Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 17 Documents
Search

The Suspension of the Advocate Oath and Its Implications for the Criminalization of the Legal Profession Lutfiadi, Lutfiadi; Wardani, Win Yuli; Ismail, Mahsun ; Mohammad, Mohammad; Sari, Insana Meliya Dwi Citra Aprilia
Jurnal Ilmu Hukum Kyadiren Vol 7 No 1 (2025): Jurnal Ilmu Hukum Kyadiren
Publisher : PPPM, Sekolah Tinggi Ilmu Hukum (STIH) Biak-Papua

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.46924/jihk.v7i1.263

Abstract

The suspension of advocates’ oaths by the High Court raises fundamental legal issues concerning the professional legitimacy of advocates and the public’s right to legal aid. This study examines the legal basis for such suspension within the framework of Law No. 18 of 2003 on Advocates, evaluates the status of advocates following suspension, analyzes potential criminal implications, and explores broader policy consequences for human rights, particularly access to justice. Employing a normative juridical method, the research draws upon approaches from legal dogmatics, legal theory, and legal philosophy, supported by analysis of statutory law, legal scholarship, and relevant judicial decisions. The findings reveal that the suspension of advocates’ oaths lacks explicit legal grounding, constitutes an ultra vires act, and contravenes the principle of legality. Advocates whose oaths are suspended remain professionally legitimate and cannot be subject to prosecution except through mechanisms established by professional organizations or a binding judicial ruling. In conclusion, the unilateral suspension of oaths generates legal uncertainty, undermines public access to legal aid, and underscores the necessity of ensuring legal certainty and safeguarding both advocates’ rights and the public’s right to justice.
The Constitutional Legitimacy of Temporary Advocate Identification in the Indonesian Legal System Lutfiadi, Lutfiadi; Wardani, Win Yuli; Heryanti, Febrina; Camelia, Noer Dini; Hanayanti, Citra Siwi
Jurnal Ilmu Hukum Kyadiren Vol 7 No 1 (2025): Jurnal Ilmu Hukum Kyadiren
Publisher : PPPM, Sekolah Tinggi Ilmu Hukum (STIH) Biak-Papua

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.46924/jihk.v7i1.295

Abstract

The rejection of the Temporary Advocate Identification (TPSA) by judicial panels in court proceedings presents significant legal and constitutional concerns, particularly with respect to the principles of legal certainty and the client’s right to legal representation. This study seeks to examine the legal status of the TPSA based on Indonesia’s positive legal framework, especially in relation to Law No. 18 of 2003 on Advocates and its implementing regulations. Furthermore, it evaluates the authority of advocate organizations in issuing identification cards as a means of establishing professional legitimacy. Utilizing a normative legal method combined with case study analysis of selected judicial decisions, this research finds that although TPSA is not explicitly regulated in statutory provisions, it possesses a valid administrative foundation. The rejection of TPSA in court proceedings has adverse implications for the constitutional rights of advocates and impairs clients’ access to legal counsel. Accordingly, the study recommends the establishment of formal regulatory recognition of TPSA to promote legal equality, procedural consistency, and the effective exercise of the right to defense within the judicial system.
Constitutionalism and the Debate Surrounding the Suspension of the Advocates’ Association Lutfiadi, Lutfiadi; Wardani, Win Yuli; Heryanti, Febrina; Camelia, Noer Dini; Purwandi, Agustri
Jurnal Ilmu Hukum Kyadiren Vol 7 No 2 (2026): Jurnal Ilmu Hukum Kyadiren
Publisher : PPPM, Sekolah Tinggi Ilmu Hukum (STIH) Biak-Papua

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.46924/jihk.v7i2.333

Abstract

The suspension of advocates’ Oath of Office (BAS) by the High Court raises significant concerns within the framework of Indonesian procedural law and state administration. The core issue stems from the absence of an explicit legal basis authorizing such action, which may contravene the principles of legality, constitutionalism, and the protection of advocates’ fundamental rights. This study aims to examine the legal legitimacy of the BAS suspension, evaluate its compliance with constitutional principles, and explore its philosophical implications for the role of advocates as law enforcers on a par with judges, prosecutors, and police officers. Employing a normative juridical approach with a focus on doctrinal analysis of the Advocates Law, the 1945 Constitution, relevant court decisions, and legal literature, the study finds that the BAS suspension constitutes an ultra vires act. Consequently, this measure undermines the rule of law, diminishes the independence of the legal profession, and has the potential to disrupt public access to justice, highlighting the need for more robust regulatory reforms.
Limiting the age for candidates of public officials viewed by human rights and moral perspective Lutfiadi, Lutfiadi; Camelia, Noer Dini; Wardani, Win Yuli; Heryanti, Febrina; Wahyono, Sapto
LEGAL BRIEF Vol. 13 No. 2 (2024): June: Law Science and Field
Publisher : IHSA Institute

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.35335/legal.v13i2.982

Abstract

Elections are a key requirement of a democratic state. Democracies uphold human rights. There are human rights that can be restricted and Elections are a key requirement of a democratic state. Democracies uphold human rights. There are human rights that can be restricted and those that cannot. The right to be elected and to vote in public office is a human right that can be restricted by the state, but the restriction must be based on reasons that are in line with morality. This research aims to understand whether restrictions on the right to be elected and to vote based on age are in line with the law and morals or vice versa. This research is normative legal research that focuses on the problem of legal norms at the level of positive law, legal theories, and principles. The approaches used are legislation, literature review, conceptual approaches. The result is that all forms of restrictions on the community to participate in state life are restrictions on human rights. Restrictions on human rights are a violation of moral values. The conclusion is that a democratic state should not limit a person's right to vote and elect. The state should leave it entirely up to the people, whether they want to vote for that person or not. The Constitutional Court should not create new norms, the Constitutional Court should only have the authority to declare a certain legal norm contrary to the 1945 Constitution or not
The existence of arbitration verdict cancellation efforts regarding final and binding characteristics Camelia, Noer Dini; Lutfiadi, Lutfiadi; Heryanti, Febrina; Wardani, Win Yuli; Purwandi, Agustri
LEGAL BRIEF Vol. 13 No. 2 (2024): June: Law Science and Field
Publisher : IHSA Institute

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar

Abstract

The arbitration verdict must include a verdict implementation period. It is based on the arbitration verdict characteristics based on Article 60 AADR LAW (Law on Arbitration and Alternative Dispute Resolution), namely that an arbitration verdict is final, has permanent legal force, and is binding on both parties; therefore, the legal consequences do not only apply to the parties who are arbiter but also arbitration verdicts cannot be further tested for legal consequences by other institutions. However, the provisions of Article 60 AADR LAW are followed by the provisions of Article 70 AADR LAW, which allows for arbitration verdict cancellation by the District Court as in Article 71 AADR LAW. Hence, this research aims to determine the binding power of an arbitration verdict and the District Court’s authority in canceling an arbitration verdict. The research methodology was normative research with statutory and conceptual approaches. The research results stated that efforts to cancel the arbitration verdict by the District Court had implications for the loss of the final and binding characteristics of the arbitration verdict. Efforts to cancel the arbitration verdict required to reconsider its existence
Efektivitas Hukum Pelaksanaan Pendidikan Politik Dalam Pelaksanaan Pemilihan Umum Presiden Dan Wakil Presiden Indonesia Wardani, Win Yuli; Nadir, Nadir
Innovative: Journal Of Social Science Research Vol. 3 No. 5 (2023): Innovative: Journal of Social Science Research
Publisher : Universitas Pahlawan Tuanku Tambusai

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar

Abstract

Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk mengungkap efektivitas hukum pelaksanaan pendidikan politik dalam pelaksanaan Pemilihan Umum Presiden dan Wakil Presiden Indonesia. Untuk mengungkap efektivitas hukum ini, maka diperlukan beberapa faktor, baik faktor hukum maupun non hukum. Penelitian ini menggunakan metode penelitian hukum dengan pendekatan sosiologi hukum, hal ini dimaksudkan untuk menganalisis dan memberikan jawaban terhadap isu-isu efektivitas hukum pelaksanaan daripada pendidikan politik di masyarakat. Data yang digunakan primary sources or authorities, secondary sources or authorities. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa hekekat pemilihan umum Presiden dan wakil Presiden di Indonesia sebagai wujud realitas dari suatu pelaksanaan konstitusi negara Indonesia dan sebagai wujud realitas kehendak umum rakyat Indonesia untuk menentukan Presiden Indonesia maju sejahtera sebagai amanat konstitusi. Untuk mengukur efektivitas hukum pelaksanaan pendidikan politik dalam pelaksanaan Pemilihan Umum Presiden dan Wakil Presiden Indonesia dapat ditentukan oleh beberapa faktor, yaitu: pertama substansi hukum, dalam hal ini adalah penegasan pengaturan norma hukum pelaksanaan pendidikan politik itu sendiri melalui hukum psositif Indonesia telah mengatur secara eksplisit. Kedua, tercapainya pembelajaran pemahaman hak dan kewajiban warga negara. Ketiga, terbentuknya kultur masyarakat Indonesia menolak politik uang. Keempat, tercapainya peningkatan partisipasi politik pemilih. Kelima, terpenuhinya sarana pendukung pelaksana pendidikan politik selama pelaksanaan berlangsung.
Kajian Sosiologis Hukum Pola Hubungan Perjanjian Terapeutik Pakendek, Adriana; Purwandi, Agustri; Wardani, Win Yuli; Royana, Dila; Saputri, Arimurtika Fajariyah
LITERATUS Vol 5 No 2 (2023): Jurnal Ilmiah Internasional Sosial dan Budaya
Publisher : Neolectura

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.37010/lit.v5i2.1470

Abstract

This study examines the therapeutic agreement relationship between doctors and patients within the context of healthcare services from the perspective of legal sociology and applicable regulations. Health, as a fundamental right guaranteed by the Indonesian Constitution, requires a supporting legal framework, as regulated in Law No. 17 of 2023 on Health. The therapeutic relationship, built on a mutual agreement between therapists and patients, is strengthened by factors such as trust, empathy, and openness, affecting the effectiveness of therapy. This research employs a normative legal method to elucidate existing legal issues, identify gaps between legal theory and practice, and propose solutions. The results indicate the importance of a deep understanding of social interaction in a legal context and the significant role of law in ensuring the application of ethical and responsible medical practices. This research aims to enhance patient awareness of their rights, expand the understanding of doctors and healthcare professionals about their professional obligations, and assist hospitals in improving service quality and reducing litigation risks.