Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 31 Documents
Search

Salutation and Role-Playing: Spiritual and Psychological Synergy to Strengthen the Confidence of Islamic Boarding School Student Yusria Ningsih; Abdul Kadir Riyadi; Amalia Madihie
Prosperity: Journal of Society and Empowerment Vol 4, No 1 (2024): June
Publisher : Universitas Islam Negeri Walisongo Semarang, Indonesia

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.21580/prosperity.v4i1.20647

Abstract

This study aims to investigate the effectiveness of combining sholawat therapy with role-playing techniques to enhance the self-confidence of santri at Darul Arqom Islamic Boarding School Surabaya. Santri, in this context, refers to students in Islamic boarding schools. A qualitative descriptive research method involves data collection through observation, interviews, and document analysis. The findings revealed that sholawat therapy with role-playing techniques had a significant positive impact on Santri's self-confidence. Santri, who participated in this program, experienced increased self-confidence, more active involvement in religious activities, and positive changes in their social behavior. This study suggests that sholawat therapy with role-playing techniques is an effective approach to strengthening Santri's self-confidence in the context of religious education. It provides a foundation for further developing this combination in clinical practice and religious education.
From Reformist to Hermeneutics: A Genealogy of Interpretationin the Modern-Contemporary Periods Mokh. Fatkhur Rokhman; Abdul Kadir Riyadi
Al Qodiri : Jurnal Pendidikan, Sosial dan Keagamaan Vol. 24 No. 2 (2026): Al Qodiri: Jurnal Pendidikan, Sosial dan Keagamaan
Publisher : Universitas Islam KH. Achmad Muzakki Syah Jember

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.53515/alqodiri.v24i2.105

Abstract

The transformation of Qur’anic interpretation in the modern and contemporary periods represents one of the most significant epistemological shifts in modern Islamic intellectual history. Nevertheless, existing scholarship has predominantly examined this transformation through descriptive, thematic, or biographical approaches, often overlooking the deeper relations between interpretation, discourse, power, and the historical construction of religious authority. This study aims to critically investigate the genealogy of Qur’anic interpretation from reformist exegesis to contemporary hermeneutics through Michel Foucault’s genealogical framework. Employing a qualitative critical-textual design, the research analyzes major interpretive and theoretical works of influential Muslim thinkers, including Muhammad Abduh, Rashid Riḍā, Fazlur Rahman, Nasr Hamid Abu Zayd, and Mohammed Arkoun. Data were examined using genealogical analysis and critical discourse analysis to identify epistemological ruptures, discursive transformations, and shifts in interpretive legitimacy across different historical periods. The findings demonstrate that the transition from reformist tafsir to contemporary hermeneutics did not emerge as a linear methodological evolution, but as a historically contingent epistemological rupture shaped by colonialism, modernization, globalization, and the encounter between Islamic scholarship and modern critical humanities. Reformist interpretation reconstructed the Qur’an as a rational and socially transformative discourse, whereas contemporary hermeneutics repositioned interpretation as a historically conditioned, discursively negotiated, and contextually produced process of meaning-making. The study further reveals that contemporary tafsir increasingly integrates interdisciplinary approaches emphasizing historicity, plurality, and critical reflexivity, thereby destabilizing singular structures of interpretive authority within modern Muslim societies. Theoretically, this research reconceptualizes Qur’anic interpretation not as a fixed theological tradition, but as a dynamic discursive formation continuously shaped by struggles over knowledge, legitimacy, and socio-political power, thereby contributing a critical genealogical perspective to contemporary global debates in Qur’anic studies and Islamic hermeneutics.
Konsep Keserasian Gender sebagai Respons Wacana Kesetaraan Gender dalam Al Qur’an (Telaah Tafsir al-Mishbah Q.S An- Nisa’: 34) Ana Miftahul Hidayah; Abdul Kadir Riyadi
Studia Quranika Vol. 8 No. 1 (2023): July
Publisher : Universitas Darussalam Gontor

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar

Abstract

Gender equality is a Western concept that is well applied in its culture to humanize women, for the dark history experienced by women during the middle ages which had an impact on traumatic attitudes towards men and religious statements, and with this sensitive nature, feminist groups oppose statements that are valued gender bias, especially in the holy texts, by adhering to the concept of 'gender equality' which means equal as a whole. However, the results of applying the concept of gender equality to the Qur'an state that the statement of the Qur'an and the interpretation of previous scholars' values ​​is gender bias, especially in Q.S An Nisa': 34 regarding male leadership in the household, which is then responded by many Muslim leaders and even contemporary mufassir, one of them with the 'concept of gender harmony'. Therefore, this research will discuss how the application of the concept of gender equality to Q.S An Nisa': 34 and the response of Muslim leaders and commentators do they agree with 'gender equality', or are they against it? To answer this question, this research used a descriptive method. analysis related to the interpretation of Quraish Shihab who is a contemporary mufassir and critical thinker, thus in this study the results were obtained that in relations between men and women cannot be equalized as a whole as the concept of 'gender equality', because both have differences in nature which turns out to have been adjusted with their respective tasks such as discussing the concept of 'gender harmony'
Analisis Kesalah pahaman Kisah Israiliyat dalam Penafsiran Al-Qur’an Aprilita Hajar; Abdul Kadir Riyadi
Studia Quranika Vol. 7 No. 2 (2023): January
Publisher : Universitas Darussalam Gontor

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar

Abstract

Deviation in Qur'anic interpretation is exceedingly perilous, and one of the things that harms Muslims' faith is the advent of Ad-Dakhil in Qur'anic interpretation. Israiliyah's narrations, particularly those that focus on historical accounts, are a frequent source of Ad-Dakhil's influence. The underlying truths about the people's history in the past are rediscovered in this inquiry using a qualitative methodology or library research. Muslims may also be misled about their faith due to misconceptions about the Israiliyat account in the Qur'an. As a result, they tend to accept and believe in teachings or stories that contain Khuraad and deviations.
The Phenomenology of Ma‘rifat al-Hallaj: Interpreting Anā al-Ḥaqq Amidst the Spiritual Crisis of the Contemporary Era: English Moh. Sholeh Baharis; Abdul Kadir Riyadi
Tasfiyah: Jurnal Pemikiran Islam Vol. 10 No. 1 (2026): Tasfiyah: Jurnal Pemikiran Islam
Publisher : University of Darussalam Gontor, Indonesia

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.21111/tasfiyah.v10i1.2

Abstract

This article examines the phenomenology of al-Hallaj’s ma‘rifat through an interpretation of the phrase “Anā al-Ḥaqq” in the context of the contemporary spiritual crisis. The main research questions include: how al-Hallaj’s ma‘rifat is understood as a transformation of mystical consciousness, how “Anā al-Ḥaqq” is interpreted phenomenologically, and how this experience is relevant in addressing the spiritual crisis of modern humanity. This study employs a literature review method with a qualitative-philosophical approach, utilizing phenomenological analysis of consciousness and textual readings of al-Hallaj’s primary sources, particularly Kitāb al-Ṭawāsīn, supported by contemporary academic studies. The results of the study indicate that al-Hallaj’s ma‘rifat is a spiritual experience characterized by tazkiyah, fanā’, baqā’, and tajallī, thereby shifting the center of consciousness from the empirical ego toward Divine Presence. Within this framework, “Anā al-Ḥaqq” should not be understood as an ontological identity claim between humanity and God, but rather as a linguistic testimony to a consciousness that has transcended the subject–object duality. A phenomenological analysis reveals that the “Ana” in this expression is not al-Hallaj’s biographical self, but a subject that has undergone the dissolution of the ego and appears as an atsar (trace) of al-Haqq. This finding affirms that al-Hallaj’s Sufism is not only significant as a classical mystical legacy but also relevant as a spiritual paradigm capable of addressing the crisis of meaning, the formalization of religion, and the existential alienation of contemporary humanity. Thus, this article contributes to bridging classical Sufism, the phenomenology of religion, and the problems of modern spirituality through a more textual, philosophical, and contextual reading.
Legitimasi Interpretasi Rasional antara Ibn Taymiyyah dan Ibn Rushd Ahmad Najibul Firdaus; Abdul Kadir Riyadi
Jurnal Kawakib Vol 6 No 1 (2025): Islamic Studies
Publisher : Universitas Negeri Padang

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.24036/kwkib.v6i1.298

Abstract

This study critically examines the contrasting perspectives of Ibn Taymiyyah and Ibn Rushd on the legitimacy of rational interpretation in Islam. Employing a qualitative method with comparative textual analysis, the research explores their methodologies, intellectual justifications, and critiques of opposing views. Ibn Taymiyyah advocates a literalist approach, emphasizing strict adherence to textual sources and rejecting allegorical interpretation (ta'wil), while Ibn Rushd harmonizes reason and revelation, endorsing ta'wil for philosophical inquiry. The findings highlight their epistemological divergences and convergences, offering insights into the historical dynamics of Islamic thought and the ongoing tension between textualism and rationalism. This study underscores the relevance of their debates in contemporary discussions on interpreting sacred texts.
DECOLONIZATION OF ISLAMIC FAMILY LAW IN INDONESIA: TRACING TRANSFORMATION AND CONTINUTIY Mukhammad Nur Hadi; Moh. Wahib; Moh. Irfan; Abdul Kadir Riyadi
JURNAL HAKAM Vol 10, No 1 (2026)
Publisher : Universitas Nurul Jadid

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.33650/jhi.v10i1.14413

Abstract

This article aims to explore the process of decolonization of Islamic family law in Indonesia by tracing its historical transformation, policy changes, and the continuity of its legal practices from the colonial period to the post-reform era. Through a conceptual, historical, and legislative approach, this article analyzes how the colonization of Islamic family law took place in Indonesia. This article argues that the decolonization of Islamic family law in Indonesia did not occur in a single manner, but instead in two primary forms. First, accommodative decolonization, which was realized through post-independence state policies, such as the theories of receptie exit and receptio a contrario, the Religious Court Law, the Compilation of Islamic Law, and various policies of the Supreme Court and the Ministry of Religious Affairs, which negotiated fiqh traditions with the need for modern legal protection, especially for women and children. This pattern aligns with Khaled Abou El Fadl's view, which regards legal reform as an inherent part of the Islamic legal tradition. Second, conservative decolonization is reflected in fatwas and classical fiqh discourse developed by Islamic boarding schools and religious organizations, in line with Wael B. Hallaq's criticism of colonial legal modernity. This article argues that the decolonization of Islamic family law in Indonesia is an ongoing process involving the state and religious scholars, and that it does not merely aim to erase the colonial legacy but also to create a contextual, just, and responsive Islamic family law system for vulnerable groups.
Permohonan The Philosophy of Sunni Sufism and Jurisprudence According to Muhammad Hasyim Asy'ari: The Foundations of Sharia and His Attitude towards Ibahiyah Moh. Ali Ghafir; Abdul Kadir Riyadi; Nur Hadi Ihsan; Nasiri Nasiri; Miftahul Ulum
Jaqfi: Jurnal Aqidah dan Filsafat Islam Vol. 11 No. 1 (2026): Jaqfi: Jurnal Aqidah dan Filsafat Islam
Publisher : Jurusan Aqidah dan Filsafat Islam Universitas Negri Sunan Gunung Djati Bandung

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar

Abstract

During modern spiritual dynamics, a dichotomy often arises between Sharia (Islamic law) and Sufism, accompanied by the spread of Ibahiyyah a school of thought that disregards formal religious laws in pursuit of ma'rifah (gnosis). The thought of Hasyim Asy’ari serves as a theological compass that preserves the authenticity of Islamic spirituality, ensuring that it remains grounded in legal discipline (taklif). This study aims to comprehensively analyze the concept of Sunni Sufism in the primary texts of Hasyim Asy’ari, dissect his critical arguments against spiritual deviations, and identify the contributions of his thought to the sustainability of moderate Islam in Indonesia. This qualitative, descriptive-analytical study is categorized as library research. The approach utilized is a biographical study focusing on the content analysis of Hadratussyaikh Hasyim Asy'ari’s corpus of thought. Primary data were collected through close reading techniques of the texts Adab al-’Alim wa al-Muta’allim, Ad-Durar al-Muntatsirah, Risalah Ahl al-Sunnah wa al-Jama’ah, and Al-Tibyan. The analysis was conducted using textual and contextual interpretation techniques to identify the common thread between the aspects of Sharia, tariqah (the spiritual path), and haqiqah (the ultimate truth). The results of this study show that: (1) Hasyim Asy’ari’s Sufism is a manifestation of Sunni Sufism that is fully integrated with Sharia through the concept of Tariqah Tarbawiyah; he views the act of seeking knowledge (ngaji) as the primary instrument for attaining Allah's pleasure and positions authoritative texts as spiritual guides when a perfect master (mursyid kamil) is difficult to find. (2) His sharp criticism of Ibahiyyah serves as a "theological fence" to protect the authenticity of Sufism from spiritual liberalization, asserting that no matter how high a person's spiritual level is, it does not exempt them from legal obligations (taklif).
RATIONALIZING REVELATION IN THE MALAY-INDONESIAN WORLD: THE DECONSTRUCTION OF FATALISM AND TAQLĪD IN OEMAR BAKRY’S TAFSIR RAHMAT Muhammad Dhiya'ul Umam; Ika Yunia Fauzia; Abdul Kadir Riyadi; Moh. Addib Amrullah
Tanzil: Jurnal Studi Al-Quran Vol. 8 No. 2 (2026): April
Publisher : Sekolah Tinggi Agama Islam Sadra

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.20871/tjsq.v8i2.595

Abstract

The tension between theological fatalism (jabr) and modernist activism defined much of 20th-century Indonesian Islamic thought, shaping the socio-political trajectory of the post-colonial nation. Within this intellectual contestation, vernacular exegesis emerged as a crucial medium for reform, translating elite theological debates into mass pedagogy. While previous studies have predominantly highlighted the pedagogical and scientific features of Oemar Bakry’s Tafsir Rahmat (1983), the specific theological mechanisms he employs to dismantle deterministic logic remain underexplored. This article investigates how Bakry’s exegesis operationalizes a Theology of Progress to explicitly deconstruct traditionalist passivity and the epistemological stagnation caused by blind imitation (taqlīd). Employing a qualitative history of ideas approach within an adabī ijtimā‘ī (socio-literary) framework, the study utilizes a thematic data coding system to analyze Bakry’s interpretation of key verses regarding socio-historical agency, calamity, and cosmology. The findings reveal a tripartite strategy of rationalization. First, Bakry reinterprets Q.S. Ar-Ra‘d [13]: 11 to frame historical change as a mechanical consequence of human effort governed by sunnatullāh (God’s natural laws), unequivocally rejecting deterministic readings that paralyze social mobility. Second, he utilizes the Minangkabau reformist maxim reason before surrender (habis akal baru tawakal) to interpret Q.S. Ash-Shūrā [42]: 30, redefining natural disasters as verifiable consequences of human negligence and ecological mismanagement rather than inexplicable divine trials. Third, the exegesis purges unverifiable folklore (isrā’īliyyāt) while simultaneously integrating modern scientific terminology, notably translating al-samāwāt as space (ruang angkasa) to bridge scriptural revelation with the Space Age. The study concludes that Tafsir Rahmat serves as a critical instrument of deliberate social engineering. By translating the intellectual elitism of global Islamic modernism into an accessible vernacular pedagogy, Bakry successfully deconstructs the fatalistic mindset to reconstruct the Indonesian Muslim subject from a passive recipient of fate into an active, rational agent of post-colonial history and nation-building.
Epistemological Tensions between Qur’anic Revisionism and Decolonial Thought: A New Concept Integrative-Critical Tafsir Alif Hibatullah; Abdul Kadir Riyadi
Tribakti: Jurnal Pemikiran Keislaman Vol. 37 No. 1 (2026): Tribakti: Jurnal Pemikiran Keislaman
Publisher : Universitas Islam Tribakti (UIT) Lirboyo Kediri

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.33367/tribakti.v37i1.8253

Abstract

This study examines the epistemological tension between devisionism and decolonial thought in contemporary Qur’anic studies. Revisionism emphasizes the historical-critical examination of the Qur’an as a human artifact, while decolonialism highlights the importance of epistemic autonomy grounded in both spiritual authority and rationality. The study employs a qualitative-descriptive approach with a comparative analysis of key scholars such as Patricia Crone, Michael Cook, and Joseph Lumbard, etc. The findings reveal a significant gap in the previous literature, as both paradigms have often been studied separately without efforts toward synthesis. Through theoretical analysis, this article proposes an integrative-critical tafsir model that combines the methodological precision of Western philology with the spiritual and ethical awareness of Islamic epistemology. By restoring Muslim epistemic agency while maintaining academic rigor, this framework provides a transformative middle ground for relevant Islamic scholarship. The case study of surah Al-Baqarah verse 144, concerning the change of the qiblah, is used to demonstrate how historical accuracy can coexist with spiritual meaning. This research affirms that integrative-critical interpretation offers a new epistemological framework for Qur’anic studies one that is both scientifically grounded and spiritually rooted bridging Western rationality and Islamic revelation, while guiding scholars to navigate the intersection of history, revelation, and wisdom through a more epistemically comprehensive interpretive methodology.