Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2020 - 2025
1.873
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal Aptisi Transactions on Technopreneurship (ATT) INTERACTION: Jurnal Pendidikan Bahasa Indonesian TESOL Journal Teaching English as a Foreign Language Overseas Journal (TEFLO) English Language Teaching Methodology (ELTM) Journal of Language Testing and Assessment Jurnal Guru Pencerah Semesta (JGPS) Journal of Computer Interaction in Education (JCIE)
Rum, Eka Prabawati
Unknown Affiliation
Humanities Computer Science & IT Economics, Econometrics & Finance Education Languange, Linguistic, Communication & Media Social Sciences Other

Published : 11 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 2 Documents
Search
Journal : Journal of Language Testing and Assessment

 1 
An Analysis of EFL Students' Communication Strategies in Classroom Context Azis, Andi Herlymerdania Mutia; Rum, Eka Prabawati; Mahmudah, Dzur Rif’ah
Journal of Language Testing and Assessment Vol. 3 No. 2 (2023): Journal of Language Testing and Assessment (JLTA)
Publisher : FKIP Unismuh Makassar

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.56983/jlta.v3i2.930

Abstract

This study aims to find out the types of communication strategies used by EFL students when learning English in the 12th grade English Cross Interest class at SMAN 5 Bantaeng. This study used descriptive qualitative method, data were collected through observation and interviews conducted with 4 students. Data came from three sources: namely audio recordings of naturally occurring classroom interactions; interviews with students and observation notes taken in the classroom. Data from the interaction transcripts were examined using Dorney & Scott's (1997) taxonomy of communication strategies.The results of this study show that there are five types of communication strategies that most often appear when students communicate with their interlocutors as well as towards their teachers during learning activities, namely; Message Abandonment, Non-Linguistic Means, Filler, Appeal For Help and Asking For Clarification. The students used L1 because the students found it difficult to understand L2. This is due to the fact that students lack knowledge of English. Students experience these types of communication strategies due to thinking time, anxiety, lack of focus, nervousness, doubt, lack of knowledge, lack of vocabulary, grammatical errors and self-confidence.
THE USE OF OUTDOOR-BASED LEARNING STRATEGY TO IMPROVE THE STUDENTS’ SPEAKING SKILL IN SMP UNISMUH MAKASSAR Nur Asti, Nur Asti; Rum, Eka Prabawati; AM, St. Asmayanti
Journal of Language Testing and Assessment Vol. 5 No. 1 (2025): Journal of Language Testing and Assessment (JLTA)
Publisher : FKIP Unismuh Makassar

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.56983/jlta.v5i1.580

Abstract

This research aimed to find out whether or not the use of Outdoor-Based Learning Strategy can improve the students speaking skill in terms of fluency and accuracy. This research was conducted in SMP Unismuh Makassar by using the true experimental design through two groups of experimental class and controlled class, and collected the data by giving pre-test, treatment, and post-test. The population of this research was the first grade students at SMP Unismuh Makassar. The sample was taken by using purposive sampling technique which consisted with 17 students as experimental class and 17 students as controlled class. The research findings showed that the first grade students of SMP Unismuh Makassar have a significant different between students’ post-test in experimental class and controlled in speaking fluency and accuracy. The mean score of post-test (2.41) in experimental class was higher than the mean score of post-test (1.94) in controlled class. While in Speaking accuracy the mean score of post-test (1.94) in experimental class as higher than the mean score post-test (1.65) in controlled class. From t-test the t-test value in speaking fluency is 4.315 > 0.05 and in speaking accuracy 3.395 > 0.05. which mean that there is significant difference between before and after giving the treatment. It indicated that the null hypothesis (HI) was accepted, and the null hypothesis (H0) was rejected. It shows that the use of outdoor-based learning significantly improve the students’ speaking fluency and accuracy.
Co-Authors abdullah, Nurdevi Bte Alfira, Nurfani AM, St. Asmayanti Amelia, Jamila Ardahali, Muh Yogi Ariana Azis, Andi Herlymerdania Mutia Azis, Awalia Cakti, Al Wahyu Tri Debinda, Phani Djasman, Ulfah Kurnia Farisha Andi Baso, Farisha Andi Hardianti Hijrah Ilmiah Ismail Sangkala, Ismail Kahar, Mutmainnah Mutia Kesya, Kesya La’biran, Roni Mahmudah, Dzur Rif’ah Mannong, Andi Bulkis Maghfirah Markus Deli Girik Allo Musoyeva, Aziza Nur Asti, Nur Asti Pongsapan, Nehru Rachel Rifaldi, Febrian Sitti Maryam Hamid, Sitti Maryam Ummi Khaerati Syam, Ummi Khaerati