Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2021 - 2026
1.723
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal Jurnal Ilmiah Edunomika (JIE) Mulawarman Law Review LEGAL BRIEF AS-SIYASI JOURNAL OF CONSTITUTIONAL LAW Mandub: Jurnal Politik, Sosial, Hukum dan Humaniora Jurnal Mediasas : Media Ilmu Syari'ah dan Ahwal Al-Syakhsiyyah International Journal of Law, Crime and Justice International Journal of Sociology and Law Desentralisasi: Jurnal Hukum, Kebijakan Publik, Dan Pemerintahan Yuriska : Jurnal Ilmiah Hukum Doh Gisin
Ivan Zairani Lisi
Unknown Affiliation
Humanities Decision Sciences, Operations Research & Management Economics, Econometrics & Finance Education Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice Social Sciences

Published : 12 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 12 Documents
Search

 1   2 
REKONSTRUKSI STANDAR PENERAPAN PEMAAFAN HAKIM GUNA MENJAMIN KEPASTIAN DAN KEADILAN PEMIDANAAN Andi Rosadi Hamri; Mahendra Putra Kurnia; Ivan Zairani Lisi
JURNAL ILMIAH EDUNOMIKA Vol. 10 No. 1 (2026): EDUNOMIKA
Publisher : ITB AAS Indonesia Surakarta

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.29040/jie.v10i1.19519

Abstract

This study aims to analyze the application of the concept of judicial forgiveness (rechterlijk pardon) as stipulated in Law Number 1 of 2023 concerning the National Criminal Code (KUHP). The primary focus of the study is to examine the legal rationale for granting this pardon authority and its concept in supporting substantive justice in Indonesia. The research method used is normative juridical with a statutory and conceptual approach. The results indicate that judicial forgiveness is an important instrument for correcting injustice resulting from the application of the rigid principle of legality. Through Article 54 of the National Criminal Code, judges have a legal basis for not imposing a sentence even if the defendant's guilt is proven, taking into account the minor nature of the act and the humanitarian aspects. This concept reinforces the shift in Indonesian criminal law towards a restorative and humanistic direction.
Penegakan Hukum terhadap Pelaku Tindak Pidana Obstruction of Justice dalam Perspektif Hukum Pidana Indonesia Iqlimah Nadhilah; Ivan Zairani Lisi; Rini Apriyani
Mandub : Jurnal Politik, Sosial, Hukum dan Humaniora Vol. 4 No. 1 (2026): Maret : Mandub: Jurnal Politik, Sosial, Hukum dan Humaniora
Publisher : STAI YPIQ BAUBAU, SULAWESI TENGGARA

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.59059/mandub.v4i1.2956

Abstract

This research aims to analyze criminal acts that may be qualified as perpetrators of the crime of obstruction of justice from the perspective of the criminal law applicable in Indonesia, as well as to analyze the application of the law against perpetrators of obstruction of justice in Indonesia. The type of research used in this thesis is doctrinal research. The doctrinal approach has a normative character; therefore, its object of study consists of a set of legal norms (black letter law) at the level of application (professional constituency), or, at certain levels of analysis, this approach extends to the examination of legal theory. Based on the results of the research, the author finds that the provisions governing acts that may be qualified as the crime of obstruction of justice in Indonesia encompass all forms of interference, from the beginning to the end, with the entire ongoing legal and judicial process. A perpetrator of obstruction of justice is aware that a person has committed a crime or is undergoing a legal process and then deliberately commits acts that may hinder or obstruct law enforcement officials in conducting examinations of the criminal offender, with the purpose that the processes of investigation, prosecution, or examination before the court are impeded, cannot be carried out, or ultimately fail to be carried out. The forms of legal enforcement against perpetrators of acts obstructing the judicial process (obstruction of justice) in Indonesia include, among others, intentionally damaging, concealing, or destroying evidence before or after the commencement of the investigation process.
Co-Authors Alfian Alfian Andi Rosadi Hamri Ansar Fajar Pratama Arung Rahmat Sijaya Aulia, Nur Riska Bonny, Michael Nicholas Deny Slamet Pribadi Faiqah Nur Azizah Hairan, Hairan Herdiansyah Hamzah I Kadek Sudiarsana Insan Tajali Nur Iqlimah Nadhilah Khristyawan Wisnu Wardana Lidiana, Mita Mahendra Putra Kurnia Muhamad Muhdar Nadia Nabela Nur Aripkah Rahman, Luthfi Ahmadani Ramadhanty, Nia Syafira Rini Apriyani Sumiati Syarifuddin , La Wati, Agustina