Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2021 - 2026
2.753
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal Kertha Negara : Journal Ilmu Hukum JURNAL MAGISTER HUKUM UDAYANA Jurnal Hukum, Politik dan Ilmu Sosial (JHPIS)
I Wayan Bela Siki Layang
Fakultas Hukum Universitas Udayana
Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice Social Sciences

Published : 10 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 2 Documents
Search
Journal : JURNAL MAGISTER HUKUM UDAYANA

 1 
The Expansion of Administrative Decision Meaning Based on Government Administration Law: a Dispute Submission Process Approach I Gusti Ngurah Wairocana; I Ketut Sudiarta; I Wayan Bela Siki Layang; Kadek Agus Sudiarawan; I Gede Pasek Pramana
Jurnal Magister Hukum Udayana (Udayana Master Law Journal) Vol 8 No 1 (2019)
Publisher : University of Udayana

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (512.869 KB) | DOI: 10.24843/JMHU.2019.v08.i01.p02

Abstract

The establishment of Government Administration Law brings significant change to the competence of the previously restricted Administrative Court to become expanded. This study aims to find the philosophical considerations from the extension of Administrative Decision meaning on Government Administration Law, to classify the legal implication arising from the regulation of the expansion of administrative decision meaning towards dispute submission process in Administrative Court and to formulate ideal attitude of the State Administrative Judge in resolving State Administrative Disputes. This is a combination of normative and empirical legal research. The study indicated that the legislator main consideration in regulating the expansion of administrative decision meaning on Government Administration Law is to expand the absolute competence of Indonesian Administrative Court which previously felt very narrow. The implication arises after new regulation consists of: the expansion of Administrative Court adjudicate authority for factual actions, subject expansion that have the authority to issue Administrative Decision, the expansion of the Administrative Court adjudicate authority over Administrative Decision which has a legal consequences although still need the approval from above instance, the regulation that Administrative Decision can be sued through the Administrative Court of any potential loss that may arise by the issuance of its Administrative Decision and the expansion towards the parties who have a chance to field a State Administrative accusation. The ideal attitude of State Administrative Judge is the judge should remain based on the strong theoretical concepts of the law so can create understanding and attitude in handling a case in Indonesian Administrative Court.
Konflik Norma Akibat Pergeseran Paradigma Keputusan Tata Usaha Negara Fiktif : Konsekuensi Undang-Undang Administrasi Pemerintahan 2014 I Gede Abdhi Satrya Mahardika; I Wayan Bela Siki Layang
Jurnal Magister Hukum Udayana (Udayana Master Law Journal) Vol 13 No 1 (2024)
Publisher : University of Udayana

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.24843/JMHU.2024.v13.i01.p14

Abstract

The reason of conducting this research is to delve into the problems related to the paradigm shift towards The Fictive State Administrative Decisions. As for these problems, namely how is the paradigm shift towards The Ficitive State Administrative Decisions as an upshot of the declaration of the 2014’s Government Administrative Law, and how to overcome the conflict of norm problem that arise as a result of the paradigm shift. This is normative legal research with a statutory, conceptual, and case approach to delve into the issues that raised. The legal items that used namely primary legal items which include several legislation and jurisprudence, and secondary legal items which include books and journals that apposite to the topic that discussed. The outcome of the reseach are revealing that the paradigm shift that occurred is the form of a change in perspective on The Fictive State Administrative Decision, which was initially seen as a rejection (Negtive Fictive) turned into an acceptance (Positive Fictive). Regarding to the way how to overcome the problem of the conflict of norm that have arisen, the most proper method to do that is by changing the substance of the State Administrative Courts Law, which is a formal law. The action that has been carried out so far tend to be wrong, because seem to ignore the dissimilarity between the field of the formal law and the field of the material law. Tujuan diadakannya penelitian ini ialah guna membahas masalah yang berkaitan dengan pergeseran paradigma terhadap Keputusan Tata Usaha Negara Fiktif. Adapun permasalahan tersebut, yakni bagaimana pegeseran paradigma terhadap Keputusan Tata Usaha Negara Fiktif sebagai konsekuensi diundangkannya UU Administrasi Pemerintahan Tahun 2014, dan bagaimana cara mengatasi permasalahan konflik norma yang terjadi akibat adanya pergeseran paradigma tersebut. Penelitian ini merupakan penelitian hukum normatif dengan pendekatan perundang-undangan, konseptual, serta kasus guna menelaah masalah yang diangkat. Bahan hukum yang digunakan yakni bahan hukum primer meliputi pelbagai peraturan perundangan serta yurisprudensi, dan bahan hukum sekunder meliputi buku-buku beserta jurnal-jurnal yang memiliki keterkaitan dengan topik yang dibahas. Hasil dari penelitian menunjukkan bahwa pergeseran paradigma yang terjadi adalah berupa perubahan cara pandang terhadap Keputusan Tata Usaha Negara Fiktif tersebut, yang pada mulanya dipandang sebagai suatu penolakan (Fiktif Negatif) berubah menjadi suatu pengabulan (Fiktif Positif). Berkaitan dengan cara untuk mengatasi permasalahan konflik norma yang ditimbulkan, maka cara yang paling tepat untuk dilakukan yakni dengan mengubah substansi dari UU Peradilan Tata Usaha Negara yang merupakan undang-undang yang bersifat formil. Tindakan yang selama ini dilakukan cenderung keliru, sebab terkesan mengabaikan perbedaan ranah undang-undang formil dan ranah undang-undang materiil.
Co-Authors A.A Ayu Inten Pratiwi Adriansyah Adriansyah Artha, Gede Ayu Reza Wulandari Budianingsih, Ni Luh Putu Ari Desak Ayu Kristyana Dewi Dewa Nyoman Rai Asmara Putra Gede Dicka Prasminda Gede Prasetia Adnyana I Dewa Made Suartha I Gede Abdhi Satrya Mahardika I Gede Artha I Gede Pasek Pramana I Gust i Ngurah Wairocana I Gusti Agung Angga Mahavira I Gusti Agung Ayu Winda Savitri Adi I Gusti Agung Tirta Sari Dewi I Gusti Mahendra Satria Pranata I Ketut Markeling I Ketut Sudiarta I Ketut Tjukup I Made Putra Sedana I Putu Rasmadi Arsha Putra I Wayan Sutarajaya I Wayan Tangun Susila Ida Ayu Nadya Putri Indirasuari Ida Ayu Wijawati Manuaba Kadek Agus Kusumanadi Kadek Agus Sudiarawan Kadek Angga Dwipayana Putra Ketut Nihan Pundari Komang Tamar Pebru Wijana Komang Widiana Purnawan Luh Putu Ayu Catur Adriani Made Diah Sekar Mayang Sari Mirah Kencana Dewi, Ni Gusti Agung Ngurah Bagus Darma Jaya Wikata Ni Kadek Wulan Suryawati Ni Ketut Serna Adiningsih Ni Made Devi Jayanthi Ni Made Diah Arista Ardiyantini Ni Made Novina Pratiwi Putheri Ni Nengah Adiyaryani Ni Putu Linda Rahmadini Ni Wayan Luh Duti Ari Anggreni Nyoman A Martana Nyoman Satyayudha Dananjaya Putu Ayu Ratih Tribuana Putu Karina Putri Putu Tantry Octaviani Putu Tissya Poppy Aristiani Radhi Kinandani, I Gusti Ayu Sang Ayu Ditapraja Adipatni Yosefina Victoria Herman