Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 22 Documents
Search

Responsibility and Accountability in the World of Futures Trading: Analysis of Futures Brokers and Broker Representatives Under the Spotlight of Civil Law and BAKTI Arbitration" Muhammad Sabir Rahman; Syamsul Efendi; Yudhi Priyo Amboro; Kristi W Simanjuntak; Nurul Fazri Elfikri; Aceng Asnawi Rohani; Dede Agus
Pena Justisia: Media Komunikasi dan Kajian Hukum Vol. 23 No. 1 (2024): Pena Justisia
Publisher : Faculty of Law, Universitas Pekalongan

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.31941/pj.v23i1.4113

Abstract

This study aims to examine the role of Article 1367 of the Civil Code in determining the duties of Futures Brokers and Futures Broker Representatives in the context of Indonesian commodity futures trading, with a focus on the consequences for violations of these duties by Futures Broker Representatives. respond to it. This methodology is based on normative legal principles and is based on research into relevant literature and examination of BAKTI rulings in the field of commodity futures trading arbitration. Findings from this study highlight the importance of taking into account the Futures Broker Representative's level of professionalism as well as any applicable rules and regulations when determining the extent to which the Futures Broker is legally liable for the Futures Broker Representative's conduct. In order to provide fairness and clarity in commodity futures trading, this study's findings suggest that current rules need to be revised and adjusted. The study also suggests directions for future research on the dynamics of futures trading's legal aspects.
From Normative Recognition to Effective Protection: Reformulating Restitution for Child Victims in Indonesia Sokhib Naim; Wahab Aznul Hidaya; Kristi Warista Simanjuntak; Rajab Lestaluhu; Nurhalisa Nurhalisa
Jurnal Ius Constituendum Vol. 11 No. 3 (2026): OCTOBER
Publisher : Magister Hukum Universitas Semarang

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.26623/jic.v11i3.14666

Abstract

This study aims to analyze the effectiveness of restitution for child victims of criminal offenses within Indonesia’s criminal justice system and formulate a restorative justice-based restitution model. Although Indonesian law recognizes restitution as a right of victims, its realization remains problematic due to fragmented regulations, weak inter-agency coordination, reliance on victims’ procedural initiative, and the absence of effective enforcement mechanisms. This issue is particularly urgent for child victims of sexual violence, whose vulnerability and long-term physical, psychological, social, and educational impacts require an effective victim-oriented legal protection mechanism. Employing normative legal research, this study uses statutory, conceptual, case, and comparative approaches to examine legislation, legal scholarship, and Judgment No. 247/Pid.Sus/2023/PN Son through qualitative legal reasoning and ratio decidendi analysis. The novelty lies in integrating normative analysis with judicial analysis to identify the relationship between regulatory fragmentation, judicial discretion, institutional weaknesses, and the persistence of a retributive paradigm, while developing an integrated restitution framework. The findings demonstrate that restitution remains predominantly a normative entitlement rather than an effective legal remedy because its implementation depends on victims’ initiative, discretionary judicial consideration, fragmented institutional coordination, and ineffective execution. Accordingly, this study proposes an Integrative Model of a Restitutory System Based on Restorative Justice comprising six stages: identification of losses, LPSK assessment, mandatory prosecutorial filing, mandatory judicial consideration, enforceable execution, and institutional monitoring. The model strengthens institutional responsibility and positions victim recovery as an integral objective of criminal justice.