Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 3 Documents
Search
Journal : JHCLS

The Effectiveness of Administrative Efforts in Reducing State Administration Disputes Ahmad Siboy; Sholahuddin Al-Fatih; Virga Dwi Efendi; Nur Putri Hidayah
Journal of Human Rights, Culture and Legal System Vol 2, No 1 (2022): Journal of Human Rights, Culture and Legal System
Publisher : Lembaga Contrarius Indonesia

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (583.683 KB) | DOI: 10.53955/jhcls.v2i1.23

Abstract

Regulating administrative efforts as the mandatory procedure is expected to be able to filter and reduce the number of disputes that must be tried by the State Administrative Court. However, the position of administrative efforts is only interpreted as a formality. This study aims to analiyz the position of administrative efforts in the settlement of state administration disputes and to find out how effective the administration efforts in reducing the number of state administration disputes in the State Administrative Courts in East Java. The results indicated that administrative efforts were the embodiment of the state law of Pancasila, but the effectiveness of administrative efforts in East Java was still very low or ineffective in reducing the number of state administrative disputes in the State Administrative Court.
Does the Cancellation Victory Foreign Nationals in Local Democracy: Evidence from United Kingdom Siboy, Ahmad; Bastomi, Ahmad
Journal of Human Rights, Culture and Legal System Vol. 4 No. 1 (2024): Journal of Human Rights, Culture and Legal System
Publisher : Lembaga Contrarius Indonesia

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.53955/jhcls.v4i1.166

Abstract

The main requirement to become a regional head candidate is to be an Indonesian citizen. In the 2020 Pilkada, it was found that a foreign citizen won the Regional Head Election. This certainly raises a legal dilemma or polemic regarding the inauguration process. Whether the person concerned can be inaugurated as regional head or canceled. The formulation of the problem raised in this research is about the legal implications of the victory of foreigners in the Regional Head Election and the legal construction of the cancellation of the inauguration. This research is normative juridical research with a concept approach, legislation approach, and case approach. The results of the study found four things that resulted from the victory of foreigners in the Regional Head Election. Namely, the weakness of the regulation, the negligence of the organizers, the validity period of the dispute resolution of the limited nomination requirements, and the confusion to advance or continue at the inauguration stage. The choice of legal construction as a solution that can be taken is to cancel the inauguration of foreign election winners. The cancelation process can go through the judicial process through the mechanism of disputing the results in the Constitutional Court. Cancellation of the inauguration can also be done by the executive body through a decision from the Ministry of Home Affairs.
Indonesian Presidential Election on Presidential Threshold Policy: Evidence from Various Countries Siboy, Ahmad; Sholahuddin Al-Fatih
Journal of Human Rights, Culture and Legal System Vol. 5 No. 3 (2025): Journal of Human Rights, Culture and Legal System
Publisher : Lembaga Contrarius Indonesia

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.53955/jhcls.v5i3.639

Abstract

The study develops a constitutional design to regulate the number of presidential and vice-presidential candidates following the Constitutional Court’s annulment of the presidential threshold. It observes that the absence of a model framework from the Court creates a regulatory vacuum that may expose the presidential election to political fragmentation, heightened polarization, and procedural inefficiencies. To address this issue, the research aims to construct a constitutional framework capable of enhancing electoral stability while sustaining democratic competitiveness. The study employs a normative juridical method supported by statutory analysis, case studies, and comparative assessment to identify feasible regulatory alternatives. The analysis demonstrates that the most effective approach to limiting the number of candidates is to regulate the number of political parties eligible to participate in general elections, given their role as the primary gatekeepers of nomination. The findings propose several regulatory instruments, including a moratorium on the establishment of new political parties, stricter requirements for party formation, enhanced eligibility criteria for electoral participation, a minimum age requirement for political parties, a maximum threshold for the number of qualified parties, and the disqualification of previously registered parties that fail to meet revised standards. The study concludes that these mechanisms collectively form a coherent constitutional strategy for maintaining a manageable number of presidential candidates and ensuring the continuity, integrity, and effective governance of the electoral process.