Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 16 Documents
Search

The Validity of The Deed of Sale and Purchase and the Deed of Granting Rights and Legal Consequences for the Winner of the Auction Based on a Mock Agreement Anggun Riska Amalita; Sulistyandari Sulistyandari; Tri Lisiani Prihatinah
Journal of Social Research Vol. 3 No. 4 (2024): Journal of Social Research
Publisher : International Journal Labs

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.55324/josr.v3i4.1999

Abstract

The validity of a covenant must meet 4 conditions, namely an agreement that binds him, the ability to make an agreement, about a certain matter, and a lawful cause. One example is in the Supreme Court Decision Number 655 K / Pdt / 2014 and Review Decision Number 636 PK / Pdt / 2016, there are differences in decisions regarding the Deed of Sale and Purchase and the Deed of Granting Rights of Dependents on the basis of a mock agreement. This study aims to analyze the validity of the sale and purchase deed and the deed of granting dependent rights as well as the legal consequences for the auction winner based on a mock agreement. The research method used is normative juridical, with a statutory approach, a conceptual approach, and a case approach. The data used in this study are secondary data obtained from literature studies. The results of the research obtained are the Validity of the Deed of Sale and Purchase of land rights based on receivables in the Supreme Court Decision Case Number 655 K / Pdt / 2014 states that the Sale and Purchase Deed made by PPAT is invalid and null and void. This is because in making the Deed of Sale and Purchase by PPAT based on the temple agreement made by a Notary, it does not meet the material requirements of an authentic deed, namely the non-fulfillment of the elements of a halal cause as stipulated in Articles 1335 and 1337 of the Civil Code, thus it also cancels the crossing out of the name in the land certificate from the Plaintiff to the Defendant carried out by BPN. In the decision of Review Decision Number 636 PK / PDT / 2016 stated that the Deed of Sale and Purchase and Deed of Granting Rights of Dependents were valid and there was no pretend agreement. The winner of the auction based on the Minister of Finance Regulation No. 93/2010 on auction implementation guidelines is the buyer who submits the highest bid and is certified as the winner of the auction by the Auction Officer. Article 41 paragraph (1) of Government Regulation No. 24/1997 on land registration explains that the transfer of land rights through transfer of rights by auction can only be registered if proven by quotation of auction minutes made by auction officials.
Penerapan Peraturan KPPU Nomor 2 Tahun 2010 dalam Indentifikasi Unsur Bersekongkol pada Kasus Persekongkolan Tender Ajeng Aditya Listyani; Tri Lisiani Prihatinah; Sulistyandari Sulistryandari
Soedirman Law Review Vol 7, No 3 (2025)
Publisher : Faculty of Law, Universitas Jenderal Soedirman

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.20884/1.slr.2025.7.3.16123

Abstract

Tender pada dasarnya harus dilaksanakan dengan adil dan terbuka. Meskipun demikian, terdapat perilaku yang mendorong para pihak melakukan persekongkolan tender. Komisi Pengawas Persaingan Usaha (KPPU) telah banyak memutus kasus persekongkolan tender, salah satunya melalui Putusan KPPU Nomor 23/KPPU-L/2018. Perbedaan kedua putusan terletak pada pendapat Majelis Hakim Pengadilan Negeri Medan yang membatalkan putusan KPPU Nomor 23/KPPU-L/2018. Penelitian ini bertujuan menganalisis kedudukan Peraturan Komisi Pengawas Persaingan Usaha dalam Hukum Persaingan Usaha di Indonesia serta menganalisis penerapan Peraturan Komisi Pengawas Persaingan Usaha Nomor 2 Tahun 2010 tentang Pedoman Pasal 22 Undang-Undang Nomor 5 Tahun 1999 tentang Larangan Persekongkolan Dalam Tender dalam Putusan yang dikaji. Penelitian ini merupakan penelitian yuridis normatif dengan pendekatan undang - undang, pendekatan konsep dan pendekatan kasus. Penelitian menggunakan data sekunder yang didapat dari studi kepustakaan. Data disajikan dengan deskriptif normatif dan dianalisis menggunakan metode normatif kualitatif. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa Peraturan Komisi Pengawas Persaingan Usaha dapat menjadi dasar hukum hakim untuk memutus sengketa persekongkolan tender. Putusan KPPU Nomor 23/KPPU-L/2018, menerapkan hukum sesuai dengan peraturan perundang-undangan.Kata Kunci: Indikasi Persekongkolan; Peraturan Komisi; Persekongkolan Tender.
Increasing The Business Performance Over Human Capital Contribution On Creative Industry In Banyumas Regency Alisa Tri Nawarini; Ekaningtyas Widiastuti; Sulistyandari Sulistyandari; Suci Indriati
EKUILIBRIUM : JURNAL ILMIAH BIDANG ILMU EKONOMI Vol 13 No 1 (2018): March
Publisher : Universitas Muhammadiyah Ponorogo

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.24269/ekuilibrium.v13i1.2018.pp11-25

Abstract

This study aims to determine the effect of human capital (innovation and creation, education and learning and experience and expertise) on business performance of actors in the creative industry sector in Banyumas regency. This research is a quantitative research by using survey method. The data collection was done by distributing questionnaires to 50 SMEs perpetrators of creative industry sector in Banyumas Regency. The method of analysis used to test the research hypothesis is multiple linear regression method. There are findings that the employees of the creative industry business have mostly had a long working period and have expertise in the field of work. They can show their best performance consistently in carrying out their work and being professional. It can be said that human capital in the form of experience and expertise has a role in influencing and improving company performance. Increased human capital owned by creative business actors can be done by involving employees in trainings (either training held by the government or private parties). By involving employees in the training, it is expected to improve the insights, skills and capabilities of individual employees so that ultimately able to improve performance in an effort to develop its business.
Perlindungan Hukum terhadap Konsumen oleh Perusahaan Pembiayaan Berdasarkan Undang-Undang Nomor 8 tahun 1999 Tentang Perlindungan Konsumen Suyadi Suyadi; Wiwik Yuni Hastuti; Sulistyandari Sulistyandari; Muksinun Muksinun; Sukirman Sukirman
Kosmik Hukum Vol. 22 No. 3 (2022)
Publisher : Universitas Muhammadiyah Purwokerto

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.30595/kosmikhukum.v22i3.13142

Abstract

AbstractThis research is entitled “Legal Protection of Consumers by Financing Companies Based on Law Number 8 of 1999 concerning Consumer Protection. The problem studied in this research is the legal protection for consumers by finance companies based on Law Number 8 of 1999 concerning Consumer Protection. The research method in this study uses a normative juridical approach. The results of the study were analyzed using a qualitative normative analysis method. The study results show that consumers have their rights protected, especially in Article 4 letters g and h of Law Number 8 of 1999 concerning Consumer Protection. This study concludes that business actors based on the decision of the Consumer Dispute Settlement Body Assembly to carry out the obligations as stipulated in Article 7 letter (a) of Law Number 8 of 1999 concerning Consumer Protection which determines the responsibilities of business actors. In this case, are Financing Companies must have good intentions in carrying out their business activities and implementing Article 19 of Law Number 8 of 1999 concerning Consumer Protection.Keywords:  Legal Protection, Consumer Protection, Financing Company           
The Role of the Land Deed Maker in the Validity of Land Grant Deeds Yenni Hermawaty; Tri Lisiani Prihatinah; Sulistyandari Sulistyandari
Enrichment: Journal of Multidisciplinary Research and Development Vol. 2 No. 3 (2024): Enrichment: Journal of Multidisciplinary Research and Development
Publisher : International Journal Labs

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.55324/enrichment.v2i3.112

Abstract

As public officials, Land Deed Officials (PPAT, Pejabat Pembuat Akta Tanah) must comply with the rules in the PPAT Position Regulation, including the primary duties, authorities, prohibitions, and PPAT Code of Ethics. This study examines the role of PPAT and the legal consequences of grant deeds canceled by the panel of judges in Supreme Court Decision Number 503K/Ag/2015. This type of research is normative juridical with statutory, conceptual, and case approaches. The data used is secondary data from primary, secondary, and tertiary legal materials. The results show that Muslim Indonesians are subject to the rules in the Compilation of Islamic Law and the Compilation of Sharia Economic Law and use the Religious Courts to resolve disputes. Grant legal acts must be legalized with a Grant Deed, which is the authority of PPAT. In making a Grant Deed, the PPAT must examine the origin of the granted property. The pillars and conditions of grants in KHI and KHES are cumulative and must be fulfilled. The grant can be canceled if one of the elements is not fulfilled. In the case of grant deed Number 112/II/GB/2003, the PPAT needed to fully carry out its role correctly. Despite having carried out duties by several articles in Government Regulation No. 37/1998 jo PP No. 24/2016, the PPAT violated Article 22 and the precautionary principle in the PPAT Code of Ethics. As a result, the grant deed was declared to have no legal force by the Panel of Judges of the Supreme Court. This research shows that violations by PPAT in making grant deeds can cause the deed to be invalid and null and void, eliminating legal certainty for the parties involved. PPAT's adherence to the rules and the precautionary principle is essential to ensure the legal validity of the deed made.
PERLINDUNGAN HUKUM PEMEGANG POLIS KRESNA LIFE DALAM PERSPEKTIF HUKUM ASURANSI PASCA PUTUSAN MAHKAMAH AGUNG NOMOR 140/K/TUN/2025 Adi Gunawan; Sulistyandari Sulistyandari; Rahadi Wasi Bintoro
Jurnal Ilmiah Advokasi Vol 14, No 2 (2026): Jurnal Ilmiah Advokasi
Publisher : Universitas Labuhanbatu

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.36987/jiad.v14i2.8845

Abstract

This study aims to analyze the forms and effectiveness of legal protection for policyholders of PT Asuransi Jiwa Kresna (Kresna Life) following Supreme Court Decision Number 140/K/TUN/2025, which declared the revocation of the company’s business license by the supervisory authority to be lawful. The research employs a normative legal research method using statutory, case, and conceptual approaches, through the analysis of primary, secondary, and tertiary legal materials. The findings indicate that, normatively, the insurance legal system has positioned policyholders as protected legal subjects and has legitimized the revocation of business licenses as a measure to safeguard the public interest. However, post–final and binding judgment, legal protection tends to be procedural in nature through liquidation mechanisms and has not fully guaranteed the substantive recovery of policyholders’ rights due to the company’s limited assets and the absence of effective guarantee instruments. This condition underscores a gap between the normative guarantees of legal protection and the reality of fulfilling policyholders’ rights. This study provides a critical evaluation of the effectiveness of legal protection for policyholders following the revocation of an insurance company's business license.Keywords: legal protection; policyholders; insurance