Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 23 Documents
Search

Vakum Norma Status dan Pengelolaan Aset Daerah Hasil Kerja Sama Pemerintah Pusat dan Daerah Pasca Pemekaran Wilayah Shella Yulianingsih; I Dewa Gede Herman Yudiawan
Pemuliaan Keadilan Vol. 3 No. 3 (2026): Juli : Pemuliaan Keadilan
Publisher : Asosiasi Penelitian dan Pengajar Ilmu Hukum Indonesia

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.62383/pk.v3i3.1797

Abstract

Regional decentralization within the framework of regional autonomy in Indonesia often creates a regulatory vacuum regarding the ownership and management of assets resulting from cooperation between the central and regional governments. This study aims to analyze the provisions of Law No. 23 of 2014 on Regional Government and to identify regulatory gaps and models for resolving conflicts over public assets following decentralization. The research method employed is a normative legal approach using legislative, conceptual, case-based, and comparative analyses. The findings reveal that Law No. 23/2014 does not explicitly regulate the status of assets during the agreement period, mechanisms for the transfer of rights and obligations, ownership proportions from multi-source financing, or compensation for the parent region. Consequently, legal uncertainty arises regarding large-scale strategic assets involving third parties. This study also found that multi-party mediation involving the governor and the prosecutor’s office proved more effective in resolving public asset disputes than litigation, as demonstrated in the Tasikmalaya case. This study recommends revising Law No. 23/2014 by adding a special chapter on the transfer of assets resulting from post-decentralization cooperation and formalizing the involvement of the prosecutor’s office in the mediation of public asset disputes.
Analisis Implementasi E-Court pada Pengadilan Negeri Singaraja Dwi Ruth Bina; Ratna Artha Windari; I Dewa Gede Herman Yudiawan; Made Sugi Hartono; Guntur Frans Gerri
Garuda: Jurnal Pendidikan Kewarganegaraan Dan Filsafat Vol. 4 No. 2 (2026): Juni : GARUDA: Jurnal Pendidikan Kewarganegaraan dan Filsafat
Publisher : International Forum of Researchers and Lecturers

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.59581/garuda.v4i2.6310

Abstract

This study aims to analyze the implementation of the e-Court system at the Singaraja District Court in accordance with Supreme Court Regulation (PERMA) Number 7 of 2022, identify the supporting and inhibiting factors influencing its implementation, and evaluate its effectiveness in realizing the principles of simple, fast, and low-cost justice. This research employs a normative legal research method using both statute and conceptual approaches. Legal materials were collected through library research, including legislation, legal doctrines, scholarly publications, and relevant court regulations, and were analyzed using a qualitative descriptive method. The findings reveal that the implementation of the e-Court system at the Singaraja District Court is generally consistent with the provisions of PERMA Number 7 of 2022, encompassing e-Filing, e-Payment, e-Summons, and e-Litigation services. The system has contributed to improving judicial efficiency, transparency, and accessibility by simplifying case administration and reducing procedural delays. Nevertheless, several obstacles continue to affect its optimal implementation, particularly limited information technology infrastructure, unstable internet connectivity, and low levels of digital literacy among non-advocate users. Based on George Edward III’s policy implementation theory, the communication and resource dimensions emerge as the most influential factors determining implementation success, highlighting the importance of effective socialization, adequate infrastructure, and continuous capacity building to enhance the sustainability and effectiveness of electronic court services.
Kekosongan Norma Penguatan Fungsi Checks and Balances Badan Pemusyawaratan Desa Pasca UU Desa 2024 Fakhri Awaludin Istiabudi; I Dewa Gede Herman Yudiawan
Jurnal Hukum, Administrasi Publik dan Negara Vol. 3 No. 4 (2026): Juli : Jurnal Hukum, Administrasi Publik dan Negara
Publisher : Asosiasi Peneliti Dan Pengajar Ilmu Sosial Indonesia

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.62383/hukum.v3i4.1133

Abstract

This study examines the normative gap concerning the strengthening of the Village Consultative Body (BPD) as a checks and balances institution following the enactment of Law Number 3 of 2024 on Villages. The research employs a normative legal approach using statutory, conceptual, and literature-based analyses of relevant legal sources. The findings reveal that the 2024 Village Law primarily emphasizes extending the village head's term of office from six to eight years without providing adequate reinforcement of the BPD's authority, supervisory functions, or institutional capacity. As a result, an imbalance of power between the village head and the BPD may emerge, potentially weakening the BPD's oversight role, reducing community representation, and limiting accountability mechanisms at the village level. Furthermore, the weakened institutional position of the BPD increases the risk of excessive concentration of local power and may undermine democratic village governance. Therefore, this study recommends strengthening the legal framework through implementing regulations that enhance the BPD's authority, improving institutional capacity through continuous training and development, and reinforcing horizontal accountability mechanisms to promote transparent, participatory, accountable, and democratic village governance.