Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2021 - 2026
1.671
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal JURNAL PENDIDIKAN TAMBUSAI Ensiklopedia of Journal Al Hurriyah : Jurnal Hukum Islam ISLAM TRANSFORMATIF : Journal of Islamic Studies JURIS (Jurnal Ilmiah Syariah) Jurnal Fuaduna: Jurnal Kajian Keagamaan dan Kemasyarakatan Islam Transformatif : Journal of Islamic Studies Al Hurriyah : Jurnal Hukum Islam Astroislamica: Journal of Islamic Astronomy Islamic Thought Review Hakamain: Journal of Sharia and Law Studies Tanfizi : Journal of Islamic Constitutional and Political Law Al Muhkam: Journal of Islamic Law and Jurisprudence
Saiful Amin
Universitas Islam Negeri (UIN) Sjech M. Djamil Djambek Bukittinggi
Religion Arts Humanities Astronomy Computer Science & IT Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice Social Sciences

Published : 15 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 15 Documents
Search

 1   2 
HEGEMONI HUKUM ISLAM DALAM LEGISLASI KUHP: ANALISIS GRAMSCIAN ATAS UNDANG-UNDANG NO.1 TAHUN 2023 Rizky Al Ikhsan; Saiful Amin; Khairul Fahmi
Al Muhkam: Journal of Islamic Law and Jurisprudence Vol. 1 No. 1 (2025): Al Muhkam: Journal of Islamic Law and Jurisprudence
Publisher : KIPS Institute Bukittinggi

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.65980/almuhkam.v1i1.35

Abstract

Hukum merupakan produk dari dinamika sosial, politik, dan ideologis yang tidak pernah netral. Dalam konteks Indonesia, pembentukan KUHP berdasarkan UU No. 1 Tahun 2023 tidak hanya menjadi simbol kedaulatan hukum nasional, tetapi juga medan kontestasi ideologi. Penelitian ini bertujuan mengkaji peran hukum Islam dalam formulasi KUHP melalui perspektif teori hegemoni Antonio Gramsci, serta menganalisis bagaimana proses legislasi mencerminkan dominasi nilai dan konsensus ideologis kelompok tertentu. Dengan menggunakan metode yuridis normatif dan pendekatan kualitatif, studi ini menelaah pasal-pasal kontroversial yang memuat norma moral keagamaan, seperti larangan perzinaan, kohabitasi, dan pembatasan aborsi, sebagai ekspresi hegemonik dari nilai-nilai dominan. Temuan menunjukkan bahwa hukum Islam tidak sekadar hadir sebagai sumber etika publik, melainkan juga sebagai alat hegemonik yang dilembagakan melalui mekanisme legislasi formal. Proses ini berlangsung melalui artikulasi wacana, legalisasi nilai, serta kooptasi institusional oleh elite politik dan keagamaan. Dalam kerangka Gramsci, KUHP menjadi instrumen pedagogis negara untuk membentuk kesadaran sosial yang mengafirmasi nilai mayoritas, namun mengabaikan keberagaman. Oleh karena itu, pendekatan kritis terhadap legislasi diperlukan untuk memastikan bahwa hukum berfungsi sebagai instrumen keadilan substantif, bukan dominasi ideologis.
The Relationship Between Religious Law and State Law: Analytical Study of Receptio and Electicism Theories Utama Wardi; Khairul Fahmi; Saiful Amin
Hakamain: Journal of Sharia and Law Studies Vol. 2 No. 2 (2023): HAKAMAIN: Journal of Sharia and Law Studies
Publisher : Yayasan Lembaga Studi Makwa

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.57255/hakamain.v2i2.326

Abstract

This research delves into the intricate relationship between religious law and state law by examining them through the theoretical frameworks of reception and eclectic theory. Reception theory posits that religious law can exert an influence on state law through processes of adaptation and incorporation, whereby elements of religious law are absorbed and integrated into the legal framework of the state. In contrast, eclectic theory advocates for a consistent and harmonious interaction between the two legal systems, suggesting that they can coexist and complement each other without conflict. The study delves into both historical contexts and contemporary examples to demonstrate how these theories are reflected in various legal frameworks around the world. By providing a comparative analysis, it highlights the diverse ways in which religious and state laws intersect and influence one another across different cultures and legal traditions. The study also addresses significant challenges, such as the conflicts that arise when religious principles clash with state laws, and the efforts made to reconcile these differences in pursuit of legal harmony and social justice. It offers valuable insights into the ongoing evolution of legal theory and practice, emphasizing the importance of accommodating the diverse needs of society while striving for a balance between respecting religious traditions and upholding the rule of law. The findings presented aim to inform future directions in legal scholarship and practice, fostering a deeper understanding of the potential for synergy and conflict between these two fundamental pillars of legal systems.
The Continuity of Qur'anic Exegesis in Sumatra: A Study of Abdrurrauf Singkel, HAKA, and HAMKA within the Local Islamic Tradition Fahmi Akhyar Al Farabi; Abdur Rohman; Saiful Amin; Muhammad Thoriqul Islam; Muhamad Shofwan Muttaqin
Jurnal Fuaduna : Jurnal Kajian Keagamaan dan Kemasyarakatan Vol. 9 No. 2 (2025): Desember 2025
Publisher : Universitas Islam Negeri Sjech M. Djamil Djambek Bukittinggi

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.30983/fuaduna.v9i2.10230

Abstract

The development of Qur’anic exegesis in Sumatra illustrates a continuous intellectual trajectory linking classical, transitional, and modern phases of Islamic scholarship. This study examines three major exegetes—Abdurrauf al-Sinkili, Haji Abdul Karim Amrullah (HAKA), and Haji Abdul Malik Karim Amrullah (HAMKA)—by exploring their biographical contexts, socio-historical settings, and distinctive interpretive features. Abdurrauf, through Tafsir Tarjuman al-Mustafid (17th-century Aceh), introduced an ijmālī and Sufi-oriented approach to make the Qur’an accessible to Malay audiences. HAKA’s Tafsir al-Burhan reflects early 20th-century Minangkabau reformism, employing a taḥlīlī method emphasizing reason and social engagement. Meanwhile, HAMKA’s Tafsir al-Azhar represents a modern, comprehensive synthesis that integrates transmitted and rational interpretations while addressing contemporary socio-political realities. Read through Talal Asad’s concept of Islam as a discursive tradition and John Bowen’s Muslims through Discourse, these tafsir works reveal not only textual interpretation but also ongoing negotiations of authority, identity, and social ethics. The continuity of Sumatra’s tafsir tradition thus reflects a discursive evolution, demonstrating how local scholars reinterpret the Qur’an in response to shifting historical and political contexts. The novelty of this study lies in positioning Nusantara tafsir as a dynamic dialogical model that contributes to contemporary Muslim societies by bridging classical heritage, local culture, and modern intellectual demands.
The Qur’anic Exegesis and Philological Critique: Epistemic Resilience in the Age of Corpus Coranicum M. Ridwan; Nanda Riswanda Pohan; Faruq Aziz Al Amin; Saiful Amin
Islamic Thought Review Vol. 3 No. 2 (2025): December 2025
Publisher : Universitas Islam Negeri Sjech M. Djamil Djambek Bukittinggi

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.30983/itr.v3i2.10103

Abstract

This study examines the epistemic resilience of the Islamic tafsīr tradition in responding to the philological and historical critiques advanced by the Corpus Coranicum project of the Berlin-Brandenburg Academy of Sciences and Humanities. By situating the Qur’an within the religious and literary context of Late Antiquity, Corpus Coranicum has significantly influenced contemporary Qur’anic studies while generating epistemological tensions with traditional Islamic scholarship. These tensions arise from differing conceptions of the Qur’an: Western philology treats it as a historical text subject to linguistic analysis, whereas tafsīr understands it as kalām Allāh, the eternal Word of God. Employing qualitative library-based research, this article analyzes selected classical and modern exegetical works through the frameworks of Jan Assmann’s cultural memory and Talal Asad’s discursive tradition. The findings demonstrate that tafsīr is not a static or defensive tradition, but one capable of adaptation, negotiation, and renewal. Three modes of epistemic response are identified—conservative, integrative, and critical-progressive—each reflecting different strategies of engagement with modern scholarship. The study concludes that such epistemic resilience allows tafsīr to maintain theological integrity while constructively engaging contemporary philological approaches, contributing to a paradigm of epistemic coexistence in Qur’anic studies.
From Text to Context: Fazlur Rahman's Double Movement Theory in Contemporary Qibla Direction Issues Hendri Hendri; Saiful Amin
Astroislamica: Journal of Islamic Astronomy Vol. 4 No. 2 (2025): Astroislamica: Journal of Islamic Astronomy (Desember)
Publisher : Islamic Astronomy Department, Sharia and Law Faculty

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.47766/astroislamica.v4i2.6942

Abstract

Qibla direction determination is an important part of Muslim worship that signifies unity of direction and obedience to Allah SWT. However, in the development of modern science and technology, there are differences in the methods and results of determining the Qibla direction in various regions of the Islamic world. This problem requires a dynamic interpretation approach, so that the values of the Qur'an can be understood and applied according to the context of the times. This research uses Fazlur Rahman's hermeneutic approach with Double Movement theory to interpret the verses about Qibla direction. The results show that the Qibla direction is not just a matter of geographical precision, but a symbol of unity, independence, and spiritual orientation of Muslims. With the application of Double Movement, the moral values of the Qur'an can be actualized through the use of modern technology in a maslahat manner and in accordance with the objectives of sharia. in the application of the discovery method.
Co-Authors Abdur Rohman Andriyaldi Andriyaldi Arsal Arsal Busyro, Busyro Edi Rosman Edi Rosman Fahmi Akhyar Al Farabi Fahmil Samiran Fajrul Wadi Faruq Aziz Al Amin Faruq Aziz Al-Amin Hendri Hendri Hendri Hendri Khairul Fahmi Lafitri Fadilah M. Ridwan Maizul Imran Miswardi Mohd Nasran Mohamad Muhamad Shofwan Muttaqin Muhammad Thoriqul Islam Nanda Riswanda Pohan Regina Qadaffy Rizky Al Ikhsan Utama Wardi Zul Efendi