Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 27 Documents
Search

The Position of the Wife as the Primary Breadwinner in the Division of Joint Property: A Legal Review of Decision No. 2388/Pdt.G/2023/PA.Im Nasution, Zulkifli; Dhiauddin Tanjung; Hasan Matsum
Al-Risalah VOLUME 25 NO 2, NOPEMBER (2025)
Publisher : Universitas Islam Negeri Alauddin Makassar

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.24252/al-risalah.vi.61691

Abstract

The shifting role of wives as primary breadwinners within families has become increasingly evident, yet this reality remains insufficiently recognized in the division of joint property upon divorce. Article 97 of the Compilation of Islamic Law (KHI), which mandates equal division, often fails to reflect actual economic contributions, particularly when the wife plays a dominant financial role. Addressing this gap, this normative legal research adopts a qualitative approach through a literature study, utilizing primary legal sources (court decisions, the Marriage Law, KHI, the Qur’an, Hadith, and fiqh principles) and secondary sources (fiqh texts, legal theories, and academic journals). The findings from the Religious Court Decision of Indramayu No. 2388/Pdt.G/2023/PA.Im show that the judges took a progressive stance by allocating 60% of the joint property to the wife and 40% to the husband, though the proportion still falls short of representing the wife’s significant economic contribution as she worked in Hong Kong and financed most of the home construction. From an Islamic legal perspective, justice implies proportionality rather than mere equality, aligning with the concept of syirkah (partnership) and the principles of maqāṣid al-syarī‘ah, which emphasize the protection of property and women’s rights. This study contributes to the reinterpretation of Article 97 of the KHI to be more responsive to contemporary social realities and calls for progressive ijtihād among judges to realize substantive justice in the division of joint property.
Maqashid Syariah: Perbandingan Antara Pemikiran Al - Ghazali dan Najmuddin At - Thufi Muhammad Habibul Amin; Dhiauddin Tanjung
El-Mujtama: Jurnal Pengabdian Masyarakat  Vol. 4 No. 5 (2024): El-Mujtama: Jurnal Pengabdian Masyarakat
Publisher : Intitut Agama Islam Nasional Laa Roiba Bogor

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.47467/elmujtama.v4i5.3497

Abstract

This article aims to compare the two concepts of Maqashid al-Syari'ah from al-Ghazali and at-Thufi with a focus on finding similarities and differences between their views. Maqashid al-Syari'ah refers to the principles or goals that are the basis of Islamic law, which aim to maintain human welfare and justice in society. Social changes arising from developments over time and the dynamics of society encourage scholars to deepen their studies of Maqashid al-Syari'ah seriously to find legal innovations that are needed to deal with existing social changes. The research method applied is qualitative in nature by utilizing library research, which involves the collection, analysis and thorough narrative interpretation of visual data to understand thoroughly and comprehensively the concept of maqashid al-Syari'ah from the perspective of al-Ghazali and at -Thufi. The results and discussion of this article confirm that the main aim of all Islamic religious teachings, including the Qur'an and hadith, is benefit. Al-Ghazali groups benefits into three parts, namely maslahah dharuriyah (urgent interests), hajiyah (necessary interests), and tahsiniyah (interests that improve the quality of life). On the other hand, At-Thufi does not divide benefits into these categories; for him, benefit is benefit, without needing to be shared. However, both agree that the essence of this benefit concept is to protect human welfare itself.
Problematics of Qibla Direction Determination in Sei Lepan Brandan District, Langkat Regency (Analysis of MUI Fatwa No. 5 of 2010 on the Amendment of MUI Fatwa No. 3 of 2010) Annisa Mawarni; Dhiauddin Tanjung
Journal of Law, Politic and Humanities Vol. 4 No. 3 (2024): (JLPH) Journal of Law, Politic and Humanities (March - April 2024)
Publisher : Dinasti Research

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.38035/jlph.v4i3.341

Abstract

Qibla direction has always been a special concern of the MUI Fatwa Commission. With this paper, it is intended to find out something that has been behind the problem of determining the Qibla direction with the issuance of the Indonesian Ulema Council Fatwa No. 5 of 2010 on the Amendment of the Indonesian Ulema Council Fatwa No. 3 of 2010. This research uses qualitative field research (Field Research) and library research (Library Research), in an analytical descriptive method. The results of the study inform that a change in the fatwa of the Indonesian Ulema Council that has been related to the Qibla position needs to be addressed reasonably. A change that occurs only in a third dictum is that changes the position of the West to the Northwest which is the Qibla of Indonesian Muslims. The first fatwa number 03/2010 only used a fiqh approach, while the next fatwa number 05/2010 used a fiqh approach, astronomy science, and falak science. In addition, determining the Qibla position is not difficult if it is carried out with an expert, even anyone can do it even in a simple way, namely Rashdul Qiblah. Therefore, calculating the Qibla position which is essentially a calculation that aims to determine the position of the Kaaba of Mecca from a position on the surface of the earth today which then every person who has performed prayers, either with a condition that is standing, ruku', or prostration which is always in a position towards the ka'bah.
Religious Leaders' Understanding of Astronomy and Its Implications in Determining the Direction of the Qibla in Medang Daras District, Batubara Regency Ihsan Asupi; Dhiauddin Tanjung
Lambung Mangkurat Law Journal Vol. 10 No. 2 (2025): September
Publisher : Program magister Kenotariatan Fakultas Hukum Universitas Lambung Mangkurat

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.32801/abc.v10i2.248

Abstract

The direction of the qibla is a fundamental aspect of Islamic worship, as facing the Kaaba is a legal requirement for the validity of prayer. Errors in determining the qibla direction, therefore, have normative implications in Islamic law. This study examines the understanding and practice of religious leaders in Medang Deras District, Batu Bara Regency, in determining the qibla direction from both legal and astronomical perspectives. Using a qualitative descriptive method, the research explores primary data obtained through interviews and direct observation, complemented by secondary data from literature and scientific references related to astronomy and Islamic law. The findings indicate that the understanding of religious leaders regarding astronomical principles remains limited, resulting in practical methods that rely heavily on local traditions such as aligning with the direction of the sunset or following the guidance of elder community members. This practice shows a discrepancy between local customary understanding and the normative standards of Islamic law, which require accuracy in facing the qibla. Therefore, strengthening legal and astronomical literacy among religious leaders is essential to ensure the precision of qibla determination and the validity of worship practices in accordance with sharia principles.
DAMPAK PERCERAIAN ORANG TUA TERHADAP HAK DAN KEWAJIBAN ANAK Kismullah habib; Dhiauddin Tanjung; Irwansyah
Pendas : Jurnal Ilmiah Pendidikan Dasar Vol. 10 No. 04 (2025): Volume 10 No. 04 Desember 2025
Publisher : Program Studi Pendidikan Guru Sekolah Dasar FKIP Universitas Pasundan

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.23969/jp.v10i04.39931

Abstract

This study aims to analyze the impact of parental divorce on the fulfillment of children’s rights and obligations, particularly concerning the rights to financial support, education, care, and protection after divorce. This research employs a normative legal research method with a qualitative approach, focusing on the examination of legal norms governing parental obligations and the protection of children’s rights following divorce. The approaches used include statutory and conceptual approaches by reviewing relevant laws and regulations, legal doctrines, and previous studies related to children’s rights after divorce. The legal materials consist of primary, secondary, and tertiary sources, which are analyzed using a qualitative-descriptive method. The results of the study indicate that, juridically, divorce does not eliminate parents’ obligations toward their children, as stipulated in the Marriage Law, the Compilation of Islamic Law, and child protection regulations. However, in practice, various problems are still found in fulfilling children’s rights after divorce. The findings reveal that the obligation to provide child support is often not carried out optimally, the fulfillment of children’s educational rights is hindered, child care tends to be borne by only one parent, and children’s psychological protection is weakened due to post-divorce conflicts. Therefore, parental divorce has a real impact on the neglect of children’s fundamental rights, highlighting the need to increase parents’ legal awareness, strengthen the active role of the courts, and enhance law enforcement to ensure the fulfillment of children’s rights and their best interests after divorce.
Analisis Ushuliyyah Terhadap Lafaz Mutlaq Dan Muqayyad Dalam Ushul Fiqh: Implikasi Terhadap Penafsiran Hukum Islam Ifham, Dhiyaul Habib; Mhd. Syahnan; Nispul Khair; Dhiauddin Tanjung
Al-Zayn: Jurnal Ilmu Sosial, Hukum & Politik Vol 3 No 6 (2025): 2025
Publisher : Yayasan pendidikan dzurriyatul Quran

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.61104/alz.v3i6.4586

Abstract

Lafaz mutlaq dan muqayyad merupakan konsep kebahasaan penting dalam ushul fiqh yang berpengaruh langsung terhadap penafsiran dan penetapan hukum Islam. Perbedaan sifat keduanya menuntut ketelitian dalam memahami nash agar tidak menyimpang dari maksud syariat. Penelitian ini bertujuan menganalisis konsep mutlaq dan muqayyad serta implikasinya terhadap proses istinbāṭ hukum Islam. Penelitian ini menggunakan metode kepustakaan dengan pendekatan normatif-usuliyyah dan konseptual, melalui analisis literatur ushul fiqh klasik dan kontemporer. Hasil kajian menunjukkan bahwa lafaz mutlaq menunjukkan keluasan makna hukum selama tidak terdapat dalil pembatas, sedangkan lafaz muqayyad berfungsi memperjelas dan membatasi penerapan hukum. Perbedaan pandangan ulama, khususnya antara jumhur dan mazhab Hanafiyyah, mencerminkan dinamika metodologis dalam penafsiran hukum. Kajian ini menegaskan pentingnya pemahaman mutlaq dan muqayyad dalam menjaga ketepatan, kehati-hatian, dan konsistensi penetapan hukum Islam
Epistemologi Ilmu Ushul Fiqh Dan Relevansinya Dalam Penetapan Hukum Syara’ Haris Dermawan; Mhd. Syahnan; Nispul Khair; Dhiauddin Tanjung
Al-Zayn: Jurnal Ilmu Sosial, Hukum & Politik Vol 3 No 6 (2025): 2025
Publisher : Yayasan pendidikan dzurriyatul Quran

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.61104/alz.v3i6.4697

Abstract

Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk menganalisis dan mendeskripsikan epistemologi yang mendasari ilmu ushul fiqh serta mengeksplorasi relevansinya yang berkelanjutan dalam proses penetapan hukum syara' (hukum Islam), baik di masa klasik maupun kontemporer. Epistemologi Ilmu Ushul Fiqh adalah kajian mendalam mengenai sumber, metode, dan validitas pengetahuan dalam kerangka metodologi hukum Islam (ushul fiqh), yang berfungsi sebagai kerangka berpikir logis untuk menetapkan hukum syara'. Relevansinya sangat vital dalam memastikan proses istinbat (pengambilan kesimpulan hukum) tetap otentik, kontekstual, dan selaras dengan tujuan syariah (maqashid al-syariah) di tengah dinamika zaman. Secara epistemologis, ushul fiqh mengakui dua sumber utama pengetahuan hukum: sumber independen (Al-Qur'an dan Sunnah) dan sumber dependen atau derivatif (ijma', qiyas, istihsan, istishlah, 'urf, dll.). Kerangka ini dipandu oleh logika deduktif dan induktif untuk membedakan penalaran yang benar dari yang menyimpang. Adapun relevansinya dalam penetapan hukum syara' sangat signifikan: Sebagai Metodologi Ijtihad, Menjamin Otentisitas dan Konsistensi, Menjawab Problematika Kontemporer. Epistemologi ilmu ushul fiqh adalah fondasi metodologis yang esensial dalam penetapan hukum syara'. Ia tidak hanya mengatur cara memperoleh pengetahuan hukum, tetapi juga memastikan relevansi dan adaptabilitas hukum Islam untuk kesejahteraan manusia di setiap zaman. Penguatan kajian epistemologi ushul fiqh sangat diperlukan untuk merespons tantangan hukum yang semakin kompleks saat ini.