Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 3 Documents
Search
Journal : AS-SIYASI JOURNAL OF CONSTITUTIONAL LAW

Constitutionality of Replacing Judges Mid-Term and Its Implications on the Independence of the Constitutional Court, Indonesia Hayya, Nur Mila; _, Rosmini; Nugraha, Harry Setya
As-Siyasi: Journal of Constitutional Law Vol. 3 No. 2 (2023): As-Siyasi: Journal of Constitutional Law
Publisher : Universitas Islam Negeri Raden Intan Lampung

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.24042/as-siyasi.v3i2.18683

Abstract

This research examines the legal problems surrounding the dismissal of Aswanto as a judge of the Constitutional Court of the Republic of Indonesia (MKRI), where the dismissal is deemed inconsistent with the prevailing laws and regulations. This study employs a doctrinal research type with a normative juridical approach through the examination of legislation and conceptual understanding to scrutinise the constitutionality of the replacement of constitutional judge Aswanto by the People's Representative Council (DPR) and its implications on the independence of the Constitutional Court. The findings suggest that, firstly, the replacement of Judge Aswanto during his tenure by the DPR is an unconstitutional act as it does not align with the constitution. Secondly, this replacement has implications for weakening the independence of the Constitutional Court, including constitutional independence, functional independence, personal independence, and evident practical independence. Therefore, the President needs to annul Presidential Decree Number 114/P/2022 and restore Judge Aswanto to his original position. Additionally, to prevent the misuse of power, further limitations and elaborations are required regarding the DPR's supervisory function over the judiciary, in this case, the Constitutional Court, in accordance with the system of checks and balances.
Peran Tunggal Otorita dalam Penyelenggaraan Pemerintahan Daerah Khusus Ibu Kota Nusantara Harry Setya Nugraha; Nugraha, Harry Setya
As-Siyasi: Journal of Constitutional Law Vol. 5 No. 2 (2025): As-Siyasi: Journal of Constitutional Law
Publisher : Universitas Islam Negeri Raden Intan Lampung

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.24042/as-siyasi.v52.27329

Abstract

This study discusses the relevance of the Authority's single role in the administration of the Special Regional Government of the Nusantara Capital City (IKN), as regulated by Law Number 3 of 2022. The study critiques the inconsistency of this concept with the principles of regional autonomy and democracy. The main objective of this research is to identify arguments for the irrelevance of the Authority's single role in the IKN government and to offer alternative designs better aligned with these two concepts. The method employed in this research is a normative juridical one. The key findings of this study are as follows: first, six (6) main arguments explain why the Authority's single role in the administration of the Special Regional Government of IKN is irrelevant to the principles of regional autonomy and democracy. Second, two (2) alternative designs for the government structure are more in line with the concepts of regional autonomy and democratic principles and have the potential to be implemented in the future: 1) maintaining IKN as a Special Regional Government with a Governor and Regional People's Representative Council (DPRD) as the administrators; 2) maintaining IKN as a Special Regional Government with a Head of Authority and DPRD as the administrators.
Peran Tunggal Otorita dalam Penyelenggaraan Pemerintahan Daerah Khusus Ibu Kota Nusantara Harry Setya Nugraha; Nugraha, Harry Setya
As-Siyasi: Journal of Constitutional Law Vol. 5 No. 2 (2025): As-Siyasi: Journal of Constitutional Law
Publisher : Universitas Islam Negeri Raden Intan Lampung

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.24042/as-siyasi.v52.27329

Abstract

This study discusses the relevance of the Authority's single role in the administration of the Special Regional Government of the Nusantara Capital City (IKN), as regulated by Law Number 3 of 2022. The study critiques the inconsistency of this concept with the principles of regional autonomy and democracy. The main objective of this research is to identify arguments for the irrelevance of the Authority's single role in the IKN government and to offer alternative designs better aligned with these two concepts. The method employed in this research is a normative juridical one. The key findings of this study are as follows: first, six (6) main arguments explain why the Authority's single role in the administration of the Special Regional Government of IKN is irrelevant to the principles of regional autonomy and democracy. Second, two (2) alternative designs for the government structure are more in line with the concepts of regional autonomy and democratic principles and have the potential to be implemented in the future: 1) maintaining IKN as a Special Regional Government with a Governor and Regional People's Representative Council (DPRD) as the administrators; 2) maintaining IKN as a Special Regional Government with a Head of Authority and DPRD as the administrators.