Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 17 Documents
Search

AGILE GOVERNANCE AND INSTITUTIONAL RESILIENCE: AN EVALUATION OF ADAPTIVE POLICY THE SOCIAL AFFAIRS OFFICE OF EAST JAVA PROVINCE Karlina Winaryanti; Ulul Albab; Ika Devi Pramudiana
International Journal of Multidisciplinary Reseach Vol. 2 No. 4 (2026): Agust
Publisher : International Journal of Multidisciplinary Reseach

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar

Abstract

This study aims to analyze the implementation of agile governance and its contribution to strengthening institutional resilience in adaptive policy evaluation at the Regional Social Service of East Java Province. The research employs a qualitative approach with a case study design to explore governance dynamics and policy evaluation processes within a public institutional context. Data were collected through in-depth interviews, observation, and document analysis, and were examined using thematic analysis techniques. The findings indicate that agile governance principles are reflected in policy responsiveness, flexible coordination, cross-sector collaboration, and data-driven evaluation processes. Adaptive policy evaluation contributes significantly to enhancing anticipatory, adaptive, and transformative capacities as the core dimensions of institutional resilience. However, structural challenges such as limited human resource capacity and regulatory synchronization continue to affect the optimization of adaptive governance practices. The study concludes that the integration of agile governance and institutional resilience represents a strategic approach to improving social policy effectiveness in complex and uncertain environments. This research provides theoretical contributions to the development of adaptive public administration paradigms and practical implications for strengthening institutional capacity in the social service sector.
STRATEGY FOR MONITORING ACCOUNTABILITY OF FREE MOTOR VEHICLE TESTING SERVICES AT THE SIDOARJO PKB UPT Yos Kurniawan; Ulul Albab; Sapto Pramono
International Journal of Multidisciplinary Reseach Vol. 2 No. 4 (2026): Agust
Publisher : International Journal of Multidisciplinary Reseach

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar

Abstract

This study aims to analyze the internal oversight strategy in overseeing the accountability of free motor vehicle inspection services (KIR testing) at the UPT PKB of the Sidoarjo Regency Transportation Agency after the enactment of Law Number 1 of 2022 and Sidoarjo Regency Regional Regulation Number 1 of 2024. This retribution exemption policy institutionally shifts the organization's orientation from fulfilling regional fiscal targets to becoming a pure public value producer unit focused on transportation safety. However, the loss of budgetary control instruments creates new challenges in the form of internal moral hazard, such as the potential for decreased apparatus discipline and procedural negligence (rubber-stamping). Using a qualitative descriptive-analytical approach with a purposive sampling technique, this study collected data through in-depth interviews, observations, and documentation studies. The results show that the UPT PKB Sidoarjo successfully mitigated these risks through adaptive built-in control system engineering based on Bovens' three dimensions of public accountability. In the professional dimension, technical supervision is carried out through computerized testing equipment integrated with Electronic Test Pass Certificates (BLUE) and a digital Audit Trail system. In the administrative dimension, daily data reconciliation is carried out between the number of vehicles in the lane CCTV cameras and the issued BLUE certificates. Meanwhile, in the social dimension, a QR Code complaint channel is provided that is directly integrated with the Indonesian Ombudsman. This study concludes that the effectiveness of accountable and integrity-based toll-free services is largely determined by management's commitment to enforcing a strict digital monitoring strategy to reduce the subjective discretion of officers in the field.
Adaptive Governance in The Bantul Regency Regional House of Representatives (DPRD) in Responding to Regional Strategic Issues Titis Ajeng Ganis Mareti; Ulul Albab; Dian Ferriswara
Educational Dynamics: International Journal of Education and Social Sciences Vol. 3 No. 3 (2026): July: Educational Dynamics: International Journal of Education and Social Scien
Publisher : International Forum of Researchers and Lecturers

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.70062/educationaldynamics.v3i3.328

Abstract

This study aims to analyze the adaptive governance practices implemented by the Bantul Regency Regional House of Representatives (DPRD) in responding to various strategic regional issues. A qualitative approach with a case study design was employed. Data were collected through in-depth interviews with the DPRD Speaker, commission members, the DPRD Secretary, Secretariat officials, and representatives from regional government agencies, supplemented by observations of the legislative process and document analysis. Data analysis utilized the interactive model developed by Miles, Huberman, and Saldaña, comprising data condensation, data display, and conclusion drawing and verification. The findings indicate that the Bantul Regency DPRD’s adaptive capacity is manifested through flexibility in legislative agenda-setting, continuous institutional learning, and multi-stakeholder collaboration at every stage of the policy process. Collaboration with the local government, academics, civil society organizations, the media, and the public contributes to higher-quality decision-making thatis more responsive and participatory. The study also identified several challenges, namely political dynamics among stakeholders, limited inter-institutional data integration, and suboptimal continuous policy evaluation. Based on these findings, the study develops an adaptive governance model consisting of five dimensions: adaptive leadership, institutional learning, decision-making flexibility, multi-stakeholder collaboration, and feedback-based policy evaluation. This research extends the application of the adaptive governance concept to local legislative bodies and offers practical implications for strengthening DPRD governance to make it more adaptive, responsive, and sustainable in the face of changing strategic environments.
Adaptive Governance in Immigration Inspection in the Era of Global Mobility Dani Hidayat Lubis; Ulul Albab; Amirul Mustofa
Educational Dynamics: International Journal of Education and Social Sciences Vol. 3 No. 3 (2026): July: Educational Dynamics: International Journal of Education and Social Scien
Publisher : International Forum of Researchers and Lecturers

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.70062/educationaldynamics.v3i3.329

Abstract

Increasing cross-border human mobility and evolving immigration policies require public organizations to maintain flexible management systems capable of balancing service delivery, regulatory oversight, and national security. This study aims to analyze the implementation of adaptive governance in immigration inspections at the Surabaya Class I Special Immigration Office (TPI) within the context of global mobility. Employing a qualitative approach and a case study design, the research gathered data through in-depth interviews, observation, and document analysis, utilizing an interactive model comprising data condensation, data display, and conclusion drawing. The findings reveal that adaptive governance is manifested in three key aspects. First, adaptive leadership and collaborative governance strengthen decision-making, organizational communication, and inter-agency coordination during immigration inspections. Second, service innovation and digitalizationachieved through the use of immigration information systems, data integration, and procedural simplification—enhance service efficiency and accuracy. Third, organizational adaptability is demonstrated by the capacity to respond to regulatory changes and rising international mobility, as well as through organizational learning and continuous employee competency development. The study concludes that successful immigration inspection relies not only on regulatory compliance but also on the organization's ability to establish a governance framework that is adaptive, collaborative, innovative, and technology-driven. Ultimately, the research proposes an adaptive governance model integrating adaptive leadership, inter-agency collaboration, digital transformation, and organizational learning as a foundation for improving the effectiveness of immigration inspections in the era of global mobility.
Translating the Policy Capacity Framework for Local Fisheries Administration: A Theory-to-Practice Review in the Indonesian Multilevel Governance Context Fatamsya Furu; Dian Ferriswara; Ulul Albab
Green Social: International Journal of Law and Civil Affairs Vol. 3 No. 3 (2026): September: International Journal of Law and Civil Affairs
Publisher : International Forum of Researchers and Lecturers

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.70062/greensocial.v3i3.340

Abstract

Local fisheries administration depends on policy knowledge, organizational resources, coordination, lawful authority, and public legitimacy, but these requirements are distributed across government levels and are often reduced to isolated shortages. This article examines how the Policy Capacity Framework (PCF) can support disciplined diagnosis in Indonesian local fisheries administration, using Kaimana Regency as an illustrative context grounded in public regulatory, organizational, statistical, and fisheries sources rather than as an empirical agency assessment. A theory-focused narrative review synthesized 28 verified full-text peer-reviewed sources and used four fisheries-governance studies and six official documents for contextual boundary checking. The analysis reconstructs the 3 × 3 PCF matrix, examines its contextual, dynamic, and relational boundaries, and maps the synthesis into eight diagnostic pathways. The findings show that capacity is a task-specific configuration of mutually conditioning skills and enabling resources rather than a universal score or proxy for performance. Organizational capability mediates whether individual competence can be mobilized within multilevel authority, interorganizational relations, and local operating conditions. The resulting framework covers task and demand, evidence and analysis, staff enablement, infrastructure and operations, coordination and partnerships, authority and legitimacy, adaptation and preparedness, and performance and public value. It offers diagnostic questions and conditional practice directions, not findings about the capacity of the Kaimana Fisheries Office or proof of intervention effectiveness. Responsible application therefore requires a defined policy task, verified legal authority, and organizational and contextual evidence.
From Information Disclosure to Public Value: A Theory-to-Practice Review for Subdistrict Transparency Bernad Bernad; Eny Haryati; Ulul Albab
International Journal of Law and Society Vol. 3 No. 4 (2026): October: International Journal of Law and Society
Publisher : Asosiasi Penelitian dan Pengajar Ilmu Hukum Indonesia

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.62951/ijls.v3i4.1038

Abstract

Formal information-disclosure performance does not by itself show whether public information is accessible, useful, responsive, or capable of generating public value. This distinction is salient for subdistrict administration, where transparency obligations are implemented close to citizens under bounded authority, capacity, and intergovernmental dependence. Anchored in the documented 2025 transparency assessment of Kecamatan Sebuku, Indonesia, this article examines how Public Value Theory can explain and guide the transition from disclosure outputs toward potential public value. It employs a Conceptual Review Article design using a Theory-Focused Narrative Literature Review with a Theory-to-Practice orientation. Six documented Scopus search runs yielded 2,437 stream-level records and 1,612 unique records; after screening and full-text verification, 33 peer-reviewed journal articles formed the analytical corpus. The synthesis reconstructs the public value proposition, authorizing environment, and operational capacity, and integrates later evidence on communicative transparency, access and use, dialogue, value conflict, multidimensional outcomes, and public-value failure. It produces a six-domain, source-traceable framework covering lawful purpose and authorization; usable and candid disclosure; multichannel access and supported use; dialogic response and accountable follow-through; operational capacity and data stewardship; and safeguarded evaluation and adaptive learning. The contribution is conceptual and translational rather than theoretical or causal. The framework guides diagnosis and context-sensitive action but does not treat formal transparency scores as evidence of citizen trust, participation, accountability, legitimacy, or realized public value.
Evaluation of Immigration Policy on Foreign Nationals at the Class I Special Immigration Office TPI Surabaya Moch. Garda Pangestu; Ulul Albab; Dian Ferriswara
International Journal of Social Welfare and Family Law Vol. 3 No. 4 (2026): October: International Journal of Social Welfare and Family Law
Publisher : Asosiasi Penelitian dan Pengajar Ilmu Sosial Indonesia

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.62951/ijsw.v3i4.728

Abstract

This study evaluates the immigration policy applied to foreign nationals at the Class I Special Immigration Office TPI Surabaya under Law Number 6 of 2011 on Immigration. Indonesian scholarship on this policy has largely asked whether it is executed as prescribed; it has rarely asked whether the results obtained justify the resources committed and resolve the problem that gave rise to the policy. The study therefore adopts an evaluative rather than an implementation lens, applying the six criteria formulated by Dunn: effectiveness, efficiency, adequacy, equity, responsiveness, and appropriateness. A qualitative evaluative case study was conducted through semi-structured interviews with officials of the information and communication unit, the intelligence and enforcement unit, and the stay-permit unit, interviews with foreign nationals as service users, direct observation of service and supervision procedures, and documentary analysis of annual reports, enforcement records, and the 2024 budget document. The office performs strongly on efficiency and responsiveness: an electronic visa is issued within one day, a limited stay permit can be processed entirely from abroad, and passport endorsement is completed in one to two working days, supported by an operating budget of Rp29,831,987,000 in 2024, equivalent to approximately Rp53,700 for each foreign arrival and departure recorded at Juanda. Effectiveness is confirmed for service-delivery targets but is weaker for supervisory targets: 192 enforcement actions were recorded between 2022 and 2024, of which 114 were deportations, against 293,712 foreign arrivals in 2024 alone. Adequacy is the weakest criterion, because supervision reaches documentary compliance far more reliably than it reaches the actual activities of foreign nationals in the field. Equity varies across categories of foreign nationals, and appropriateness is qualified by an unresolved tension between facilitating mobility and controlling it. The study recommends reorienting internal evaluation from output counts toward outcome indicators, converting the Foreigner Supervision Team from a coordinating forum into a joint operating mechanism with a shared database, and institutionalising periodic compliance evaluation of issued stay permits.