Garuda - Garba Rujukan Digital

Assessing Pre-Service Teachers’ Analytical Thinking in Science Fundamentals through a Moodle-Based Online Test Yusro, Andista Candra; Setyosari, Punaji; Degeng, I Nyoman Sudana; Degeng, Made Duananda Kartika
Journal of Educational Technology and Learning Creativity Vol. 3 No. 2 (2025): December
Publisher : Cahaya Ilmu Cendekia Publisher

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.37251/jetlc.v3i2.2541

Purpose of the study: This study aims to assess the analytical thinking skills of second-year pre-service teachers in the Concepts of Science course using a Moodle-based online assessment, emphasizing higher-order cognitive skills in Bloom’s taxonomy. Methodology: A descriptive quantitative design was employed involving 58 students from the Primary School Teacher Education (PGSD) program. Data were collected through a Moodle-based online test consisting of 20 items measuring analytical thinking at the analyzing level (C4), focusing on differentiating, organizing, and attributing in fundamental science topics. Descriptive statistics were used to analyze students’ performance levels. Main Findings: The findings show that approximately 62% of students achieved a moderate level of analytical thinking. Students performed better in identifying relationships between variables and interpreting experimental results, while difficulties were observed in organizing and evaluating scientific information. This indicates that Moodle-based assessments are effective in measuring analytical thinking but require instructional reinforcement to strengthen higher-order cognitive processes.. Novelty/Originality of this study: This study provides empirical evidence on the effectiveness of Moodle-based assessments in evaluating analytical thinking skills aligned with Bloom’s taxonomy in science teacher education. It highlights the potential of digital assessment platforms to support valid, efficient, and scalable measurement of pre-service teachers’ analytical competencies.

The Scopus Radar Readiness Model for Mitigating Algorithmic Discontinuation Risks Eko Pramudya Laksana; Ikhwan Arief; Mochammad Tanzil Multazam; Busro Busro; Arif Zainudin; Akhmad Anwar Dani; Andista Candra Yusro; Dedi Rahman Nur; Utama Alan Deta; Much Fuad Saifuddin; Mohammad Fauziddin; Muhamad Ratodi; Asep Erlan Maulana; Muh. Firyal Akbar; Lucky Zamzami; Aldy Rialdy Atmadja; Eko Pramudya Laksana; Ikhwan Arief; Mochammad Tanzil Multazam; Busro Busro; Arif Zainudin; Akhmad Anwar Dani; Andista Candra Yusro; Dedi Rahman Nur; Utama Alan Deta; Much Fuad Saifuddin; Mohammad Fauziddin; Muhamad Ratodi; Asep Erlan Maulana; Muh. Firyal Akbar; Lucky Zamzami; Aldy Rialdy Atmadja
Jurnal Pembelajaran, Bimbingan, dan Pengelolaan Pendidikan Vol. 6 No. 3 (2026)
Publisher : Universitas Negeri Malang

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.17977/um065.v6.i3.2026.3

The integrity of the global academic record is under unprecedented threat due to the industrialization of scientific misconduct, driven by paper mills, citation cartels, and identity theft, prompting major bibliographic databases to replace manual curation with algorithmic systems. This study examines the operational mechanics of the Scopus Radar tool, an unsupervised anomaly detection system designed to identify and eliminate articles exhibiting anomalous behavior. We reconstruct the bibliometric indicators that lead to discontinuation by triangulating data from the November 2025 Scopus Discontinued Titles list, public Elsevier policy papers, and independent bibliometric research. Our study of 62 cancelled journals shows that Publication Concerns (59.7%) and Outlier conduct (14.5%) are the top grounds for removal. There are definite tendencies when it comes to hyper-concentrated authorship, quick volume velocity spikes, and citation stacking that does not make sense. We also see a "contagion effect," where certain publications have far greater rates of quitting than others. Based on these findings, we propose the Scopus Radar Readiness Model (SRRM). The model is based on the Core Practices of the Committee on Publication Ethics (COPE) and has four stages of growth. This roadmap gives editorial boards the tools they need to go from reactive compliance to proactive integrity assurance. They can do this by using internal bibliometric audits to find and fix problems before they lead to external algorithmic enforcement. The results show that journals need to use Level 4 Optimized integrity practices to stay alive in a time when automated gatekeeping is common.

The Scopus Radar Readiness Model for Mitigating Algorithmic Discontinuation Risks Eko Pramudya Laksana; Ikhwan Arief; Mochammad Tanzil Multazam; Busro Busro; Arif Zainudin; Akhmad Anwar Dani; Andista Candra Yusro; Dedi Rahman Nur; Utama Alan Deta; Much Fuad Saifuddin; Mohammad Fauziddin; Muhamad Ratodi; Asep Erlan Maulana; Muh. Firyal Akbar; Lucky Zamzami; Aldy Rialdy Atmadja; Eko Pramudya Laksana; Ikhwan Arief; Mochammad Tanzil Multazam; Busro Busro; Arif Zainudin; Akhmad Anwar Dani; Andista Candra Yusro; Dedi Rahman Nur; Utama Alan Deta; Much Fuad Saifuddin; Mohammad Fauziddin; Muhamad Ratodi; Asep Erlan Maulana; Muh. Firyal Akbar; Lucky Zamzami; Aldy Rialdy Atmadja
Jurnal Pembelajaran, Bimbingan, dan Pengelolaan Pendidikan Vol. 6 No. 3 (2026)
Publisher : Universitas Negeri Malang

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.17977/um065.v6.i3.2026.3

The integrity of the global academic record is under unprecedented threat due to the industrialization of scientific misconduct, driven by paper mills, citation cartels, and identity theft, prompting major bibliographic databases to replace manual curation with algorithmic systems. This study examines the operational mechanics of the Scopus Radar tool, an unsupervised anomaly detection system designed to identify and eliminate articles exhibiting anomalous behavior. We reconstruct the bibliometric indicators that lead to discontinuation by triangulating data from the November 2025 Scopus Discontinued Titles list, public Elsevier policy papers, and independent bibliometric research. Our study of 62 cancelled journals shows that Publication Concerns (59.7%) and Outlier conduct (14.5%) are the top grounds for removal. There are definite tendencies when it comes to hyper-concentrated authorship, quick volume velocity spikes, and citation stacking that does not make sense. We also see a "contagion effect," where certain publications have far greater rates of quitting than others. Based on these findings, we propose the Scopus Radar Readiness Model (SRRM). The model is based on the Core Practices of the Committee on Publication Ethics (COPE) and has four stages of growth. This roadmap gives editorial boards the tools they need to go from reactive compliance to proactive integrity assurance. They can do this by using internal bibliometric audits to find and fix problems before they lead to external algorithmic enforcement. The results show that journals need to use Level 4 Optimized integrity practices to stay alive in a time when automated gatekeeping is common.

Assessing Pre-Service Teachers’ Analytical Thinking in Science Fundamentals through a Moodle-Based Online Test Yusro, Andista Candra; Setyosari, Punaji; Degeng, I Nyoman Sudana; Degeng, Made Duananda Kartika
Journal of Educational Technology and Learning Creativity Vol. 3 No. 2 (2025): December
Publisher : Cahaya Ilmu Cendekia Publisher

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.37251/jetlc.v3i2.2541

Purpose of the study: This study aims to assess the analytical thinking skills of second-year pre-service teachers in the Concepts of Science course using a Moodle-based online assessment, emphasizing higher-order cognitive skills in Bloom’s taxonomy. Methodology: A descriptive quantitative design was employed involving 58 students from the Primary School Teacher Education (PGSD) program. Data were collected through a Moodle-based online test consisting of 20 items measuring analytical thinking at the analyzing level (C4), focusing on differentiating, organizing, and attributing in fundamental science topics. Descriptive statistics were used to analyze students’ performance levels. Main Findings: The findings show that approximately 62% of students achieved a moderate level of analytical thinking. Students performed better in identifying relationships between variables and interpreting experimental results, while difficulties were observed in organizing and evaluating scientific information. This indicates that Moodle-based assessments are effective in measuring analytical thinking but require instructional reinforcement to strengthen higher-order cognitive processes.. Novelty/Originality of this study: This study provides empirical evidence on the effectiveness of Moodle-based assessments in evaluating analytical thinking skills aligned with Bloom’s taxonomy in science teacher education. It highlights the potential of digital assessment platforms to support valid, efficient, and scalable measurement of pre-service teachers’ analytical competencies.

Title Search

Found 44 Documents Search

Abstract

Abstract

Abstract

Abstract

Title

Found 44 Documents
Search