Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 5 Documents
Search

Kebijakan Publik Indonesia: Studi pada Kebijakan Pemerintah Tentang Pembatasan BBM Subsidi Tahun 2024 Wahyu Trisno Aji; Mohammad Solekhan
Journal Innovation In Education Vol. 2 No. 4 (2024): Desember : Journal Innovation in Education (INOVED)
Publisher : STIKes Ibnu Sina Ajibarang

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.59841/inoved.v2i4.1874

Abstract

This study examines the government's public policy related to the restriction of subsidized fuel oil (BBM) in 2024 through a public policy theory approach. This study uses a qualitative type with a case study with a literature study documentation data collection technique on the topic discussed. The results of the study Public policy is understood as government actions or inactions that reflect certain goals and values. In this context, the policy of restricting subsidized fuel was born as a response to public problems, especially the swelling of the state budget (APBN) due to energy subsidies. Through this policy, fuel subsidies are directed only to certain groups, such as public vehicles, transportation of basic goods, motorbikes under 150 cc, and cars with special criteria, which aim to make budget use more efficient. From the perspective of public policy theory, this step is included in the rational policy model, which seeks to prioritize the principle of "maximum social gain," where the policy is expected to provide maximum benefits to the community. This study aims to explore how the policy of restricting fuel subsidies reflects the principle of rationality in public policy and its implications for society and the state budget.
PERANAN KULIAH KERJA LAPANGAN DAN RELEVANSINYA TERHADAP KETERAMPILAN, PROFESIONAL MAHASISWA Mohammad Solekhan; M. Rusdi; Syafruddin; Efi Endang Dwi Setyorini; Achmad Napis Qurtubi
Ahsani Taqwim: Jurnal Pendidikan dan Keguruan Vol. 1 No. 2 (2024): Juni: Ahsani Taqwim
Publisher : Yayasan Baitul Hikmah al-Zain

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.63424/ahsanitaqwim.v1i2.50

Abstract

one important part of higher education is fieldwork lectures (KKL), which aim to combine theoretical learning with real-world work experience. This article discusses the positive impact of KKL on students, with particular emphasis on the benefits it gives them in personal development and preparation for future student careers. In addition to analyzing data from relevant literature, the study involved a thorough interview with students who have already attended fieldwork lectures (KKL). The results of the study show that KKL is very beneficial for student growth both in the field and outside the field. The practical skills that students acquire in the field, such as problem-solving, communication, and adaptability to the diverse work environment, are learned by students during the course of the KKL. This experience also gives them a better understanding of social issues, helps them understand real situations, and improves their understanding of real work. This fieldwork lecture program aims to bring students from the academic community into the more real world of the field, giving them invaluable practical experience.
Tanggung Jawab Perdata dalam Kasus Wanprestasi dan Perbuatan Melawan Hukum : Civil Liability in Cases of Default and Unlawful Acts Markus Suryoutomo; Mohammad Solekhan; Sri Murni; Hamdani; Saryana
Jurnal Kolaboratif Sains Vol. 8 No. 4: April 2025
Publisher : Universitas Muhammadiyah Palu

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.56338/jks.v8i4.7261

Abstract

Tanggung jawab perdata adalah konsep yang sangat penting dalam hukum yang berhubungan dengan kewajiban seseorang untuk memberikan ganti rugi akibat perbuatannya yang merugikan pihak lain. Dalam sistem hukum Indonesia, wanprestasi dan perbuatan melawan hukum adalah dua sumber utama yang dapat menyebabkan timbulnya tanggung jawab perdata. Wanprestasi merujuk pada kegagalan dalam memenuhi kewajiban yang terdapat dalam suatu perjanjian, sedangkan perbuatan melawan hukum mencakup tindakan yang melanggar norma hukum yang berlaku dan menyebabkan kerugian bagi pihak lain. Artikel ini bertujuan untuk membahas berbagai aspek tanggung jawab perdata dalam konteks wanprestasi dan perbuatan melawan hukum, serta dampaknya dalam hukum perdata Indonesia. Dengan pendekatan yuridis normatif, artikel ini memberikan pemahaman yang lebih mendalam mengenai bagaimana kedua hal tersebut berkontribusi terhadap timbulnya tanggung jawab perdata dan bagaimana hukum memberikan perlindungan kepada pihak yang dirugikan dalam hal ini.
Implementation of the Principle of Constitutional Supremacy in Law Enforcement in Indonesia Kevin Mario Immanuel; Andri Rahmat Isnaini; Mohammad Solekhan; Yusuf
International Journal of Health, Economics, and Social Sciences (IJHESS) Vol. 7 No. 3: July 2025
Publisher : Universitas Muhammadiyah Palu

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.56338/ijhess.v7i3.8189

Abstract

The principle of constitutional supremacy serves as a foundational cornerstone within Indonesia’s legal and governmental framework, positioning the 1945 Constitution of the Republic of Indonesia (UUD NRI 1945) as the highest authority in the hierarchy of legislation. This supremacy is not merely symbolic; it acts as a fundamental norm (grundnorm) that should guide both the legislative process and the execution of state power. This article explores how the principle of constitutional supremacy is applied in the enforcement of law in Indonesia, while also highlighting the normative and structural challenges that hinder consistent constitutional adherence. Utilizing a normative juridical approach, this study analyzes statutory regulations, Constitutional Court rulings, and observes state practices. The findings reveal that despite the Constitutional Court’s significant role in safeguarding constitutional integrity through judicial review, implementation at the practical level often suffers from regulatory inconsistencies, non-compliance with constitutional rulings, and limited constitutional understanding among law enforcers and lawmakers. To address these issues, institutional strengthening, legislative reform, and widespread constitutional education are imperative to ensure all state actions and policies are in harmony with the principle of constitutional supremacy.
Legal Implications of Minimum Education Requirements for DPR Candidates in the Perspective of the 1945 Constitution and Constitutional Court Decisions Budi Handayani; Muchamad Taufiq; Yusuf; Fatma Faisal; Mohammad Solekhan
International Journal of Health, Economics, and Social Sciences (IJHESS) Vol. 7 No. 4: October-2025
Publisher : Universitas Muhammadiyah Palu

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.56338/ijhess.v7i4.8941

Abstract

The establishment of a minimum education requirement for candidates of the House of Representatives (DPR) has become a complex legal issue, sparking debates between the principles of meritocracy and the fulfillment of citizens’ constitutional rights. On one hand, educational qualifications are considered essential to ensure the intellectual capacity, rationality, and legislative competence of parliamentary members in performing their lawmaking and supervisory functions. On the other hand, such provisions may lead to discrimination against citizens who lack access to adequate formal education, thereby restricting their constitutional right to be elected as guaranteed under the 1945 Constitution of the Republic of Indonesia. This article aims to thoroughly examine the legal implications of establishing a minimum education requirement for DPR candidates from the perspective of the 1945 Constitution and the Constitutional Court’s jurisprudence. Using a normative juridical approach, this study analyzes the compatibility of educational restrictions with the principles of equality before the law, political rights, and constitutional democracy. The findings reveal that educational qualifications should not be perceived as discriminatory limitations but rather as instruments to ensure competence and integrity within the legislative body as part of a democratic rule-of-law system. Nevertheless, such restrictions must be formulated proportionally, clearly, and in accordance with constitutional objectives so as not to violate the principle of equality before the law or the fundamental right of citizens to participate in governance. Therefore, any regulation regarding educational requirements for DPR candidates must strike a balance between the need for legislative professionalism and the protection of citizens’ constitutional rights.