Garuda - Garba Rujukan Digital

Legalitas dan Implementasi Wakaf Online Menurut MUI Sumatera Utara: Studi pada Yayasan Darul Waqaf Al-Hadiy Siregar, Pangundian; Muhibbussabry
AL-SULTHANIYAH Vol. 15 No. 1 (2026): AL-SULTHANIYAH
Publisher : Institut Agama Islam Sultan Muhammad Syafiuddin Sambas

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.37567/al-sulthaniyah.v15i1.4627

The implementation of online waqf at the local level currently faces a dual challenge between massive technological adoption and the unpreparedness of legal-administrative aspects. In North Sumatra, although waqf institutions have transitioned to digital platforms, there remains an absence of regional technical fatwas and obstacles in the formal verification of nazhir that may undermine public trust. This study aims to analyze: (1) the perspective of the North Sumatra Indonesian Ulema Council (MUI) regarding the legality of online waqf; (2) the technical implementation at the Darul Waqaf Alhadiy Foundation in Medan City; and (3) the conformity of these mechanisms with both Islamic and positive law. This research employs a juridical-empirical method, with data collected through interviews, documentation, and field observation. The findings indicate that the North Sumatra MUI considers online waqf to be substantively valid as long as it fulfills the essential pillars (rukn al-waqf), although no specific technical guidelines have yet been issued. The Darul Waqaf Alhadiy Foundation has implemented a digital mechanism that fulfills the requirements of electronic sighat (contract), but from the perspective of positive law, the formal legality of the cash waqf nazhir is still under verification by the Indonesian Waqf Board (BWI). The study concludes that although the online waqf mechanism has been fulfilled from a fiqh perspective, formal legalization of nazhir and the issuance of regional technical fatwas are urgently needed to ensure legal certainty and institutional accountability.

Kafālah Perspektif Tafsir dan Hadis Aḥkām: Analisis Normatif dalam Fikih Muamalah Kontemporer Muhibbussabry; Jamil, M.; Yuslem, Nawir
Jurnal Alwatzikhoebillah : Kajian Islam, Pendidikan, Ekonomi, Humaniora Vol. 12 No. 1 (2026): Jurnal Alwatzikhoebillah : Kajian Islam, Pendidikan, Ekonomi, Humaniora
Publisher : Institut Agama Islam Sultan Muhammad Syafiuddin Sambas

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.37567/alwatzikhoebillah.v12i1.4858

Kafālah is a guarantee contract in muamalah fiqh that serves to maintain legal certainty and protect rights in transactions, while also reflecting social responsibility and economic solidarity. In contemporary Islamic finance practices, the application of kafālah often emphasizes technical and operational aspects rather than strengthening its normative foundations, thus giving rise to the need for comprehensive normative studies. This article analyzes the concept of kafālah through an integrative approach of tafsir and hadith aḥkām, and affirms its position in fiqh muamalah as a tawthīqī contract. This study uses a normative-qualitative method with an approach of tafsir aḥkām, takhrij and analysis of hadith aḥkām, as well as a study of istinbāṭ law by classical and contemporary fuqaha. The results of the study show that kafālah has strong shar‘i legitimacy in the Qur'an and Sunnah, and is consistently constructed as an accessory guarantee contract without removing the liability of the principal debtor. From the perspective of maqāṣid al-syarī‘ah, kafālah generally falls within the realm of ḥājiyyāt, but in certain contexts it can rise to the level of ḍarūriyyāt. This study strengthens the normative framework of kafālah and provides a conceptual basis for the development of sharia guarantee instruments that are fair and oriented towards public interest.

KAIDAH HUKMU AL-HĀKIM YARFA’U AL-KHILĀF DALAM PENGELOLAAN IKHTILĀF: PERSPEKTIF FIKIH SIYASAH Muhibbussabry; Hamdani, Muhammad Faisal; Syahnan, Mhd.; Asmuni , Asmuni
QANUN: Journal of Islamic Laws and Studies Vol. 4 No. 3 (2026): QANUN: Journal of Islamic Laws and Studies, Maret 2026
Publisher : ASIAN PUBLISHER

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.58738/qanun.v4i3.1241

Perbedaan pendapat (ikhtilāf) merupakan karakter inheren dalam tradisi ijtihad hukum Islam akibat keragaman metode penalaran para fuqaha. Meskipun memperkaya khazanah keilmuan, ikhtilāf dalam ranah hukum publik berpotensi menimbulkan ketidakpastian hukum dan fragmentasi sosial apabila tidak dikelola secara institusional. Penelitian ini mengkaji kaidah Hukmu al-Hākim Yarfa’u al-Khilāf sebagai kerangka normatif penyelesaian perbedaan pendapat dalam wilayah ijtihādiyyah melalui penelitian hukum normatif berbasis studi kepustakaan terhadap al-Qur’an, hadis, karya fuqaha klasik, dan literatur fikih siyasah kontemporer. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa kaidah ini dibangun atas pemahaman al-hukm sebagai keputusan mengikat, al-hākim sebagai otoritas sah, serta raf’ al-khilāf sebagai mekanisme penyudahan konflik praktik hukum tanpa meniadakan perbedaan secara epistemologis. Keberlakuannya bersifat terbatas dan bersyarat, hanya pada perkara ijtihādiyyah, tidak bertentangan dengan nash qaṭ’ī, berorientasi pada kemaslahatan umum, dan selaras dengan maqāṣid al-syarī’ah. Secara konseptual, penelitian ini menegaskan bahwa kaidah Hukmu al-Hākim Yarfa’u al-Khilāf tidak lagi semata dipahami sebagai kaidah fikih klasik, melainkan sebagai prinsip tata kelola hukum (governance principle) dalam ruang kekuasaan negara. Secara aplikatif, kaidah ini diterapkan dalam ibadah publik dan kebijakan negara modern, khususnya dalam wilayah ta’zīr dan regulasi sosial, dengan catatan bahwa penerapannya menuntut pembatasan normatif dan mekanisme akuntabilitas agar tidak berujung pada legitimasi kekuasaan yang represif.

Konfigurasi Politik dan Pembentukan Hukum Islam di Indonesia: Analisis Politik Hukum terhadap Legislasi Nasional Muhibbussabry; Nurasiah, Nurasiah; Ananda, Faisar
JOM Vol 6 No 4 (2025): Indonesian Journal of Humanities and Social Sciences , December
Publisher : Universitas Islam Tribakti Lirboyo Kediri

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.33367/ijhass.v6i4.8707

This study analyzes the relationship between political configuration and law formation as a political product, as well as its implications for the development of Islamic law in Indonesia’s national legal system. Departing from the view that law is autonomous and neutral, this study proposes a political reading of law that positions Islamic law in a structural relationship with state power. Using a qualitative juridical-normative approach and political-legal analysis, this study examines how power structures, political orientations of the regime, and legislative dynamics influence the character and substance of institutionalized law. The findings show that changes in political configuration, whether democratic, authoritarian, or religiously ideological, correlate directly with the level of accommodation and restriction of Sharia norms in national law. The main contribution of this research lies in asserting that the institutionalization of Islamic law in Indonesia is not solely determined by religious normative legitimacy, but rather by political configurations that operate through legislative mechanisms and legal institutionalization. A normative comparison with the practices of other Muslim countries reveals a general pattern of political-legal relations in Islam, highlighting political-legal analysis as an essential theoretical framework for understanding the direction and future of Islamic law in Indonesia.

Analisis Investasi Emas Online pada Aplikasi Dinaran berdasarkan Tinjauan Fatwa MUI No.77/DSN-MUI/V/2010 Chaniago, Akbar; Muhibbussabry
Jurnal Alwatzikhoebillah : Kajian Islam, Pendidikan, Ekonomi, Humaniora Vol. 12 No. 1 (2026): Jurnal Alwatzikhoebillah : Kajian Islam, Pendidikan, Ekonomi, Humaniora
Publisher : Institut Agama Islam Sultan Muhammad Syafiuddin Sambas

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.37567/alwatzikhoebillah.v12i1.5047

This study aims to examine the conformity of digital gold investment practices of Dinaran application with the provisions of DSN-MUI Fatwa No. 77/DSN-MUI/V/2010 and the fundamental principles of Islamic jurisprudence in mu‘āmalah. This research is motivated by the rapid growth of digital platforms for gold investment in Indonesia, which offer ease of access, transactional flexibility, and operational efficiency. Nevertheless, such developments simultaneously raise significant sharia legal concerns, given that gold constitutes a ribāwī commodity that requires contractual certainty, transparent pricing, and legitimate possession in every transaction. The study employs an empirical legal research approach combined with a normative analysis grounded in fiqh al-mu‘āmalah. Primary data were collected through direct observation of the operational mechanisms of the Dinaran platform, while secondary data were derived from DSN-MUI fatwas, relevant regulatory frameworks, and scholarly literature. The findings indicate that the digital gold purchasing process on the Dinaran application satisfies the principles of price clarity and object specification. Therefore, value fluctuations resulting from market price movements cannot be classified as ribā, but rather represent a reasonable market risk inherent in gold trading as a commodity. However, with regard to the mechanism for withdrawing physical gold, the fulfillment of the qabḍ element tends to take the form of qabḍ ḥukmī, as the delivery process involves a time delay and limited transparency concerning the existence of gold as the underlying asset. Gold investment practices within the Dinaran application may be considered permissible within sharia boundaries, although further improvements are necessary to enhance ownership transparency and ensure procedural certainty in the physical delivery of gold.

Kafālah Perspektif Tafsir dan Hadis Aḥkām: Analisis Normatif dalam Fikih Muamalah Kontemporer Muhibbussabry; Jamil, M.; Yuslem, Nawir
Jurnal Alwatzikhoebillah : Kajian Islam, Pendidikan, Ekonomi, Humaniora Vol. 12 No. 1 (2026): Jurnal Alwatzikhoebillah : Kajian Islam, Pendidikan, Ekonomi, Humaniora
Publisher : Institut Agama Islam Sultan Muhammad Syafiuddin Sambas

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.37567/alwatzikhoebillah.v12i1.4858

Kafālah is a guarantee contract in muamalah fiqh that serves to maintain legal certainty and protect rights in transactions, while also reflecting social responsibility and economic solidarity. In contemporary Islamic finance practices, the application of kafālah often emphasizes technical and operational aspects rather than strengthening its normative foundations, thus giving rise to the need for comprehensive normative studies. This article analyzes the concept of kafālah through an integrative approach of tafsir and hadith aḥkām, and affirms its position in fiqh muamalah as a tawthīqī contract. This study uses a normative-qualitative method with an approach of tafsir aḥkām, takhrij and analysis of hadith aḥkām, as well as a study of istinbāṭ law by classical and contemporary fuqaha. The results of the study show that kafālah has strong shar‘i legitimacy in the Qur'an and Sunnah, and is consistently constructed as an accessory guarantee contract without removing the liability of the principal debtor. From the perspective of maqāṣid al-syarī‘ah, kafālah generally falls within the realm of ḥājiyyāt, but in certain contexts it can rise to the level of ḍarūriyyāt. This study strengthens the normative framework of kafālah and provides a conceptual basis for the development of sharia guarantee instruments that are fair and oriented towards public interest.

Praktik penguasaan harta sebelum pewaris meninggal persfektif khi dan hukum positif (Studi kasus Desa Padang Garugur Kec. Padang Bolak) Irpan Riadi Siregar; Muhibbussabry
Cessie : Jurnal Ilmiah Hukum Vol. 4 No. 5 (2026): Cessie: Jurnal Ilmiah Hukum
Publisher : ARKA INSTITUTE

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.55904/cessie.v4i5.1983

Penguasaan harta sebelum pewaris meninggal Merupakan fenomena yang sering terjadi di pedesaan, termasuk di desa Padang Garugur Kecamatan Padang Bolak. Praktik ini umumnya dilatar belakangi oleh faktor kedekatan hubungan keluarga, lemahnya pengetahuan masyarakat tentang waris. Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk menganalisis ketentuan hukum terkait penguasaan harta waris sebelum pewaris meninggal berdasarkan perspektif Kompilasi Hukum Islam (KHI) dan Hukum Positif. Metode yang digunakan adalah penelitian hukum empiris dengan pendekatan kualitatif melalui wawancara dan studi literatur. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa baik menurut KHI maupun Hukum Positif penguasaan harta waris oleh ahli waris sebelum pewaris meninggal dunia tidak sah dan dapat digolongkan perbuatan melawan hukum. Namun, di Desa Padang Garugur praktik ini masih terjadi karena dominasi adat kesepakatan keluarga yang tidak formal serta minimnya pemahaman masyarakat terhadap prosedur pembagian harta waris yang benar. Penelitian ini menegaskan perlunya sosialisasi hukum waris Islam dan hukum positif pada masyarakat, serta mendorong penyelesaian sengketa secara musyawarah sebelum berujung pada jalur litigasi.

Maqāṣid al-Syarī‘ah dan Legislasi Nasional: Rekonstruksi Model Sistemik Berbasis Teori Sistem Jasser Auda Muhibbussabry; Mhd. Syahnan; Hasan Matsum; Nispul Khoir
JOM Vol 7 No 2 (2026): Indonesian Journal of Humanities and Social Sciences, June
Publisher : Universitas Islam Tribakti Lirboyo Kediri

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.33367/ijhass.v7i2.9381

This article examines Maqāṣid al-Syarī‘ah as a paradigm of modern legislation in the formation of Indonesian national law. The main issue addressed is the absence of a systematic methodological framework for integrating public interest values into the legislative process, causing lawmaking to often remain limited to formal validity without fully reflecting substantive justice. Previous studies have generally positioned maqāṣid as an interpretive framework or normative principle in Islamic legal reform, while its operationalization as a legislative methodology within national lawmaking remains limited. This study employs normative legal research with statutory, conceptual, and maqāṣidī approaches, using Jasser Auda’s systems theory as the analytical framework. The findings show that maqāṣid values have been substantially internalized in several areas of national law, particularly in marriage regulation, human rights protection, domestic violence prevention, environmental protection, and the safeguarding of human dignity. However, such integration remains partial, implicit, and has not yet been institutionalized as an operational instrument in lawmaking. The novelty of this article lies in reconstructing maqāṣid not merely as an ethical-normative principle, but as a systemic legislative methodology. This article proposes a maqāṣid-based legislative model consisting of five stages: identifying the objectives of Sharia, analyzing the social context, formulating legal norms, testing public interest, and conducting systemic evaluation. This model is expected to strengthen the development of national law oriented toward substantive justice, public welfare, human dignity, and social sustainability.

Dilema Cucu sebagai Ahli Waris: Perbandingan Hukum Mesir dan Indonesia Muhibbussabry; M. Iqbal Irham; Faisar Ananda; Dhiauddin Tanjung
Al-fiqh Vol. 4 No. 1 (2026): Al-fiqh : Journal of Islamic Studies
Publisher : CV Global Research Publication

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.59996/al-fiqh.v4i1.1118

This article analyzes the differences between the legal constructions of Egypt and Indonesia in addressing the dilemma of grandchildren whose parents predeceased the decedent, thereby potentially causing them to be excluded by closer heirs. The study focuses on a comparison between the obligatory bequest (waṣiyyah wājibah) in Egyptian law and substitute heirs in Indonesian law. This research employs a normative juridical method using statutory, conceptual, comparative-law, and maqāṣid al-sharī‘ah approaches. The findings show that Egypt, through Law of Bequest No. 71 of 1946 (Qanun al-Wasiyyah), provides protection for grandchildren through a bequest limited to a maximum of one-third of the estate. In contrast, Indonesia, through Article 185 of the Compilation of Islamic Law, positions grandchildren as substitute heirs who receive a share based on the position of the parent they replace. The findings of this article affirm that the difference between the two systems is not merely a technical matter of inheritance distribution, but reflects different paradigms in the reform of Islamic inheritance law: Egypt adopts a protective-testamentary model, while Indonesia adopts a representative-inheritance model. From the perspective of maqāṣid al-sharī‘ah, both models are oriented toward the protection of lineage and property, but they differ in balancing legal certainty, the protection of grandchildren, and justice for other heirs.

Model Integratif-Kritis Pembentukan Hukum Kewarisan Islam di Indonesia: Analisis Sosio-Antropologis atas Dialektika Norma, Adat, dan Perubahan Sosial Muhibbussabry; Dhiauddin Tanjung; Nispul Khoir; Imam Yazid
Aksioreligia Vol. 4 No. 1 (2026): Aksioreligia : Jurnal Studi Keislaman
Publisher : CV Global Research Publication

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.59996/aksioreligia.v4i1.1072

Islamic inheritance law in Indonesia is shaped not only by faraidh norms, but also by state codification, customary practices, family legal culture, and social change. This article aims to analyze the formation of Islamic inheritance law in Indonesia through a socio-anthropological approach to the dialectic between norms, custom, and social transformation. This study employs qualitative library research with normative, statutory, sociology of law, legal anthropology, legal pluralism, and maqāṣid al-sharī‘ah approaches. The findings show that Islamic inheritance law in Indonesia is formed through layered negotiations among the certainty of faraidh, the reformative provisions of the Compilation of Islamic Law, family deliberation, kinship systems, local authority, and socio-economic needs. Custom may function as a mechanism of harmony, but it may also eliminate heirs’ rights when not accompanied by legal awareness, voluntary consent, and protection of vulnerable parties. This article proposes an integrative-critical model that positions faraidh as a normative anchor, while local practices may be accommodated insofar as they fulfill transparency of rights, clarity of property status, voluntary agreement, protection of vulnerable heirs, and maqāṣid-oriented benefit. This model affirms inheritance as both a legal norm and a dynamic, contextual social practice.

Title

Found 21 Documents
Search

Abstract

Abstract

Abstract

Abstract

Abstract

Abstract

Abstract

Abstract

Abstract

Abstract

Title Search

Found 21 Documents Search

Abstract

Abstract

Abstract

Abstract

Abstract

Abstract

Abstract

Abstract

Abstract

Abstract

Title

Found 21 Documents
Search