Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2021 - 2026
2.907
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal Qistie: Jurnal Ilmu Hukum Jurnal Akta Yustisia Merdeka : Jurnal Ilmiah Hukum Pagaruyuang Law Journal Sosio Dialektika Amorti: Jurnal Studi Islam Interdisipliner Research Horizon
Bahrul Fawaid
Universitas Wahid Hasyim
Religion Arts Humanities Economics, Econometrics & Finance Education Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice Social Sciences Other

Published : 23 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 23 Documents
Search

 1   2   3 
Legal Protection for Consumers Against Food Products that are not Halal Certified Based on Law Number 33 of 2014 Ribut Widiono; M. Shidqon Prabowo; Bahrul Fawaid
JURNAL AKTA Vol 12, No 4 (2025): December 2025
Publisher : Program Magister (S2) Kenotariatan, Fakultas Hukum, Universitas Islam Sultan Agung

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.30659/akta.v12i4.49601

Abstract

This study aims to analyze the legal protection provided to consumers against the circulation of food products that are not halal certified based on Law Number 33 of 2014 concerning Halal Product Assurance. The certification process involves three main institutions: the Halal Product Assurance Organizing Agency as the organizing authority, the Halal Inspection Institute as the inspection and testing institution, and the Indonesian Ulema Council as the institution that issues fatwas on halal product certification. Legal protection for Muslim consumers is reflected in the principles of protection, responsibility, and transparency of information, which are strengthened by reporting mechanisms and the imposition of sanctions on violating business actors. This study uses a normative juridical approach with descriptive analysis of legal norms to examine the provisions, enforcement mechanisms, and implications of the Halal Product Assurance Law for consumer protection. The results show that although the Halal Product Assurance Law provides a strong legal basis, its implementation is still hampered by weak supervision, lack of socialization, and limited coordination between institutions. Therefore, it is necessary to strengthen Halal Product Assurance Organizing Agency, increase public awareness, and align halal policies with consumer protection regulations to ensure legal certainty and public trust.
Pandangan Masyarakat terhadap Tahun Duda dalam Penentuan Hajatan Pernikahan dalam Perspektif Hukum Syariah Anni Hayatus Zulfa; Rosyida Rosyida; Bahrul Fawaid
Qistie Jurnal Ilmu Hukum Vol 18 No 2 (2025): Qistie : Jurnal Ilmu Hukum
Publisher : Fakultas Hukum Universitas Wahid Hasyim

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.31942/jqi.v18i2.15366

Abstract

The “tahun duda” tradition practiced in Pidodo Village, Karangtengah District, Demak Regency, is a social custom that restricts a widowed or divorced man from remarrying before the completion of one year after divorce or the death of his wife. This practice has no normative basis in the Qur’an, Hadith, or classical Islamic jurisprudence concerning marriage, thus raising questions regarding its legal status in Islamic law. This study aims to analyze the tradition from the perspectives of ‘urf and maqāṣid al-sharī‘ah. The research employs a normative legal method with conceptual and case approaches, relying primarily on library research supported by field data as social illustration. The findings indicate that the tahun duda tradition does not possess binding legal force in Islamic law. It may be categorized as valid ‘urf (ʿurf ṣaḥīḥ) if understood merely as a social ethic without theological implications. However, if it is believed to bring metaphysical consequences or positioned as a religious obligation, it potentially constitutes invalid ‘urf (ʿurf fāsid). Therefore, the tradition cannot be equated with Islamic legal provisions, and its legitimacy depends on how it is socially interpreted and practiced.
Kompatibilitas BIT Indonesia-UEA Dengan Prinsip Syariah: Perspektif Hukum Perdata Internasional Atas Klausul Kompensasi Dan Arbitrase ARUM WIDIASTUTI; BAHRUL FAWAID
Amorti: Jurnal Studi Islam Interdisipliner Vol. 5 No. 3 Juli 2026: Amorti: Jurnal Studi Islam Interdisipliner
Publisher : Yayasan Azhar Amanaa Yogyakarta

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.59944/amorti.v5i3.1406

Abstract

Perjanjian Investasi Bilateral (Bilateral Investment Treaty/BIT) merupakan instrumen hukum internasional yang mengatur perlindungan investasi asing, namun keberadaannya berpotensi bersinggungan dengan sistem hukum ekonomi syariah di negara-negara mayoritas Muslim, baik pada level hukum internasional publik maupun pada level hukum perdata internasional dalam pelaksanaan putusan arbitrase. Indonesia dan Uni Emirat Arab (UEA), sebagai dua negara dengan sistem ekonomi syariah yang mapan, menandatangani BIT pada 24 Juli 2019 dan memperluas hubungan investasinya melalui Comprehensive Economic Partnership Agreement (CEPA) pada tahun 2022. Penelitian ini menganalisis kompatibilitas klausul kompensasi ekspropriasi (Pasal 9-10), mekanisme penyelesaian sengketa (Pasal 17), serta aspek hukum perdata internasional atas pengakuan dan pelaksanaan putusan arbitrase investasi di Indonesia dengan prinsip syariah, khususnya larangan riba dan gharar serta kerangka maqāṣid al-syarī‘ah, menggunakan metode yuridis-normatif dengan desain studi kasus tunggal dan analisis isi kualitatif atas teks resmi perjanjian serta peraturan perundang-undangan terkait. Hasil kajian menunjukkan bahwa klausul kompensasi BIT Indonesia-UEA tidak memuat ketentuan bunga sama sekali, sehingga terhindar dari potensi riba nasi'ah, namun frasa "tanpa penundaan yang tidak wajar" tanpa parameter waktu yang jelas berpotensi menimbulkan gharar. Mekanisme penyelesaian sengketa berjenjang melalui Joint Committee menunjukkan kemiripan struktural dengan sulh dan tahkim, sementara pengakuan putusan arbitrase di Indonesia tetap tunduk pada syarat ketertiban umum dalam Undang-Undang Nomor 30 Tahun 1999 tentang Arbitrase, yang dalam praktiknya ditafsirkan secara sempit sehingga sulit dijadikan dasar penolakan eksekusi atas dasar riba semata. Penelitian ini merekomendasikan perumusan klausul kompensasi berbasis ta‘wīḍ, pemanfaatan eksplisit klausul prudential measures untuk keuangan syariah, penguatan peran Joint Committee, dan pembaruan konsep ketertiban umum dalam hukum arbitrase nasional.
Co-Authors Adityo Puro Prakoso Adityo Putro Prakoso Adityo Putro Prakoso Anni Hayatus Zulfa Anto Kustanto Arum Widiastuti Azami, Takwim Damayanti, Putri fajar ainun ridho HR, Mahmutarom Indriyanto, Indriyanto M. Shidqon Prabowo Manan, Ahmad Fikal Marsela, Dian Muchammad Shidqon Prabowo Muhammad Faizal Nazar Nurdin Purwanto Purwanto Qurnia Fitriyatinur Ribut Widiono Riko Andriko Rita Dwi Ratnani Rosyida Rosyida Wibisono, Muhammad Iqbal Yudhistira, Yustian