Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 2 Documents
Search
Journal : MAQASIDI

An Analysis of Wahbah Az-Zuhaili's Views on Interfaith Marriage and Its Implementation in Indonesian Legal Context Abdullah, Arifin; Amri, Aulil; Nadia, Varatun; Khalidi, Muhadi
MAQASIDI: Jurnal Syariah dan Hukum Vol. 4, No. 2 (Desember 2024)
Publisher : MAQASIDI: Jurnal Syariah dan Hukum published by the Islamic Criminal Law Program of the Sharia and Islamic Economics Department at the Sekolah Tinggi Agama Islam Negeri Teungku Dirundeng Meulaboh

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.47498/maqasidi.v4i2.3526

Abstract

Marriage is a very important need in family and a social life that is pleasing to Allah, therefore in choosing a husband and wife, Islam strongly recommends that everything be based on religious norms so that the life companion has commendable morals, there is no balance to a belief. However, the problem is that it is forbidden for Muslim men to marry polytheistic women and marriage between Muslim women and infidel men. Meanwhile, Wahbah Az-Zuhaili's opinion that Muslim men and women are different from the opinions of other scholars. This research is with the formulation of the problem: How does Wahbah Az-Zuhaili think about interfaith marriage and how is the review of Islamic law about interfaith marriage in Islamic law thinking according to Wahbah Az-Zuhaili. This research is a type of library research. whose research object is the opinion and legal istinbath used by Wahbah Az-Zuhaili. The data collection method of this research uses a method of collecting legal materials, journals, and so on. The data analysis is qualitative, that is, the analysis is carried out by grouping data, presenting the results of the analysis in the form of a narrative, and drawing conclusions. Based on the results of this study, Wahbah Az-Zuhaili knew that it is forbidden to marry a Muslim man to a polytheistic woman, interfaith marriage, a Muslim woman to an infidel man, marriage between a Muslim man and a woman who is an expert in the book. The legal identity used by Wahbah Az-Zuhaili himself is QS. Al-Baqarah Al-Mumtahanah Al-Maidah. But the woman whose books are referred to is only the descendants of the children of Israel who still hold fast to the original book that was handed down to the Prophet Moses and the Prophet Jesus AS. As a defect, the prophets Moses and Jesus were sent only for the Bani Israel.
A Siyāsah Qaḍā’iyyah Perspective on the Implementation of Article 67 of Qanun Aceh No. 6/2014 in the Mahkamah Syar‘iyyah of Banda Aceh Fanisa, Hilda; Yuhermansyah, Edi; Amri, Aulil
MAQASIDI: Jurnal Syariah dan Hukum Vol. 5, No. 1 (Juni 2025)
Publisher : MAQASIDI: Jurnal Syariah dan Hukum published by the Islamic Criminal Law Program of the Sharia and Islamic Economics Department at the Sekolah Tinggi Agama Islam Negeri Teungku Dirundeng Meulaboh

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.47498/maqasidi.v5i1.4629

Abstract

Aceh, as a region with special autonomy to implement Islamic law, holds the authority to enforce jināyah (criminal) law, as stipulated in Qanun Aceh Number 6 of 2014 concerning Jināyah Law. Notably, Article 67 of the Qanun provides special treatment for children who commit jarīmah (criminal acts), including the limitation of ‘uqūbah (punishment) to a maximum of one-third of the adult sentence, and rehabilitative alternatives such as returning the child to their parents or placement in a rehabilitation institution. However, implementation in the Mahkamah Syar‘iyyah (Sharia Court) of Banda Aceh reveals inconsistencies in judicial decisions and a lack of standardized technical procedures, partly due to the absence of sufficient implementing regulations, as noted in paragraph (2) of the article. This study aims to evaluate the application of Article 67 by the Mahkamah Syar‘iyyah of Banda Aceh and assess its alignment with the principles of siyāsah qaḍā’iyyah (judicial policy). The research adopts a qualitative methodology using a normative juridical approach and case studies of two jināyah verdicts involving children from 2021 and 2022. The findings indicate that the court has made efforts to implement the article; however, the forms of ‘uqūbah applied vary, ranging from limited imprisonment to rehabilitation. This reflects a flexible implementation adapted to the social and psychological conditions of the child. While the decisions generally align with child protection principles, consistency remains a significant challenge. This study highlights Article 67 as a potential meeting point between Islamic law and the national juvenile justice system.