Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2021 - 2026
5.312
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal Jurnal Pendidikan dan Pengajaran Jurnal Tematik Jurnal Daya Matematis Scholaria: Jurnal Pendidikan dan Kebudayaan Satya Widya Pendas : Jurnah Ilmiah Pendidikan Dasar JURNAL PENDIDIKAN TAMBUSAI Jurnal Cendekia : Jurnal Pendidikan Matematika Jurnal Basicedu Jurnal Mantik Jurnal Pendidikan dan Konseling Proximal: Jurnal Penelitian Matematika dan Pendidikan Matematika Jurnal Educatio FKIP UNMA Journal On Teacher Education (Jote) Jurnal Ilmiah Wahana Pendidikan Journal of Integrated Elementary Education Jurnal Pembelajaran, Bimbingan, dan Pengelolaan Pendidikan Jurnal Basicedu Innovative: Journal Of Social Science Research JURNAL HANDAYANI PGSD FIP UNIMED JAMAS: Jurnal Abdi Masyarakat Edumaspul: Jurnal Pendidikan Open Access DRIVERset
Yohana Setiawan
Universitas Kristen Satya Wacana
Religion Agriculture, Biological Sciences & Forestry Humanities Computer Science & IT Economics, Econometrics & Finance Education Languange, Linguistic, Communication & Media Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice Mathematics Public Health Social Sciences Other

Published : 57 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 57 Documents
Search

 2   3   4   5   6 
PENGEMBANGAN SITUS SIGAYA UNTUK MENINGKATKAN KEMAMPUAN BERPIKIR KRITIS SISWA KELAS IV SD Aditya Kristrifena; Yohana Setiawan
Pendas : Jurnal Ilmiah Pendidikan Dasar Vol. 9 No. 04 (2024): Volume 09 No. 04, Desember 2024.
Publisher : Program Studi Pendidikan Guru Sekolah Dasar FKIP Universitas Pasundan

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.23969/jp.v9i04.18064

Abstract

This research aims to improve the critical thinking skills of fourth grade elementary school students. The subjects in this research were 21 grade IV students at SD Negeri 03 Klepu, Pringapus District. Data collection was carried out by interviews, observation, formulating learning objectives, developing products, product trials, pretest and posttest as well as evaluation and revision. This research method uses quantitative descriptive. The research results show that SIGAYA media can improve the critical thinking skills of fourth grade elementary school students. SIGAYA Media obtained a score of 100% in material expert validation and 100% in media expert validation. Both validation results are included in the "Very valid" category. The average score for critical thinking skills obtained was the lowest score of 10 and the highest score of 90 with an average of 63. After using SIGAYA media the lowest score was 20 and the highest score was 100 with an average of 68.5. So the data can be concluded that the average score of students' pretest and posttest results increased by 5.24. SIGAYA media was declared effective because the posttest results increased from the pretest. has 0.041 which is greater than 0.05, so it is said that Ha is accepted and Ho is rejected. Ha is accepted, which means that in the pretest and posttest there are significant changes to improve the critical thinking skills of grade 4 elementary school.   Keywords: Research and Development (R&D), critical thinking, site development
Evaluasi Kinerja Berdasarkan Standar Komptensi Guru pada Guru Kelas di SD Negeri Randuacir 02 Wahyu Prasetyo; Yohana Setiawan
Edumaspul: Jurnal Pendidikan Vol 5 No 1 (2021): Edumaspul: Jurnal Pendidikan
Publisher : Universitas Muhammadiyah Enrekang

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.33487/edumaspul.v5i1.1231

Abstract

Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk mengetahui kinerja guru kelas di SD Negeri Randuacir 02 berdasarkan standar kompetensi guru dari penilaian asesor (kepala sekolah), penilaian diri sendiri, dan penilaian teman sejawat. Jenis penelitian ini termasuk dalam penelitian evaluasi. Model yang digunakan adalah model benchmarking (bangku ukur). Teknik analisis yang digunakan adalah kuantitatif deskriptif. Populasi penelitian ini adalah guru kelas di SD Negeri Randuacir 02. Penelitian sampel guru kelas dilakukan dengan propotional random sampling sebanyak 6 guru. Teknik pengumpulan data menggunakan kuisioner. Dari 57 item terdapat 41 item dinyatakan valid, item- item tersebut memiliki koefisien corrected item to total correlation ≥ 0,20, Hasil analisis kuesioner penilaian kinerja guru diperoleh alpha Cronbach’s= 0,721 sehingga dapat dikatakan memiliki reliabilitas pada kategori tinggi. Teknik analisis data menggunakan analisis statistik deskriptif dengan persentase. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa : (1) kompetensi pedagogik guru kelas di SD Negeri Randuacir 02 dalam kategori tinggi dengan rata-rata persentase sebesar 89,42%. (2) kompetensi kepribadian guru kelas di SD Negeri Randuacir 02 dalam kategori tinggi dengan rata-rata persentase sebesar 92,3%. (3) kompetensi sosial guru kelas di SD Negeri Randuacir 02 dalam kategori tinggi dengan rata-rata persentase 91,7%. (4) kompetensi profesional guru kelas di SD Negeri Randuacir 02 dalam kategori tinggi dengan rata-rata persentase 94,4%. Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk mengetahui kinerja guru kelas di SD Negeri Randuacir 02 berdasarkan standar kompetensi guru dari penilaian asesor (kepala sekolah), penilaian diri sendiri, dan penilaian teman sejawat. Jenis penelitian ini termasuk dalam penelitian evaluasi. Model yang digunakan adalah model benchmarking (bangku ukur). Teknik analisis yang digunakan adalah kuantitatif deskriptif. Populasi penelitian ini adalah guru kelas di SD Negeri Randuacir 02. Penelitian sampel guru kelas dilakukan dengan propotional random sampling sebanyak 6 guru. Teknik pengumpulan data menggunakan kuisioner. Dari 57 item terdapat 41 item dinyatakan valid, item- item tersebut memiliki koefisien corrected item to total correlation ≥ 0,20, Hasil analisis kuesioner penilaian kinerja guru diperoleh alpha Cronbach’s= 0,721 sehingga dapat dikatakan memiliki reliabilitas pada kategori tinggi. Teknik analisis data menggunakan analisis statistik deskriptif dengan persentase. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa : (1) kompetensi pedagogik guru kelas di SD Negeri Randuacir 02 dalam kategori tinggi dengan rata-rata persentase sebesar 89,42%. (2) kompetensi kepribadian guru kelas di SD Negeri Randuacir 02 dalam kategori tinggi dengan rata-rata persentase sebesar 92,3%. (3) kompetensi sosial guru kelas di SD Negeri Randuacir 02 dalam kategori tinggi dengan rata-rata persentase 91,7%. (4) kompetensi profesional guru kelas di SD Negeri Randuacir 02 dalam kategori tinggi dengan rata-rata persentase 94,4%.
PENGEMBANGAN SLIDES AND LADDERS GAME BANGUN DATAR PERSEGI UNTUK MENINGKATKAN PROBLEM SOLVING SISWA SEKOLAH DASAR KELAS 5 Audy Prudencia, Gabriella; Setiawan, Yohana
Pendas : Jurnal Ilmiah Pendidikan Dasar Vol. 9 No. 2 (2024): Volume 09 No. 2 Juni 2024
Publisher : Program Studi Pendidikan Guru Sekolah Dasar FKIP Universitas Pasundan

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.23969/jp.v9i2.14116

Abstract

After the pandemic, mathematics learning media has undergone significant changes in creative and innovative directions, for example board games. Media board games are one of the most attractive media options for students. This research aims to improve the problem-solving ability of grade 5 students through making Slides and Ladders learning media with square flat building material using research and development methods. Sugiyono's Research and Development method has 7 stages, namely: 1) Potential and problems; 2) Collection of information; 3) Product design; 4) Design validation; 5) Design improvement; 6) Product trials; and 7) Product revisions. This study stated successful with a validity rate of 80.61%, a practicality rate of 87.1% and increased effectiveness. It can be seen from the students look enthusiastic and focused judged from being able to understand the material well, understand how to play, understand the 4 stages of solving problems.
Implementation of The Critical Thinking Skills Measurement Instrument Integrated with the Critical and Creative Thinking in Research-Based Learning Model Mawardi Mawardi; Yohana Setiawan; Mawardi; Yohana Setiawan; Suhandi Astuti
Jurnal Pembelajaran, Bimbingan, dan Pengelolaan Pendidikan Vol. 7 No. 2 (2027)
Publisher : Universitas Negeri Malang

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.17977/um065.v7.i2.2027.2

Abstract

This study addresses the limited availability of critical thinking assessment instruments that comprehensively measure university students' competencies in higher education. Existing FRISCO-based instruments are constrained by suboptimal internal consistency, a predominant focus on cognitive dimensions, limited assessment of critical thinking dispositions, and potential subjectivity arising from inconsistent interpretation of assessment criteria. To overcome these limitations, the Critical Thinking Skills Measurement Instrument (CTSMI) integrated with the Critical and Creative Thinking Research-based Learning (CCTRbL) model was developed. This study aimed to examine the validity, effectiveness, implementation fidelity, and user acceptability of the integrated CTSMI. A mixed-methods approach combining a pre-experimental design and Collaborative Action Research (CAR) was employed, involving four lecturers and a hundred undergraduate students. Expert validation by specialists in psychology, linguistics, and educational evaluation produced mean scores of 77.0, 77.8, and 72.0, respectively, confirming the instrument's validity. Empirical testing yielded a Cronbach's alpha coefficient of 0.734, while Corrected Item–Total Correlation values demonstrated that all items met the validity criterion (r ≥ 0.30). Implementation of the CTSMI integrated with the CCTRbL model resulted in a mean critical thinking score of 68, indicating a high level of performance. The findings demonstrate that the CTSMI is a valid and reliable instrument for assessing and promoting university students' critical thinking skills. Furthermore, the instrument exhibited strong user acceptability and was implemented effectively, supporting its applicability as a comprehensive assessment tool for higher education learning environments.  
Implementation of The Critical Thinking Skills Measurement Instrument Integrated with the Critical and Creative Thinking in Research-Based Learning Model Mawardi Mawardi; Yohana Setiawan; Mawardi; Yohana Setiawan; Suhandi Astuti
Jurnal Pembelajaran, Bimbingan, dan Pengelolaan Pendidikan Vol. 7 No. 2 (2027)
Publisher : Universitas Negeri Malang

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.17977/um065.v7.i2.2027.2

Abstract

This study addresses the limited availability of critical thinking assessment instruments that comprehensively measure university students' competencies in higher education. Existing FRISCO-based instruments are constrained by suboptimal internal consistency, a predominant focus on cognitive dimensions, limited assessment of critical thinking dispositions, and potential subjectivity arising from inconsistent interpretation of assessment criteria. To overcome these limitations, the Critical Thinking Skills Measurement Instrument (CTSMI) integrated with the Critical and Creative Thinking Research-based Learning (CCTRbL) model was developed. This study aimed to examine the validity, effectiveness, implementation fidelity, and user acceptability of the integrated CTSMI. A mixed-methods approach combining a pre-experimental design and Collaborative Action Research (CAR) was employed, involving four lecturers and a hundred undergraduate students. Expert validation by specialists in psychology, linguistics, and educational evaluation produced mean scores of 77.0, 77.8, and 72.0, respectively, confirming the instrument's validity. Empirical testing yielded a Cronbach's alpha coefficient of 0.734, while Corrected Item–Total Correlation values demonstrated that all items met the validity criterion (r ≥ 0.30). Implementation of the CTSMI integrated with the CCTRbL model resulted in a mean critical thinking score of 68, indicating a high level of performance. The findings demonstrate that the CTSMI is a valid and reliable instrument for assessing and promoting university students' critical thinking skills. Furthermore, the instrument exhibited strong user acceptability and was implemented effectively, supporting its applicability as a comprehensive assessment tool for higher education learning environments.  
Implementation of The Critical Thinking Skills Measurement Instrument Integrated with the Critical and Creative Thinking in Research-Based Learning Model Mawardi Mawardi; Yohana Setiawan; Mawardi; Yohana Setiawan; Suhandi Astuti
Jurnal Pembelajaran, Bimbingan, dan Pengelolaan Pendidikan Vol. 7 No. 2 (2027)
Publisher : Universitas Negeri Malang

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.17977/um065.v7.i2.2027.2

Abstract

This study addresses the limited availability of critical thinking assessment instruments that comprehensively measure university students' competencies in higher education. Existing FRISCO-based instruments are constrained by suboptimal internal consistency, a predominant focus on cognitive dimensions, limited assessment of critical thinking dispositions, and potential subjectivity arising from inconsistent interpretation of assessment criteria. To overcome these limitations, the Critical Thinking Skills Measurement Instrument (CTSMI) integrated with the Critical and Creative Thinking Research-based Learning (CCTRbL) model was developed. This study aimed to examine the validity, effectiveness, implementation fidelity, and user acceptability of the integrated CTSMI. A mixed-methods approach combining a pre-experimental design and Collaborative Action Research (CAR) was employed, involving four lecturers and a hundred undergraduate students. Expert validation by specialists in psychology, linguistics, and educational evaluation produced mean scores of 77.0, 77.8, and 72.0, respectively, confirming the instrument's validity. Empirical testing yielded a Cronbach's alpha coefficient of 0.734, while Corrected Item–Total Correlation values demonstrated that all items met the validity criterion (r ≥ 0.30). Implementation of the CTSMI integrated with the CCTRbL model resulted in a mean critical thinking score of 68, indicating a high level of performance. The findings demonstrate that the CTSMI is a valid and reliable instrument for assessing and promoting university students' critical thinking skills. Furthermore, the instrument exhibited strong user acceptability and was implemented effectively, supporting its applicability as a comprehensive assessment tool for higher education learning environments.  
Implementation of The Critical Thinking Skills Measurement Instrument Integrated with the Critical and Creative Thinking in Research-Based Learning Model Mawardi Mawardi; Yohana Setiawan; Mawardi; Yohana Setiawan; Suhandi Astuti
Jurnal Pembelajaran, Bimbingan, dan Pengelolaan Pendidikan Vol. 7 No. 2 (2027)
Publisher : Universitas Negeri Malang

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.17977/um065.v7.i2.2027.2

Abstract

This study addresses the limited availability of critical thinking assessment instruments that comprehensively measure university students' competencies in higher education. Existing FRISCO-based instruments are constrained by suboptimal internal consistency, a predominant focus on cognitive dimensions, limited assessment of critical thinking dispositions, and potential subjectivity arising from inconsistent interpretation of assessment criteria. To overcome these limitations, the Critical Thinking Skills Measurement Instrument (CTSMI) integrated with the Critical and Creative Thinking Research-based Learning (CCTRbL) model was developed. This study aimed to examine the validity, effectiveness, implementation fidelity, and user acceptability of the integrated CTSMI. A mixed-methods approach combining a pre-experimental design and Collaborative Action Research (CAR) was employed, involving four lecturers and a hundred undergraduate students. Expert validation by specialists in psychology, linguistics, and educational evaluation produced mean scores of 77.0, 77.8, and 72.0, respectively, confirming the instrument's validity. Empirical testing yielded a Cronbach's alpha coefficient of 0.734, while Corrected Item–Total Correlation values demonstrated that all items met the validity criterion (r ≥ 0.30). Implementation of the CTSMI integrated with the CCTRbL model resulted in a mean critical thinking score of 68, indicating a high level of performance. The findings demonstrate that the CTSMI is a valid and reliable instrument for assessing and promoting university students' critical thinking skills. Furthermore, the instrument exhibited strong user acceptability and was implemented effectively, supporting its applicability as a comprehensive assessment tool for higher education learning environments.  
Co-Authors Aditya Kristrifena Afifah, Lutvia Agustianingrum, Hesti Alfrianto Pauwang Anita Adinda Sari Aprilina Isabela Maharani Ari Safitri Atha Haryo Ramadhani Audy Prudencia, Gabriella Borom, Alfian Dedy Raidons Se’u Denise Dwi Rahmatania Devita Inanda Hernawan Dian Nuryani Dimas Afif Kurniawan Elza Pristy Latifah Endah Murwatiningsih Estheria Finaningtyas Siwi Firosalia Kristin Fitryani, Arum Fransiska Faberta Kencana Sari Hermyn Benny Hina Hesti Agustianingrum Isna Fitri Nurjannah Kezia Reza Febyani Lucia Christin Sembiring Maharani, Aprilina Isabela Mamji, Yulianus Marwa, Keterina Mawardi Mawardi Murti, Renita Eka Nafa Adliya Nanda Agung Nugroho Octaviana, Santi Oktaviani, Monica Synthia Pattiasina, Nathania Tri Asih Permatasari, Karenhapukh Rahmatania, Denise Dwi Ribka Ginting Sagita Putri Maharani Sari, Rachelia Anggita Sawen, Jeane Diana Siwi, Estheria Finaningtyas Suhandi Astuti Tri Puji Ati Triyona Asmaraningtyas Wahyu Prasetyo Wahyudi Winda Ayu Puspaningrum Wulandari, Rasel Yohana Intan Dili Susanti