Ihdi Karim Makinara
Universitas Islam Negeri Ar-Raniry, Banda Aceh

Published : 14 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 14 Documents
Search

Negotiating Sharia and Power: Political Dynamics behind the Drafting of the Qanun on Ahwal Al-Syakhsiyyah in Aceh Makinara, Ihdi Karim; A. Rani, Faisal; Idami, Zahratul; Rinaldi, Yanis
Samarah: Jurnal Hukum Keluarga dan Hukum Islam Vol. 9 No. 2 (2025): Samarah: Jurnal Hukum Keluarga dan Hukum Islam
Publisher : Islamic Family Law Department, Sharia and Law Faculty, Universitas Islam Negeri Ar-Raniry

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.22373/k97hy420

Abstract

This article explores the political dynamics behind the legislative process of the Qanun on Ahwal al-Syakhshiyah in Aceh, a province with special autonomy to implement Islamic law in Indonesia. Rather than focusing solely on the substance of the qanun, this study investigates the complex interplay of power, ideology, and institutional interests during its formulation. The main research question addressed is: How do political, religious, and institutional actors shape the legislative process of Islamic family law in Aceh? Using a socio-legal approach and political legal theory, this article analyzes the roles of key actors such as the Aceh House of Representatives (DPRA), the Ulama Consultative Council (MPU), the provincial executive, civil society, and the central government. The study reveals that the legislative process is not merely normative or religious in character, but is deeply embedded in political contestation, ideological negotiation, and regional–national power dynamics. This article contributes to the discourse on Islamic legal politics by demonstrating how sharia-based legislation in autonomous regions is shaped by broader negotiations of authority and legitimacy.
Politik Hukum Hak Angket: Analisis Terhadap Celah Legislasi dalam Undang-Undang Tentang MPR, DPR, DPD, dan DPRD dalam Pelaksanaan Pemilu 2024 Alqusri, Rieza; Makinara, Ihdi Karim; Achayar, Gamal
Politica: Jurnal Hukum Tata Negara dan Politik Islam Vol 12 No 1 (2025): POLITICA: Jurnal Hukum Tata Negara dan Politik Islam
Publisher : Prodi Tata Negara (Siyasah) IAIN Langsa

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.32505/politica.v12i1.12480

Abstract

This study analyzes the implementation of the right of inquiry (hak angket) by the Indonesian House of Representatives (DPR) as regulated in Law Number 17 of 2014 concerning the MPR, DPR, DPD, and DPRD. The main problem lies in the unclear boundaries, mechanisms, and legal consequences of the inquiry right, particularly in overseeing the 2024 general election. Although the 1945 Constitution authorizes the DPR to exercise this instrument as part of its oversight function, its effectiveness in uncovering alleged electoral irregularities remains debated. The purpose of this research is to examine the stages, legal framework, and practical challenges of the inquiry right in responding to election-related violations, and to evaluate its role in strengthening democratic accountability. This study employs a normative legal method by analyzing constitutional provisions, statutory regulations, and the DPR’s internal rules. Findings show that the inquiry process consists of submission, preliminary discussion, investigation, special hearings, report drafting, and final decision-making. In the 2024 election context, the inquiry right is directed at proving indications of fraud and mapping institutional weaknesses of election organizers, serving as an alternative oversight mechanism outside litigation. Nonetheless, unresolved issues remain, such as its legal standing vis-à-vis election bodies, undefined operational limits, lack of timeframe, weak supervisory instruments, and uncertain outcomes. The study implies that clearer regulations and stronger enforcement mechanisms are needed so that the inquiry right functions not merely as a political tool, but as an effective instrument to ensure the DPR’s oversight role and the integrity of Indonesia’s electoral democracy.
WHO HAS THE AUTHORITY TO DETERMINE THE TERM OF OFFICE FOR THE LEADERSHIP OF THE KPK (KOMISI PEMBERANTASAN KORUPSI)? Nabilla, Shinta; Ahmad, Kamaruzzaman Bustamam; Makinara, Ihdi Karim
Dusturiyah: Jurnal Hukum Islam, Perundang-undangan dan Pranata Sosial Vol. 14 No. 2 (2024): JURNAL DUSTURIAH
Publisher : Universitas Islam Negeri Ar-Raniry

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.22373/dusturiyah.v14i2.23999

Abstract

The implementing of the Constitutional Court’s decisions may be direct or require the establishment of the implementating rules. Implementating rules is present when a test affects the cancellation of a rule that is contrary to the UUD. Generally, this follow-up is implemented with the emergence of a post-revised law by its creator. But it will take a long time, and need for legal certainty cannot wait until the investigation is completed. In this interest the product of the law was born answering the problem. Then what if the legal product intended to replace the law does not actually have the urgency of interest as required to provide legal certainty. This reseacrh examines the urgency of Keppers in enforcing Constitutional Court Decision No. 112/PUU-XX/2022 on the age limit and term of office of the KPK chairman given that there are other legal products that can enforce the judgment. This research is normative legal research. The results of the research show that the presence of Keppres does not contain urgency until a study or improvement of the KPK Act by the DPR is carried out. Even if it is of urgent value, Perppu can be an alternative given that Perppu is in line with the law and is regulatory while Keppres is only a settlement. This article consists of four sections starting with the introduction, the  explanation, and the conclusion.
Pengulu Uten’s Forest Management in Central Aceh: A Perspective of Fiqh al-Bi'ah Gayo, Ahyar; Makinara, Ihdi Karim; Aristeus, Syprianus; Djuniarti, Evi; Putri Nungrahani, Ellen Lutya
AHKAM : Jurnal Ilmu Syariah Vol. 24 No. 1 (2024)
Publisher : Universitas Islam Negeri Jakarta

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.15408/ajis.v24i1.34518

Abstract

Indonesia's legislation stipulates that forest management involves the active participation of indigenous communities, manifested in the form of pengulu uten in Central Aceh. However, it is essential to examine the degree to which the forest management model implemented by pengulu uten aligns with the principles of fiqh al-bī’ah in Islamic law. This study employs an empirical juridical approach with a qualitative methodology. The data was obtained through a literature review, focus group discussions, and interviews with reje kampung, pengulu uten, and other relevant stakeholders. The findings indicate that pengulu uten plays a significant role in forest management and supervision. They engage in community fostering, counseling, and socialization activities about protected forests, production forests, customary forests, and the utilization of forest resources. The existence of pengulu uten emerged long ago as customary institutions in forest management (in other Aceh regions called Pawang Glee), so in Aceh, their existence is strengthened in the Qanun of Central Aceh Regency No. 10/2002 concerning Gayo Customary Law. However, there may occasionally be inconsistencies in forest management process since the function of pengulu uten is not carried out synergistically with other forestry officials. In light of this, the forest management by pengulu uten is found to be in accordance with fiqh al-bī’ah principles. It includes the protection of nature as the essence of religion, the enhancement of faith through forest management, the responsibility of humans as Khalīfah to safeguard the environment, the practice of al-amr bi al-ma'rūf wa al-nahy ‘an al-munkar in forest management, and the maintenance of ecosystem equilibrium. Hence, this study emphasizes the significance of synergy among the government, pengulu uten, and the community in attaining sustainable forest management following the principles of fiqh al-bī’ah.  Abstrak: Peraturan perundang-undangan di Indonesia memandatkan pengelolaan hutan dengan melibatkan masyarakat Adat Aceh Tengah yang diwujudkan dalam bentuk pengulu uten. Maka, penting untuk mengkaji sejauh mana keserasian model pengelolaan hutan oleh pengulu uten dengan prinsip fiqh al-bī’ah. Penelitian ini menggunakan pendekatan hukum yuridis empiris dengan metode kualitatif. Data diperoleh melalui studi kepustakaan, FGD, dan wawancara dengan reje kampung, pengulu uten, dan stakeholders. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa pengulu uten memiliki peran signifikan dalam pengelolaan dan pengawasan hutan. Mereka melakukan kegiatan seperti membina, menyuluh, dan mensosialisasikan kepada masyarakat tentang hutan lindung, hutan produksi, hutan adat, dan pemanfaatan sumber daya hutan. Eksistensi pengulu uten muncul sejak dulu sebagai lembaga adat dalam pengurusan hutan (di wilayah Aceh lainnya disebut Pawang Glee) sehingga di Aceh, keberadaan mereka dikuatkan dalam Qanun Kabupaten Aceh Tengah Nomor 10 Tahun 2002 tentang Hukum Adat Gayo. Namun, dalam praktiknya saat ini fungsi pengulu uten tidak dilakukan secara sinergis dengan petugas kehutanan lainnya sehingga terkadang terjadi ketidakseimbangan dalam pengelolaan hutan. Padahal, pengelolaan hutan oleh pengulu uten sesuai dengan prinsip fiqh al-bī’ah yang dinilai baik karena mencakup perlindungan alam sebagai esensi agama, kesempurnaan iman melalui pengelolaan hutan, peran manusia sebagai khalifah yang melindungi alam, amar makruf nahi mungkar dalam pengelolaan hutan, serta menjaga keseimbangan ekosistem. Oleh karena itu, penelitian ini menekankan pentingnya sinergi antara pemerintah, pengulu uten, dan masyarakat dalam mencapai keberlanjutan pengelolaan hutan yang didasarkan pada prinsip fiqh al-bī’ah.