Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2021 - 2026
4.141
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal Ajudikasi : Jurnal Ilmu Hukum Jurnal Ilmu Hukum The Juris Awang Long Law Review Ilmu Hukum Prima Jurnal Kajian Pembaruan Hukum Interdisciplinary Social Studies SETARA : Jurnal Ilmu Hukum VIVA THEMIS- Jurnal Ilmu Hukum dan Humaniora JUSTICIA SAINS: Jurnal Ilmu Hukum Jurnal Indonesia Sosial Sains Innovative: Journal Of Social Science Research Jurnal Hukum Bisnis Al-Zayn: Jurnal Ilmu Sosial & Hukum Jurnal Inovasi Global Media Hukum Indonesia (MHI) Jurnal Riksa Cendikia Nusantara
Setiawan, Puguh Aji Hari
Unknown Affiliation
Religion Agriculture, Biological Sciences & Forestry Arts Humanities Astronomy Biochemistry, Genetics & Molecular Biology Chemistry Computer Science & IT Decision Sciences, Operations Research & Management Earth & Planetary Sciences Economics, Econometrics & Finance Education Energy Engineering Environmental Science Health Professions Immunology & microbiology Languange, Linguistic, Communication & Media Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice Library & Information Science Materials Science & Nanotechnology Mathematics Neuroscience Physics Public Health Social Sciences Other

Published : 31 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 4 Documents
Search
Journal : Ilmu Hukum Prima

 1 
Legal Protection Of Consumer Personal Data In Electronic Transactions With Legal Certainty Sihite, Thomas Ericson Hadinata; Iryani, Dewi; Setiawan, Puguh Aji Hari
Ilmu Hukum Prima (IHP) Vol. 8 No. 2 (2025): JURNAL ILMU HUKUM PRIMA
Publisher : jurnal.unprimdn.ac.id

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.34012/jihp.v8i2.7637

Abstract

Online buying and selling can result in the leakage of consumer personal data, as seen in the breaches of user accounts on the Tokopedia and Shopee marketplaces. The data leaks on e-commerce platforms have left users' personal data unprotected. Law No. 19 of 2016 also does not specifically address personal data protection. The type of research used in this research is normative legal research. The results of this research, namely Regulations related to the protection of personal data according to the laws and regulations in force in Indonesia, include: Government Regulation Number 71 of 2019 concerning the Implementation of Electronic Systems and Transactions is a revision of Government Regulation Number 82 of 2012. In addition, it is also regulated in Government Regulation No. 44 of 2008 concerning the Provision of Compensation, Restitution, and Assistance to Victim Witnesses, in addition there is Article 1 paragraph (6) and Article 5 paragraph (1) Point A of the Law concerning the Protection of Witnesses and Victims, PERKOMINFO (Regulation of the Minister of Communication and Information) Number 20 of 2016 and Article 28 paragraph (1) of Law Number 1 of 2024 concerning the Second Amendment to Law Number 11 of 2008 concerning Electronic Information and Transactions. These regulations are aimed at encouraging the public to respect personal data, which is part of the right to privacy, so that other people's personal data is not widely disseminated or traded for any reason. Legal protection of consumer personal data in electronic transactions with legal certainty is as stated in Article 19 of the Consumer Protection Law, which states that e-commerce startups are responsible for losses experienced by consumers by providing administrative compensation to consumers.
Settlement Of Industrial Relations Disputes Due To Termination Of Employment Due To Efficiency In Maintaining Balance Between Employers And Workers Sudirgo, Tony; Iryani, Dewi; Setiawan, Puguh Aji Hari
Ilmu Hukum Prima (IHP) Vol. 8 No. 2 (2025): JURNAL ILMU HUKUM PRIMA
Publisher : jurnal.unprimdn.ac.id

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.34012/jihp.v8i2.7645

Abstract

Regulations related to termination of employment for reasons of efficiency are not explained explicitly, this will have an impact on the emergence of industrial relations disputes, thus affecting the balance between the interests of employers and the protection of workers/laborers. This study aims to examine the regulations regarding termination of employment for reasons of efficiency based on laws and judges' decisions and efforts to resolve them to ensure justice for the parties. In this study, a normative juridical method is used with a statutory and case approach, where this study analyzes Law Number 13 of 2003, Law Number 6 of 2023, Government Regulation Number 35 of 2021, and decisions such as the Constitutional Court Number 19/PUU-IX/2011. With the findings of ambiguity in the definition of efficiency, the phrase loss, and prevention of potential losses, which are seen in the cases of PT. S against Mrs. E and PT. Jtrust Olympindo Multi Finance against Sudadi Hari Widianto, causing misuse of efficiency reasons in termination of employment. Thus, in its implications, it is necessary to update regulations with a more explicit definition of efficiency, strengthening the role of judges in analyzing company financial audit reports, and transparent steps by companies such as analyzing the company's macro and micro conditions in advance and mapping workers/laborers to ensure the achievement of justice, benefits, and legal certainty, so as to support a harmonious balance in industrial relations.
Legal Certainty Regarding The Cancellation Of Arbitration Awards In District Courts Juniarty, Santy; Setiawan, Puguh Aji Hari; Iryani, Dewi
Ilmu Hukum Prima (IHP) Vol. 8 No. 2 (2025): JURNAL ILMU HUKUM PRIMA
Publisher : jurnal.unprimdn.ac.id

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.34012/jihp.v8i2.7647

Abstract

Arbitration in Indonesia, based on Law Number 30 of 1999, is designed as a dispute resolution mechanism that provides legal certainty through its final and binding decisions. This principle, known as das sollen, is expected to support a conducive investment climate. However, in practice (das sein), Article 70 of the same law authorizes the District Court to annul arbitration awards. The implementation of this authority, particularly on grounds of "trickery," often leads to inconsistencies in court decisions. This study uses a normative juridical research method with a statute approach and a conceptual approach. Data collection was conducted through library research on primary, secondary, and tertiary legal materials. The collected data were then analyzed qualitatively using systematic, theological, and grammatical interpretations. To analyze legal issues in depth, this study uses the Theory of Legal Certainty and the Theory of Agreements as analytical tools for three relevant case studies of Supreme Court decisions: Decision Number 941 B/Pdt.Sus-Arbt/2024, Decision Number 244 B/Pdt.Sus-Arbt/2022, and Decision Number 477 B/Pdt.Sus-Arbt/2022. The research findings indicate that the legal basis and considerations of judges in annulling arbitral awards are in accordance with legal provisions only if they are based on violations of fundamental principles in the legal process, such as the existence of legally proven fraud that affects the legal standing of the parties or the integrity of the process. However, court intervention becomes unlawful when re-examining the substance of the dispute, because it violates the autonomy of the parties' will. It is concluded that legal certainty regarding the annulment of arbitral awards is in a vulnerable condition due to inconsistent interpretations of judges. This inconsistency directly weakens the predictability of law and the principle of finality of arbitration, which has implications for declining investor confidence in the domestic dispute resolution system.
Application of the Principle of Commercial Exit from Financial Distress in Corporate Bankruptcy Applications and its Implications for Creditor Protection Elina, Rindi; Suhariyanto, Didik; Setiawan, Puguh Aji Hari
Ilmu Hukum Prima (IHP) Vol. 8 No. 2 (2025): JURNAL ILMU HUKUM PRIMA
Publisher : jurnal.unprimdn.ac.id

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.34012/jihp.v8i2.7665

Abstract

This research is motivated by the increasing misuse of bankruptcy mechanisms in Indonesia, where solvent debtors exploit bankruptcy as a strategy to evade obligations rather than as a genuine solution for financial distress. The study aims to analyze the regulation of corporate bankruptcy applications that reflect the principle of Commercial Exit from Financial Distress and to examine creditor protection in cases that deviate from this principle. Using a normative juridical approach through statute, case, and conceptual methods, this research relies on primary legal materials including Law Number 37 of 2004 concerning Bankruptcy and Suspension of Debt Payment Obligations and two court decisions: Number 04/Pdt.Sus-Pailit/2023/PN Niaga Medan (PT Ricky Kurniawan Kertapersada) and Number 41/Pdt.Sus-Pailit/2025/PN Niaga Central Jakarta (PT Teknik Lancar Mandiri). The analysis was conducted qualitatively using sociological interpretation to link legal norms with judicial practice. The findings reveal that Indonesia’s bankruptcy system remains formalistic because it does not apply an insolvency test as a substantive basis for determining financial failure. The PT RKK case demonstrates bankruptcy abuse to avoid debt, while the PT TLM case exemplifies fair application of the Commercial Exit from Financial Distress principle. Hence, reform of bankruptcy law is essential to achieve substantive justice and equitable legal protection for creditors. Penelitian ini menggunakan metode hukum normatif dengan pendekatan yuridis normatif, melalui statute approach, case approach, dan conceptual approach. Bahan hukum primer yang digunakan meliputi peraturan perundang-undangan dan dua putusan pengadilan, yaitu Putusan Nomor 04/Pdt.Sus-Pailit/2023/PN Niaga Medan (PT Ricky Kurniawan Kertapersada) dan Putusan Nomor 41/Pdt.Sus-Pailit/2025/PN Niaga Jakarta Pusat (PT Teknik Lancar Mandiri). Analisis dilakukan secara kualitatif menggunakan metode interpretasi sosiologis untuk menemukan relevansi norma hukum dengan penerapannya di pengadilan. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa sistem kepailitan Indonesia masih bersifat formalistik karena belum menerapkan insolvency test sebagai dasar substantif. Kasus PT RKK menunjukkan penyalahgunaan mekanisme pailit untuk menghindari kewajiban, sedangkan PT TLM mencerminkan penerapan prinsip Commercial Exit from Financial Distress secara adil dan proporsional. Oleh karena itu, reformasi hukum kepailitan diperlukan untuk memastikan keadilan substantif dan perlindungan hukum kreditur secara seimbang.
Co-Authors Abdul Rohman Achmad Hidayat Afika, Alzam Andri Andri Annika Rahmawati Aris, Mokhamad Azhari, Moh Tohri Belinda, Suci Fidia Fitriza Dewi Iryani Didik Suhariyanto Ekoprasetyo, Antonius Bintarto Elina, Rindi H, Hartana Hartana, Hartana Herman, KMS Hie, Hengky Himawan Ismail Ismail I, Ismail Ismail Ismail Ismarilda, Ismarilda Juniarty, Santy Khikmatussafira, Ilma Lumbanraja, Gilbert Nino, Tursino Nurmawati, Bernadete Panda, Daniel Puspita, Ria Rae, Gradios Nyoman Tio Rae, Nyoman Tio Ramadani, Muhammad Aru Rikmadani, Yudi Anton Santoso, Niken Larasayu Sihite, Thomas Ericson Hadinata Sihotang, Roymartin Sorialam, Mangottang Sriulina, Maria Eva Sudirgo, Tony Susetyo Rohadi Suwito Suwito Umra, Alieffandy