Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2021 - 2026
4.529
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal Jurnal Hukum Volkgeist KRTHA BHAYANGKARA Mutawasith: Jurnal Hukum Islam Yumary: Jurnal Pengabdian kepada Masyarakat Jurnal Sosial dan Teknologi Jurnal Ilmiah Wahana Pendidikan Law Development Journal Journal of Law, Poliitic and Humanities Inicio Legis : Jurnal Hukum Al-Zayn: Jurnal Ilmu Sosial & Hukum RESLAJ: Religion Education Social Laa Roiba Journal International Journal of Integrated Science and Technology Terang: Jurnal Kajian Ilmu Sosial, Politik dan Hukum Federalisme : Jurnal Kajian Hukum Dan Ilmu Komunikasi International Journal of Law Analytic Truth De Journal Green Social: International Journal of Law and Civil Affairs Journal of Law and Nation Rechtsnormen: Journal of Law
Prahasti Suyaman
Universitas Muhammadiyah Sukabumi
Religion Arts Humanities Civil Engineering, Building, Construction & Architecture Computer Science & IT Decision Sciences, Operations Research & Management Economics, Econometrics & Finance Education Engineering Environmental Science Languange, Linguistic, Communication & Media Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice Social Sciences Other

Published : 27 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 27 Documents
Search

 1   2   3 
Implementation of Article 7 of Undang-Undang No. 1 of 1974 and Article 7 of Undang-Undang No. 16 of 2019 concerning the Minimum Age Limit for Marriage in Suppressing Cases of Early Marriage Augusty, Arsista; Suyaman, Prahasti
Journal of Law, Politic and Humanities Vol. 5 No. 6 (2025): (JLPH) Journal of Law, Politic and Humanities
Publisher : Dinasti Research

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.38035/jlph.v5i6.2287

Abstract

This study aims to examine the implementation of Article 7 of Undang-Undang No. 1 of 1974 and Article 7 of Undang-Undang No. 16 of 2019 concerning the minimum age of marriage in suppressing cases of early marriage, especially in the Sukabumi City area. Although there has been a change in the minimum age from 16 years to 19 years for women, the phenomenon of child marriage still continues to take advantage of the gap in marriage dispensation from the courts. Through an empirical juridical approach and supported by field data and interviews with judicial officials, this study shows that the high number of marriage dispensation applications after the change in the law indicates that the law is still weak in practice. Social, cultural, and lack of legal education are also the main causes of the high dispensation of child marriage. Therefore, a more progressive legal approach and the active participation of all parties are needed to strengthen child protection and suppress the practice of early marriage across the board.
Perbandingan Penyebab Perceraian di Pengadilan Negeri dan Nullitas Perkawinan di Tribunal Gereja Dwi Karyanto, Yustinus; Rasyid, Agus; Suyaman, Prahasti
Jurnal Sosial Teknologi Vol. 4 No. 1 (2024): Jurnal Sosial dan Teknologi
Publisher : CV. Green Publisher Indonesia

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.59188/jurnalsostech.v4i1.1099

Abstract

Penyebab Perceraian di Pengadilan Negeri sungguh berbeda dengan penyebab Nullitas di Tribunal Gereja. Penyebab perceraian di pengadilan Negeri terjadi sebelum perkawinan, berlandaskan peristiwa atau kejadian dan berujung pada putusan perceraian. Sedangkan penyebab Nullitas Perkawinan di Tribunal Gereja terjadi sebelum dan saat perkawinan berlangsung, berlandaskan kapasitas pribadi dan berujung pada putusan bahwa perkawinan tersebut tidak sah atau tidak ada. Dengan demikian dapat dikatakan putusan perceraian di Pengadilan Negeri memutuskan berakhirnya perkawinan Katolik yang sudah ada. Sedangkan pihak Tribunal Gereja dengan Nullitas Perkawinan menyatakan bahwa sedari atau sejak awal perkawinan itu tidak ada atau tidak sah
Obstacles Faced by DP3A in Providing Legal Protection for Child Molestation Victims Rawung, Putri Alifia; Suyaman, Prahasti
International Journal of Law Analytics Vol. 2 No. 3 (2024): August 2024
Publisher : MultiTech Publisher

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.59890/ijla.v2i3.2266

Abstract

Child molestation is a serious crime that threatens the well-being and rights of children, causing serious trauma. In Indonesia, Law No. 35 of 2014 aims to protect children, with the Women's Empowerment and Child Protection Agency (DP3A) to handle cases. Data from DP3A Sukabumi shows 85 cases of child sexual violence throughout 2023 and 48 cases up to June 2024. This study finds DP3A Sukabumi faces several obstacles in providing legal protection for the victims. These include victims' fear of social stigma, lack of knowledge, distrust in the legal system, and threats from perpetrators,  which hinder reporting. Additionally, DP3A struggles with a shortage of human resources and limited budget, reducing its capacity to effectively manage cases and support victims.
Interpretation of Article 28J Paragraph (2) of the 1945 Constitution Regarding Interfaith Marriage in Indonesia Azzahra, Syifa Nabilah; Prahasti Suyaman
International Journal of Integrated Science and Technology Vol. 2 No. 7 (2024): July 2024
Publisher : MultiTech Publisher

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.59890/ijist.v2i7.2246

Abstract

The problem of interfaith marriage involves the conflict between religious freedom and religious values and the constitution. Regarding interfaith marriage in Indonesia, Article 28J, Paragraph 2 of the 1945 Constitution highlights that legal restrictions may be placed on an individual's rights and freedoms. This research discusses how to ensure the protection of human rights without neglecting upheld religious values. This study uses a normative juridical analysis method of laws and regulations, legal norms and doctrines as well as previous articles on marriage and human rights. The results of the study found that the right to marriage is qualified as a derogable right (a right that can be restricted) by the 1945 Constitution. Although the right to marry is a human right, its implementation is not liberal and the religious aspect in the understanding of particularism greatly affects the protection and enforcement of human rights, including the right to marry.
Upaya Penegakkan Hak Bertemu Anak Bagi Orang Tua Non Pemegang Hadhanah Pasca Perceraian Fadil Sidik Fatahilah; Prahasti Suyaman
Terang : Jurnal Kajian Ilmu Sosial, Politik dan Hukum Vol. 2 No. 4 (2025): Desember : Terang : Jurnal Kajian Ilmu Sosial, Politik dan Hukum
Publisher : Asosiasi Peneliti dan Pengajar Ilmu Hukum Indonesia

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.62383/terang.v2i4.1454

Abstract

Divorce often creates new problems, one of which is related to child custody and visitation rights for parents who do not have custody. Prohibiting visitation by the custodial parent not only violates the rights of the non-custodial parent, but also disregards the child's right to receive affection from both parents. The purpose of this study is to examine the types of legal protection available to non-custodial parents who are prohibited from seeing their children. This study uses a normative legal research method with a statutory approach. Data collected from interviews with legal practitioners and parties who have experienced similar problems are included in this study. The results show that prohibiting parents who have custody from meeting their children is against the law and contrary to the principle of the best interests of the child. Parents who do not have custody rights can file a lawsuit to revoke custody rights, as stipulated in SEMA No. 1 January 2017. This study emphasizes the importance of the law in balancing the rights and obligations of parents after divorce for the best interests of the child.
PEMENUHAN HAK ISTRI PASCA PERCERAIAN DILUAR PENGADILAN AGAMA DI DESA SINAR LAUT KABUPATEN CIANJUR Novitasari Novitasari; Prahasti Suyaman
JOURNAL OF LAW AND NATION Vol. 3 No. 2 (2024): Journal of Law and Nation
Publisher : INTELIGENSIA MEDIA

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar

Abstract

Marriage is a physical and mental union between husband and wife, which connects the two of them who were originally two different human individuals. The method used in the research is a descriptive method with a qualitative approach. The type of legal research conducted is Juridical Empirical, namely legal research that examines applicable legal regulations and the reality that occurs in society, this research is conducted to understand the actual situation that occurs in society, with the aim of finding facts used as research data, then the data is analyzed to identify problems that ultimately lead to problem solving. This research was conducted in Sinar Laut Village, and the Religious Affairs Office (KUA) of Agrabinta District, Cianjur Regency. Data collection techniques in this research are observation, interviews, documentation and literature study. The results showed that divorce outside the religious court carried out by the people of Sinar Laut Village illustrates a form of injustice in the fulfillment of wives' rights, this is caused by five factors including Many women do not know their rights such as iddah and mut'ah maintenance, as well as legal procedures for filing divorces in court, long distances to the court and high costs are the main obstacles, coupled with the complicated and time- consuming divorce process, Economic dependence on husbands or in-laws leaves women without the resources to claim their rights after divorce, Influence from husbands and in-laws and concerns about family reputation often prevent women from claiming their rights through legal channels, and cases of domestic violence and irresponsible behavior from husbands exacerbate women's conditions, yet they still do not receive adequate legal protection. The results also show that the role of the Village Head, KUA, and Amil is crucial in addressing and reducing cases of out-of-court divorce by socializing to the community the negative impact of out-of-court divorce on the rights of the wife and children as well as other administrative aspects.
Analisis Yuridis Disparitas Pertimbangan Hakim dalam Penerapan SEMA Nomor 2 Tahun 2019 pada Putusan Nomor 75/Pdt.G/2021/PA.Pyb dan 1529/Pdt.G/2021/PA.Slw Tria Octoviyanti Margono; Prahasti Suyaman
Al-Zayn: Jurnal Ilmu Sosial, Hukum & Politik Vol 4 No 3 (2026): 2026
Publisher : Yayasan pendidikan dzurriyatul Quran

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.61104/alz.v4i3.5866

Abstract

Perkawinan sebagai ikatan lahir dan batin mengandung konsekuensi hukum berupa kewajiban nafkah, termasuk setelah perceraian. Namun, dalam praktik peradilan masih ditemukan disparitas pertimbangan hakim dalam menetapkan nafkah madhliyah anak. Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk menganalisis disparitas pertimbangan hakim dalam penerapan SEMA Nomor 2 Tahun 2019 pada Putusan Nomor 75/Pdt.G/2021/PA.Pyb dan Putusan Nomor 1529/Pdt.G/2021/PA.Slw. Metode yang digunakan adalah yuridis normatif dengan pendekatan perundang-undangan dan pendekatan kasus, serta dianalisis secara kualitatif melalui metode deskriptif-komparatif. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa dalam Putusan Nomor 75/Pdt.G/2021/PA.Pyb, hakim menggunakan pendekatan progresif dengan menerapkan SEMA Nomor 2 Tahun 2019 sebagai dasar untuk mengabulkan nafkah madhliyah anak berdasarkan bukti kelalaian ayah. Sebaliknya, dalam Putusan Nomor 1529/Pdt.G/2021/PA.Slw, hakim menggunakan pendekatan normatif dengan berpegang pada yurisprudensi dan doktrin klasik yang menyatakan nafkah anak tidak dapat dituntut setelah berlalu waktu. Perbedaan ini menunjukkan adanya disparitas akibat perbedaan penafsiran hukum. Oleh karena itu, diperlukan harmonisasi dalam penerapan hukum untuk menjamin kepastian hukum dan perlindungan hak anak.
Tinjauan Hukum Islam terhadap Pertimbangan Hakim pada Putusan Nomor 187/Pdt.G/2024/PA.Smi dalam Perkara Perceraian KDRT Nur Kurnia Awali Fazrin; Prahasti Suyaman
Al-Zayn: Jurnal Ilmu Sosial, Hukum & Politik Vol 4 No 3 (2026): 2026
Publisher : Yayasan pendidikan dzurriyatul Quran

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.61104/alz.v4i3.5876

Abstract

Perkawinan bertujuan membentuk keluarga yang harmonis, namun dalam praktiknya sering diwarnai konflik yang berujung pada kekerasan dalam rumah tangga (KDRT) dan perceraian. Kondisi ini menuntut adanya pertimbangan hakim yang komprehensif dalam memutus perkara agar mampu memberikan keadilan dan perlindungan hukum. Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk menganalisis pertimbangan hakim dalam Putusan Nomor 187/Pdt.G/2024/PA.Smi terkait perceraian akibat KDRT serta meninjaunya dalam perspektif hukum Islam. Metode yang digunakan adalah penelitian yuridis empiris dengan pendekatan kualitatif melalui studi kepustakaan, dokumentasi, dan analisis putusan pengadilan. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa pertimbangan hakim didasarkan pada fakta persidangan, keabsahan alat bukti termasuk bukti elektronik, serta ketentuan hukum positif dan hukum Islam. Hakim tidak hanya menilai aspek formal, tetapi juga mempertimbangkan keadilan substantif dan perlindungan terhadap korban. Selain itu, penetapan nafkah iddah dan mut’ah mencerminkan pemenuhan hak-hak perempuan pasca perceraian. Dari perspektif hukum Islam, putusan tersebut sejalan dengan prinsip keadilan, kemaslahatan, dan pencegahan kemudaratan. Dengan demikian, pertimbangan hakim dalam perkara ini mencerminkan integrasi antara hukum positif dan nilai-nilai syariah dalam mewujudkan keadilan.
Pemanggilan Melalui Kantor Pos Dalam Sistem E-Court Pada Perkara Perceraian Menjamin Partisipasi Nyata Para Pihak Dalam Persidangan Tanpa Mengorbankan Asas Penelitian Yang Adil (Fair Trial) Anisa Putri Aprili Susilawati; Prahasti Suyaman
Al-Zayn: Jurnal Ilmu Sosial, Hukum & Politik Vol 4 No 3 (2026): 2026
Publisher : Yayasan pendidikan dzurriyatul Quran

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.61104/alz.v4i3.6290

Abstract

Perkembangan teknologi informasi telah mendorong modernisasi sistem peradilan di Indonesia melalui penerapan E-Court sebagai bentuk digitalisasi layanan hukum. Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk menganalisis mekanisme pemanggilan melalui kantor pos dalam sistem E-Court pada perkara perceraian serta relevansinya dalam menjamin partisipasi nyata para pihak tanpa mengorbankan asas peradilan yang adil (fair trial). Metode penelitian yang digunakan adalah pendekatan yuridis normatif dengan analisis terhadap peraturan perundang-undangan dan praktik peradilan. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa sistem E-Court mampu meningkatkan efisiensi administrasi, mempercepat proses persidangan, serta memperluas akses keadilan bagi masyarakat. Pemanggilan melalui kantor pos menjadi alternatif penting bagi pihak yang belum sepenuhnya terjangkau teknologi digital, sehingga tetap menjamin kehadiran dan keterlibatan para pihak dalam persidangan. Namun, implementasinya masih menghadapi kendala seperti keterbatasan infrastruktur, rendahnya literasi digital, serta potensi keterlambatan pengiriman surat. Oleh karena itu, diperlukan optimalisasi sistem pemanggilan yang adaptif agar tetap menjamin kepastian hukum dan perlindungan hak para pihak. Dengan demikian, pemanggilan melalui kantor pos dalam sistem E-Court dapat mendukung terwujudnya peradilan yang efektif, efisien, dan berkeadilan.
Legal Reasoning Hakim terhadap Penerimaan Saksi Testimonium De Auditu dalam Perkara Perceraian Sifa Sofiatul Fikriah; Prahasti Suyaman
Al-Zayn: Jurnal Ilmu Sosial, Hukum & Politik Vol 4 No 3 (2026): 2026
Publisher : Yayasan pendidikan dzurriyatul Quran

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.61104/alz.v4i3.6455

Abstract

Penelitian ini mengkaji kedudukan hukum dan pertimbangan hakim terhadap saksi testimonium de auditu dalam perkara perceraian di Pengadilan Agama Sukabumi. Dengan metode yuridis empiris dan studi kasus Putusan Nomor 738/Pdt.G/2023/PA.Smi, ditemukan bahwa meskipun secara normatif dilarang oleh Pasal 171 HIR, kesaksian ini memiliki kedudukan eksepsional sebagai persangkaan hukum dalam perkara keluarga. Hakim menitikberatkan pada keadilan substantif dan fakta broken marriage dibandingkan kekakuan formalitas pembuktian. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa keterangan de auditu digunakan sebagai bukti pendukung (corroborative) yang diperkuat dengan fakta objektif seperti pisah rumah dalam waktu lama dan ketidakharmonisan yang nyata.
Co-Authors Abdul Bari Aden Rosadi Agustina, Nadia Alfiany, Temmy Fitriah Anisa Putri Aprili Susilawati Asalia Lubian Asantia Puspita Rohmah Asti Sri Mulyanti Augusty, Arsista Azzahra, Syifa Nabilah Dwi Karyanto, Yustinus Fadil Sidik Fatahilah Fitriah Alfiany, Temmy Ika Sofia Rizqiani Iqbal Noor Kasmudi Kasmudi Leonita Siwiyanti Mukhlas, Oyo Sunaryo Nadia Agustina Nirzon, Febriannisa NOVITASARI Novitasari Novitasari Nur Kurnia Awali Fazrin Pramudita, Roni Renaldi Prilia Ayuningtyas Ramdani Wahyu Sururie Rasyid, Agus Rawung, Putri Alifia Rizky Maulana Yusuf Rohmah, Asantia Puspita Roni Renaldi Pramudita Saepullah, Usep Sapitri, Neng Tessa Rahmawati Sifa Sofiatul Fikriah Sri Wahyuni, Yuyun Temmy Fitriah Alfiani Temmy Fitriah Alfiany Tria Octoviyanti Margono Tutu, Ratu Salsabila Winda Apriandari