Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2021 - 2026
4.244
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal USU LAW JOURNAL Nagari Law Review JURNAL PENDIDIKAN TAMBUSAI JOURNAL OF SCIENCE AND SOCIAL RESEARCH Jurnal Ilmiah Galuh Justisi Journal of Education, Humaniora and Social Sciences (JEHSS) DOKTRINA: JOURNAL OF LAW Legalite: Jurnal Perundang Undangan dan Hukum Pidana Islam Jurnal Sains dan Teknologi NOMOI Law Review Unri Conference Series: Community Engagement Jurnal Hukum Lex Generalis POLITICA: Jurnal Hukum Tata Negara dan Politik Islam Sibatik Journal : Jurnal Ilmiah Bidang Sosial, Ekonomi, Budaya, Teknologi, Dan Pendidikan Literacy : International Scientific Journals of Social, Education, Humanities al-Mawarid Jurnal Syariah dan Hukum (JSYH) Innovative: Journal Of Social Science Research Algebra ULJLS
Yati Sharfina Desiandri
Program Studi Magister Ilmu Hukum Fakultas Hukum Universitas Sumatera Utara
Religion Arts Humanities Astronomy Computer Science & IT Economics, Econometrics & Finance Education Health Professions Languange, Linguistic, Communication & Media Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice Mathematics Physics Public Health Social Sciences Other

Published : 34 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 2 Documents
Search
Journal : Jurnal Hukum Lex Generalis

 1 
DISPARITY OF JUDGEMENTS TOWARD DRUG-RELATED CRIME (STUDY OF DECISION NUMBER 47/PID.SUS/2024/PN TBT AND DECISION NUMBER 48/PID.SUS/2024/PN TBT) Yohana Serevina Mikha Gusta; Marlina; Yati Sharfina Desiandri
Jurnal Hukum Lex Generalis Vol 5 No 7 (2024): Tema Hukum Pidana
Publisher : CV Rewang Rencang

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.56370/jhlg.v5i7.546

Abstract

Narcotics crimes in Indonesia have caused many victims, especially among the young generation of the nation, which is very dangerous for the lives of society, the nation, and the state. In enforcing criminal law against narcotics crimes, it is a concern in connection with the rampant disparity in sentencing. The court decisions in Case Number 47/Pid.Sus/2024/PN.Tbt and Case Number 48/Pid.Sus/2024/PN. Tbt imposed sentences with very different differences, so that the considerations and implications need to be studied in depth. The results of this study indicate that there is no legal regulation that prohibits disparity in sentencing. The occurrence of disparity in sentencing for narcotics crimes in the verdict of narcotics crimes Case Number 47/Pid.Sus/2024/PN.Tbt and Case Number 48/Pid.Sus/2024/PN. Tbt refers to the principle of judges' freedom in carrying out their judicial functions. The judge's considerations in the verdict of narcotics crimes Case Number 47/Pid.Sus/2024/PN.Tbt with defendant Jefri and Case Number 48/Pid.Sus/2024/PN. Tbt with defendant Supriadi are an integral and inseparable unit, but there was an error in the judge's considerations so that the sentences were imposed with very different differences. The implications of the disparity in sentencing in the two decisions are that there is injustice, uncertainty and uselessness in law enforcement against narcotics crimes.
FULFILLMENT OF RESTITUTION RIGHTS TO TRAFFICKING VICTIMS CRIMINAL ACT (Study of Decision Number 322/Pid.Sus/2023/PN Jkt.Sel and Decision Number 667/Pid.Sus/2023/PN Petricia Br Sembiring; Marlina; Yati Sharfina Desiandri
Jurnal Hukum Lex Generalis Vol 5 No 7 (2024): Tema Hukum Pidana
Publisher : CV Rewang Rencang

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar

Abstract

The crime of human trafficking has been regulated by Law Number 21 of 2007 concerning the eradication of the crime of trafficking. When the victims have experienced material and immaterial losses, restitution is one of the forms of assistance to victims of the crime of human trafficking. The research method used in this study is descriptive-analytical with a normative legal research type. Furthermore, the research data consists of primary and secondary data. Law Number 21 of 2007 regulates restitution for victims of human trafficking. Decision 322/Pid. Sus/2023/PN Jkt. Sel does not provide restitution, while Decision 667/Pid. Sus/2023/PN Kis does. Judges need to be consistent and objective in handling human trafficking cases so that justice is achieved. Decision 322/Pid. Sus/2023/PN Jkt. Sel is considered to have paid less attention to the facts of the trial, while Decision 667/Pid. Sus/2023/PN Kis is appropriate because the judge creates legal certainty. Legal certainty in a judge's decision must be based on relevant facts.
Co-Authors Amin Sinaga, Harun Arifiyanto, Joiverdia Berutu, Riski Pardinata Darmawansyah Sihombing, Rizky Dasyah, Faisal Devi Azwar, T. Keizerina Edi Yunara Edy Ikhsan Feni, Evita Hutahuruk, Christina Gracef indriani, dice Lidya Pratiwi Lubis, Usman Usman M. Wau, Hilbertus Sumplisius Madiasa Ablisar Manalu, Iwandi Agung Marlina Marlina Marlina Marlina Marlina, Marlina Marpaung, Mitasari Febyanti Maulida Rahmah Muhammad Khoir Simamora Muyassar, Mauris Pane, Anggina Putri Pasaribu, Davin Hansel Petricia Br Sembiring Prayudati, Yulia Martha Putri Rumondang Siagian Rosmalinda, Rosmalinda Sahida Ayu Fajjari saidin, saidin Saragih, Geofani Milthree Sari, Tika Puspita Shauqi, Saddam Siagian, Putri Rumondang Silitonga, Rizky Pani Hamonangan Simanjuntak, Novita Sari Ayu Siti Khairunnissa Solly Aryza Susi Indriani Syam, Farhans Mahendra T. Keizerina Devi Azwar Trisna, Wessy Utari Maharany Barus Very Irawan Wahyuni, Rizki Wau, Hilbertus Sumplisius M. Widayanti, Yuyun Yohana Serevina Mikha Gusta