Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 23 Documents
Search

Relevance of Aceh's Qanun Jinayat in Minimizing Cases of Sexual Harassment against Children in Aceh Wiwin Widiarti; Erika Magdalena Chandra; Rully Herdita Ramadhani
JUSTISI Vol. 11 No. 1 (2025): JUSTISI
Publisher : Fakultas Hukum Universitas Muhammadiyah Sorong

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.33506/js.v11i1.3670

Abstract

This study aims to describe the relevance of Qanun Number 6 of 2014 concerning Jinayat Law as a legal regulation used to address cases of child sexual Harassment in Aceh. This is considered important because until now cases of child sexual Harassment in Aceh have continued to increase every year. In addition, Aceh is a region that has special regulations that are formed based on Islamic law and customary law. Therefore, the provisions relating to sexual Harassment in Aceh are different from other provincial areas that use the Child Protection Law, the Sexual Violence Crime Law or Law Number 1 of 2023 concerning the Criminal Code. The study was conducted using a sociological legal research method with descriptive analytical writing specifications. The focus of this study is on how the relevance of Aceh Qanun Number 6 of 2014 concerning Jinayat Law is in minimizing the number of cases of child sexual Harassment in Aceh, thus causing this study to be different from previous studies. The results of this study indicate that Qanun Number 6 of 2014 concerning Jinayat Law has not been able to optimally address cases of child sexual Harassment in Aceh. It is because the five factors that influence the effectiveness of the implementation of Qanun Jinayat in Aceh have not been effective until now. The five factors are legal factors, law enforcement factors, facilities and infrastructure factors, community factors and cultural factors. In addition, the provisions of the threat of sanctions contained in Qanun Jinayat when associated with the theory of just desert and the theory of the purpose of punishment in Islamic criminal law are still relatively light so that they have an impact on the unprotection of children's rights as victims and do not provide a deterrent effect for perpetrators.
Peran Penuntut Umum Terhadap Pemenuhuan Restitusi Anak Korban Tindak Pidana Kekerasan Seksual Deanova, Luthfie Arya; Sulistiani, Lies; Ramadhani, Rully Herdita
Legal Standing : Jurnal Ilmu Hukum Vol. 9 No. 3 (2025): Legal Standing
Publisher : Universitas Muhammadiyah Ponorogo

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.24269/ls.v9i3.11889

Abstract

Sexual violence crimes not only affect adults as victims but also targetand impact children. Concern over the high number of sexual crimes experienced by children should not solely focus on punishing the perpetrators but also on fulfilling the rights of child victims of criminal acts. One way to restore the condition of child victims of sexual violence is through restitution. In cases of sexual crimes against children, the Public Prosecutor (JPU) plays a central role in ensuring the fulfillment of the victim's right to restitution. The central role of the Public Prosecutor in providing restitution is stated in Government Regulation No. 43 of 2017. This study aims to examine the urgency of the Public Prosecutor's role in fulfilling restitution rights and to identify the challenges and efforts in the process of fulfilling these rights for child victims. This research uses a normative juridical approach. The findings indicate that filing for restitution for child victims of sexual violence crimes is crucial and should be included in the Public Prosecutor's indictment as a form of legal protection for the child victims. However, the implementation of restitution requests in the indictment still faces obstacles, both from within the prosecutor's office and from external institutions.
HARMONISASI HUKUM: UPAYA MENGATASI KONFLIK NORMA ANTARA UNDANG-UNDANG PERADILAN MILITER DAN UNDANG-UNDANG PENGADILAN TINDAK PIDANA KORUPSI TERHADAP PERKARA KORUPSI YANG DILAKUKAN OLEH PRAJURIT TNI Sidqi, Bella Karina; Sulistiani, Lies; Ramadhani, Rully Herdita
Jurnal Ilmiah Galuh Justisi Vol 14, No 1 (2026): Jurnal Ilmiah Galuh Justisi
Publisher : Universitas Galuh

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.25157/justisi.v14i1.21438

Abstract

Penelitian ini mengkaji disharmoni peraturan perundang-undangan antara Undang-Undang Nomor 31 Tahun 1997 tentang Peradilan Militer dan Undang-Undang Nomor 46 Tahun 2009 tentang Pengadilan Tindak Pidana Korupsi (Tipikor) dalam penanganan kasus korupsi yang dilakukan oleh Prajurit Tentara Nasional Indonesia (TNI). Permasalahan ini menciptakan ketidakpastian hukum, seperti yang terlihat pada kasus korupsi di Basarnas tahun 2023 yang pada akhirnya menimbulkan konflik tarik menarik yurisdiksi antara KPK dan Puspom TNI atas kewenangannya. konflik kedua undang-undang yang bersifat lex specialis ini dipicu oleh penggunaan metode  pendekatan yang berbeda, antara lain pendekatan subjek (pelaku) oleh peradilan militer dan pendekatan objek (tindak pidana) oleh Pengadilan Tipikor.Penelitian ini menggunakan metode yuridis normatif dengan data sekunder berupa undang-undang, buku, dan jurnal, serta data primer dari wawancara, yang dianalisis secara kualitatif. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa konflik norma tersebut menimbulkan implikasi negatif, termasuk potensi impunitas, hambatan dalam pemberantasan korupsi, dan diskriminasi perlakuan hukum yang bertentangan dengan prinsip equality before the law.Sebagai kesimpulan, diperlukan harmonisasi hukum dengan cara pembaruan hukum. Penelitian ini menyarankan agar Undang-Undang Peradilan Militer direvisi untuk mengecualikan tindak pidana korupsi dari yurisdiksi peradilan militer dan secara eksplisit menyerahkannya kepada Pengadilan Tipikor. Untuk mewujudkan hal ini, disarankan pembentukan mekanisme hukum acara kolaboratif antara penyidik militer (POM TNI) dan sipil (KPK/Kejaksaan) dengan penuntutan dan peradilan tetap berada di Pengadilan Tipikor, tanpa perlu persetujuan khusus, untuk menjamin kepastian hukum, transparansi, dan akuntabilitas.