Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

The Concept of Restitution as Legal Accountability in the Crime of Human Trafficking Rajarif Syah Akbar Simatupang; Ida Hanifah; Adi Mansar
Pena Justisia: Media Komunikasi dan Kajian Hukum Vol. 24 No. 1 (2025): Pena Justisia
Publisher : Faculty of Law, Universitas Pekalongan

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.31941/pj.v24i2.6444

Abstract

Indonesia as a country that has problems in human trafficking, not only functions as a country of origin (source) and transit point for international human trafficking, but also as a country that receives victims. The increasing number of workers that is not accompanied by the availability of employment opportunities is a very complex problem to overcome. This research is a normative legal research, namely a legal study that positions law as a structured norm system. In Indonesian legal regulations, it has been regulated in Law No. 21 of 2007 concerning the Eradication of Criminal Acts of Human Trafficking related to legal accountability for criminal acts of human trafficking. This law also regulates the rights of victims to receive medical and social rehabilitation, repatriation, and reintegration that must be provided by the state, especially for those who experience physical, psychological, and social suffering due to the crime of human trafficking. Restitution prioritizes the perpetrator's responsibility for the impacts caused by the crime. Therefore, the main target is to handle all losses experienced by the victim.
Emil Law Enforcement Of Fishery Crimes By Corporations In Indonesia: Law Enforcement Of Fishery Crimes By Corporations In Indonesia Emiel Salim Siregar; Adi Mansar; Surya Perdana
Pena Justisia: Media Komunikasi dan Kajian Hukum Vol. 24 No. 1 (2025): Pena Justisia
Publisher : Faculty of Law, Universitas Pekalongan

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.31941/pj.v24i2.6449

Abstract

This article aims to enforce the law on criminal acts of fisheries by corporations in Indonesia. Fisheries is a leading sector for the Indonesian economy, but there are often violations of the law committed by corporations in their fisheries activities, so that law enforcement against criminal acts of fisheries by corporations in Indonesia has complex challenges. This study uses normative legal research, which refers to applicable legal regulations and binds the surrounding community. This study formulates critical questions about the legal regulation of criminal acts of fisheries by corporations in Indonesia and also the implementation of law enforcement of criminal acts of fisheries by corporations in Indonesia. Increasing cooperation between government law enforcement agencies and civil society is important to overcome existing challenges and ensure the sustainability of fisheries resources in Indonesia.
Legal Liability of Electronic Money Corruption as a Crime of Origin of Money Laundering Crime Arifin Said Ritonga; Triono Eddy; Adi Mansar
Pena Justisia: Media Komunikasi dan Kajian Hukum Vol. 24 No. 2 (2025): Pena Justisia
Publisher : Faculty of Law, Universitas Pekalongan

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.31941/pj.v24i2.6718

Abstract

Money is a very crucial aspect of human life. Changes in the way we use money are evolving rapidly, along with advances in technology and information. Both notes and coins have transformed into electronic money. The law, specifically Article 17 to Article 22 of the ITE Law, regulates electronic transactions, also known as e-commerce buying and selling contracts. Article 17 paragraph (2) of the ITE Law states that parties conducting electronic transactions as mentioned in paragraph (1) must act in good faith when interacting and/or exchanging electronic documents and electronic information during such transactions. Article 18 paragraph (2) states that the party conducting electronic transactions as mentioned in paragraph (1) This research is a normative legal research, namely a legal study that positions law as a structured system of norms. The type of normative legal research is law that is formulated based on norms or rules that apply in society and become a guideline for the behavior of each individual. Money laundering in general can be defined as an act or actions that transfer, use or perform other actions or the proceeds of a criminal act that is often carried out by crime organizations or individuals who commit acts of corruption, narcotics trafficking, and other criminal acts. The goal is to hide or obscure the origin of the illicit money so that it can be used as if it were legitimate money.
Reconstruction of Sports Dispute Settlement Law Through Integrated Sports Dispute Settlement Goncalwes Sirait; Adi Mansar; Farid Wajdi
Pena Justisia: Media Komunikasi dan Kajian Hukum Vol. 24 No. 2 (2025): Pena Justisia
Publisher : Faculty of Law, Universitas Pekalongan

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.31941/pj.v24i2.7127

Abstract

Sport is a strategic asset in fostering national integration and strengthening social capital due to its inherently democratic nature, prioritizing brotherhood even amidst intense competition on the field. The fundamental values ​​that often save a nation from disunity are deliberation and consensus, and problems in sport are ideally resolved through deliberation and consensus in accordance with true wisdom. In essence, civil disputes are resolved peacefully by seeking agreement between the disputing parties. Because disputes arise from conflicting personal interests, their resolution depends heavily on the initiative of the parties involved. Civil disputes can be resolved either conventionally through the courts (litigation) or using alternative dispute resolution methods outside the courts. Dispute resolution through the courts is subject to provisions of civil procedural law, such as the Herzienne Indonesisch Reglement (HIR) for the Java and Madura regions, the RBg (Rechtsreglement Buitengewesten), and other regulations governing civil procedure. Courts serve as a means of law enforcement, a place of legal protection, and a forum for citizens involved in disputes to seek justice. Current practices for resolving disputes regarding competitive sports are not fully in line with Article 102 of Law Number 11 of 2022 concerning Sports, which states that disputes in sports must be resolved through deliberation and consensus by the parent sports organization. If deliberation and consensus cannot be reached, the disputing parties must enter into a written agreement regarding the chosen dispute resolution method. Dispute resolution is carried out through mediation, conciliation, and arbitration
Legal Protection for Creditors Due to Criminal Acts of Embezzlement of Bankrupt Assets by Corporations Asrul Azwar Siagian; Adi Mansar; Ida Nadirah
JURNAL AKTA Vol 13, No 1 (2026): March 2026
Publisher : Program Magister (S2) Kenotariatan, Fakultas Hukum, Universitas Islam Sultan Agung

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.30659/akta.v13i1.50996

Abstract

Bankruptcy is a legal mechanism intended to ensure the fair and proportional distribution of a debtor's assets among its creditors in accordance with the principle of pari passu prorata parte. However, in practice, corporate debtors frequently commit the criminal act of embezzlement of bankruptcy assets by concealing, transferring, or reducing the value of assets that should form part of the bankruptcy estate. Such actions not only harm creditors as rightful beneficiaries but also undermine legal certainty and the effectiveness of bankruptcy law enforcement in Indonesia. This research aims to analyze the legal framework governing the criminal act of embezzlement of bankruptcy assets by corporations, examine the extent of legal certainty available to creditors, and formulate an ideal model of legal protection for creditors as victims. This study employs a normative juridical method with statutory, conceptual, and case approaches. The findings indicate a legal vacuum in procedural law concerning the criminal liability of corporations for inclusion of bankruptcy assets. Additionally, there exists regulatory disharmony between the Criminal Code, the Bankruptcy and PKPU Law, and Supreme Court Regulation (PERMA) No. 13 of 2016 regarding the prosecution of corporate crime. Therefore, legal reform is necessary through strengthened regulations, integration of criminal asset forfeiture into the bankruptcy estate process, and the consistent enforcement of corporate criminal liability doctrines to ensure effective legal protection for creditors.
Analisis Pertanggungjawaban Pidana Korupsi Dana Investasi Pada PT Asuransi Angkatan Bersenjata Republik Indonesia: (Studi Putusan Nomor: 49/Pid.Sus-TPK/2021/PN Jkt.Pst) Dhimas Abie Thoyib; Adi Mansar; Agusta Ridha Minin
Al-Zayn: Jurnal Ilmu Sosial, Hukum & Politik Vol 4 No 3 (2026): 2026
Publisher : Yayasan pendidikan dzurriyatul Quran

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.61104/alz.v4i3.5601

Abstract

Tindak pidana korupsi pada sektor keuangan negara, khususnya yang melibatkan Badan Usaha Milik Negara (BUMN), menunjukkan kompleksitas yang tinggi baik dari aspek perbuatan melawan hukum, penyalahgunaan kewenangan, maupun pembuktian pertanggungjawaban pidana pelaku. Salah satu kasus yang menarik perhatian publik adalah perkara korupsi dana investasi pada PT Asuransi Angkatan Bersenjata Republik Indonesia (PT ASABRI), yang menimbulkan kerugian keuangan negara dalam jumlah sangat besar dan berdampak luas terhadap kepercayaan masyarakat terhadap pengelolaan dana publik. Putusan Nomor 49/Pid.Sus-TPK/2021/PN Jakarta Pusat menjadi penting untuk dianalisis karena menggambarkan bagaimana hakim menilai unsur-unsur tindak pidana korupsi, bentuk kesalahan pelaku, serta konstruksi pertanggungjawaban pidana dalam kejahatan korporasi dan keuangan negara. Metode penelitian yang digunakan adalah penelitian hukum normatif dengan pendekatan perundang-undangan, pendekatan kasus, dan pendekatan konseptual. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa Majelis Hakim dalam perkara tindak pidana korupsi diharapkan terus menegakkan prinsip keadilan substantif dengan memperhatikan dampak sosial, moral, dan ekonomi dari perbuatan koruptif. Pertimbangan hukum sebaiknya tidak hanya fokus pada unsur formil, tetapi juga memperhatikan kerugian moral dan sosial yang ditimbulkan terhadap institusi negara dan masyarakat.
Juridical Issues and the Application of Criminal Law Principles in Content-Related Offenses under the Electronic Information and Transactions Law Muhammad Tri Apriyansyah Idris; Adi Mansar
Journal of Legal and Cultural Analytics Vol. 5 No. 2 (2026): May 2026
Publisher : PT FORMOSA CENDEKIA GLOBAL

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.55927/jlca.v5i2.16415

Abstract

The Electronic Information and Transactions Law (ITE Law) is the primary legal framework in Indonesia, regulating various acts in the digital space as non-conventional crimes. This study aims to analyze the effectiveness and challenges of cybercrime law enforcement, with a particular focus on content crimes. Using a juridical-normative research method, this study examines the implementation of the principle of criminal responsibility and the validity of electronic evidence in judicial practice. The results indicate that while the ITE Law is quite effective in addressing technical crimes such as hacking, its effectiveness in combating content crimes remains limited due to the problem of "rubber articles" that are open to multiple interpretations, sanctions with a low deterrent effect, marked by a recidivism rate above 40%, and limited technical capacity of law enforcement officers. Therefore, reformulation and harmonization of regulations with the Criminal Code and the Personal Data Protection Law (PDP) are needed to create adaptive, equitable law enforcement that still guarantees freedom of expression in cyberspace
Legal Analysis of the Acquittal Verdict in the Amsal Sitepu Case: Implications for Legal Remedies within the Criminal Justice System Mahsin; Adi Mansar
Journal of Legal and Cultural Analytics Vol. 5 No. 2 (2026): May 2026
Publisher : PT FORMOSA CENDEKIA GLOBAL

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.55927/jlca.v5i2.16416

Abstract

This study examines the status of the finality of acquittals (vrijspraak) after the enactment of Law Number 20 of 2025 concerning the Criminal Procedure Code, with a case study of the case of Defendant Amsal Christy Sitepu. Using normative legal research methods, the results of the study indicate that this new regulation absolutely closes the space for filing an appeal against the acquittal through Article 299 paragraph (2) letter a. Regarding the ambiguity of the appeal legal remedy, a systematic interpretation of Article 244 in conjunction with Article 299 confirms that the acquittal is designed to be effective and final immediately after it is pronounced. The decision in the a quo case confirms the essence of the court as a bastion of human rights protection, guarantees legal certainty, and prevents the practice of over-criminalization from prosecutions with weak evidence. In conclusion, the transition to the 2025 Criminal Procedure Code represents a paradigm shift in the national criminal justice system towards a model centered on the protection of rights (due process-oriented).
INCONSISTENCY OF CRIMINAL ELEMENTS IN THE ARTICLE ON GRATIFICATION COMMITTED BY CIVIL SERVANTS IN RELATION TO THE LAW ON CRIMINAL ACTS OF CORRUPTION Muhammad Ali Akbar Panjaitan; Adi Mansar; Mhd Teguh Syuhada Lubis
NOMOI Law Review Vol 7, No 1 (2026): May Edition
Publisher : NOMOI Law Review

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.30596/nomoi.v7i1.31161

Abstract

Law No. 20 of 2001 Amending Law No. 31 of 1999 on the Eradication of Corruption still contains inconsistencies in its provisions, particularly regarding gratification, specifically in Article 5(2) and Article 11, which share the same elements as Article 12(a) and (b), as well as Article 6(2), which shares common elements with Article 12(c); however, each is subject to different criminal penalties, thereby creating legal uncertainty and opening the door to abuse of authority by law enforcement officials in the application of these provisions. This study employs a normative legal method through a legislative, theoretical, and legal conceptual approach to analyze the offense of gratification committed by civil servants, the application of its criminal sanctions, and the reformulation of legal provisions regarding gratification in corruption-related criminal offenses. The research findings indicate that the offense of gratification consists of four main elements: the perpetrator being a civil servant or public official; the act of receiving gratification; the existence of a relationship with an official position that conflicts with duties or obligations; and the failure to report the gratification to the Corruption Eradication Commission (KPK) within 30 working days of receipt. Various obstacles were identified in the enforcement of sanctions, including internal legal system obstacles—such as legal substance, institutional issues, and legal culture—as well as external obstacles in the form of sociological factors, technical challenges in law enforcement, and overlapping regulations.
Legal Certainty in the Termination of Prosecution Based on Restorative Justice: A Study at the Gunungsitoli District Prosecutor’s Office Richisandi Sibagariang; Triono Eddy; Adi Mansar
International Journal of Economic, Technology and Social Sciences (Injects) Vol. 6 No. 2 (2025): October 2025
Publisher : CERED Indonesia Institute

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.53695/injects.v6i2.1648

Abstract

This study examines legal certainty in the implementation of the termination of criminal prosecutions based on restorative justice, with a particular focus on the jurisdiction of the Gunungsitoli District Prosecutor’s Office. As a state governed by the rule of law, Indonesia maintains a legal enforcement system that seeks to balance the principles of legal certainty, justice, and expediency. The enactment of Attorney General Regulation (PERJA) No. 15 of 2020 concerning the Termination of Prosecution Based on Restorative Justice provides a juridical basis for prosecutors, as holders of the dominus litis principle, to exercise prosecutorial discretion in resolving criminal cases. Employing a normative juridical and empirical socio-legal research approach with a descriptive-analytical design, this study analyzes the legal framework, implementation process, and challenges encountered in the application of restorative justice. The findings indicate a significant increase in the settlement of criminal cases through restorative justice at the Gunungsitoli District Prosecutor’s Office, rising from four cases in 2023 to nine cases in 2024. The principal obstacles include the failure to satisfy substantive and procedural requirements, conflicts of interest arising from disproportionate compensation demands, and the absence of willingness among the parties to reach an amicable settlement. To address these challenges, the study recommends strengthening the capacity of Prosecutor Facilitators, enhancing institutional coordination and harmonization, and establishing restorative justice counseling centers to facilitate the psychological recovery of both victims and offenders. These measures are expected to improve the effectiveness of restorative justice while ensuring greater legal certainty in the exercise of prosecutorial discretion.