Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 5 Documents
Search
Journal : Mediator

Komunikasi Antarpersona: Perspektif Komunikasi Cyberspace Fardiah, Dedeh
Mediator Vol 3, No 1 (2002)
Publisher : FIkom Unisba

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar

Abstract

Kehadiran teknologi komunikasi canggih telah menggeser dan memperkaya makna komunikasi antarpersona. Kini, komunikasi antarpersona tak lagi mensyaratkan keharusan adanya lalap muka. Komunikasi demikian dapat berlangsung. misalnya dengan internet melalui/asilitas chatting. Inilah komunikasi antarpersona dalam dunia cyber. Sebagaimana komunikasi antarpersona tatapmuka. pada komunikasi antarpersona di dunia maya pun masih diperlukan dimensi-dimensi psikologis, sehingga komunikasi itu bisa e/ektif. Namun demikian, bagaimanapun komunikasi an~arpersona cyberspace tidak sepenuhnya persis sama dengan komunikasi antarpersona tatap muka, karena ada yang tergantikan yakni aspek "memberi dan menerima diri penuh secara psikologis".
Telaah Buku Fardiah, Dedeh
Mediator Vol 4, No 2 (2003)
Publisher : FIkom Unisba

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar

Abstract

Mengonstruksi Jurnalisme Abad IniJudul Buku : Sembi/an Elemen Jurnalisme: Apa yang Seharusnya Diketahui Wartawan danyang Diharapkan Publik; Penulis: Bill Kovach & Tom Rosnstiel; Penerjemah YusiA. Pareanom; Editor Andreas Harsono; Penerbit Yayasan Pan/au; Tahun terbit 2003;Tebal xii + 273 him (termasuk indeks)
“Focus Group Discussion” dalam Paradigma Pembangunan Partisipatif Fardiah, Dedeh
Mediator Vol 6, No 1 (2005): Kontroversi Dakwah dan Politik
Publisher : FIkom Unisba

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar

Abstract

Some recent years, the field of Development Communication has developed a bottom up approach in order to build a comprehensive program for stakeholders. The reason behind this approach is to generate participation among people who became their target. As a variant of participatory development, Focus Group Discussion has became an alternative for communication research method. In practice, Focus Group Discussion has great potential to achieve their optimum role. But, whoever employ this approach must also aware its limitations.
Tinjauan Kritis tentang Program Tayangan Anak di Televisi Fardiah, Dedeh
Mediator Vol 7, No 2 (2006): Bagaimana Kita Menafsirkan Komunikasi Pembangunan?
Publisher : FIkom Unisba

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar

Abstract

In the field of mass communication, studies concerning children and mass media always provide interesting perspectives, especially concerning the effect of television viewing . Each year, communication experts, psychologists, as well as parents attended this issue seriously. From communication and psychological perspectives, televisions were blamed as the source of the problem due to bad program qualities as well as high frequent of TV  violence, and sexual content. Employing Critical Theories for analyzing device, this article addresses the map of children program on TV, and how the program was packed. Children program on TV still face many obstacles, including the challenge thrown by rating on media market industries.
Polemik Rancangan Undang-Undang Anti Pornografi & Pornoaksi (RUU-APP) Fardiah, Dedeh
Mediator Vol 8, No 1 (2007): Berkomunikasi dengan Anak
Publisher : FIkom Unisba

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar

Abstract

This article focuses on polemics concerning the draft of Anti-pornography Act as represented by two national dailies: Kompas and Republika. Kompas was traditionally perceived as media with strong Christianity values and liberal tendencies. Contrasted with Kompas, Republika is perceived as media which represents Islamic values with strong Islam movement interests. Employing framing analysis devices, it is found that Kompas has defined anti-pornography act polemics as humanity problem. Meanwhile, Republika framed it as national problem to be solved. Concerning the source of problem, Kompas blamed the substance of the draft, whereas Republika blamed the government.