Articles
375 Documents
<![CDATA[IMPLEMENTASI ASAS IN BEZIT STELLING PADA CASH COLLATERAL SEBAGAI JAMINAN ATAS PERJANJIAN KREDIT (Studi PT. Bank Rakyat Indonesia (PERSERO) KC Bojonegoro) ]]>
<![CDATA[Khoirunnisa Diyah Permata]]>;
<![CDATA[Anjar Sri Ciptorukmi Nugraheni]]>
<![CDATA[ Jurnal Privat Law Vol 12, No 2 (2024): AGUSTUS-DESEMBER ]]>
Publisher : <![CDATA[Fakultas Hukum Universitas Sebelas Maret ]]>
Show Abstract
|
Download Original
|
Original Source
|
Check in Google Scholar
|
DOI: 10.20961/privat.v12i2.50734
<![CDATA[AbstractThis Articles aims to analyze the implementation of in bezit stelling principle on cash collateral as collateral for credit agreements and the execution of cash collateral by analyze first the implementation of credit agreements. This study belongs to empirical law research that is descriptive in nature. The data was obtained from primary and secondary data. Considering the result of research and discussion Based on the results of the research and discussion, a conclusion was made regarding the implementation of in bezit stelling principle on cash collateral at BRI Bojonegoro Branch Office and execution of cash collateral, credit loans use cash collateral tied to a mortgage agreement to ensure repayment of debtor debt, There is a surrender of cash collateral as a real delivery which is the legal amount of the mortgage along with the blocking of the credit. Creditor also has preference right, namely the right to precedence in the term of debt repayment over object execution result becoming the mortgage collateral objects against other creditor. If when the debtor makes a default, then BRI Bojonegoro Branch Office execute directly (parate execution) against cash collateral. Execution may be made by withdrawal for payment of debtor debt.]]>
<![CDATA[KEDUDUKAN HUKUM PEMEGANG SAHAM YANG TIDAK MELAKUKAN PENYETORAN MODAL SECARA PENUH ATAS PEMBAGIAN DIVIDEN DALAM PERSEROAN TERBATAS ]]>
<![CDATA[Indra Jaya Nata]]>
<![CDATA[ Jurnal Privat Law Vol 11, No 1 (2023): JANUARI-JUNI ]]>
Publisher : <![CDATA[Fakultas Hukum Universitas Sebelas Maret ]]>
Show Abstract
|
Download Original
|
Original Source
|
Check in Google Scholar
|
DOI: 10.20961/privat.v11i1.46940
<![CDATA[This article aims to find out about the legal standing of shareholders who do not make a full capital deposit on dividend distribution in a limited liability company. This legal research is a normative legal research and the legal source used consists of primary legal material and secondary legal material, then analyzed by deductive method of silogism based on the mindset of the general to specific things, by connecting between the major premise and the minor premise is further drawn conclusively. The results of this legal research show that the legal standing of shareholders who do not make a full capital deposit causes the loss of shareholders' rights in accordance with Article 52 paragraph (1) of the UUPT including the right to obtain dividend distribution. Such rights will be obtained by shareholders after carrying out their obligations to deposit capital in full.]]>
<![CDATA[PROBLEMATIKA PERLINDUNGAN HAK CIPTA KARYA FOTOGRAFI DI MEDIA SOSIAL BERDASAKAN UNDANG-UNDANG NOMOR 28 TAHUN 2014 TENTANG HAK CIPTA ]]>
Muhammad Alvi Sadewo; Munawar Kholil
<![CDATA[ Jurnal Privat Law Vol 9, No 2 (2021): JULI-DESEMBER ]]>
Publisher : <![CDATA[Fakultas Hukum Universitas Sebelas Maret ]]>
Show Abstract
|
Download Original
|
Original Source
|
Check in Google Scholar
|
DOI: 10.20961/privat.v9i2.60049
<![CDATA[Abstract Article is intended to determine the problematic implementation of the protection of the legal rights of copyright works of photography in the media of social method of research that is used in the writing of the law this is a method of study law empirical or non-doctrinal research (social legal research) the use of materials of law consists of primary data in the form of interviews and secondary data in the form of a literature study . Data processed by the techniques of analysis of data qualitatively using the method of analysis interactive . The results of the study that the problems of implementation of the protection of the legal rights of copyright works of photography in the media of social among other weaknesses in principle deklartif , difficulty in doing the proof of ownership rights of copyright Media social as the implications of the advancement of technology information that led to increased severity of the protection of the rights of copyright on a media social , the granting sanction violations of the rights of copyright that does not cause the effect deterrent ownership of the account media social more than one also becomes one of the causes of widespread violations of the rights of copyright in media social . the lack of protection of the rights of copyright in media social which one of them on the terms and ketentuanya , lack of enforcement of laws regarding perlanggaran Rights Reserved in media social , and the latter the lack of understanding of the creators of the rights of copyright both in the literal as well as regulatory legislation which set of rights copyright Keywords: Copyright; Photography; protection; Social media Abstrak Artikel ini bertujuan untuk mengetahui problematika pelaksanaan perlindungan hukum hak cipta karya fotografi di media sosial Metode penelitian yang digunakan dalam penulisan hukum ini adalah metode penelitian hukum empiris atau non-doctrinal research (social legal research) yang menggunakan bahan hukum terdiri dari data primer berupa wawancara dan data sekunder berupaa studi kepustakaan. Data diolah dengan Teknik analisis data kualitatif menggunakan metode analisis interaktif. Hasil penelitian bahwa problematika pelaksanaan perlindungan hukum hak cipta karya fotografi di media sosial antara lain kelemahan pada prinsip deklartif, kesulitan dalam melakukan pembuktian kepemilikan hak cipta, media sosial sebagai implikasi dari kemajuan teknologi informasi yang menyebabkan bertambah parahnya perlindungan hak cipta pada media sosial, adanya pemberian sanksi pelanggaran hak cipta yang tidak menimbulkan efek jera kepemilikan akun media sosial lebih dari satu juga menjadi salah satu penyebab maraknya pelanggaran hak cipta di media sosial. lemahnya perlindungan hak cipta di media sosial yang salah satunya pada syarat dan ketentuanya, kurangnya penegakan hokum mengenai perlanggaran Hak Cipta di media sosial, dan yang terakhir yakni rendahnya pemahaman para pencipta mengenai hak cipta baik secara harfiah dan juga peraturan perundang-undangan yang mengatur tentang hak cipta. Kata Kunci : Hak Cipta; Karya Fotografi; perlindungan; Media sosial]]>
<![CDATA[PERTANGGUNGJAWABAN PERDATA AHLI WARIS PELAKU TINDAK PIDANA KORUPSI YANG SUDAH MENINGGAL ]]>
<![CDATA[Obed Joshua Sirait]]>;
<![CDATA[Anjar Sri Ciptorukmi Nugraheni]]>
<![CDATA[ Jurnal Privat Law Vol 12, No 1 (2024): JANUARI-JUNI ]]>
Publisher : <![CDATA[Fakultas Hukum Universitas Sebelas Maret ]]>
Show Abstract
|
Download Original
|
Original Source
|
Check in Google Scholar
|
DOI: 10.20961/privat.v12i1.50465
<![CDATA[AbstractThis articles aims to analyze the construction of the legal relationship between testator, heirs, and the state as well as to study and analyze the form of accountability for state losses that have been caused by criminal offenders who have died in court proceedings. The research method is using normative legal research with statute approach, case approach, and conseptual approach. The legal materials used are primary and secondary legal materials, with data collection techniques used are document study technique or library study technique. Based on the result of the research, it can be concluded that there is a relationship between the heir and the state resulting from the act of the testator who commits corruption and the obligation to pay the loss still exists even though in the Criminal Code the criminal obligation has been terminated because the perpetrator died, the heirs of the perpetrators of a criminal act of corruption are obliged to be responsible if the person concerned receives the inheritance and the inheritance has been proven to contain losses to state finances.Keywords: Heirs; Inheritance; Responsibilities; State Finance LossAbstrakArtikel ini bertujuan untuk menganalisis konstruksi hubungan hukum antara pewaris, ahli waris, dan negara serta mengkaji dan menganalisis bentuk pertanggungjawaban dari kerugian negara yang telah diakibatkan oleh pelaku tindak pidana yang sudah meninggal di dalam proses pengadilan. Metode penelitian yang digunakan adalah penelitian hukum normatif dengan pendekatan perundang - undangan, pendekatan kasus, dan pendekatan konseptual. Bahan hukum yang digunakan adalah bahan hukum primer dan sekunder, dengan teknik pengumpulan data yang digunakan adalah teknik studi dokumen atau studi kepustakaan. Berdasarkan hasil pembahasan dapat diketahui bahwa adanya konstruksi hubungan antara ahli waris dengan negara yang ditimbulkan dari perbuatan pewaris yang melakukan korupsi dan kewajiban untuk membayar kerugiannya tetap masih ada walaupun di dalam KUHP kewajiban pidananya telah gugur dikarenakan pelakunya meninggal dunia, Ahli waris dari pelaku tindak pidana korupsi wajib bertanggungjawab apabila yang bersangkutan menerima harta warisan tersebut dan harta warisan tersebut telah secara nyata terbukti mengandung kerugian keuangan negara.Kata Kunci: Ahli Waris; Kerugian Keuangan Negara; Tanggung Jawab; Waris]]>
<![CDATA[IMPLEMENTATION OF THE SETTLEMENT OF MSME BAD LOANS BASED ON POJK NUMBER 11 OF 2020 DUE TO THE COVID-19 PANDEMIC (STUDY AT PT. BANK RAKYAT INDONESIA (PERSERO) TBK SURAKARTA) ]]>
<![CDATA[Raihan Ade Izdihar]]>;
<![CDATA[Moch. Najib Imanullah]]>
<![CDATA[ Jurnal Privat Law Vol 12, No 2 (2024): AGUSTUS-DESEMBER ]]>
Publisher : <![CDATA[Fakultas Hukum Universitas Sebelas Maret ]]>
Show Abstract
|
Download Original
|
Original Source
|
Check in Google Scholar
|
DOI: 10.20961/privat.v12i2.50945
<![CDATA[This article aims to review legal issues regarding the implementation of the settlement of MSME bad loans based on Financial Services Authority (POJK) Regulation Number 11 of 2020 at PT. Bank Rakyat Indonesia and constraints in the implementation of bad credit settlement due to Covid-19 and alternative solutions. To achieve this goal, then empirical legal research is conducted which is descriptive The data type in this study consists of primary data obtained directly from the field and secondary data obtained from the results of literature study. The primary data collection technique used is to use interview techniques, while secondary data collection techniques use downloading and collecting necessary legal materials. The data analysis techniques used are interactive analysis models. The results of this research and study, show that the implementation of economic recovery policy issued by the government has been applied well by Bank BRI, especially for Micro, Small, and Medium Enterprises (MSMEs) debtors. The form of restructuring conducted by Bank BRI Surakarta is by lowering interest rates and extending the installment period. Government policy by issuing a credit relaxation policy is a very appropriate step, especially for debtors of Micro, Small, and Medium Enterprises or MSMEs of Bank BRI Surakarta. The settlement of bad loans due to the Covid-19 pandemic at Bank BRI Surakarta has been implemented based on The Financial Services Authority (POJK) Regulation Number 11 of 2020 on The Stimulus Impact of Covid-19. An alternative solution to the constraints of the implementation of bad credit settlement due to Covid-19 is the launch of the Economic Recovery Program (PEN) through the Regulation of the Financial Services Authority (POJK) Number 11 of 2020 on Stimulus Impact of Covid-19. State-owned banks, in this case Bank BRI Surakarta has helped MSME debtors affected by Covid-19]]>
<![CDATA[PERLINDUNGAN HUKUM TERHADAP PEKERJA KONTRAK DALAM PERJANJIAN KERJA DENGAN SISTEM OUTSOURCING DI INDONESIA ]]>
<![CDATA[Pandhu Maruli Yoso]]>;
<![CDATA[" Suraji]]>
<![CDATA[ Jurnal Privat Law Vol 11, No 2 (2023): JULI - DESEMBER ]]>
Publisher : <![CDATA[Fakultas Hukum Universitas Sebelas Maret ]]>
Show Abstract
|
Download Original
|
Original Source
|
Check in Google Scholar
|
DOI: 10.20961/privat.v11i2.48652
<![CDATA[This article aims to determine the concept and examine the relationship between agency workers and companies involved in work agreements with the outsourcing system in Indonesia. There is a legal vacuum in defining this work relationship that gives more benefits to the company, which on the other hand also creates problems related to the protection of agency workers' rights. This research is a normative legal research. The approach used by the author is the statutory approach, case approach and the conceptual approach. The sources of law used consist of primary and secondary legal materials. The data collection technique used by the writer is a library research obtained from a review of legal regulations related to outsourcing contract workers. The technique of analyzing legal materials uses the syllogistic method with a deductive mindset. The result of this study is that with the existence of a legal vacuum in defining a legal relationship, the work agreement must have legal certainty in accordance with the work agreement arrangement in the outsourcing system and the agreement principle in the work agreement itself. This is intended so that contract workers and companies in the outsourcing system can mutually fulfill their rights and obligations according to the binding agreement of each party.]]>
<![CDATA[IMPLIKASI DAN MEKANISME EKSEKUSI OBJEK JAMINAN FIDUSIA PASCA PUTUSAN MAHKAMAH KONSTITUSI NO.18/PUU-XVII/2019 DALAM HAL DEBITUR WANPRESTASI ]]>
<![CDATA[Brigita Cindy Meiliana]]>;
<![CDATA[Arief Suryono]]>
<![CDATA[ Jurnal Privat Law Vol 11, No 2 (2023): JULI - DESEMBER ]]>
Publisher : <![CDATA[Fakultas Hukum Universitas Sebelas Maret ]]>
Show Abstract
|
Download Original
|
Original Source
|
Check in Google Scholar
|
DOI: 10.20961/privat.v11i2.49811
<![CDATA[This article aims to find out the legal implications of the Constitutional Court Decision No.18 / PUU-XVII / 2019 and the mechanism for the execution of fiduciary object guarantees after the Constitutional Court Decision No.18 / PUU-XVII / 2019. This type of research is normative with the nature of applied and prescriptive research. Based on the results of research and discussion, the most important implications are the reduced executive power of fiduciary certificates, the elimination of the parate execution mechanism, and inefficiency in handling fiduciary guarantee disputes. Meanwhile, the mechanism is longer and more complicated.]]>
<![CDATA[PERLINDUNGAN HUKUM MEREK SAH TERHADAP TINDAKAN PEMBONCENGAN REPUTASI (PASSING OFF) ]]>
<![CDATA[Muhammad Faisal Aditya]]>;
<![CDATA[Yudho Taruno Muryanto]]>
<![CDATA[ Jurnal Privat Law Vol 12, No 1 (2024): JANUARI-JUNI ]]>
Publisher : <![CDATA[Fakultas Hukum Universitas Sebelas Maret ]]>
Show Abstract
|
Download Original
|
Original Source
|
Check in Google Scholar
|
DOI: 10.20961/privat.v12i1.50451
<![CDATA[AbstractThis article examines the form of legal protection for registered trademark rights holders against the existence of a passing off action along with what legal remedies can be taken by the aggrieved parties for the existence of this passing off act. So that through mechanisms both in litigation and non-litigation, it is hoped that it can provide justice for the aggrieved parties. This research is a normative-juridical research which is prescriptive in nature. Types of secondary data include primary, secondary and tertiary legal materials. The data collection technique used is through literature study, research instruments in the form of Undang-Undang No. 20 of 2016 concerning Trademarks and Geographical Indications. The results of this study indicate how the form of legal protection provided by the government for registered trademark rights owners against the act of passing off. The form of protection provided is in the form of granting exclusive rights to use a registered mark in the trade in goods / services, as a "differentiator" from the product against its competitors. In addition, it is explained in relation to the efforts that can be made by the aggrieved party if there is an action of passing off aimed at his brand. Efforts that can be made can be in the form of Application for Mark Cancellation in the Mark Official Gazette (during registration), the Litigation Path, and the Non-Litigation Path. AbstrakArtikel ini mengkaji terkait dengan bentuk perlindungan hukum bagi pemegang hak merek terdaftar terhadap adanya tindakan pemboncengan reputasi beserta upaya hukum apa yang dapat dilakukan oleh pihak-pihak yang dirugikan atas adanya tindakan pemboncengan reputasi tersebut. Sehingga melalui mekanisme baik secara litigasi maupun non-litigasi, diharap dapat memberi keadilan bagi pihak-pihak yang dirugikan. Penelitian ini merupakan penelitian normatif-yuridis yang bersifat preskriptif. Jenis data sekunder meliputi bahan hukum primer, sekunder dan tersier. Teknik pengumpulan data yang digunakan adalah melalui studi kepustakaan, instrumen penelitian berupa Undang-Undang Nomor 20 Tahun 2016 tentang Merek dan Indikasi Geografis. Hasil penelitian ini menunjukan tentang bagaimana bentuk perlindungan hukum yang diberikan oleh pemerintah bagi pemilik hak merek yang sudah terdaftar terhadap adanya tindakan passing off. Bentuk perlindungan yang diberikan tersebut adalah berupa pemberian hak eksklusif untuk menggunakan merek yang didaftarkan ke dalam perdagangan barang/jasa, sebagai “pembeda” daripada produk tersebut terhadap para pesaingnya. Selain itu dijelaskan terkait dengan upaya yang dapat dilakukan oleh pihak yang dirugikan apabila terdapat tindakan passing off yang ditujukan kepada mereknya. Upaya yang dapat dilakukan dapat berupa Permohonan Pembatalan Merek pada Berita Resmi Merek (saat pendaftaran), Jalur Litigasi, dan Jalur Non-Litigasi.]]>
<![CDATA[DASAR HUKUM PERTIMBANGAN HAKIM DALAM MENETAPKAN HAK ASUH ANAK DIBAWAH UMUR PADA SUAMI AKIBAT PERCERAIAN (Studi Putusan Nomor 12/Pdt.G/2018/PN/Skt) ]]>
Luthfita Yuliana Nur Yumna S; Ambar Budhisulistyawati
<![CDATA[ Jurnal Privat Law Vol 9, No 2 (2021): JULI-DESEMBER ]]>
Publisher : <![CDATA[Fakultas Hukum Universitas Sebelas Maret ]]>
Show Abstract
|
Download Original
|
Original Source
|
Check in Google Scholar
|
DOI: 10.20961/privat.v9i2.60044
<![CDATA[AbstractThe purpose of this article is to find out the basic considerations of judges in deciding divorce case Nomor 12/Pdt.G/2018/PN.Surakarta. The method used in this legal article applies perspective and is applied. The advice used is an update carried out to resolve broad legal issues to find out custody or child custody of divorced husbands. The collection of legal material is done by studying the literature. This research is based on primary legal material consisting of laws and court decisions and secondary legal material consisting of books, journals, and articles. The return of legal material in this revision uses literature study or document study techniques. The results obtained are the basic law in collecting child custody from divorce, in this decision in accordance with the provisions of the Marriage Law, the Child Protection Act, and the judge's decision. In this case, the judge must consider everything that happened at the hearing. Keywords: Marriage; Divorce; Child Detention AbstrakTujuan artikel ini adalah untuk mengetahui dasar hukum pertimbangan hakim dalam memutuskan perkara perceraian Nomor 12/Pdt.G/2018/PN Skt dalam menetapkan hak asuh anak pada suami. Metode yang digunakan dalam artikel hukum ini bersifat prespektif dan terapan. Pendekatan yang digunakan adalah pendekatan kasus yang dilakukan untuk memecahkan isu hukum yang dihadapi untuk mengetahui hak pemeliharaan atau hak asuh anak pada suami akibat perceraian. Pengumpulan bahan hukum dilakukan dengan studi pustaka. Penelitian bersumber pada bahan hukum primer yang berupa perundang-undangan dan putusan pengadilan dan bahan hukum sekunder yang berupa buku, jurnal, dan artikel. Teknik pengumpulan bahan hukum dalam penulisan ini menggunakan teknik studi kepustakaan atau studi dokumen. Hasil yang diperoleh adalah dasar hukum hakim dalam menetapkan hak asuh anak pada suami akibat perceraian, dalam putusan ini sesuai dengan ketentuan Undang-Undang Perkawinan, Undang-Undang Perlindungan Anak, dan keputusan dari hakim. Dalam hal ini, hakim harus mempertimbangkan segala hal yang terjadi di persidangan.Kata Kunci : Perkawinan; Perceraian; Hak Asuh Anak]]>
<![CDATA[PERLINDUNGAN HAK CIPTA PENCIPTA LAGU TERHADAP PEMBAJAKAN DALAM BENTUK MODIFIKASI APLIKASI SPOTIFY ]]>
<![CDATA[Dwi Adittya Rahmad]]>;
<![CDATA[Hernawan Hadi]]>
<![CDATA[ Jurnal Privat Law Vol 10, No 2 (2022): JULI - DESEMBER ]]>
Publisher : <![CDATA[Fakultas Hukum Universitas Sebelas Maret ]]>
Show Abstract
|
Download Original
|
Original Source
|
Check in Google Scholar
|
DOI: 10.20961/privat.v10i2.65074
<![CDATA[AbstractThis Study aims to determine form the copyright protection based On Act Number 28 Year 2014 About Copy Right And Act Number 19 Year 2016 About Information And Electronic Transaction in the practice of piracy in the form of Spotify online music player application. These problems can give rise to various problems which many cause harm to The Creator and/or Copyright Holders for illegal acts based on internet media that take advantage of current technological developments. Legal protection is a preventive government effort aimed at preventing disputes and repressive efforts aimed at resolving disputes. The effectiveness of a regulation can be assessed through legal substance, which is the core of legislation, legal structure, namely law enforcement and legal culture. The study is prescriptive, using the technique of collecting legal materials by reviewing and studying literature, books, legislation, report documents, and other research results that have a correlation with research. The result of this study are Copyright Protection by the creator has been regulated in the current regulations and the form of harmonization between the act is the activity of blocking illegal website that have been regulated in both Act.Keywords: Copyright Protection; Spotify; Piracy; Creator and Copyright HoldersAbstrakKajian ini bertujuan untuk mengetahui bentuk perlindungan Hak Cipta pencipta lagu berdasarkan Undang-Undang Nomor 28 Tahun 2014 tentang Hak Cipta dan Undang-Undang Nomor 19 Tahun 2016 tentang Informasi dan Transaksi Elektronik dalam praktik pembajakan dalam bentuk modifikasi aplikasi pemutar musik online Spotify. Permasalahan tersebut dapat menimbulkan kerugian bagi pencipta dan/ atau Pemegang Hak Cipta atas tindakan illegal berbasis media internet yang memanfaatkan perkembangan teknologi saat ini. Perlindungan hukum merupakan suatu upaya pemerintah yang bersifat preventif untuk mencegah terjadinya sengketa dan upaya yang bersifat represif untuk menyelesaikan terjadinya sengketa. Efektif atau tidaknya suatu peraturan bisa dikaji melalui substansi hukum, yaitu inti dari peraturan perundang-undang, struktur hukum, yaitu para penegak hukum dan budaya hukum. Kajian ini bersifat preskriptif, menggunakan teknik pengumpulan bahan hukum dengan cara mengkaji dan mempelajari literatur, buku-buku, peraturan perundang-undangan, dokumen laporan, arsipan hasil penelitian lainnya yang memiliki korelasi dengan penelitian yang sedang diteliti. Hasil dari kajian ini adalah perlindungan Hak Cipta terhadap pencipta sudah diatur dalam peraturan yang berlaku saat ini dan bentuk harmonisasi antara Undang-Undang adalah kegiatan pemblokiran situs-situs ilegal yang telah diatur di dalam kedua Undang-Undang.Kata Kunci: Perlindungan Hak Cipta; Spotify; Pembajakan; Pencipta dan Pemagang Hak Cipta]]>
