Sriwijaya Law Review
The Sriwijaya Law Review known as the SLRev launched on the 31st January 2017 and inaugurated formally by the Rector of the university is a forum which aims to provide a high-quality research and writing related to law. Areas that relevant to the scope of the journal cover: business law, criminal law, constitutional law, administrative law, and international law
Articles
307 Documents
<![CDATA[Potential Investor Claims and Possible State Defences During the Covid-19 Emergency ]]>
<![CDATA[Sefriani Sefriani]]>;
<![CDATA[Seguito Monteiro]]>
<![CDATA[ Sriwijaya Law Review Volume 5 Issue 2, July 2021 ]]>
Publisher : <![CDATA[Faculty of Law, Sriwijaya University, Indonesia ]]>
Show Abstract
|
Download Original
|
Original Source
|
Check in Google Scholar
|
DOI: 10.28946/slrev.Vol5.Iss2.1067.pp236-246
<![CDATA[Since it was announced as a public health emergency of international concern in 2019, Covid-19 has caused enormous loss of property and life. The country's emergency policies in responding to the Covid outbreak are numerous, such as closing public transportation and prohibiting the export of medical devices. These policies have potentially harmed the interests of investors. This study has three purposes: investors' potential claims to challenge state measures addressed to Covid-19, the legal defences of states, and the possibility of an international investment dispute. This study shows that investors' potential claims may be delivered based on violations of the principles of fair and equal treatment, full protection and security, and national treatment and the most favoured nations. While a state can defend itself based on the principles of force majeure and state necessity, states can also defence through Non preclude measures or right to regulate clause in international investment agreements. In addition, it would also be better to build international solidarity and cooperation to mitigate and defeat the Covid-19 pandemic than sue the government before ISDS. States need collective action to avoid a surge of investor-state Arbitration. Governments’ policy to combat Covid-19 is to be considered as acting in necessity and therefore cannot be found in breach of their investment treaty obligations as long as that policy meet the necessity, proportionate, and non-discrimination requirements.]]>
<![CDATA[The Criticism of Land Procurement Law to Improve Landowners Welfare in Indonesia ]]>
<![CDATA[Fifik Wiryani]]>;
<![CDATA[Mokhammad Najih]]>
<![CDATA[ Sriwijaya Law Review Volume 5 Issue 2, July 2021 ]]>
Publisher : <![CDATA[Faculty of Law, Sriwijaya University, Indonesia ]]>
Show Abstract
|
Download Original
|
Original Source
|
Check in Google Scholar
|
DOI: 10.28946/slrev.Vol5.Iss2.1073.pp175-191
<![CDATA[This study is to conduct a juridical analysis of the implications of Law No. 2 of 2012 on Land Procurement for Development for the Public Interest to improve the welfare of landowners after the release of land rights. The focus of the study is on the arrangement of indemnity from the aspects: assessors, indemnity assessment, and deliberation on the determination of indemnity. The research approach uses normative juridical, with secondary data sourced from primary legal materials and secondary legal materials from March to July 2020. The data was analysed using content analysis combined with prescriptive analysis. As a result, this research proposes the arrangement of compensation in the Law on Land Procurement for the Development of the Public Interest. These arrangements are included the material determination of assessors, the value of compensation, deliberationof the determination of compensation, and the custody of compensation (consignment) in the Law on Land Procurement which is inconsistent with the principles and principles of land procurement that should be as the basis and guidelines for the formulation of norms.]]>
<![CDATA[In Search of Ummah Welfare Model: The Revitalisation of Sharia Economic Law in Indonesia ]]>
<![CDATA[Erie Hariyanto]]>;
<![CDATA[Harisa Harisah]]>;
<![CDATA[Moh. Hamzah]]>;
<![CDATA[Fatekhul Mujib]]>;
<![CDATA[Hidayatullah Hidayatullah]]>;
<![CDATA[Cut Linda Marheni]]>
<![CDATA[ Sriwijaya Law Review Volume 7 Issue 2, July 2023 ]]>
Publisher : <![CDATA[Faculty of Law, Sriwijaya University, Indonesia ]]>
Show Abstract
|
Download Original
|
Original Source
|
Check in Google Scholar
|
DOI: 10.28946/slrev.Vol7.Iss2.1080.pp244-261
<![CDATA[Sharia economic law in Indonesia has been revitalised through legal unification and codification to improve national economic development. In this context, the Sharia economy has become a guideline in every transaction. Therefore, people must understand the Islamic economic concept to create maslahah (goodness) in every aspect of life. Sharia economic law is not a new system, as it has been implemented since the era of the Prophet. However, there is a need for adjustment in the implementation of the Sharia economic law from time to time to enable it responding the current development. This study employs qualitative inquiry, using library research to analyse Sharia economic law's history and legal development. Legal documents used include state laws and regulations, the regulations of the Bank of Indonesia, the fatwa of DSN-MUI, and others. This paper argues that the revitalisation of the Sharia economic law in Indonesia is in line with the efforts made by the predominantly Muslim population to conserve and develop the system. This includes non-legalised and legalised implementation of the Sharia economic system, such as Sharia banking. Furthermore, the system does not contradict the value of Pancasila and the 1945 Constitution’s pillars of the Unitary State of the Republic of Indonesia. Sharia economic law, prioritising moral and religious principles, has proven to create maslahah and become a solution to the economic crisis. This was shown by the survival of Sharia banks during the 1998 economic crisis, maintaining the Sharia-standardised contract to create justice in society.]]>
<![CDATA[Protection of Performers' Rights in Indonesian Copyright Law: Copyrighted Works Uploaded to YouTube ]]>
<![CDATA[Yulia Yulia]]>;
<![CDATA[Zinatul Ashiqin Zainol]]>;
<![CDATA[Fatahillah F]]>
<![CDATA[ Sriwijaya Law Review Volume 7 Issue 2, July 2023 ]]>
Publisher : <![CDATA[Faculty of Law, Sriwijaya University, Indonesia ]]>
Show Abstract
|
Download Original
|
Original Source
|
Check in Google Scholar
|
DOI: 10.28946/slrev.Vol7.Iss2.1092.pp300-317
<![CDATA[The Beijing Treaty allows performers to benefit from using audiovisual fixation for commercial purposes. This treaty is the first treaty specifically to protect against the head of the show. Indonesia has ratified the Beijing Treaty in order to give protection to the performers. There are provisions that performers can maintain moral rights until death (but not after death) and until the end of economic rights and refuse all forms of distortion, excision and modification that damage the reputation of performers. This article analyses the protection of the rights of performers whose works were uploaded without permission to YouTube under Indonesian Copyright Law 2014. This research is normative juridical research with a conceptual and statutory approach. The result is that the show performers’ performance rights under the Beijing Agreement have been adopted in the 2014 Indonesian Copyright Act, even though there are some differences in defining the fixation and scope of the show rights to the fixed performance terms. The 2014 Indonesian Copyright Law has indefinitely maximised the protection of performers' moral rights. Moreover, the Indonesian Copyright Law 2014 Act No. 28 states that the rights of performers cannot be eliminated or cannot be removed for any reason, including their economic rights, such as a right to carry out themselves, give permission, prohibit broadcast or communication the performance to other parties, come under by using online media. Therefore, when an illegal act such as uploading the performance of performers without permission violates Copyright Law, dan perpetrators can be sued.]]>
<![CDATA[Sustainable Infrastructure Legal Policy in Indonesia: A National Strategic Project Approach for National Development ]]>
<![CDATA[Maret Priyanta]]>;
<![CDATA[Cut Sabina Anasya Zulkarnain]]>
<![CDATA[ Sriwijaya Law Review Volume 7, Issue 1 January 2023 ]]>
Publisher : <![CDATA[Faculty of Law, Sriwijaya University, Indonesia ]]>
Show Abstract
|
Download Original
|
Original Source
|
Check in Google Scholar
|
DOI: 10.28946/slrev.Vol7.Iss1.1108.pp1-18
<![CDATA[Infrastructure development is the top priority of the Indonesian government. The development of transportation network infrastructure is expected to support the growth of national and international economies by connecting regions and opening public and commodity access. The new integrated growth cities were developed to reduce the burden of Jakarta as the central government and economic national centre. Legal aspects become one of the main issues in realising government politics in developing infrastructure. The national strategic project approach became a mechanism to connect a new development centre, such as the Metropolitan Bandung Area, through infrastructure development. However, its implementation requires a legal and regulatory basis with various technical, social, and economic considerations, including anticipating its environmental impact. This research paper aims to give an academic review of the problem of infrastructure development in Indonesia. The normative legal approach is based on the law's theory, concepts, and principles by considering the technical aspects to develop alternative solutions to provide legal certainty in developing infrastructure in Indonesia. The rules for spatial planning are a key issue in developing infrastructure related to random locations and land acquisition. This conflict becomes a major obstacle in developing new primate cities in Indonesia.]]>
<![CDATA[The Implementation of Waqf as 'Urf in Indonesia ]]>
<![CDATA[Ani Yumarni]]>;
<![CDATA[Gemala Dewi]]>;
<![CDATA[Jaih Mubarok]]>;
<![CDATA[Wirdyaningsih Wirdyaningsih]]>;
<![CDATA[Anna Sardiana]]>
<![CDATA[ Sriwijaya Law Review Volume 5 Issue 2, July 2021 ]]>
Publisher : <![CDATA[Faculty of Law, Sriwijaya University, Indonesia ]]>
Show Abstract
|
Download Original
|
Original Source
|
Check in Google Scholar
|
DOI: 10.28946/slrev.Vol5.Iss2.1126.pp287-299
<![CDATA[As a tradition that has been practised for a long time, waqf or endowment is clear evidence that Muslims in Indonesia are developing through this worship. However, what if the waqf is in the form of a mosque, Islamic school, and grave (3M’s waqf). It is an unusual thing in the contemporary Islamic tradition, but its existence persists. Meanwhile, 'Urf as one of the legal propositions in establishing Islamic law has known the concept and has been practised for generations in suburban areas where most of the population is Muslim. This tradition is then accommodated in Law Number 41 of 2004 concerning endowment, which contains land endowment and endowment organiser (nazhir). This paper examines the tradition of endowment in Indonesian society to benefit mosques, Islamic schools, and graves. By using the historical and analytical-conceptual approaches, this paper will analyse waqf in these three forms. The results of this study can be taken into consideration by stakeholders in developing strategies for strengthening and empowering 3M's donated land to create benefits for the Indonesian since 3M’s endowment is commonly found in Indonesian society. ]]>
<![CDATA[Asylum Seekers and Refugee Management: (Im)Balance Burden Sharing Case between Indonesia and Australia ]]>
<![CDATA[Arie Afriansyah]]>;
<![CDATA[Hadi Rahmat Purnama]]>;
<![CDATA[Akbar Kurnia Putra]]>
<![CDATA[ Sriwijaya Law Review Volume 6 Issue 1, January 2022 ]]>
Publisher : <![CDATA[Faculty of Law, Sriwijaya University, Indonesia ]]>
Show Abstract
|
Download Original
|
Original Source
|
Check in Google Scholar
|
DOI: 10.28946/slrev.Vol6.Iss1.1145.pp70-100
<![CDATA[Since the 1970s, Indonesia has been acting as a transit country for asylum seekers and refugees to reach Australia and New Zealand. Being a non-state party to the Refugee Convention, Indonesia has become the strategic partner for Australia in managing the issue of asylum seekers and refugees. The two countries have been involved in many bilateral and regional arrangements to tackle the issues. The “Bali process†is one of Indonesia and Australia's arrangements to lead the region in tackling forced migration and refugees. Unfortunately, despite their “common†interests, many of Australia's policies towards asylum seekers have negatively impacted Indonesia in many ways. This paper uses desk study research with a normative approach to analyse nationally and internationally relevant laws and policies. This paper analyses the Bali Process as regional cooperation means of burden-sharing in which Indonesia and Australia play dominant roles while scrutinising how both countries implement the policies within their domestic realms. In addition, the dynamics within the two countries will also be examined to understand how they shape their policies. This paper argues that Indonesia has fulfilled its part by managing these protected persons within Indonesia. However, Australia seems to consistently try to shift its burden to Indonesia as its neighbouring state. By revisiting the Bali Process arrangement, it is suggested that Australia needs to respect its commitment and take any means necessary to keep good relations with its neighbours, including Indonesia.]]>
<![CDATA[The Problematics of Management Personal Protection Equipment Waste related to Covid-19 in Indonesia ]]>
<![CDATA[Muhammad Hadin Muhjad]]>;
<![CDATA[Fakhruddin Razy]]>;
<![CDATA[Ahmad Fikri Hadin]]>
<![CDATA[ Sriwijaya Law Review Volume 5 Issue 2, July 2021 ]]>
Publisher : <![CDATA[Faculty of Law, Sriwijaya University, Indonesia ]]>
Show Abstract
|
Download Original
|
Original Source
|
Check in Google Scholar
|
DOI: 10.28946/slrev.Vol5.Iss2.1161.pp300-308
<![CDATA[Medical Waste for Covid-19 Personal Protective Equipment (PPE) is classified as B3, which can potentially be a medium for spreading the virus. Therefore, management must be carried out, consisting of collection, sorting, transportation, temporary storage, to processing (destruction) based on the Circular of the Minister of Environment and Forestry Number 2 of 2020 using the incinerator and problematic autoclave methods. The purpose of this study is to find out how the law regulates the management of Covid-19 PPE waste in Indonesia and how it should be. The research method used is normative legal research. The results showed that based on the Circular Letter of the Minister of LHK No. 2 of 2020, it is determined that the destruction of Covid-19 PPE waste as B3 waste must go through an incinerator facility with a minimum combustion temperature of 800â° C and an autoclave equipped with a shredder. This method is considered overkill and incurs high costs. The conclusion of this study is to provide input for the Government to review or revise the Circular regarding safer Covid-19 PPE B3 waste management, including through the pyrolysis method.]]>
<![CDATA[Constitutional Rules on Waqf and Fiscal Policy Outcomes ]]>
<![CDATA[Abdul Ghafar Ismail]]>;
<![CDATA[Wahyu Ario Pratomo]]>
<![CDATA[ Sriwijaya Law Review Volume 5 Issue 2, July 2021 ]]>
Publisher : <![CDATA[Faculty of Law, Sriwijaya University, Indonesia ]]>
Show Abstract
|
Download Original
|
Original Source
|
Check in Google Scholar
|
DOI: 10.28946/slrev.Vol5.Iss2.1169.pp262-272
<![CDATA[Fiscal policy, inter alia, looks at the list of government revenues. The constitutional rules provide guidance on the list of revenues. However, the previous studies find that waqf is not considered as part of government revenues. In this study, we argue that waqf brings in a new list of government revenues. To prove this point, we select a sample of fifty-seven countries under the Organization of Islamic Countries. The constitution of each country is investigated by using content analysis. The study uses a combination of several keywords, namely “tax or taxes or fiscal obligations,†“revenues or budget or finance†and “waqf†in investigating the rules on revenues and waqf. The findings in this study are classified into five kinds of countries, namely countries that highlight government revenue and waqf in the constitution, countries that claim to recognize sharia law as the basis of the law but the waqf rules in the constitution are missing, countries that mention in their constitution that government revenues are placed under the government system, financial system, and parliament, countries that place waqf is ruled under the public finance matter, and countries that place waqf as the main policy. This finding implies that the constitutional rules lead to the view that waqf is a part of public finance that can be used as a fiscal policy tool and should be included in the state budget plan.]]>
<![CDATA[The Patent System During Global Pandemic and the Access to Medications and Vaccines ]]>
<![CDATA[Fatou Diagne Mbaye]]>;
<![CDATA[Agus Sardjono]]>
<![CDATA[ Sriwijaya Law Review Volume 6 Issue 1, January 2022 ]]>
Publisher : <![CDATA[Faculty of Law, Sriwijaya University, Indonesia ]]>
Show Abstract
|
Download Original
|
Original Source
|
Check in Google Scholar
|
DOI: 10.28946/slrev.Vol6.Iss1.1233.pp55-69
<![CDATA[The Declaration on Trade-Related Intellectual Property Rights (TRIPS) and Public Health Agreements want to promote the balanced interpretation and implementation of its provisions and promote universal access by assisting WTO members to protect public health rights. Two years will soon pass, and the emergence of new variants of COVID-19 shows that the virus will not stop at national borders. However, vaccines are gradually entering and almost monopolised by industrialised countries. If Jonas Salk thought in the 1950s that patenting his polio vaccine was like patenting the sun, the problem appearing is that today's patent holders do not think so. The COVID-19 vaccine is owned by biotech companies, universities, research institutes or pharmaceutical companies. The purpose of this research is to analyse, through a normative juridical approach, the requirement for patent holders to protect their intellectual property rights if they are to remain competitive in the marketplace. Not to forget that they must pay patent fees as a percentage of the final price of the vaccine, which is a significant benefit to the economies of the countries where they are located. While for developing countries, the best solution would be to produce their vaccines. With industrial property rights, it seems impossible to transfer the vaccine technology on COVID-19. That is why some developing countries (South Africa and India have the support of many other developing countries) have filed a complaint with the WTO, requesting a waiver of property rights under Article 31 of TRIPS in order to produce a COVID-19 vaccine on a large scale and at an affordable price. ]]>
