Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2021 - 2026
2.338
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal AL-Daulah JPPI (Jurnal Pendidikan Islam Pendekatan Interdisipliner) Jurnal de jure Qisthosia Prosiding Seminar Nasional Sisfotek (Sistem Informasi dan Teknologi Informasi) Borneo : Journal of Islamic Studies Jurnal Hukum Unsulbar
Fatri Sagita
Sekolah Tinggi Agama Islam Negeri Majene
Religion Humanities Computer Science & IT Economics, Econometrics & Finance Education Environmental Science Languange, Linguistic, Communication & Media Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice Social Sciences Other

Published : 15 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 15 Documents
Search

 1   2 
Pengawasan Lembaga Advokasi Terhadap Kasus Pidana Dapat Meningkatkan Akuntabilitas Dalam Sistem Peradilan Sagita, Fatri; Basri, Hasan
Jurnal de jure Vol 16, No 2 (2024): Jurnal De Jure
Publisher : Fakultas Hukum Universitas Balikpapan

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.36277/jurnaldejure.v16i2.1029

Abstract

Artikel ini membahas peran penting lembaga advokasi dalam pengawasan kasus pidana dan dampaknya terhadap akuntabilitas sistem peradilan. Dengan melakukan monitoring yang ketat terhadap proses hukum, lembaga advokasi berkontribusi dalam menciptakan transparansi, perlindungan hak asasi manusia, dan peningkatan kepercayaan publik terhadap sistem peradilan. Metode yang digunakan dalam penelitian ini adalah pendekatan kualitatif dengan studi kasus. Data dikumpulkan melalui wawancara dengan anggota lembaga advokasi, aparat penegak hukum, dan pihak-pihak terkait lainnya. Selain itu, dokumentasi laporan pengawasan dan catatan kasus pidana yang telah diobservasi oleh lembaga advokasi juga dianalisis. Melalui analisis kasus dan pengumpulan data, artikel ini menunjukkan bahwa pengawasan lembaga advokasi tidak hanya menyoroti kekurangan dalam sistem hukum, tetapi juga memberikan rekomendasi perbaikan yang dapat diimplementasikan oleh aparat penegak hukum. Hasil penelitian ini menegaskan pentingnya kolaborasi antara lembaga advokasi dan sistem peradilan untuk mencapai keadilan yang lebih baik bagi semua pihak.
Menilai Kesetaraan dan Akurasi Qibla on Compass Aplikasi Miqat terhadap Metode Azimuth Geodesi: Analisis Galat Absolut, Bland-Altman, dan TOST Andi Jusran Kasim; Rahman Subha; Fatri Sagita; Noercholis Rafid. A; Maryam U
Borneo : Journal of Islamic Studies Vol. 6 No. 1 (2025): BORNEO: Journal of Islamic Studies
Publisher : Institut Agama Islam Sultan Muhammad Syafiuddin Sambas

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.37567/borneo.v6i1.4532

Abstract

This study aims to evaluate the accuracy level of the Miqat Play Store application, tested in 36 mosques by comparing the results with the geodetic azimuth reference coordinates WGS84. The method used is quantitative observational, with measurements taken three times at each location using the Miqat application on various types of Android smartphones. The results of the analysis show a difference between the geodetic azimuth and Miqat with an absolute error between -0.7278° and 0.6523°, an average error of -0.19295° and a standard deviation of 0.1982°. Bland-Altman analysis showed that the difference between the two methods was within acceptable limits, with an upper limit (ULA) of 0.1956° and a lower limit (LLA) of -0.5815°. The TOST equivalence test showed an average difference of 0.193°, which was smaller than the tolerance of ±0.5°, so the two methods could be considered mathematically equivalent. This study concludes that Miqat is suitable for use as an aid in determining the azimuth of the compass qibla in controlled environmental conditions and with good magnetic sensor calibration.
Transformasi Kebijakan Pidana Siber Menuju Keamanan dan Keadilan Digital Fatri Sagita; Ardiansyah; Noercholis Rafid. A
Prosiding SISFOTEK Vol 9 No 1 (2025): SISFOTEK IX 2025
Publisher : Ikatan Ahli Informatika Indonesia

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar

Abstract

This study examines the effectiveness of Indonesia’s criminal law in addressing cybersecurity and personal data protection amid the rise of artificial intelligence (AI). Using a normative juridical method with statutory and conceptual approaches, the analysis examines the Electronic Information and Transactions Law (Law No. 11 of 2008) and the Personal Data Protection Law (Law No. 27 of 2022), supported by secondary data from legislation, scholarly works, and official reports. The findings show that the criminal law framework remains fragmented, reactive, and unprepared for AI-driven cyber offenses. Overlapping institutional authority, the absence of an independent supervisory body, and limited digital forensic capacity undermine enforcement and legal certainty. Normatively, the study concludes that reforming Indonesia’s cyber penal policy is essential to extend criminal liability to algorithmic offenses, establish an independent supervisory authority, and integrate national digital forensic systems. Such reforms align with the principle of criminal law as ultima ratio, ensuring justice, security, and protection of citizens’ digital rights.
MENGUKUR EFEKTIVITAS RESTORATIVE JUSTICE DALAM PENYELESAIAN PERKARA PENGANIAYAAN: ANALISIS TERHADAP PRAKTIK DAN DINAMIKA IMPLEMENTASINYA DI KEPOLISIAN Fatri Sagita; Nur Afiah; Sukri Badaruddin
Jurnal Hukum Unsulbar Vol. 9 No. 2 (2026): Jurnal Hukum Unsulbar
Publisher : Program Studi Hukum Universitas Sulawesi Barat

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.31605/j-law.v9i2.6420

Abstract

Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk menganalisis efektivitas penerapan restorative justice dalam penyelesaian perkara penganiayaan di lingkungan kepolisian, dengan fokus pada Polres Majene. Selain itu, penelitian ini juga mengidentifikasi faktor-faktor yang mendukung maupun menghambat implementasi pendekatan tersebut, serta mengevaluasi kesesuaiannya dengan ketentuan Undang-Undang Nomor 1 Tahun 2023 tentang Kitab Undang-Undang Hukum Pidana (KUHP). Penelitian menggunakan metode hukum empiris dengan pendekatan kualitatif melalui studi kasus di Polres Majene. Data diperoleh melalui wawancara, observasi lapangan, dokumentasi, dan kajian pustaka, kemudian dianalisis menggunakan teknik analisis deskriptif kualitatif. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa penerapan restorative justice dalam penyelesaian perkara penganiayaan di Polres Majene telah berjalan secara efektif serta sejalan dengan ketentuan hukum yang berlaku. Pendekatan ini dinilai mampu menyelesaikan konflik secara lebih komprehensif melalui pemulihan hubungan antara pelaku dan korban, sesuai dengan tujuan pemidanaan sebagaimana diatur dalam Pasal 51, Pasal 54, dan Pasal 70 Undang- Undang Nomor 1 Tahun 2023 tentang KUHP. Keberhasilan implementasi tersebut juga dipengaruhi oleh peran aktif penyidik serta adanya kesediaan para pihak untuk mencapai penyelesaian secara damai.
Di Balik Dispensasi Kawin: Perlindungan Hukum Anak Dari Pemaksaan Perkawinan Oleh Orang Tua Fatri Sagita
QISTHOSIA : Jurnal Syariah dan Hukum Vol. 5 No. 1 (2024)
Publisher : Sekolah Tinggi Agama Islam Negeri Majene

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.46870/jhki.v5i1.2518

Abstract

Child marriage constitutes a complex legal protection issue, particularly when an application for marriage dispensation is submitted by parents who also exercise authority over the child’s personal decisions. This situation raises legal concerns regarding the position of the child’s consent, the limits of parental authority, and legal protection when the child’s will is confronted with pressure to enter into marriage. This study aims to examine the position of children’s consent within the marriage dispensation mechanism, the limits of parental authority from the perspectives of child protection law and Islamic family law, and the legal protection framework against forced marriage from a criminal law perspective. This study uses normative legal research and draws on statutory, conceptual, and Islamic legal approaches. The analysis applies the principles of the best interests of the child, legal protection theory, the concept of free and informed consent, and maqāṣid al-usrah. The findings demonstrate that marriage dispensation does not constitute consent and cannot legitimize forced marriage. A child’s consent must be substantively assessed based on freedom of will, understanding of the consequences of marriage, and the absence of coercion. Parental authority is protective rather than absolute, while ijbar cannot be equated with coercion. Forced marriage, including child marriage, may entail criminal consequences where the conduct fulfills the elements of an offense under the Sexual Violence Crime Law. Therefore, the marriage dispensation mechanism should ensure that children are recognized as legal subjects whose will and best interests must be protected.
Co-Authors AA Sudharmawan, AA Andi Jusran Kasim Andi Jusran Kasim Ardiansyah Badaruddin, Sukri Dwi Utami Hudaya Nur Dwi Utami Hudaya Nur Hasan Basri Maryam U Muh. Fachrur Razy Mahka Najirah Umar Noercholis Rafid A. Nur Afiah Nur Akifah Janur Nur Lilis Sukanda Rahman Subha Rizqi Annisah Samsul, Fatimah Syamsiar, Syamsiar Zuhriyah, Sitti