Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 2 Documents
Search
Journal : JIHAD : Jurnal Ilmu Hukum dan Administrasi

Disparity in Constitutional Court Decisions Regarding the Age Limits for Presidential and Vice-Presidential Candidates (Study of Decision No. 29/PUU-XXI/2023 and Decision No. 90/PUU-XXI/2023 concerning the Age Limit for Presidential and Vice-Presidential Candidates) Ashari, Ashari; Amalia, Riska Ari; Umam, Khairul; Kafrawi, Rachman Maulana
JIHAD : Jurnal Ilmu Hukum dan Administrasi Vol 6, No 2 (2024): JIHAD : Jurnal Ilmu Hukum Dan Administrasi
Publisher : Lembaga Penelitian dan Pendidikan (LPP) Mandala

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.58258/jihad.v6i2.6959

Abstract

The aim of this research is to determine the disparity in constitutional court decisions regarding the age threshold for presidential and vice-presidential candidates. This research is a type of normative legal research that uses statutory, conceptual and case approach methods. The results of the research explain that if examined from the aspect of considerations of constitutional court judges in case number 29/PUU-XXI/2023, it is stated that determining the minimum age of the President and Vice President is the domain of law makers (open legal policy), while in case number 90/PUU- XXI/2023 the constitutional court interpreted that the existence of an open legal policy (open legal policy) although it can be accepted in constitutional practice, but in its development the constitutional court could ignore or set aside while giving a re-interpretation of the norm which is an open legal policy, while from the adoption procedure decision in the judge's deliberative meeting held in case Number 29/PUU-XXI/2023, the chairman of the constitutional court, Anwar Usman, did not participate in discussing and deciding to avoid conflicts of interest, while in case Number 90/PUU-XXI/2023 with the same constitutionality issue the chairman The constitutional court participated in discussing and deciding the case with the decision being granted in part, namely being at least 40 years old or having/currently held a position elected through general elections, including regional head elections.
Comparison of Corruption Eradication Institutions in Various Countries (Indonesia, Hong Kong, Japan, Australia, New Zealand) Setiawan, Agung; Ashari, Ashari; Fallahiyan, Muh. Alfian; Kafrawi, Rachman Maulana
JIHAD : Jurnal Ilmu Hukum dan Administrasi Vol 6, No 2 (2024): JIHAD : Jurnal Ilmu Hukum Dan Administrasi
Publisher : Lembaga Penelitian dan Pendidikan (LPP) Mandala

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.58258/jihad.v6i2.6968

Abstract

This study discusses the Corruption Eradication Commission (KPK) since 2019 there has been a significant change, because the second amendment to the KPK Law has been ratified through Law Number 19 of 2019, Indonesia's ranking index is at 115, amputated authority and declining performance. The study conducted a comparative approach between the Indonesian KPK and the corruption eradication institutions of Hong Kong, Japan, Australia and New Zealand. It was found that Asian and Australian countries have less authority, but are ranked high (3 to 14) in eradicating corruption compared to Indonesia which is ranked 115. The results of the study show that there has been a change in the position of the KPK institution in terms of state administration which is no longer an Auxiliary body but a state organ, full authority but requires permission from the supervisory board, accountability and full control by the government (executive).