Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2021 - 2026
1.556
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal Varia Justicia SELAPARANG: Jurnal Pengabdian Masyarakat Berkemajuan Surya Abdimas Didaktik : Jurnal Ilmiah PGSD STKIP Subang AMNESTI : Jurnal Hukum Refleksi Hukum: Jurnal Ilmu Hukum Suara Edukasi Hukum
Agus Budi Santoso
Universitas Muhammadiyah Purworejo
Agriculture, Biological Sciences & Forestry Humanities Computer Science & IT Control & Systems Engineering Economics, Econometrics & Finance Education Engineering Environmental Science Health Professions Languange, Linguistic, Communication & Media Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice Medicine & Pharmacology Nursing Public Health Social Sciences Other

Published : 11 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 11 Documents
Search

 1   2 
Appointment of A Judicial Guardian In The Case OfGuardian Adhal: An Analysis of Decision Number48/Pdt.P/2025/PA.Pwr Muhammad Misbahudin; Agus Budi Santoso; Muhammad Alfian
Suara Edukasi Hukum Vol 2 No 2 (2026): Vol 2 No 2 2026
Publisher : Perkumpulan Maju Karya Yogyakarta

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.67084/ezspxc22

Abstract

Marriage is a physical and spiritual bond between a man and a woman aimed at establishing a happy and lasting family based on the belief in God Almighty. In Islamic law, a marriage guardian (wali nikah) is one of the essential pillars of marriage. Problems arise when a biological guardian (wali nasab) refuses to marry off a woman under his guardianship without a valid reason under Islamic law, known as wali adhal. This study aims to analyze the conformity of the appointment of a judicial guardian (wali hakim) in Decision Number 48/Pdt.P/2025/PA.Pwr with Islamic law and Indonesian positive law, as well as to analyze the reasons for the guardian’s refusal. This research employs normative legal research using statutory and case approaches. The legal materials consist of primary legal materials, including Law Number 16 of 2019, the Compilation of Islamic Law, Minister of Religious Affairs Regulation Number 20 of 2019, and the court decision, supported by books, journals, and relevant literature. The data were analyzed descriptively and qualitatively. The results show that the appointment of the judicial guardian is consistent with Islamic law and Indonesian positive law. The guardian’s refusal based on differences in religious organizations between LDII and NU and the length of the prospective couple’s relationship is not legally justified. Therefore, the appointment of a judicial guardian provides legal protection, certainty, justice, and benefit for the prospective bride.
Co-Authors Budi Setiawan Didik Widiyantono Ela Rosita Ariana Galih Bagas Soesilo Indah Kusuma Dewi Lyla Shafiya Anindita Meilania Wisma Puspita Muhamad Taufik Muhammad Alfian Muhammad Misbahudin Nusantoro, Agung Putri Kartika Widiyaningsih Rahmadi Kurniawan Rofiq Nurhadi Sapardiyono Sapardiyono Septi Indrawati Sugeng Eko Putro Widoyoko Uswatun Hasanah Wibawanti, Jeki Mediantari Wahyu Yusril Aji Nurfaizi Zulfanita Zulfanita