I Gusti Agung Ayu Gita Pritayanti Dinar
Fakultas Hukum Universitas Warmadewa

Published : 37 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 1 Documents
Search
Journal : JURNAL MAGISTER HUKUM UDAYANA

Scopping the Dispute Submitted Before Indonesia Arbitration I Gusti Agung Ayu Gita Pritayanti Dinar; I Nyoman Bagiastra; I Nyoman Gede Sugiartha
Jurnal Magister Hukum Udayana (Udayana Master Law Journal) Vol 12 No 3 (2023)
Publisher : University of Udayana

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.24843/JMHU.2023.v12.i03.p02

Abstract

The problem of equating the concepts of dispute and default results as legal practitioners tending to assume that every case with an arbitration clause is a dispute that must be examined at an arbitration institution even though the case is not necessarily a dispute because cases, disputes and default have different concepts, nature and causes. According to international instrument, arbitration clause is mandatory for cases that submitted to the arbitration. It shall have clearly regulated under agreement of the parties to the dispute. Thus if there a dispute when implementing their agreement then the settlement brought before arbitration. Unfortunately in the reality is different. This research is used normative legal research methods with approaches: (1) Analitical and Conceptual Approach, and (2) The Statue Approach. The result of this research is between arbitration institutions and general justice must implimentated in harmony and must contribute to each other in creating justice, certainty and benefit of the law in carrying out their duties. Only with this harmony will creating a suitability of judicial competence which is fair to all parties. Regulation regarding the definition of arbitration dispute should be clearly and explicitly stipulated in the general provisions of the Arbitration Law and Alternative Dispute Resolution so that all parties may understanding to and the justice, legal certainty in determining in related cases of the competence of arbitration can be achieved.
Co-Authors A. A. Sagung Laksmi Dewi A.A Mas Karpeka Devi Anak Agung Alit Ista Damayanti Anak Agung Ngurah Adhi Wibisana Anak Agung Rai Gayatri Artha Yani Anak Agung Sagung Laksmi Dewi Anak Agung Sagung Laksmi Dewi Annie Long Ashton Brendan Matthew Fandoe Carmelita Juliana Putri Benny Cokorda Istri Agung Mahayuni Dewi, A.A Sagung Laksmi I Gede Prema Nugraha Suastama I Gusti Agung Mahendra I Gusti Ngurah Agung Krisna Dwipayana Pradnyan I Kadek Wahyu Dwi Payana I Kadek Wahyu Dwipayana I Ketut Gede Satria Wibawa Aryana I Komang Tresnanda Pramana I Made Aditya Mantara Putra I Made Ardena I Made Ardena I Made Bangbang Agus Sindu I Made Gede Adi Arya Natih I Made Minggu Widyantara I Made Minggu Widyantara I Made Pria Dharsana I Made Pria Dharsana, I Made Pria I Nyoman Bagiastra I Nyoman Gede Sugiartha I Nyoman Gede Sugiartha I Nyoman Gede Sugiartha I Nyoman Gede Sugiartha I Nyoman Gede Sugiartha I Nyoman Gede Sugiartha I Nyoman Gede Sugiartha I Nyoman Gede Sugiartha I Nyoman Gede Sugiartha I Nyoman Putu Budiarta I Nyoman Putu Budiartha I Nyoman Putu Budiartha I Nyoman Putu Budiartha I Nyoman Sumardika I Putu Aditya Pramana I Putu Nyoman Budiartha Ida Ayu Putu Purnam Asri Indah Permatasari Janneta Angela Pangalila Jyoti KaniaCri Kade Richa Mulyawati Kadek Bagus Rakyan Dana Sinatra Kadek Nadya Pramita Sari Made Irnanda Diandifa Lestari Mulyawati, Kade Richa N. Nurnaningsih Ni Komang Triana Diah Mahadewi Ni Luh Gede Novianti Ni Made Puspasutari Ujianti Ni Made Puspasutari Ujianti Ni Nyoman Muryatini Ni Putu Ayu Angreny Widhiastuty Ni Putu Ayu Mandalay Shasa Alba Chiara Putu Budiartha, I Nyoman Putu Lingga Dhananjaya Putu Marita Maharani Putri Putu Marita Maharani Putri