Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 3 Documents
Search
Journal : TELL - US JOURNAL

THE IMPACT OF PEER FEEDBACK ON HIGHER EDUCATION STUDENTS’ ORAL PRESENTATION: A CASE STUDY Suharni, Suharni; Imelwaty, Sri; Sesmiyanti, Sesmiyanti; Perpisa, Lili
TELL - US JOURNAL Vol 8, No 3 (2022): English Education Art
Publisher : Universitas PGRI Sumatera Barat

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (1047.421 KB) | DOI: 10.22202/tus.2022.v8i3.6181

Abstract

Peer feedback on oral presentation is still an unexplored area. Much research has been conducted on peer feedback in various teaching and learning contexts, only a few about how peer gives feedback on his/her partner’ oral presentations. The study described here focuses using peer feedback on oral presentations. Analyzing data from semi-structured interviews, this case study investigated impact of giving peer feedback on oral presentations used by English as Foreign Language (EFL) college students on other student’s oral presentation tasks. Data analysis revealed that the peer gave oral feedback mainly focused on content-related criteria (quality of introduction, structure, and conclusion). Most of the peers focused on the nature of the delivery (eye-contact, vocal delivery, enthusiasm, interaction with the audience and body-language), and a few focused on a general quality and on the design of the students’ PowerPoint (PPT) slides.
LECTURERS’ PERCEPTION TOWARD BASIC READING TEXTBOOK IN STKIP PGRI SUMATERA BARAT Rozman, Febby Carmila; Sesmiyanti, Sesmiyanti; Suharni, Suharni
TELL - US JOURNAL Vol 6, No 2 (2020): November 2020
Publisher : Universitas PGRI Sumatera Barat

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (364.687 KB) | DOI: 10.22202/tus.2020.v6i2.4243

Abstract

This study aims to describe the lecturers' perception of the Basic Reading textbook used in the Basic Reading Course. This study used a qualitative approach with a total of 2 respondents. The data collection technique used semi-structured interviews with 2 English Education Study Program lecturers at STKIP PGRI Sumatera Barat. The results of this study explained that lecturers' perception toward Basic Reading textbook was based on four main components of the Basic Reading textbook, namely: content, vocabulary and grammar, exercises and activities and as well as the attractiveness and physical make up of the textbook. The lecturers' perception of the content of the textbook was very helpful for students in understanding learning. Regarding vocabulary and grammar in the Basic Reading textbook, according to the lecturer who used the Basic Reading textbook, the used of vocabulary and grammar was easy to understand and in accordance with student abilities. The activities used have an effect on students in implementing character education in the learning process. Exercises also required students to think critically. The attractiveness and physical make up of the textbook showed that the textbook cover and pictures on the textbook were very attractive to students because the textbook components are based on Multimodality. Multimodality is a combination of elements such as visual design, pictures, writing variations, layout, utterance, diagrams and tables and more.
EFFECTIVENESS OF SHARINGPLUS MODEL AS ATOOL FOR CONTROLLING STUDENTS’ LEARNING TASKS Yelfiza, Yelfiza; Siska, Siska; Sesmiyanti, Sesmiyanti; Perpisa, Lili; Zulfariati, Zulfariati
TELL - US JOURNAL Vol 9, No 2 (2023): English Education Art
Publisher : Universitas PGRI Sumatera Barat

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.22202/tus.2023.v9i2.6858

Abstract

Controlling undergraduate students’ tasks and supervising the process via online could decrease the quality of the task, since online feedback could not be well transmitted, which then resulted in unexpected revision.  Therefore, this research was aimed at finding out the effectiveness of SHARINGPLUS. This research used the action research method, done to twenty students in even semester 2020/2021. The model contained kinds of tasks with indicators and sub-indicators, list of students, and task options related to their final grades. The model contains eleven stages for every kind of task, but the students who succeed in doing the task until stage 4 do not need to do the following steps. Only the students with difficulty should follow the steps until the end. Findings showed that 45 % participants could follow 4 processes (SHAR). They worked in R stage repeatedly, since there was no limitation of task submission. The remaining students found difficulty in working in the system so that they could not finish their tasks  in the system. Thus, conclusion can be stated that the model was not yet effective to make students work as expected so that it needs more development.