Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2021 - 2026
1.99
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal Asy Syar'iyyah: Jurnal Ilmu Syari'ah dan Perbankan Islam JYRS: Journal of Youth Research and Studies Jurnal Fakta Hukum (JFH) Jurnal Penelitian Hukum Indonesia (J-PeHI) ISLAMITSCH FAMILIERECHT JOURNAL
Anwar, Reski
Unknown Affiliation
Religion Humanities Economics, Econometrics & Finance Education Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice Public Health Social Sciences

Published : 13 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 13 Documents
Search

 1   2 
Komparasi Perma Nomor 7 Tahun 2022 dalam Rbg (Tata Cara Persidangan) Dan Panggilan Surat Tercatat KMA Studi Kasus Pengadilan Agama Tanjungpandan Kelas 1B Huda, M. Nurul; Prayuda, Hidayatullah; Anwar, Reski; Mukhafidhoh, Lucky; Rismawanti, Rismawanti
ISLAMITSCH FAMILIERECHT JOURNAL Vol. 6 No. 1 (2025): Islamitsch Familierecht Journal
Publisher : Fakultas Syariah dan Ekonomi Islam, IAIN Syaikh Abdurrahman Siddik, Bangka Belitung

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.32923/ifj.v6i1.5481

Abstract

This research aims to analyze and compare PERMA No. 7 of 2022 with provisions in the Burgerlijk Rechtsvordering (RBG) Regulations regarding trial procedures and the use of registered letters based on the provisions of the Supreme Court (KMA). The approach used is normative juridical, based on applicable laws and regulations. Apart from that, this research also uses an empirical approach through interviews with religious court employees to gain practical understanding regarding the implementation of these regulations. The research results are expected to provide differences between PERMA No. 7 of 2022 and RBG, as well as the registered letter summons process at the Tanjungpandan Religious Court. Keywords: Perma number 7 of 2022, Registered Letter Summons. Keywords: PERMA No. 7 of 2022, Burgerlijk Rechtsvordering (RBG), Registered Letter Summons.
Penerapan Peraturan Mahkamah Agung Nomor 1 Tahun 2024 Tentang Pedoman Mengadili Perkara Pidana Berdasarkan Keadilan Restoratif Ditinjau Dari Istihsan: Studi Di Pengadilan Negeri Mentok Kelas II Muttawadi, Ichsan; Winarno, Winarno; Anwar, Reski
JYRS: Journal of Youth Research and Studies Vol. 6 No. 1 (2025): Jurnal JYRS Juni 2025
Publisher : FAKULTAS SYARIAH DAN EKONOMI ISLAM IAIN SYAIKH ABDURRAHMAN SIDDIK BANGKA BELITUNG

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.32923/jyrs.v6i1.5494

Abstract

Restorative justice is the resolution of criminal cases involving the perpetrator, victim, the perpetrator/victim's family, and other related parties to jointly seek a fair resolution by emphasizing restoration to the original state and not retaliation. Supreme Court Regulation Number 1 of 2024 concerning Guidelines for Adjudicating Criminal Cases Based on Restorative Justice is a regulation that regulates the implementation of restorative justice in the District Court. In the implementation of PERMA Number 1 of 2024 at the Mentok District Court, there are obstacles, namely the victim does not want to take restorative justice because he feels aggrieved so that the victim hopes for retaliation and the consequences received by the perpetrator in the form of sanctions and punishments stipulated in the court decision, the perpetrator makes the same or similar mistakes within a period of 3 (three) years since the perpetrator received a permanent court decision, and has become the third stage in seeking restorative justice after the investigation stage by the police and continued at the prosecution stage by the prosecutor's office which also seeks restorative justice. associated with istihsan aims to bring the goodness of general law to laws whose application is exceptional and cannot be fulfilled due to challenges and obstacles that occur in the field
PERLINDUNGAN HAK INOVASI: TELAAH UNDANG-UNDANG PATEN MELALUI LENSA EFISIENSI EKONOMI Tauratiya, Tauratiya; Anwar, Reski; Ekaningsih, Lailasari
JPeHI (Jurnal Penelitian Hukum Indonesia) Vol 6, No 02 (2025): Jurnal Penelitian Hukum Indonesia (JPeHI)
Publisher : Universitas Darul Ulum Islamic Centre Sudirman GUPPI

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.61689/jpehi.v6i02.794

Abstract

ABSTRAKArtikel ini mengeksplorasi perlindungan hak inovasi melalui telaah Undang-Undang Paten di Indonesia dari perspektif efisiensi ekonomi. Pada pendahuluan, dibahas peran krusial inovasi dalam mendorong kemajuan teknologi dan pertumbuhan ekonomi, diikuti sejarah pengaturan paten sejak era kolonial hingga Undang-Undang Nomor 65 Tahun 2024, yang bertujuan menyeimbangkan insentif inovator dengan kesejahteraan publik. Metode penelitian yang digunakan adalah yuridis normatif, dengan menganalisis data sekunder seperti peraturan perundang-undangan, teori hukum, dan literatur ekonomi secara sistematis. Pembahasan menguraikan tiga teori efisiensi: Pareto, yang menekankan keseimbangan tanpa kerugian pihak mana pun melalui lisensi wajib dan durasi paten optimal; Kaldor-Hicks, yang membenarkan monopoli sementara jika manfaat jangka panjang melebihi biaya; serta Teorema Coase, yang mendorong negosiasi hak paten dengan biaya transaksi rendah untuk alokasi sumber daya efisien. Kesimpulan menyatakan bahwa efisiensi ekonomi menjadi alat kuat untuk menilai keadilan regulasi paten, dengan menekankan keseimbangan antara hak eksklusif inovator dan aksesibilitas masyarakat guna mencapai kesejahteraan kolektif yang berkelanjutan.Kata Kunci: Perlindungan Hukum; Hak Inovesi; Paten; Efisiensi Ekonomi
Co-Authors Alfadiah, Cut Nadita Fatih, Abillah Fatmawati Fatmawati Hajrianto, Anugrah Hikmah, Karimatul Huda, Muhamad Nurul Ikrom, Muhammad Karmianto, Johan Apris Kurniawan, Lendra Dika Lailasari Ekaningsih Lintang, Ayu M. Nurul Huda Mardalena Mardalena Mubarokah, M. Muhammad Muslim, Muhammad Mukhafidhoh, Lucky Muttawadi, Ichsan Nurwada, Yesika Prayuda, Hidayatullah Rismawanti, Rismawanti Sari, Novita Sari Taufik Hidayat Tauratiya, Tauratiya Winarno Winarno