Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 13 Documents
Search

Implementation of Source-Based Waste Segregation Based on Bali Governor Regulation Number 47 of 2019 in Siangan Village Putra, Anak Agung Gede Bagus Darma; Senastri, Ni Made Jaya; Rideng, I Wayan
Journal of Governance, Taxation and Auditing Vol. 4 No. 3 (2026): Journal of Governance, Taxation and Auditing (January - March 2026)
Publisher : PT Keberlanjutan Strategis Indonesia

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.38142/jogta.v4i3.1881

Abstract

The waste management issue in the Province of Bali led to the enactment of Governor Regulation of Bali Number 47 of 2019 concerning Source-Based Waste Management, which emphasizes waste segregation at the household level. This study aims to analyze the implementation of source-based waste segregation in Siangan Village, which has established a Reduce, Reuse, Recycle Waste Processing Facility (TPS3R), and to identify the inhibiting factors in its implementation. The research applies an empirical juridical method with statutory, conceptual, and socio-legal approaches. Data were collected through document studies and interviews with the Village Head, TPS3R management, and community members. The findings indicate that institutionally Siangan Village has provided adequate structural and infrastructural support, including the TPS3R facility, a scheduled collection system, and a legal basis through Village Regulation Number 7 of 2022. However, the effectiveness of implementation remains suboptimal due to systemic obstacles such as inconsistent supervision and limited human resources, as well as social constraints reflected in the lack of collective awareness and environmental legal culture. Therefore, optimizing implementation requires strengthening institutional governance and fostering sustainable community awareness.
Authority of The Ministry of Law In The Dishonourable Dismissal of Notaries For Violations of The Code of Ethics Artini, Dewa Ayu; Senastri, Ni Made Jaya; Renaya, Nengah
Journal of Law, Politic and Humanities Vol. 6 No. 3 (2026): (JLPH) Journal of Law, Politic and Humanities
Publisher : Dinasti Research

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.38035/jlph.v6i3.3112

Abstract

A Notary is tasked with carrying out a crucial role in society and is therefore required to always maintain their conduct, honour, and dignity as a public official. According to Article 16 letter a, a notary must safeguard the interests of the parties involved in legal processes and act in a trustworthy, honest, thorough, independent, and impartial manner. The objectives of this research include identifying and analysing the sanctions imposed on notaries by the Honorary Council for violations of the Code of Ethics, as well as the authority of the Ministry of Law in supervising notaries with regard to such violations. The type of research used in this study is normative legal research, applying the Statute Approach, Analytical and Conceptual Approach, and Case Approach. The synergy among supervisory institutions, continuous education, transparency, and an effective appeal system will enhance the effectiveness of oversight and professional discipline. For notaries, the researcher suggests that in carrying out their profession and position as public officials, they are expected to understand and comply with the provisions of the laws and regulations of the established Code of Ethics. The Ministry of Law can strengthen coordination and establish an integrated reporting system with the Notary Honorary Council in handling alleged violations of the Code of Ethics, ensuring that public reports are followed up promptly and transparently and to give open information on the status of reports, thereby increasing public participation in maintaining the integrity of the notarial profession.
Legal Implications of Changing Building Use Rights To Ownership Rights Saputra, I Komang Dedi; Senastri, Ni Made Jaya; Utama, I Wayan Kartika Jaya
Journal of Law, Politic and Humanities Vol. 6 No. 3 (2026): (JLPH) Journal of Law, Politic and Humanities
Publisher : Dinasti Research

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.38035/jlph.v6i3.3115

Abstract

The transfer of Building Use Rights to Ownership Rights is an important aspect in the regulation of agrarian law in Indonesia, especially after the issuance of Government Regulation Number 18 of 2021 concerning Management Rights, Land Rights, Apartment Units, and Land Registration. In this study, the normative legal research method is used. Regulations related to the transfer of Building Use Rights to Ownership Rights are regulated in Government Regulation Number 18 of 2021 concerning Management Rights, Land Rights, Apartment Units and Land Registration. Provisions regarding whether or not a Building Use Right can be transferred are stated in Article 45 paragraph (2) of the Article as the basis or basis for someone to change their Rights from Building Use Rights to Ownership Rights. The change of Building Use Rights to Ownership Rights has been clarified in Article 94 of Government Regulation Number 18 of 2021. The form of implementation of Article 48 of Government Regulation Number 18 of 2021 concerning Management Rights, Land Rights, Apartment Units and Land Registration and also as an effort to realize the government regulation. Determining priority rights over land in the form of Building Use Rights (HGB) that have expired depends on three factors: the subject of the rights, in terms of who submits the application for the rights, usually the subject of the rights whose name is recorded on the certificate (the former rights holder); the subject of the rights who submits the application must be able to prove that they are truly entitled to the land; and the land use is in accordance with the intent of the granting of the rights in question.