Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Aspek Keperdataan dalam Upaya Penyelesaian Sengketa Medis antara Pasien dengan Tenaga Medis Berdasarkan Undang-Undang Kesehatan Camellia, Lintang Zandra; Kartika, Adhitya Widya
Jurnal Hukum & Pembangunan
Publisher : UI Scholars Hub

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar

Abstract

Medical disputes in the civil field are disputes that can occur between patients and doctor as a medical-professionals and are related to the full fillment of the rights and obligations of the binding relationship as a legal result in the provision of medical services. Medical disputes can lead to losses suffered by patients which can be in the form of limb disability, even death. The emergence of law and health provides a beneficial collaboration, where the health field can be used to face public health challenges and the law can be used to maintain peace and order in society. The regulation of health law in Indonesia contained in Law No. 36 of 2009 which has now been amended by Law No. 17 of 2023 provides differences in efforts to resolve medical disputes which are important to examine and are the focus of this research. The author's research was conducted using a juridical-normative legal methodology with a conceptual approach and a statutory approach. The civil aspect in the settlement of medical disputes is that there are losses suffered by patients due to negligence committed by medical personnel. Patients have the right to claim compensation which can be done by litigation or non-litigation. The parties involved in medical dispute resolution want a dispute resolution that is closed and provides a sense of security, especially on the part of medical personnel so that their reputation is not tainted, so they prefer to conduct non-litigation dispute resolution. Law No. 17 of 2023 provides several options for dispute resolution using Alternative Dispute Resolution which in Law No. 36 of 2009 medical dispute resolution can only be done by mediation.
Analisis Putusan Peninjauan Kembali Di Bawah Ketentuan Minimum Pidana Penjara Dalam Perkara Narkotika (Studi Kasus Putusan MA Nomor 375 PK/PID.SUS/2024) Adrian, Sesilia Firsty; Adhitya Widya Kartika
Lex Stricta : Jurnal Ilmu Hukum Vol. 4 No. 1 (2025)
Publisher : Sekolah Tinggi Ilmu Hukum Sumpah Pemuda

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar

Abstract

The application of law in Indonesia is based on the positive law applicable in Indonesia. There is an application of law in Supreme Court Decision Number 375 PK/Pid.Sus/2024 which is the object of the author's research by reviewing the suitability of the decision by comparing the decision with the positive law applicable in Indonesia. The verdict can be reviewed from formal law by referring to the Criminal Procedure Code as the legal basis, while from material law referring to Law Number 35 of 2009 concerning Narcotics. The application of the law in the Supreme Court Decision is reviewed from formal law by looking at the procedure when the applicant submits a request for a review to reopen a decision that has permanent legal force to be retried in court. The author conducts research on the application of formal law whether it is in accordance with the requirements and procedures contained in the Criminal Procedure Code and in accordance with the process of requesting a Judicial Review. The suitability of the application of material law is also examined by the author reviewing Law Number 35 of 2009 concerning Narcotics and also several related regulations. The purpose of the suitability of the application of law to a decision has an impact on the realization of the pillars of law stated by Gustav Radburch, namely justice, expediency, and legal certainty. The author in this study will examine the realization of the pillar of legal certainty in Supreme Court Decision Number 375 PK/Pid.Sus/2024.
Kajian Politik Hukum Putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi Nomor 135/PUU-XXII/2024 Tentang Pemisahan Pemilihan Umum Nasional dan Lokal Suryana, Eka Pala; Kartika, Adhitya Widya; Fikri, Abdullah
Legalita Vol 7 No 2 (2025): Jurnal Hukum Legalita
Publisher : Universitas Muhammadiyah Kotabumi

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.47637/legalita.v7i2.2094

Abstract

The Constitutional Court Decision Number 135/PUU-XXII/2024 ruled the separation of national and local elections, with the Court’s considerations emphasizing that previous electoral practices had led to excessive workloads for election organizers, political party pragmatism, the marginalization of regional development issues, institutional fatigue and casualties, as well as voter fatigue and a decline in the quality of popular sovereignty. This study examines the legal politics underlying the Constitutional Court’s decision and its juridical implications by employing both a case approach, which analyzes legal disputes in the electoral law domain, and a conceptual approach, which explores the transformation of electoral concepts. The findings demonstrate that the legal politics of Decision Number 135/PUU-XXII/2024 aim to enhance the quality of democracy, since democratic elections play a vital role in safeguarding state integrity, establishing representative institutions, and ensuring effective governance, all of which must be conducted in accordance with the general principles of democracy. Furthermore, the juridical impact of the decision highlights the urgency of strategic measures in electoral governance, particularly the need for immediate legislative revisions of the Electoral Law to guarantee voter accessibility, consolidate political parties, and rationalize the workload of election organizers, thereby providing a clear operational legal basis for the transitional period.
Pelaksanaan Pemenuhan Hak-Hak Istri pada Perkara Cerai Talak di Pengadilan Agama Surabaya Nur Rais Madjid; Adhitya Widya Kartika
Jurnal Ilmu Hukum, Humaniora dan Politik Vol. 4 No. 5 (2024): (JIHHP) Jurnal Ilmu Hukum, Humaniora dan Politik (Juli - Agustus 2024)
Publisher : Dinasti Review Publisher

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.38035/jihhp.v4i5.2188

Abstract

Perceraian adalah tindakan hukum, di mana akan melahirkan beberapa akibat hukum. Sebagaimana Pasal 144 Kompilasi Hukum Islam (KHI), bahwa terjadinya perceraian ialah dapat disebabkan adanya suami yang menalak maupun istri yang menggugat cerai sebagaimana dituangkan dalam Putusan Hakim. Mantan suami dimungkinkan memiliki kewajiban dalam rangka membiayai hidup mantan istrinya yang dinamakan Mut’ah, nafkah Iddah (apabila istrinya tersebut tak Nusyuz), dan nafkah terhadap anaknya. Penelitian disini mengkaji tentang pelaksanaan pemenuhan segala hak istri pada perkara cerai talak di Pengadilan Agama Surabaya, berdasarkan Putusan No. 3617/Pdt.G/2022/PA.Sby serta untuk mengetahui, menjelaskan kendala-kendala dan upaya penyelesaiannya dalam pelaksanaan pemenuhan hak-hak istri pada perkara cerai talak di Pengadilan Agama Surabaya. Hasil penelitian ditemui bahwa pertimbangan Hakim mengenai penentuan segala hak istri setelah cerai ialah memperhatikan sisi nilai patut sekaligus nilai adil sekaligus melihat kemampuan dari mantan suami. Kendala dalam perwujudan segala hak bekas istri ialah ketidakhadiran bekas istri pada muka persidangan sehingga Majelis Hakim memutus perkara secara putusan “Verstek”. Kemampuan ekonomi dari bekas suami merupakan kendala tersendiri bagi majelis hakim karena bekas suami adalah keluarga miskin. Upaya dalam mengatasi kendala-kendala bila sudah diputus secara “Verstek” ada perlawanan berupa “Verzet” sehingga Termohon bisa meminta hak-haknya selama bisa membuktikan dalil-dalinya walaupun sudah diputuskan secara Verstek, segala hak istri tetap diberikan sebagaimana Perma Nomor 3 Tahun 2017. Majelis Hakim melaksanakan hak Ex-Officio demi menciptakan keadilan kedua belah pihak.  
EKSISTENSI SURAT REKOMENDASI OMBUDSMAN SEBAGAI OBJEK KEPUTUSAN TATA USAHA NEGARA Ahmad Luthfi; Adhitya Widya Kartika
Kertha Semaya: Journal Ilmu Hukum Vol. 13 No. 9 (2025)
Publisher : Fakultas Hukum Universitas Udayana

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.24843/KS.2025.v13.i09.p06

Abstract

Tujuan dari penelitian ini guna menganalisis eksistensi surat rekomendasi ORI dalam ruang lingkup sistem hukum positif di Indonesia dan kedudukan serta konsekuensi yuridis surat rekomendasi ORI sebagai objek KTUN. Tulisan ini tergolong penelitian hukum normatif yang dilaksanakan dengan menggunakan pendekatan konseptual serta peraturan perundang-undangan. Penelitian ini memberi kesimpulan bahwa SRO secara hukum positif diatur dalam UU No. 37 Tahun 2008 dan PO. Dalam dasar hukum positif tersebut ditemukan kesesuaian sifat SRO dengan KTUN yang berdasarkan Pasal 87 UU No. 30 Tahun 2014. Namun, konsekuensi hukum yang timbul adalah sulit untuk dilakukan pengujian atau penegakan hukum di PTUN karena terhalang Pasal 10 UU No. 37 Tahun 2008. The purpose of this research is to analyze the existence of ORI recommendation letters within the scope of the positive legal system in Indonesia and the position and juridical consequences of ORI recommendation letters as objects of KTUN. This paper is classified as normative legal research conducted using a conceptual approach and legislation. This research concludes that the SRO in positive law is regulated in Law No. 37 of 2008 and PO. In the positive legal basis, it is found that the nature of the SRO is consistent with the KTUN based on Article 87 of Law No. 30 of 2014. However, the legal consequence that arises is that it is difficult to conduct testing or enforcement at the State Administrative Court because it is hindered by Article 10 of Law No. 37 of 2008.
Kajian Muatan Undang-Undang Pers Dan Undang-Undang Informasi dan Transaksi Elektronik Pada Aspek Kebebasan Berpendapat Bagi Jurnalis: (Studi Muatan Pasal 15 ayat (2) huruf d UU Pers dan Pasal 27 ayat (3) UU ITE 2008 Serta UU ITE 2016) Diniroja, Syahda Aneira; Kartika, Adhitya Widya
Lex Stricta : Jurnal Ilmu Hukum Vol. 4 No. 2 (2025)
Publisher : Sekolah Tinggi Ilmu Hukum Sumpah Pemuda

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar

Abstract

Journalistic activities now largely take place through digital media, giving rise to a dilemma between the application of the Press Law or the 2008 ITE Law and the 2016 ITE Law. In fact, the 2021 Joint Ministerial Decree on the ITE Law has confirmed that the Press Law is lex specialis. This study aims to examine the scope of the Press Law and the ITE Law in facing the development of digital media, as well as to analyse the construction and harmonisation of the law to maintain press freedom. The study uses a normative juridical method with a legislative and conceptual approach. The results show that the two regulations are not yet fully able to keep up with changes in the digital media landscape. There is a conflict of norms between Article 15 paragraph (2) letter d of the Press Law and Article 27 paragraph (3) of the ITE Law, thus requiring legal harmonisation. Harmonisation can be carried out without amending the Press Law, but by revising the ITE Law to add an exception clause for press products published digitally.
IMPLEMENTASI PEMBENTUKAN RANCANGAN PERATURAN WALI KOTA SURABAYA TENTANG POSYANDU BERDASARKAN UNDANG-UNDANG PEMBENTUKAN PERATURAN PERUNDANG-UNDANGAN Saputra, Moch. Rafli Wahyu Dwi; Kartika, Adhitya Widya
Legal Standing : Jurnal Ilmu Hukum Vol. 10 No. 1 (2026): Legal Standing
Publisher : Universitas Muhammadiyah Ponorogo

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.24269/ls.v10i1.12903

Abstract

This research addresses the low level of public understanding regarding the procedure for drafting the Surabaya Mayor Regulation (Raperwali) on Posyandu, despite the mechanism being regulated in Law No. 12 of 2011 on the Formation of Laws and Regulations and its implementing provisions. The limited knowledge of the stages of planning, drafting, deliberation, ratification, and promulgation creates a gap between the normative process conducted by the local government and community involvement as stakeholders. This study employs a descriptive qualitative approach through field research and document analysis. Primary data were obtained from in-depth interviews with officials involved in the drafting process, while secondary data were collected from legal and administrative documents. The findings indicate that the drafting of the Surabaya Mayor Regulation on Posyandu generally complies with applicable statutory provisions; however, several obstacles remain, including limited human resources, the lack of legal drafting experts, and lengthy bureaucratic procedures. Therefore, although the regulation has a valid legal and procedural basis, strengthening transparency, cross-sectoral coordination, and institutional capacity is necessary to enhance its effectiveness and legitimacy. Ultimately, the Mayor Regulation on Posyandu serves not only as an administrative legal instrument but also as a means of community empowerment in supporting the achievement of Minimum Service Standards (SPM) in public services.
Regulatory Harmonization of Academic Freedom Provisions in the National Education System Lubis, Brian Bottor; Kartika, Adhitya Widya
Lex Publica Vol. 11 No. 1 (2024)
Publisher : APPTHI

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.58829/lp.11.1.2024.266

Abstract

This research examines the inconsistencies in the provisions of Article 24 of Law Number 20 of 2003 on the National Education System and the implementation of Government Regulation Number 57 of 2021 concerning academic freedom and higher education autonomy. Despite the legal framework’s intent to promote academic freedom and autonomy, the absence of references to Article 24 in the preamble of the regulation creates disharmony, leading to legal uncertainty and confusion. The research aims to assess the legal impact of these inconsistencies on Indonesia’s national education policies and practices. Using a normative legal methodology, the study employs a legislative approach and analyzes the legal hierarchy to evaluate the alignment of laws and regulations. The analysis reveals that the failure to include Article 24 in the considerations of Government Regulation Number 57/2021 violates the principle of legal hierarchy and undermines the effectiveness of the law. This disharmony results in legal confusion, inconsistent law enforcement, inefficiency in policy implementation, and a potential decline in the quality of education. The study suggests several solutions, including judicial review, revision of laws, and improved harmonization strategies.
PENYELESAIAN SENGKETA KREDIT MACET PROGRAM NASIONAL PEMBERDAYAAN MASYARAKAT SIMPAN PINJAM PEREMPUAN DI KABUPATEN KEDIRI Randita Putri Nugraini; Adhitya Widya Kartika
Jurnal Hukum Samudra Keadilan Vol 20 No 2 (2025): Jurnal Hukum Samudra Keadilan
Publisher : Fakultas Hukum, Universitas Samudra

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.33059/jhsk.v20i2.11729

Abstract

PNPM Kelompok SPP yang ada di Kecamatan Kayen Kidul Kabupaten Kediri beroperasi sejak tahun 2009, dimana dalam pelaksanaanya menemui hambatan terjadi kredit macet angsuran setiap bulannya dari pemanfaat dana SPP. Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk menganalisis hubungan hukum dari para pihak pada pelaksanaannya serta untuk menganalisis bentuk penyelesaian sengketa kredit macet pada PNPM Kelompok SPP di Kecamatan Kayen Kidul Kabupaten Kediri. Metode penelitian yang digunakan yaitu metode penelitian hukum empiris yang mana dalam memperoleh data menggunakan dua cara yakni wawancara bersama pihak Badan Usaha Milik Desa (Bumdesma) Kayen Kidul Sehati LKD dan menggunakan sumber lain yang memiliki relevansi pada penelitian berupa daftar peraturan-peraturan, buku, dan jurnal yang ada. Hasil dari penelitian ini adalah penyelesaian sengketa yang dilakukan sudah sesuai dengan prosedur yang ada, akan tetapi kurangnya pegawai menghambat jalannya prosedur yang ada. Kesimpulan dari penelitian ini adalah hambatan yang ada dalam prosedur penyelesaian sengketa seharusnya segera di atasi dengan membuka program magang sebagai tambahan bantuan di kantor.
ANALISIS YURIDIS TERHADAP PENYELESAIAN PERKARA PELANGGARAN KODE ETIK PENYELENGGARA PEMILIHAN UMUM (STUDI PUTUSAN DKPP NOMOR 317-PKE-DKPP/X/2019): LEGAL ANALYSIS OF THE SETTLEMENT OF CASES OF VIOLATIONS OF THE CODE OF ETHICS OF GENERAL ELECTION ORGANIZERS (STUDY OF DKPP DECISION NUMBER 317-PKE-DKPP/X/2019) Imron Rosadi; Adhitya Widya Kartika
Journal Presumption of Law Vol 6 No 2 (2024): Volume 6 Nomor 2 Tahun 2024
Publisher : Universitas Majalengka

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.31949/jpl.v6i2.9131

Abstract

Etika memiliki peran penting bagi penyelenggara Pemilu untuk terciptanya Pemilu yang sesuai dengan prinsip demokrasi. Dewan Kehormatan Penyelenggara Pemilihan Umum (DKPP) merupakan lembaga etik Pemilu yang berwenang untuk memeriksa dan mengadili aduan perkara pelanggaran kode etik. DKPP dalam menjalankan kewenangan harus berpedoman pada hukum acara yang telah diatur dalam peraturan perundang-undangan. Tujuan dari penelitian ini untuk menganalisis Putusan DKPP Nomor 317-PKE-DKPP/X/2019 berdasarkan peraturan perundang-undangan dan menjelaskan upaya hukum yang dapat ditempuh para pihak akibat adanya Putusan DKPP. Penelitian ini menggunakan metode penelitian normatif. Data penelitian terdiri dari data primer dan data sekunder yang diperoleh dari studi pustaka dan analisis peraturan. Hasil penelitian ditemukan ketidaksesuaian penerapan aspek prosedural dan subtansial seperti objek sengketa dalam perkara tersebut bukan ranah pelanggaran etik sehingga DKPP dianggap melampaui kewenangannya, Pengadu telah mencabut aduannya dan pelaksanaan rapat pleno anggota DKPP yang tidak sesuai dengan hukum acara DKPP. Adapun upaya hukum yang dapat ditempuh para pihak apabila merasa dirugikan dapat menggugat Keputusan Tata Usaha Negara (KTUN) yang merupakan tindakan lanjut dari Putusan DKPP ke Pengadilan Tata Usaha Negara.