Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2021 - 2026
3.592
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal Dharmakarya : Jurnal Aplikasi Ipteks Untuk Masyarakat Arena Hukum PADJADJARAN Jurnal Ilmu Hukum (Journal of Law) Bina Hukum Lingkungan Surya Abdimas Legal Standing : Jurnal Ilmu Hukum JUSTISI Paulus Law Journal PAMPAS: Journal of Criminal Law Indonesian Journal of Criminal Law and Criminology (IJCLC) Bina Hukum Lingkungan Trunojoyo Law Review Deposisi: Jurnal Publikasi Ilmu Hukum Jurnal Hukum dan Sosial Politik
Rully Herdita Ramadhani
Fakultas Hukum Universitas Padjadjaran
Agriculture, Biological Sciences & Forestry Arts Humanities Economics, Econometrics & Finance Education Engineering Environmental Science Languange, Linguistic, Communication & Media Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice Public Health Social Sciences Other

Published : 22 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 22 Documents
Search

 1   2   3 
Peran Penuntut Umum Terhadap Pemenuhuan Restitusi Anak Korban Tindak Pidana Kekerasan Seksual Deanova, Luthfie Arya; Sulistiani, Lies; Ramadhani, Rully Herdita
Legal Standing : Jurnal Ilmu Hukum Vol. 9 No. 3 (2025): Legal Standing
Publisher : Universitas Muhammadiyah Ponorogo

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.24269/ls.v9i3.11889

Abstract

Sexual violence crimes not only affect adults as victims but also targetand impact children. Concern over the high number of sexual crimes experienced by children should not solely focus on punishing the perpetrators but also on fulfilling the rights of child victims of criminal acts. One way to restore the condition of child victims of sexual violence is through restitution. In cases of sexual crimes against children, the Public Prosecutor (JPU) plays a central role in ensuring the fulfillment of the victim's right to restitution. The central role of the Public Prosecutor in providing restitution is stated in Government Regulation No. 43 of 2017. This study aims to examine the urgency of the Public Prosecutor's role in fulfilling restitution rights and to identify the challenges and efforts in the process of fulfilling these rights for child victims. This research uses a normative juridical approach. The findings indicate that filing for restitution for child victims of sexual violence crimes is crucial and should be included in the Public Prosecutor's indictment as a form of legal protection for the child victims. However, the implementation of restitution requests in the indictment still faces obstacles, both from within the prosecutor's office and from external institutions.
Analisis Pertimbangan Hakim Mengenai Keadaan Meringankan Hukuman Pada Putusan MA Nomor 813k/Pid/2023 Berdasarkan Asas Proporsionalitas Pemidanaan Helda Okta Havifah; Somawijaya Somawijaya; Rully Herdita Ramadhani
Jurnal Hukum dan Sosial Politik Vol. 2 No. 3 (2024): Agustus: Jurnal Hukum dan Sosial Politik
Publisher : International Forum of Researchers and Lecturers

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.59581/jhsp-widyakarya.v2i3.3657

Abstract

This research aims to analyze the judge's considerations regarding the circumstances of mitigating the sentence in the Supreme Court decision Number 813k/Pid/2023 based on the principle of proportionality of punishment. The principle of proportionality of punishment is a principle of criminal law which demands that the punishment given must be proportional to the error committed by the convict. The research method used is a literature study by collecting and analyzing data from relevant Supreme Court decisions as well as theoretical reviews related to the principle of proportionality of punishment. The research results show that the judge's consideration of Inspector General Ferdy Sambo's service as a member of the National Police as a mitigating circumstance was appropriate. Although theoretically, a person's service should not be used as a reason to mitigate punishment, in practice, the service of a defendant is often considered in court decisions in Indonesia. However, the judge's consideration of merit as a reason for mitigating punishment in this case was not sufficient to reduce the reproach attached to the defendant, especially with his state apparatus status. Therefore, the decision of the panel of judges to change the sentence to life imprisonment was wrong and not in accordance with the principle of proportionality
Co-Authors Agus Takariawan Ajie Ramdan Al Fasha, Jidny Izham Azadia Az Zahra Cahya Irawadi Cahya Irawady Deanova, Luthfie Arya Dewi Kania Sugiharti Erika Magdalena Chandra Erika Magdalena Chandra Farol Medeline Helda Okta Havifah Ijud Tajudin Indri Yuliafitri Indri  Yuliaftri Izharti, Rakhmi Jidny Izham Al Fasha Lameng, Jihan Shavira Yosephin Lies Sulistiani Magdalena, Erika Manayra Aisha Putri Indradjaja Mei Susanto Memed Sueb Muhammad Al Riyadh Nella Sumika Putri Rusmiati, Elis Salman Nazil Firdaus Sigid Suseno Somawijaya -, Somawijaya Syahla Putri Raharyanti Tiara Rahmawati Wiwin Widiarti Zainal Muttaqin