN JURNAL ILMU HUKUM (JOURNAL OF LAW) Vol 7, No 1 (2020): PADJADJARAN JURNAL ILMU HUKUM (JOURNAL OF LAW) Vol 6, No 3 (2019): PADJADJARAN JURNAL ILMU HUKUM (JOURNAL OF LAW) Vol 6, No 2 (2019): PADJADJARAN JURNAL ILMU HUKUM (JOURNAL OF LAW) Vol 6, No 1 (2019): PADJADJARAN JURNAL ILMU HUKUM (JOURNAL OF LAW) Vol 5, No 3 (2018): PADJADJARAN JURNAL ILMU HUKUM (JOURNAL OF LAW) Vol 5, No 2 (2018): PADJADJARAN JURNAL ILMU HUKUM (JOURNAL OF LAW) Vol 5, No 2 (2018): PADJADJARAN JURNAL ILMU HUKUM (JOURNAL OF LAW) Vol 5, No 1 (2018): PADJADJARAN JURNAL ILMU HUKUM (JOURNAL OF LAW) Vol 5, No 1 (2018): PADJADJARAN JURNAL ILMU HUKUM (JOURNAL OF LAW) Vol 4, No 3 (2017): PADJADJARAN Jurnal Ilmu Hukum (Journal of Law) Vol 4, No 3 (2017): PADJADJARAN Jurnal Ilmu Hukum (Journal of Law) Vol 4, No 2 (2017): PADJADJARAN Jurnal Ilmu Hukum (Journal of Law) Vol 4, No 2 (2017): PADJADJARAN Jurnal Ilmu Hukum (Journal of Law) Vol 4, No 1 (2017): PADJADJARAN Jurnal Ilmu Hukum (Journal of Law) Vol 4, No 1 (2017): PADJADJARAN Jurnal Ilmu Hukum (Journal of Law) Vol 3, No 3 (2016): PADJADJARAN Jurnal Ilmu Hukum (Journal of Law) Vol 3, No 3 (2016): PADJADJARAN Jurnal Ilmu Hukum (Journal of Law) Vol 3, No 2 (2016): PADJADJARAN Jurnal Ilmu Hukum (Journal of Law) Vol 3, No 2 (2016): PADJADJARAN Jurnal Ilmu Hukum (Journal of Law) Vol 3, No 1 (2016): PADJADJARAN Jurnal Ilmu Hukum (Journal of Law) Vol 3, No 1 (2016): PADJADJARAN Jurnal Ilmu Hukum (Journal of Law) Vol 2, No 3 (2015): PADJADJARAN Jurnal Ilmu Hukum (Journal of Law) Vol 2, No 3 (2015): PADJADJARAN Jurnal Ilmu Hukum (Journal of Law) Vol 2, No 2 (2015): PADJADJARAN Jurnal Ilmu Hukum (Journal of Law) Vol 2, No 2 (2015): PADJADJARAN Jurnal Ilmu Hukum (Journal of Law) Vol 2, No 1 (2015): PADJADJARAN Jurnal Ilmu Hukum (Journal of Law) Vol 2, No 1 (2015): PADJADJARAN Jurnal Ilmu Hukum (Journal of Law) Vol 1, No 3 (2014): PADJADJARAN Jurnal Ilmu Hukum (Journal of Law) Vol 1, No 3 (2014): PADJADJARAN Jurnal Ilmu Hukum (Journal of Law) Vol 1, No 2 (2014): PADJADJARAN Jurnal Ilmu Hukum (Journal of Law) Vol 1, No 2 (2014): PADJADJARAN Jurnal Ilmu Hukum (Journal of Law) Vol 1, No 1 (2014): PADJADJARAN Jurnal Ilmu Hukum (Journal of Law) Vol 1, No 1 (2014): PADJADJARAN Jurnal Ilmu Hukum (Journal of Law) More Issue