Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2020 - 2025
1.745
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal Ahkam: Jurnal Ilmu Syariah DE JURE Dusturiah : Jurnal Hukum Islam, Perundang-undangan dan Pranata Sosial SAMARAH: Jurnal Hukum Keluarga dan Hukum Islam El-Usrah: Jurnal Hukum Keluarga Media Syari'ah: Wahana Kajian Hukum Islam dan Pranata Sosial POLITICA: Jurnal Hukum Tata Negara dan Politik Islam Jurnal Rechts Vinding : Media Pembinaan Hukum Nasional
Ihdi Karim Makinara
Universitas Islam Negeri Ar-Raniry, Banda Aceh
Religion Humanities Economics, Econometrics & Finance Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice Social Sciences

Published : 12 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 12 Documents
Search

 1   2 
Negotiating Sharia and Power: Political Dynamics behind the Drafting of the Qanun on Ahwal Al-Syakhsiyyah in Aceh Makinara, Ihdi Karim; A. Rani, Faisal; Idami, Zahratul; Rinaldi, Yanis
Samarah: Jurnal Hukum Keluarga dan Hukum Islam Vol. 9 No. 2 (2025): Samarah: Jurnal Hukum Keluarga dan Hukum Islam
Publisher : Islamic Family Law Department, Sharia and Law Faculty, Universitas Islam Negeri Ar-Raniry

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.22373/k97hy420

Abstract

This article explores the political dynamics behind the legislative process of the Qanun on Ahwal al-Syakhshiyah in Aceh, a province with special autonomy to implement Islamic law in Indonesia. Rather than focusing solely on the substance of the qanun, this study investigates the complex interplay of power, ideology, and institutional interests during its formulation. The main research question addressed is: How do political, religious, and institutional actors shape the legislative process of Islamic family law in Aceh? Using a socio-legal approach and political legal theory, this article analyzes the roles of key actors such as the Aceh House of Representatives (DPRA), the Ulama Consultative Council (MPU), the provincial executive, civil society, and the central government. The study reveals that the legislative process is not merely normative or religious in character, but is deeply embedded in political contestation, ideological negotiation, and regional–national power dynamics. This article contributes to the discourse on Islamic legal politics by demonstrating how sharia-based legislation in autonomous regions is shaped by broader negotiations of authority and legitimacy.
Politik Hukum Hak Angket: Analisis Terhadap Celah Legislasi dalam Undang-Undang Tentang MPR, DPR, DPD, dan DPRD dalam Pelaksanaan Pemilu 2024 Alqusri, Rieza; Makinara, Ihdi Karim; Achayar, Gamal
Politica: Jurnal Hukum Tata Negara dan Politik Islam Vol 12 No 1 (2025): POLITICA: Jurnal Hukum Tata Negara dan Politik Islam
Publisher : Prodi Tata Negara (Siyasah) IAIN Langsa

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.32505/politica.v12i1.12480

Abstract

This study analyzes the implementation of the right of inquiry (hak angket) by the Indonesian House of Representatives (DPR) as regulated in Law Number 17 of 2014 concerning the MPR, DPR, DPD, and DPRD. The main problem lies in the unclear boundaries, mechanisms, and legal consequences of the inquiry right, particularly in overseeing the 2024 general election. Although the 1945 Constitution authorizes the DPR to exercise this instrument as part of its oversight function, its effectiveness in uncovering alleged electoral irregularities remains debated. The purpose of this research is to examine the stages, legal framework, and practical challenges of the inquiry right in responding to election-related violations, and to evaluate its role in strengthening democratic accountability. This study employs a normative legal method by analyzing constitutional provisions, statutory regulations, and the DPR’s internal rules. Findings show that the inquiry process consists of submission, preliminary discussion, investigation, special hearings, report drafting, and final decision-making. In the 2024 election context, the inquiry right is directed at proving indications of fraud and mapping institutional weaknesses of election organizers, serving as an alternative oversight mechanism outside litigation. Nonetheless, unresolved issues remain, such as its legal standing vis-à-vis election bodies, undefined operational limits, lack of timeframe, weak supervisory instruments, and uncertain outcomes. The study implies that clearer regulations and stronger enforcement mechanisms are needed so that the inquiry right functions not merely as a political tool, but as an effective instrument to ensure the DPR’s oversight role and the integrity of Indonesia’s electoral democracy.
Co-Authors A. Rani, Faisal Abdul Jalil Salam Achayar, Gamal Akbar, Hajarul Alqusri, Rieza Arrazi, Fitrah Darna, Andi Evi Djuniarti, Evi Fauzan, Faisal Gayo, Ahyar Hadi Nasbey Hasnul Arifin Melayu Jamhir Jamhir Jamhuri Kamaruzzaman Bustamam Ahmad Khairil Akbar Khairuddin Hasballah MD Zawawi Abu Bakar Nabilla, Shinta Putri Nungrahani, Ellen Lutya Rusjdi Ali Muhammad Said, Wardana Sarah Fadhilah Syprianus Aristeus, Syprianus Yanis Rinaldi Zahlul Pasha Zahratul Idami