Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2021 - 2026
2.906
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal Lentera Hukum Jurnal Konstitusi Jurnal Ilmiah Hukum LEGALITY Mimbar Yustitia : Jurnal Hukum dan Hak Asasi Manusia Sociological Jurisprudence Journal Indonesian Journal of Law and Society The Journal of Contemporary Sociological Issues (CSI) Jurnal Konstitusi Al-MIKRAJ: Jurnal studi Islam dan Humaniora Jurnal Penelitian Interdisciplinary Journal on Law, Social Sciences and Humanities Jurnal Kajian Konstitusi PUSKAPSI Law Review Journal of Constitutional Law Society (JCLS) Jurnal Legislasi Indonesia PUSKAPSI Law Review
Antikowati Antikowati
Fakultas Hukum Universitas Jember
Humanities Economics, Econometrics & Finance Education Engineering Environmental Science Languange, Linguistic, Communication & Media Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice Social Sciences Other

Published : 26 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 26 Documents
Search

 1   2   3 
TRANSPARENCY OF VITAE OF LEGISLATIVE CANDIDATES IN THE 2024 ELECTIONS: TRANSPARANSI DAFTAR RIWAYAT HIDUP CALON ANGGOTA LEGISLATIF DALAM PEMILU 2024 Adisty, Septiani Jessica; Antikowati, Antikowati; Chandra, Ratih Listyana
Constitutional Law Society Vol. 4 No. 1 (2025): March
Publisher : Center for Constitutional and Legislative Studies University of Bandar Lampung

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.36448/cls.v4i01.101

Abstract

One of the information provided by the The General Election Commission a curriculum vitae of legislative candidates in the legislative elections. Historical life list information is useful for voters as material for consideration in determining their choice according to their preferences. In this article, we will examine how public information disclosure is implemented, especially the curriculum vitae of legislative candidates in the 2024 Legislative Election and how it will affect the The General Election Commission if it does not implement election information disclosure. The method used in this writing is normative juridical with a statutory and contextual approach. The research results show that in the 2024 Legislative Election the percentage of legislative candidates who open their curriculum vitae is greater than the legislative candidates who do not open their curriculum vitae. This phenomenon is caused by the absence of binding regulations that require legislative candidates to open a curriculum vitae. The General Election Commission gives each legislative candidate the freedom to open or not make a curriculum vitae. This step is a form of The General Election Commission effort to carry out public information disclosure. The General Election Commission will be subject to criminal sanctions if it does not carry out information disclosure in accordance with Public Information Openness Law.
KEKUATAN MENGIKAT PUTUSAN PENGUJIAN UNDANG-UNDANG OLEH MAHKAMAH KOSTITUSI TERHADAP PUTUSAN PENGUJIAN PERATURAN PERUNDANG-UNDANGAN OLEH MAHKAMAH AGUNG Setiawan, Andri; Antikowati, Antikowati; Anggono, Bayu Dwi
Jurnal Legislasi Indonesia Vol 18, No 1 (2021): Jurnal Legislasi Indonesia - Maret 2021
Publisher : Direktorat Jenderal Peraturan Perundang-undang, Kementerian Hukum dan Hak Asasi Manusia

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.54629/jli.v18i1.796

Abstract

Kewenangan pengujian peraturan perundang-undangan (judicial review) yang sama-sama diberikan kepada Mahkamah Konstitusi (MK) dan Mahkamah Agung (MA) menimbulkan problematika khusus di dalam sistem kekuasaan kehakiman di Indonesia. Permasalahan tersebut terlihat jelas utamanya dalam implementasi kewenangan baik yang dimiliki MK maupun MA, sebagaimana tidak jarang norma hukum yang dihasilkan oleh putusan MK dan MA saling bertolak belakang. Dengan menggunakan metode penelitian yuridis normatif, artikel ini berupaya untuk mendiskusikan bagaimana kekuatan mengikat putusan pengujian undang-undang pada MK terhadap putusan pengujian peraturan perundang-undangan di bawah undang-undang pada MA. Selain itu artikel ini juga hendak memberikan gambaran bagaimana menyelesaikan problematika pertentangan putusan antara pengujian peraturan perundang-undangan dibawah undang-undang pada MA dan pengujian undang-undang pada MK. Artikel ini berkesimpulan bahwa perlu dilakukan integrasi pengujian satu atap peraturan perundang-undangan dibawah MK. Puncaknya, artikel ini merekomendasikan untuk melakukan sinkronisasi dan harmonisasi dengan cara melakukan perubahan terhadap UUD NRI 1945, Undang-Undang Kekuasan Kehakiman, Undang-Undang MA dan Undang-Undang MK.
Maladministration in the Public Service: Should Government Officials be Responsible for their Decisions? Irmajayanti, Maulida Zulia; Sudaryanto, Totok; Antikowati, Antikowati
Journal of Contemporary Sociological Issues Vol. 1 No. 1 (2021): Journal of Contemporary Sociological Issues
Publisher : Advanced Studies on Socio-Economy Development

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (210.546 KB) | DOI: 10.19184/csi.v1i1.21507

Abstract

The concept of the welfare state upholds the existence of the legal system under the premise of legal certainty and the protection of basic human rights. Paragraph IV of the 1945 Constitution of the Republic of Indonesia emphasizes the existence of “state obligations” and “the government duty” to protect and serve all public interest. The normative basis of the Constitution was translated as the national principle to embody the public services. The Public Service Law Number 25 of 2009 is a formulation of legal certainty. However, the main problem that occurs in the public services is maladministration in bureaucracy. It is important to build interpretations of the authority attached to the bureaucratic system or on subjects who become government officials. By analyzing the Constitution, this article states that the government official dimensions must be considered as an interrelated issue, so that the articulate practice must be seen as inherent social conditions. Keywords: Responsibility, Government Officials, Maladministration.
Constitutional Question dan Constitutional Complaint: Pembaharuan Mahkamah Konstitusi dan Terjaminnya Hak Konstitusional Warga Negara Jumantoro, Tegar Raffi Putra; Albanna, Syedna Ahmad; Antikowati, Antikowati; Wada, Igam Arya
AL-MIKRAJ Jurnal Studi Islam dan Humaniora Vol. 4 No. 02 (2024): Al-Mikraj, Jurnal Studi Islam dan Humaniora
Publisher : Pascasarjana Institut Agama Islam Sunan Giri Ponorogo

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.37680/almikraj.v4i02.5030

Abstract

The constitutional rights of citizens are the main rights that should be protected and guaranteed by the state. However, in practice, there are still several violations of the constitutional rights of citizens in Indonesia, for example in the process of making legal products, namely laws and regulations, which do not include participation from citizens and the increasingly narrowing of citizens' right to freedom in expressing their suggestions and input in public. . Seeing the problems above, researchers try to provide recommendations by internalizing adjudicating Constitutional Question and Constitutional Complaint cases as one of the powers of the Constitutional Court. This research is very important as a basis for state officials in guaranteeing the constitutional rights of citizens in the future. This research uses normative legal methods and a statutory approach. The data collection method was carried out using library research. The results of the research found legal facts that the concepts of Constitutional Question and Constitutional Complaint had not yet been adopted as part of the authority of the Constitutional Court and found several dynamics of violations of citizens' constitutional rights. In practice, the Constitutional Court only has the authority to hear and decide cases where the applicant feels disadvantaged by the existence of the law, not by state officials. Researchers recommend synergies in increasing the accessibility of public services for handling Constitutional Court cases online as well as the implementation of adjudicating Constitutional Question and Constitutional Complaint cases in Indonesia.
Kepastian Hukum Hak Guna Usaha di atas Hak Pengelolaan Nisriina Milla Sharfinda; Antikowati Antikowati; Bhim Prakoso
MIMBAR YUSTITIA : Jurnal Hukum dan Hak Asasi Manusia Vol 7 No 2 (2023): Desember 2023
Publisher : Universitas Islam Darul Ulum

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.52166/mimbar.v7i2.5060

Abstract

The ratification of Law 6/2023 creates a new norm for granting HGU, which is stated in Article 129 Paragraph (2) that the right: to cultivate; build use; and use, can be provided on top of HPL. Based on the closing provisions of Law 6/2023 Article 184 which states that all implementing regulations remain in force as long as they do not conflict with government regulations in place of this law, PP 18/2021 is still valid. The government regulation states that in Article 8 Paragraph (1) HPL can be granted HGU. This can result in abuse of authority as has occurred in the general transmigration program for West Java residents to Riau Province in East Tambusai Village, Kampar Regency, the Regional Government of Riau Province part of the transmigration management land was carried out in collaboration with PT Pancasurya Agrindo. The research carried out was to analyze the implementation of granting HGU applications above HPL to determine the basis and legal certainty of HGU above HPL. This research using the normative juridical research method found the problem related to the basis and the legal certainty of HGU above HPL. Legal certainty from HGU above HPL is not optimal if based on the analysis of existing cases, because the application article for the issuance of HGU above HPL does not provide space for people who object to the issuance of HGU certificates. Legal certainty will be implemented if the law related to the implementation of HGU above HPL is effective.
Urgensi Keberadaan Wakil Menteri di Indonesia Aliyah, Prita; Antikowati, Antikowati
PUSKAPSI Law Review Vol. 2 No. 1 (2022): June 2022
Publisher : Pusat Pengkajian Pancasila dan Konstitusi (PUSKAPSI) FH UNEJ

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.19184/puskapsi.v2i1.29250

Abstract

Abstract As President whose own the prerogative rights in order to doing governmental affairs, besides Vice President, President also assisted by Minister, it is regulated on Article Number 17 of Constitution of the Republic of Indonesia year 1945. Nor, the authority of appoint the ministers in the cabinet, President also has the authority to appoint the Vice Minister but this authority only can applied on particular circumstances which regulated on Article Number 10 of Law No. 39 Year 2008 about Ministry of State. As the history told, that seat of Vice Minister is has existed since the first year of Presidency of Soekarno, after the Independent Day. Yet, by the time goes the issues about Prime Ministry has regulated in Law No. 39 Year 2008 about Ministry of State and also in Presidential Decree No. 47 Year 2009 about Formation and Organizations of State Ministries. As the factual in reality practical, the appoint of Vice Minister gain the Pros and Contras for the society, because it impress the public the imagination of being political appointee as a gift for support coalition of the cabinet. The existences of Vice Minister is to assisted the Minister with the urgency situation, supposed to assisted in particular circumstances. This article aims to understanding and explain the main issues by using normative constitutional research method and legal approach method. Keywords: The urgency of Vice Minister, Ministry Effectiveness and Efficiency, Vice Minister Appointee Regulations. Abstrak Dalam hak prerogatifnya sebagai Presiden dalam menjalankan tugasnya, selain Wakil Presiden, Presiden juga dibantu oleh Menteri. Hal ini diatur dalam Pasal 17 Undang-Undang Dasar Negara Republik Indonesia Tahun 1945. Selain kewenangannya dalam mengangkat Menteri, Presiden juga memiliki kewenangan dalam mengangkat Wakil Menteri, hal ini diatur dalam Pasal 10 Undang-Undang No. 39 Tahun 2008 Tentang Kementerian Negara. Dalam penerapannya dengan sesuai fakta terjadinya pengangkatan Wakil Menteri menuai Pro dan Kontra bagi para rakyat karena dalam pengangkatannya terkesan bahwa jabatan Wakil Menteri merupakan hadiah politik yang dimanfaatkan dan diberikan hanya untuk para koalisi pendukung kabinet. Dalam menyelesaikan permasalahan-permasalahan tersebut penelitian ini memberikan gagasan melalui rumusan masalah berupa pengkajian hukum mengenai urgensi dan fungsi pengangkatan jabatan Wakil Menteri, serta pertimbangan upaya hukum dalam memberikan batasan dalam pengangkatan Wakil Menteri melalui pengaturan hukum mengenai persyaratan dalam pengangkatannya. Artikel ini bertujuan untuk memahami dan menjelaskan permasalahan-permasalahan yang menjadi pokok utama pembahasan dengan menggunakan metode penelitian hukum normatif dan pendekatan undang-undang, pendekatan konseptual, serta pendekatan kasus. Dengan adanya pengaturan mengenai pengangkatan wakil menteri diharapkan untuk tidak dijadikan sebagai jabatan yang digunakan untuk mengakomodasi koalisi pendukung kabinet alias menjadikan posisi wakil menteri sebagai hadiah politik. Selain itu, dalam penerapannya Presiden selaku kepala pemerintahan semestinya mempertimbangkan syarat yang telah dijelaskan oleh Mahkamah Konstitusi supaya tidak terjadi rangkap jabatan yang dilakukan oleh Wakil Menteri. Maka dengan kesimpulan dalam penelitian ini membuahkan saran yaitu, seharusnya meskipun dalam kewenangannya Presiden mengangkat Wakil Menteri perlu adanya penilaian yang mempertimbangkan kefektivitasan dan keefisiensi keadaan suatu Kementerian dan seharusnya posisi Wakil Menteri harus memiliki syarat yang diatur secara tertulis dalam Peraturan Perundang-undangan. Guna menghindari terjadinya rangkap jabatan bagi Wakil Menteri, seharusnya pemberlakuan syarat Menteri juga berlaku bagi Wakil Menteri. Sehingga secara konstitusi terdapat batasan Presiden dalam kewenangannya.
Co-Authors Adisty, Septiani Jessica Al Khanif Al Khanif Al Khanif, Al Khanif Albanna, Syedna Ahmad Aliyah, Prita Andri Setiawan Andri Setiawan Aninda Novedia Esafrin Bayu Dwi Anggono Dian Ayu Widya Ningrum Eskanugraha, Andika Putra Farid, Mifta Firdaus, Faris Ahlul Gautama Budi Arundhati, Gautama Budi Handono, Mardi Irmajayanti, Maulida Zulia Jumantoro, Tegar Raffi Putra Muhammad Bahrul Ulum Ningrum, Dian Ayu Widya Nisriina Milla Sharfinda Nugraha, Reyka Widia Prakoso, Bhim Prayulianda, Helga Anton Putra Pratama, Nawangga Ramadhani, Nuzul Putri Ratih Listyana Chandra Rohmati, Ulfa Rosita Indrayati Sanubari, Robindra Akhmad Sekar Dani Ajeng Adinda Siti Maimunawaroh Soetijono, Iwan Rachmad Sudaryanto, Totok Tua Sagala, Christo Samurung Wada, Igam Arya Widiyaningtyas, Karina Putri Yunita, Fenny Tria Yuri Sulistyo