Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 23 Documents
Search

Antibiotic consumption and resistance: a 3-years ecological study for four critical groups of bacteria in a general regional hospital Sanjaya, Dwi Arymbhi; Siada, Nyoman Budiartha; Juanita, Rr Asih; Mahaputra, I Putu Yudistira; Kamalia, Made Gek Adisti; Meriyani, Herleeyana
Pharmaciana Vol. 14 No. 1 (2024): Pharmaciana
Publisher : Universitas Ahmad Dahlan

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.12928/pharmaciana.v14i1.27321

Abstract

Pseudomonas aeruginosa, Acinetobacter baumannii, Escherichia coli, and Klebsiella pneumoniae are the most critical groups of multi-drug resistant (MDR) bacteria that cause a threat in hospitals. This study identified the trend of antibiotic consumption, antibiotic resistance pattern, and the relationship between antibiotic consumption and antibiotic resistance in a critical group of bacteria in a general regional hospital. This ecological study was based on retrospective data from inpatient databases in a general regional hospital over three years (2017-2019). The trend for annual antibiotic consumption over 2017-2019 was defined as defined daily doses/100 bed-days. The relationship between total antibiotic consumption and the percentage of antibiotic resistance among four isolated critical bacteria was explored in time series analysis and linear regression. The most frequently used antibiotic was ampicillin (220.33 DDD/100 bed-days), ciprofloxacin (126.86 DDD/100 bed-days), and ampicillin-sulbactam (126.34 DDD/100 bed-days). There was a significant relationship between antibiotic consumption (ampicillin, ampicillin-sulbactam, ceftazidime, gentamicin, amikacin, and ciprofloxacin) in DDD/100 bed-days and antibiotic resistance in E. coli, K. pneumoniae, and P. aeruginosa (p<0.05) but not statically significant in A. baumannii (p=0.062). The annual usage fluctuated or remained stable, with no statistically significant trends change. The relationship between antibiotic consumption and antibiotic resistance was significant in three out of four critical groups of bacteria.
Kajian Literatur: Study Design Dalam Farmakoepidemiologi Untuk Mengetahui Resistensi Bakteri Terhadap Antibiotik Herleeyana Meriyani; Dwi Arymbhi Sanjaya; Rr Asih Juanita; Nyoman Budiartha Siada
JPSCR: Journal of Pharmaceutical Science and Clinical Research Vol 8, No 1 (2023)
Publisher : Universitas Sebelas Maret

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.20961/jpscr.v8i1.61651

Abstract

Penelitian terkait resistensi bakteri terhadap antibiotik dapat dilakukan dengan berbagai study design. Study design merupakan salah satu titik kritis dalam penelitian resistensi bakteri terhadap antibiotik. Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk memberikan gambaran kelebihan dan kekurangan dari study design yang digunakan dalam penelitian farmakoepidemiologi tentang resistensi bakteri terhadap antibiotik. Pencarian literatur dilakukan secara elektronik untuk artikel yang dipublikasikan tahun 2011 hingga 30 Juni 2021 pada basis data EBSCO, Plos One, Proquest, PubMed, ScienceDirect, dan Google Scholar. Kriteria inklusi meliputi original article dengan desain cohort (prospective dan retrospective), case control, cross-sectional dan ecological study; memiliki Digital Object Identifier (DOI); dipublikasi 10 tahun terakhir; serta mengunakan Bahasa Inggris. Artikel dalam bentuk review, tidak merupakan full text, dan artikel dengan jumlah sampel penelitian yang tidak jelas tidak disertakan dalam kajian ini. Artikel yang terkumpul dari 6 database sejumlah 209 artikel (EBSCO 45 artikel, Plos One 42 artikel, ProQuest 32 artikel, PubMed 68 artikel, ScienceDirect 19 artikel dan Google Scholar 3 artikel). Duplikasi artikel dieksklusi (29 artikel). Artikel tidak memenuhi kriteria inklusi (86 artikel), 64 artikel tidak relavan dengan tujuan penelitian, sehingga diperoleh 30 artikel dalam studi ini. Rancangan penelitian pada penelitian ini yaitu case-control (2 artikel), cohort-prospective (14 artikel), cohort-retrospective (5 artikel), cross-sectional (8 artikel) dan ecological study (1 artikel). Masing-masing rancangan memiliki kelebihan dan kekurangannya masing-masing. Pemilihan desain studi dalam penelitian resistensi bakteri terhadap antibiotik dilakukan sesuai dengan tujuan penelitian, jenis paparan yang diamati, jenis outcome serta tipe penelitian (comparative, correlative study) serta ketersediaan sumber daya dalam melakukan penelitian resistensi bakteri terhadap antibiotik.
The Association between Resistance of Sepsis-Inducing Bacteria to First-Line Antibiotics and Sepsis Outcome: A Retrospective Cross-Sectional Study Herleeyana Meriyani; Dwi Arymbhi Sanjaya; Rr. Asih Juanita; Nyoman Budiartha Siada; I Wayan Maysa Yudiartha; Kadek Suryawan
Jurnal Ilmiah Medicamento Vol 12 No 1 (2026): Jurnal Ilmiah Medicamento (In progress)
Publisher : Fakultas Farmasi Universitas Mahasaraswati Denpasar

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.36733/medicamento.v12i1.13597

Abstract

Background: Sepsis is a significant infectious disease linked to high mortality rates. Several bacterial pathogens that cause sepsis have shown resistance to first-line antibiotics. This resistance in sepsis-causing bacteria to initial antibiotic agents threatens treatment success, elevating mortality risk, healthcare costs, and prolonged hospital stays.Objective: This study aimed to investigate the relationship between the resistance of sepsis-causing bacteria to first-line antibiotics and sepsis treatment outcomes.Methods: This cross-sectional study was a single-center retrospective study. Data were collected from sepsis patients admitted to the intensive care unit of a general hospital in Bali between 2022 and 2023. The patients included in this study were those with a positive bacterial infection, as provided in the culture result. Therapy outcomes were evaluated based on discharge status: improved or unimproved (deceased). The resistance of sepsis-causing bacteria to first-line antibiotics, including fluoroquinolones, third- and fourth-generation cephalosporins, piperacillin-tazobactam, and vancomycin, was assessed through blood cultures. The relationship between antibiotic resistance and therapy outcomes was analyzed using the Gamma correlation coefficient. This study included 57 of 108 sepsis patients, primarily male (57.89%) and older than 60 years (57.89%).Results: A strong, significant positive correlation was observed between the resistance of sepsis-causing bacteria to third-generation cephalosporins and therapy outcomes (p=0.001; r=0.637). In contrast, resistance to fluoroquinolones (p=0.108; r=0.387), fourth-generation cephalosporins (p=0.377; r=-0.199), piperacillin-tazobactam (p=0.816; r=-0.060), and vancomycin (p=0.911; r=0.030) did not significantly impact therapy outcomes. The outcome of sepsis therapy is associated with resistance of sepsis-causing bacteria to third-generation cephalosporins but not to fluoroquinolones, fourth-generation cephalosporins, piperacillin-tazobactam, or vancomycin. This study uses a relatively small sample size, which precludes subgroup analyses.Conclusion: Non-significant findings for some antibiotics may reflect insufficient power; further study is needed to assess the correlation between resistance of sepsis-causing bacteria to fluoroquinolones, fourth-generation cephalosporins, piperacillin-tazobactam, and vancomycin.