Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2021 - 2026
2.407
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal STUDIA ISLAMIKA Ulul Albab: Jurnal Studi Islam Jurnal Theologia Teosofi: Jurnal Tasawuf dan Pemikiran Islam ISLAMICA: Jurnal Studi Keislaman Wawasan : Jurnal Ilmiah Agama dan Sosial Budaya Teosofia: Indonesian Journal of Islamic Mysticism Madania: Jurnal Ilmu-Ilmu Keislaman TSAQAFAH Al-Kawakib Tebuireng: Journal of Islamic Studies and Society Prosperity: Journal of Society and Empowerment QOF: Jurnal Studi Al-Qur'an dan Tafsir Al Qodiri: Jurnal Pendidikan, Sosial dan Keagamaan Studia Quranika: Jurnal Studi Quran Tasfiyah: Jurnal Pemikiran Islam
Abdul Kadir Riyadi
Universitas Islam Negeri Sunan Ampel Surabaya
Religion Arts Humanities Economics, Econometrics & Finance Education Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice Social Sciences Other

Published : 26 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 26 Documents
Search

 1   2   3 
Salutation and Role-Playing: Spiritual and Psychological Synergy to Strengthen the Confidence of Islamic Boarding School Student Yusria Ningsih; Abdul Kadir Riyadi; Amalia Madihie
Prosperity: Journal of Society and Empowerment Vol 4, No 1 (2024): June
Publisher : Universitas Islam Negeri Walisongo Semarang, Indonesia

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.21580/prosperity.v4i1.20647

Abstract

This study aims to investigate the effectiveness of combining sholawat therapy with role-playing techniques to enhance the self-confidence of santri at Darul Arqom Islamic Boarding School Surabaya. Santri, in this context, refers to students in Islamic boarding schools. A qualitative descriptive research method involves data collection through observation, interviews, and document analysis. The findings revealed that sholawat therapy with role-playing techniques had a significant positive impact on Santri's self-confidence. Santri, who participated in this program, experienced increased self-confidence, more active involvement in religious activities, and positive changes in their social behavior. This study suggests that sholawat therapy with role-playing techniques is an effective approach to strengthening Santri's self-confidence in the context of religious education. It provides a foundation for further developing this combination in clinical practice and religious education.
From Reformist to Hermeneutics: A Genealogy of Interpretationin the Modern-Contemporary Periods Mokh. Fatkhur Rokhman; Abdul Kadir Riyadi
Al Qodiri : Jurnal Pendidikan, Sosial dan Keagamaan Vol. 24 No. 2 (2026): Al Qodiri: Jurnal Pendidikan, Sosial dan Keagamaan
Publisher : Universitas Islam KH. Achmad Muzakki Syah Jember

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.53515/alqodiri.v24i2.105

Abstract

The transformation of Qur’anic interpretation in the modern and contemporary periods represents one of the most significant epistemological shifts in modern Islamic intellectual history. Nevertheless, existing scholarship has predominantly examined this transformation through descriptive, thematic, or biographical approaches, often overlooking the deeper relations between interpretation, discourse, power, and the historical construction of religious authority. This study aims to critically investigate the genealogy of Qur’anic interpretation from reformist exegesis to contemporary hermeneutics through Michel Foucault’s genealogical framework. Employing a qualitative critical-textual design, the research analyzes major interpretive and theoretical works of influential Muslim thinkers, including Muhammad Abduh, Rashid Riḍā, Fazlur Rahman, Nasr Hamid Abu Zayd, and Mohammed Arkoun. Data were examined using genealogical analysis and critical discourse analysis to identify epistemological ruptures, discursive transformations, and shifts in interpretive legitimacy across different historical periods. The findings demonstrate that the transition from reformist tafsir to contemporary hermeneutics did not emerge as a linear methodological evolution, but as a historically contingent epistemological rupture shaped by colonialism, modernization, globalization, and the encounter between Islamic scholarship and modern critical humanities. Reformist interpretation reconstructed the Qur’an as a rational and socially transformative discourse, whereas contemporary hermeneutics repositioned interpretation as a historically conditioned, discursively negotiated, and contextually produced process of meaning-making. The study further reveals that contemporary tafsir increasingly integrates interdisciplinary approaches emphasizing historicity, plurality, and critical reflexivity, thereby destabilizing singular structures of interpretive authority within modern Muslim societies. Theoretically, this research reconceptualizes Qur’anic interpretation not as a fixed theological tradition, but as a dynamic discursive formation continuously shaped by struggles over knowledge, legitimacy, and socio-political power, thereby contributing a critical genealogical perspective to contemporary global debates in Qur’anic studies and Islamic hermeneutics.
Konsep Keserasian Gender sebagai Respons Wacana Kesetaraan Gender dalam Al Qur’an (Telaah Tafsir al-Mishbah Q.S An- Nisa’: 34) Ana Miftahul Hidayah; Abdul Kadir Riyadi
Studia Quranika Vol. 8 No. 1 (2023): July
Publisher : Universitas Darussalam Gontor

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar

Abstract

Gender equality is a Western concept that is well applied in its culture to humanize women, for the dark history experienced by women during the middle ages which had an impact on traumatic attitudes towards men and religious statements, and with this sensitive nature, feminist groups oppose statements that are valued gender bias, especially in the holy texts, by adhering to the concept of 'gender equality' which means equal as a whole. However, the results of applying the concept of gender equality to the Qur'an state that the statement of the Qur'an and the interpretation of previous scholars' values ​​is gender bias, especially in Q.S An Nisa': 34 regarding male leadership in the household, which is then responded by many Muslim leaders and even contemporary mufassir, one of them with the 'concept of gender harmony'. Therefore, this research will discuss how the application of the concept of gender equality to Q.S An Nisa': 34 and the response of Muslim leaders and commentators do they agree with 'gender equality', or are they against it? To answer this question, this research used a descriptive method. analysis related to the interpretation of Quraish Shihab who is a contemporary mufassir and critical thinker, thus in this study the results were obtained that in relations between men and women cannot be equalized as a whole as the concept of 'gender equality', because both have differences in nature which turns out to have been adjusted with their respective tasks such as discussing the concept of 'gender harmony'
Analisis Kesalah pahaman Kisah Israiliyat dalam Penafsiran Al-Qur’an Aprilita Hajar; Abdul Kadir Riyadi
Studia Quranika Vol. 7 No. 2 (2023): January
Publisher : Universitas Darussalam Gontor

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar

Abstract

Deviation in Qur'anic interpretation is exceedingly perilous, and one of the things that harms Muslims' faith is the advent of Ad-Dakhil in Qur'anic interpretation. Israiliyah's narrations, particularly those that focus on historical accounts, are a frequent source of Ad-Dakhil's influence. The underlying truths about the people's history in the past are rediscovered in this inquiry using a qualitative methodology or library research. Muslims may also be misled about their faith due to misconceptions about the Israiliyat account in the Qur'an. As a result, they tend to accept and believe in teachings or stories that contain Khuraad and deviations.
The Phenomenology of Ma‘rifat al-Hallaj: Interpreting Anā al-Ḥaqq Amidst the Spiritual Crisis of the Contemporary Era: English Moh. Sholeh Baharis; Abdul Kadir Riyadi
Tasfiyah: Jurnal Pemikiran Islam Vol. 10 No. 1 (2026): Tasfiyah: Jurnal Pemikiran Islam
Publisher : University of Darussalam Gontor, Indonesia

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.21111/tasfiyah.v10i1.2

Abstract

This article examines the phenomenology of al-Hallaj’s ma‘rifat through an interpretation of the phrase “Anā al-Ḥaqq” in the context of the contemporary spiritual crisis. The main research questions include: how al-Hallaj’s ma‘rifat is understood as a transformation of mystical consciousness, how “Anā al-Ḥaqq” is interpreted phenomenologically, and how this experience is relevant in addressing the spiritual crisis of modern humanity. This study employs a literature review method with a qualitative-philosophical approach, utilizing phenomenological analysis of consciousness and textual readings of al-Hallaj’s primary sources, particularly Kitāb al-Ṭawāsīn, supported by contemporary academic studies. The results of the study indicate that al-Hallaj’s ma‘rifat is a spiritual experience characterized by tazkiyah, fanā’, baqā’, and tajallī, thereby shifting the center of consciousness from the empirical ego toward Divine Presence. Within this framework, “Anā al-Ḥaqq” should not be understood as an ontological identity claim between humanity and God, but rather as a linguistic testimony to a consciousness that has transcended the subject–object duality. A phenomenological analysis reveals that the “Ana” in this expression is not al-Hallaj’s biographical self, but a subject that has undergone the dissolution of the ego and appears as an atsar (trace) of al-Haqq. This finding affirms that al-Hallaj’s Sufism is not only significant as a classical mystical legacy but also relevant as a spiritual paradigm capable of addressing the crisis of meaning, the formalization of religion, and the existential alienation of contemporary humanity. Thus, this article contributes to bridging classical Sufism, the phenomenology of religion, and the problems of modern spirituality through a more textual, philosophical, and contextual reading.
Legitimasi Interpretasi Rasional antara Ibn Taymiyyah dan Ibn Rushd Ahmad Najibul Firdaus; Abdul Kadir Riyadi
Jurnal Kawakib Vol 6 No 1 (2025): Islamic Studies
Publisher : Universitas Negeri Padang

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.24036/kwkib.v6i1.298

Abstract

This study critically examines the contrasting perspectives of Ibn Taymiyyah and Ibn Rushd on the legitimacy of rational interpretation in Islam. Employing a qualitative method with comparative textual analysis, the research explores their methodologies, intellectual justifications, and critiques of opposing views. Ibn Taymiyyah advocates a literalist approach, emphasizing strict adherence to textual sources and rejecting allegorical interpretation (ta'wil), while Ibn Rushd harmonizes reason and revelation, endorsing ta'wil for philosophical inquiry. The findings highlight their epistemological divergences and convergences, offering insights into the historical dynamics of Islamic thought and the ongoing tension between textualism and rationalism. This study underscores the relevance of their debates in contemporary discussions on interpreting sacred texts.
Co-Authors Abdul Rofiq Abdul Rofiq Ahmad Najibul Firdaus Amalia Madihie Ana Miftahul Hidayah Ana Miftahul Hidayah Anillahi Ilham Akbar Aprilita Hajar Azhar Ibrahim Fathurrofiq Fathurrofiq Idri Ika Yunia Fauzia Ika Yunia Fauzia Khaidir, Piet Hizbullah Khoirul Umami Moh. Adib Amrullah Moh. Isom Mudin Moh. Sholeh Baharis Mokh. Fatkhur Rokhman Muhammad Esa Prasastia Amnesti Muhammad Esa Prasastia Amnesti Setio Budi Setio Budi Suwarko, Andi Yusria Ningsih