Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 4 Documents
Search
Journal : Bhinneka Multidisiplin Journal

MENYUSUN KEMISKINAN: BAGAIMANA RASISME MEMBENTUK ANAK KEMISKINAN DAN KESEHATAN ANAK DAN REMAJA Novriansyah, Beldi; Surya, Edi; Destriani, Mellanie; Hendri, Taufik; Untung, DB.; Nelly, Nelly; Suryadi, Suryadi; Fikri, KMS. Novyar Satriawan
Bhinneka Multidisiplin Journal Vol. 2 No. 1 (2025): Bhinneka Multidisiplin Journal
Publisher : Yayasan Education and Social Center

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.53067/bmj.v2i1.46

Abstract

The most severely affected racial and ethnic groups by poverty are the Black, Native, and Latinx populations. The disproportionate distribution of poverty should be recognized as a result of governmental decisions, some of which have endorsed violence, while others have established norms that persistently influence access to power, resources, rights, and safeguards. This review utilizes interdisciplinary scholarship from pediatrics, public health, environmental health, epidemiology, social and biomedical sciences, law, policy, and urban planning to investigate the primary subject. What is the correlation among structural racism, poverty, and pediatric health? We examine historical and contemporary events essential for comprehending poverty within the framework of American racism and pediatric health. We contest traditional frameworks that regard racialized poverty as an intrinsic aspect of American society. We propose a conceptual framework to demonstrate how white supremacy and American capitalism perpetuate structural racism and influence the racial allocation of resources and power in the environments where children and adolescents reside, learn, and engage in recreational activities, thereby exacerbating pediatric health disparities. We provide antipoverty techniques rooted in antiracist practices that address the cumulative, generational effects of racism and poverty on health to enhance the well-being of children, adolescents, and families.
COVID-19, PANDEMI BAYANGAN, DAN AKSES TERHADAP KEADILAN BAGI KAUM MUDA KORBAN KEKERASAN DALAM RUMAH TANGGA Saputra, Eno; Anggara, Ari; Husaini, Husaini; Salasa, Ricco; Haryadi, Donni; Rafik, M.; Fikri, KMS Novyar Satriawan
Bhinneka Multidisiplin Journal Vol. 2 No. 2 (2025): Bhinneka Multidisiplin Journal
Publisher : Yayasan Education and Social Center

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.53067/bmj.v2i2.21

Abstract

The COVID-19 pandemic has co-existed alongside a far less visible “shadow pandemic” of violence against women, with COVID-19 impacting the number and complexity of domestic violence cases and enabling new tactics for coercive control. This article provides a preliminary assessment of the extent to which Canada’s responses to the COVID-19 pandemic have prioritized the safety of women and children, with a focus on the courts and women’s access to justice. We examine court directives and judicial decisions triaging which cases would be heard as “urgent,” as well as courts’ decisions on the merits in cases involving domestic violence and COVID-19, spanning the areas of family, child welfare, criminal law, and civil protection orders. In the sixty-seven reported decisions in our sample, we find very little awareness overall of the heightened risks for survivors during COVID-19, in keeping with the prepandemic tendency of decision makers to focus on incident-based physical violence instead of patterns of coercive control. Our analysis also suggests that survivors’ability to  prove domestic violence and secure court orders that would help to ensure their safety was hampered not only by procedural complexity but also by the reduced availability of a range of services—health, counselling, housing, and supervised access centres, for example as a result of COVID-19
FUNDAMENTALISME GENDER DAN HETERONORMATIVITAS DALAM DUNIA POLITIK Firnandes, Banokta; Ramlan, Ramlan; Syahrial, Syahrial; Asnizar, Andi; R, Dony.; S, Herman.; Rafli, M.; Fikri, KMS Novyar Satriawan
Bhinneka Multidisiplin Journal Vol. 2 No. 2 (2025): Bhinneka Multidisiplin Journal
Publisher : Yayasan Education and Social Center

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.53067/bmj.v2i2.50

Abstract

In  2016,  the  Italian  Parliament  passed  a  law  that  extended  to  same-sex  couples  most  of  the  rights  of  married  heterosexual  couples. However, the  possibility  of  a  partner  in  a  same-sex  couple  adopting  the  biological  children  of  the  other  partner  so  contro-versial that  it  had  to  be  deleted  in  order  for  the  law  to  pass,  thus  denying  lesbian  and  gay  was  parents  the  legal  protection  they  need.  In  this  article,  we  analyze  the  speeches of  Parliamentarians  who  opposed  the  section  of  the  bill  concerning  lesbian  and  gay  parenthood. The  empirical  analysis  shows  different  discursive  strategies  deployed  by  MPs  to  combat  the  challenges  to  the  heteronormative family,  whose  common  reference  is  the  hegemonic  model  of  gender  which  has  characterized  the  resistance  of  the  Catholic  Church to  the  recognition  of  non-heterosexual  reproduction  and  kinship.  Findings  highlight  that  the  opposition  to  the  recognition  of  gay  and lesbian  parents  contributes  to  reiterating  restrictive  standards  of  motherhood  and  to  maintaining  the  institutionalization  of  sexualities and  reproduction  within  the  patriarchal  order.  Implications  of  the  research  findings  for  public  and  social  policies  are  discussed.
KETIMPANGAN PERLINDUNGAN ANAK DI JAKARTA : GRADIEN SOSIAL DAN 'HUKUM INTERVENSI TERBALIK' Supriadi, Dedi; Saprizon, Saprizon; Putri, Aslina; Wirnawan, Frendli; Afandi, Ahmad; Alpian, Alpian; Fikri, KMS. Novyar Satriawan
Bhinneka Multidisiplin Journal Vol. 2 No. 2 (2025): Bhinneka Multidisiplin Journal
Publisher : Yayasan Education and Social Center

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.53067/bmj.v2i2.51

Abstract

Contact with child protection systems are a key site of the expression of social inequalities, yet research into the size and nature of this relationship remains sparse in Jakarta system context. This article reports on a study of the relationships between child protection system contact and small area-level deprivation. Using a national linked dataset including all children with system contact in 2013–14, (n =13,851 children) it found there is a marked relationship between deprivation and system contact, and significant differences between regions for all three outcomes of interest. Compared to children living in the least deprived quintile of small areas, children in the most deprived quintile had, on average, 13 times the rate of substantiation, 18 times the rate of a family group conference, and 6 times their chance of placement in foster care. There was limited evidence for the ‘inverse intervention law’ that proposes that children in similarly deprived small areas have higher rates of child protection system contact if they live in less deprived regions (larger areas). The pattern of placements showed the strongest support for this law, with children in similarly deprived small areas having, on average, almost twice the rate of placement if they lived in less deprived regions compared to more deprived regions. These findings have implications for policy, as they suggest a need to apply an inequalities perspective to child protection similarly to health inequities. Specifically, action is needed to address the causes of deprivation, provide services that respond to families living in poverty, address biases, and undertake further research to examine the interactions between demand and supply of services between similar deprivation levels.